Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization |
(ii) EIN |
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) |
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? |
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? |
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? |
(vii) Amount of support? |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | ||||||
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3.. | ||||||
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | ||||||
| 6 | Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | ||||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | ||||||
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets.. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | ||||||






| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | 35 | 28,303 | 125,426 | 151,560 | 367,437 | 672,761 |
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | 102,203 | 3,945,701 | 12,068,608 | 13,963,509 | 38,564,354 | 68,644,375 |
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | 102,238 | 3,974,004 | 12,194,034 | 14,115,069 | 38,931,791 | 69,317,136 |
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | 0 | |||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | 0 | |||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | 0 | |||||
| 8 | Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 69,317,136 | |||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | 102,238 | 3,974,004 | 12,194,034 | 14,115,069 | 38,931,791 | 69,317,136 |
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 1,657,828 | 5,462,877 | 7,635,950 | 7,981,361 | 22,738,016 | |
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | 1,657,828 | 5,462,877 | 7,635,950 | 7,981,361 | 22,738,016 | |
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) | ||||||
| 13 | Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.). | 102,238 | 5,631,832 | 17,656,911 | 21,751,019 | 46,913,152 | 92,055,152 |




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 2 | DEBRA B. DOYLE, OFFICER, CRAIG ERICKSON, OFFICER, AND JEFFREY A. JACOBSON, OFFICER, HAVE A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP. THEY WERE OFFICERS ONLY FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - APRIL 2010. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 3 | WIND CREST, INC. PREVIOUSLY CONTRACTED WITH ERICKSON RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, LLC ("ERC") TO PROVIDE MANAGEMENT SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE CCRC FACILITY. ERC IS A MARYLAND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WHICH OPERATED AND MANAGED LARGE SCALE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES. ERC FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION IN OCTOBER 2009. THE SALE OF ERC'S ASSETS WAS CONDUCTED BY A COMPETITIVE AUCTION PROCESS THROUGH THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. ON APRIL 30, 2010, WIND CREST, INC. ENTERED INTO A NEW MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING AGREEMENT WITH ERICKSON LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC ("ELM") TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED BY ERC. ELM IS A SUBSIDIARY OF REDWOOD-ERC SENIOR LIVING HOLDINGS, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS ERICKSON LIVING HOLDINGS, LLC WHICH, TOGETHER WITH OTHER RELATED ENTITIES, PURCHASED THE MAJORITY OF THE ASSETS OF ERC. ELM IS A MARYLAND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WHICH OPERATES AND MANAGES LARGE SCALE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES. THE NEW MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT INCLUDES (WITHOUT LIMITATION) PROVISIONS WHICH PERMIT WIND CREST, INC. TO REVIEW AND RENEGOTIATE MANAGEMENT FEES WITH THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY AFTER YEAR THREE AND YEAR SEVEN, RESPECTIVELY, IF THE MANAGEMENT FEES BEING PAID UNDER THE NEW MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT DEVIATE FROM MARKET (AS DEFINED IN THE AGREEMENT) AT SUCH TIME. THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS IS FOR A TERM OF TEN YEARS. WIND CREST, INC. MAY TERMINATE THE NEW MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT IF CERTAIN OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ARE NOT MET. IN ADDITION TO A NEW MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING AGREEMENT, WIND CREST, INC. ALSO ENTERED INTO A NEW MASTER LEASE AND USE AGREEMENT, A NEW AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY LOAN AGREEMENT AND NOTE, A NEW WORKING CAPITAL LOAN AGREEMENT AND NOTE, AND A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS THE ("NEW AGREEMENTS"). WHILE THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE NEW AGREEMENTS WERE DETERMINED THROUGH THE COMPETITIVE AUCTION PROCESS, WHICH PROCESS WAS APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE PARTIES ALSO ENGAGED IN EXTENSIVE NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE THREE MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE APRIL 30, 2010 SALE TO FINALIZE THE NEW AGREEMENTS. AN IMPORTANT OUTCOME OF THE ERC BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING, THE AUCTION, AND THE SALE OF ERC'S ASSETS WAS THE ELIMINATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION DEBT THAT HAD ENCUMBERED THE REAL ESTATE COMPRISING THE ORGANIZATION'S FACILITY. MASTER LEASE AND USE AGREEMENT THE ORGANIZATION LEASES ITS CAMPUS FROM A THIRD PARTY. REDWOOD-ERC LITTLETON CAMPUS, L.L.C. (HEREINAFTER "LITTLETON CAMPUS") WAS FORMED BY ERICKSON LIVING HOLDINGS, LLC FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE OF ACQUIRING THE CAMPUS LEASED BY THE ORGANIZATION AS PART OF THE ERC BANKRUPTCY. ONCE THE ACQUISITION WAS COMPLETED, THE ORGANIZATION ENTERED INTO A NEW MASTER LEASE AND USE AGREEMENT (HEREINAFTER THE "LEASE") WITH LITTLETON CAMPUS. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL RIGHTS OF THE RESIDENTS, INCLUDING THEIR RIGHT TO RESIDE IN THEIR UNITS AND THEIR RIGHT TO A REFUND OF THEIR ENTRANCE DEPOSITS, ARE PRESERVED IN THE LEASE VIA A NON-DISTURBANCE AGREEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, LITTLETON CAMPUS IS REQUIRED TO IMPOSE THIS NON-DISTURBANCE AGREEMENT ON ANY FUTURE LENDER FOR FINANCING OF THE PROPERTY AND FACILITY. THIS IS AN EXPANSION OF THE PROTECTION AFFORDED RESIDENTS IN THE PRIOR LEASE, AS IT ENSURES THAT, UNLESS THE RESIDENT IS IN BREACH OF HIS/HER RESIDENCE AND CARE AGREEMENT, THE RESIDENT WILL NOT LOSE HIS/HER RIGHT TO OCCUPY HIS/HER UNIT OR THE RIGHT TO AN ENTRANCE DEPOSIT REFUND AS A RESULT OF A DEFAULT UNDER THE LEASE OR UNDER ANY FUTURE FINANCING. IF THE LEASE IS TERMINATED, LITTLETON CAMPUS ASSUMES THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE NECESSARY SERVICES AND TO REFUND ENTRANCE DEPOSITS TO THE RESIDENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE RESIDENCE AND CARE AGREEMENT. THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN THE PROTECTION OF THE RESIDENTS. THE PREVIOUS MASTER LEASE ONLY PROTECTED THE RESIDENTS' RIGHT TO OCCUPY THEIR UNITS. NOW ALL RESIDENT RIGHTS UNDER THE RESIDENCE AND CARE AGREEMENT ARE PROTECTED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE A REFUND. THE TERM OF THE LEASE IS 27.5 YEARS AND IS SUBJECT TO RENEWAL OPTIONS ON THE PART OF THE ORGANIZATION. THE ORGANIZATION HAS A PURCHASE OPTION AND HAS THE RIGHT TO MAKE AN OFFER TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME DURING THE LEASE TERM. THE PURCHASE PRICE FORMULA UNDER THE PURCHASE OPTION WAS CHANGED BY REQUIRING A DETERMINATION OF THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PREMISES. THE FAIR MARKET VALUE IS DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE BY AN INDEPENDENT APPRAISER BASED ON A FORMULA CONTAINED IN THE LEASE. AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY LOAN AGREEMENT THE AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY LOAN AGREEMENT INCLUDES NEW PROVISIONS WHICH BENEFIT THE ORGANIZATION AND THE RESIDENTS. FOR EXAMPLE, ONE NEW SECTION PROVIDES THAT, IN THE EVENT THE MASTER LEASE IS TERMINATED FOR ANY REASON, THE BORROWER (I.E., LITTLETON CAMPUS) ASSUMES WIND CREST, INC.'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE RESIDENCE AND CARE AGREEMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF THE PREPETITION COMMUNITY LOAN DUE TO WIND CREST, INC. COULD HAVE BEEN DISCHARGED, THAT BALANCE WAS REINSTATED IN FULL AS PART OF ERC'S BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING AND IT REMAINS AS AN OBLIGATION DUE TO WIND CREST, INC. WIND CREST, INC. ENTERED INTO IN A NEW AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY LOAN AGREEMENT, A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATION AND REDWOOD-ERC PROPERTIES, L.L.C. THE SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT PROVIDES FOR THE RELATIVE PRIORITY OF THE PRE AND POST PETITION COMMUNITY LOAN OBLIGATIONS. THE ORGANIZATION REPRESENTED IN ITS APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION THAT IT WOULD SUBMIT THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT TO A COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS ON A REGULAR SCHEDULE. THE BOARD HAS MODIFIED ITS POLICY WITH RESPECT TO GOING OUT TO BID FOR THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS FOLLOWED AN EXHAUSTIVE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS THAT WAS CONDUCTED IN 2008 BY A RELATED ORGANIZATION. THE PROCESS TOOK ALMOST A FULL YEAR TO COMPLETE AT A COST IN EXCESS OF $100,000 AND ONLY THREE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES WERE INTERESTED IN BIDDING. GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF TIME AND MONEY SPENT ON THE COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT PROCESS BY A RELATED ORGANIZATION AND THE END RESULT, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECIDED THAT CONDUCTING A MANDATORY COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT PROCESS ON A PREDETERMINED SCHEDULE WAS NOT NECESSARILY THE BEST METHOD OF PROCURING A MANAGEMENT COMPANY. THEREFORE, ON JANUARY 29, 2009, THE POLICY REQUIRING A COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT PROCESS WAS REVISED BY THE ORGANIZATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE PRIOR PARAGRAPH. THE RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ORGANIZATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO AMEND THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY PROCUREMENT PROCESS REAFFIRMED THE ORGANIZATION'S POLICIES THAT ANY RENEWAL, RENEGOTIATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY OR ANY SUCCESSOR MANAGEMENT COMPANY: (1) WILL COMPLY WITH IRS REGULATIONS IN SUPPORT OF IRC SECTION 4958; AND (2) WILL BE NEGOTIATED ON AN ARMS-LENGTH BASIS. THE RESOLUTION FURTHER PROVIDED THAT THE BOARD WILL DETERMINE WHEN, IF AT ALL, IT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE ORGANIZATION TO ENGAGE IN A PROCUREMENT PROCESS WITH RESPECT TO ENGAGING MANAGEMENT COMPANY SERVICES IN THE FUTURE. A COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS WAS HELD IN DECEMBER 2009 UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY COURT PROCEEDING WHEREBY A COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE PURCHASER OF THE ASSETS OF ERC. THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE NEW MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WERE DETERMINED THROUGH THE COMPETIVE AUCTION PROCESS, WHICH PROCESS WAS APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE PARTIES ALSO ENGAGED IN EXTENSIVE NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE THREE MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE APRIL 30, 2010 SALE TO FINALIZE THE NEW AGREEMENT. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 4 | WIND CREST, INC. ADOPTED BYLAWS AMENDMENTS IN 2009 WHEREBY MOST OF THE RESERVED POWERS OF THE SOLE MEMBER WERE ELIMINATED. ADDITIONALLY, WIND CREST, INC. AMENDED ITS ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION (CHARTER) IN 2009 TO ADD A PROVISION AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 2-104 OF THE CORPORATIONS & ASSOCIATIONS ARTICLE OF THE MARYLAND ANNOTATED CODE. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 6 | WIND CREST, INC.'S SOLE MEMBER IS NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. ("NSC"). NSC IS A MARYLAND NON-STOCK CORPORATION. AT THE CURRENT TIME, NSC HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF EXEMPTION WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, AS A "SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION" WITH RESPECT TO WIND CREST, INC, AS WELL AS CERTAIN OTHER ORGANIZATIONS SPECIFIED IN ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. AS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATIONS RELATING TO "SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS," CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NSC WILL ALSO BE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORGANIZATION. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7A | NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT AND ELECT ALL DIRECTORS. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7B | CERTAIN EXTRAORDINARY ACTIONS OF THE CORPORATION REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE MEMBER UNDER APPLICABLE STATE LAW. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11 | THE BOARD APPOINTS A COMMITTEE FROM AMONG ITS DIRECTORS AS WELL AS THE DIRECTORS FROM ONE OR MORE RELATED ENTITIES TO OVERSEE THE PREPARATION OF FORM 990. THE BOARD CHAIR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW FORM 990 PRIOR TO ITS FILING OR TO DESIGNATE ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER TO REVIEW THE FORM. THE FULL BOARD IS GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE FINAL VERSION OF FORM 990 BEFORE IT IS FILED AND ASK QUESTIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OR THE REVIEWER REGARDING THE FORM. THE BOARD CHAIR DESIGNATES AN OFFICER TO SIGN FORM 990. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | WIND CREST, INC.'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY COVERS ALL DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, KEY EMPLOYEES, EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS IN A POSITION TO EXERCISE SUBSTANTIAL INFLUENCE OVER WIND CREST, INC.'S AFFAIRS, COMMITTEE MEMBERS, PROSPECTIVE DIRECTORS, AND SENIOR STAFF PROVIDING SERVICES TO THE ORGANIZATION UNDER A MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. EACH COVERED PERSON COMPLETES A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ANNUALLY AND AS POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARISE DURING THE YEAR. THESE STATEMENTS ARE REVIEWED BY THE BOARD CHAIR. IF THE CONFLICT INVOLVES A COVERED EMPLOYEE, THE CHAIR DETERMINES WHETHER A CONFLICT EXISTS AND, IF SO, HOW IT IS TO BE HANDLED, OR THE CHAIR MAY REFER THE MATTER TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR CONSIDERATION. FOR ALL OTHER CONFLICTS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR A COMMITTEE OF DISINTERESTED DIRECTORS WILL DETERMINE WHETHER A CONFLICT ACTUALLY EXISTS. A COVERED PERSON MAY NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY DISCUSSION OR DEBATE BY THE BOARD BUT MAY ANSWER QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE CLARIFYING INFORMATION UNLESS ANY BOARD MEMBER OBJECTS. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15 | THE BOARD HAS APPROVED A DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION POLICY WHICH ESTABLISHES THE PROCESS BY WHICH ALL DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED. OFFICERS SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION. A REVIEW OF THE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION IS CONDUCTED EACH FISCAL YEAR. COMPENSATION IS APPROACHED ON AN OVERALL BASIS AND THE TOTAL VALUE OF ALL FORMS OF COMPENSATION IS ESTABLISHED AND MONITORED. AN INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT IS PERIODICALLY RETAINED TO PERFORM AN ANALYSIS OF WIND CREST, INC.'S COMPENSATION USING COMPARABLES OF BOTH FOR-PROFIT AND NON-PROFIT PEERS. A COMMITTEE OF THE NSC BOARD REVIEWS THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT AND MAKES A RECOMMENDATION TO THE ORGANIZATION AS TO APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS. THE FULL BOARD HAS ACCESS TO WIND CREST INC.'S CONSULTANT'S REPORT AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO QUESTION THE CONSULTANT ABOUT THE PROCESS, METRICS, AND COMPARABLES THAT WERE USED IN DETERMINING THE RECOMMENDED COMPENSATION. THE BOARD THEN VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND A CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORD IS MADE OF THE MEETING AND THE VOTE. THE CONSULTANT REVIEW WAS LAST UNDERTAKEN IN 2010 AND WAS ACTED UPON BY THE BOARD IN EARLY 2011. | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST AT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S OFFICE. | |
| FORM 990,PART XII, LINE 2C: THE PROCESS HAS NOT CHANGED FROM THE PRIOR YEAR. | ||
| MISSION STATEMENT - 990 PAGE 1, PART I, LINE 1 AND PART III, LINE 1 MISSION STATEMENT SHARING OUR GIFTS TO CREATE COMMUNITIES THAT CELEBRATE LIFE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. AND ITS SUPPORTED COMMUNITIES ARE COMMITTED TO ACHIEVING THE MISSION BY: 1. PROMOTING AN ACTIVE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR SENIORS -CREATING LARGE SCALE RETIREMENT CAMPUSES TO PROMOTE ACTIVITY AND HEALTHY LIVING. -PROVIDING A RESIDENT CENTERED SERVICE CULTURE. -ENCOURAGING RESIDENT RUN ACTIVITIES WITH PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT. 2. ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE IN SERVICES AND PROGRAMS -EXERCISING ITS AUTHORITY IN SERVICES, PROGRAMS, FEES, FACILITIES AND FINANCING. -EMBRACING COMPLIANCE, ETHICS AND INTEGRITY. -OVERSEEING SERVICES AND PROGRAMS PERSONALLY AND IN MEETINGS WITH THE RESIDENTS ADVISORY COUNCIL. -TAKING A LONG-TERM VIEW OF FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY. 3. INSURING AFFORDABILITY TO MIDDLE INCOME SENIORS -FOCUSING ON THE LONG TERM VIABILITY OF THE COMMUNITY FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS. -USING FINANCING STRATEGIES TO LOWER THE COST OF CAPITAL. -QUALIFYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAX. -OBTAINING PROPERTY TAX REDUCTIONS FROM COMMUNITY GOVERNMENTS. -ACCUMULATING NET INCOME TO FURTHER THE MISSION. -MAINTAINING A POLICY FOR FULLY REFUNDABLE ENTRANCE DEPOSIT. -OFFERING FEE-FOR-SERVICE HEALTH CARE. 4. MAKING A LIFE CARE COMMITMENT -TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, ENSURING THAT NO RESIDENT SHOULD EVER HAVE TO LEAVE A COMMUNITY AS A RESULT OF FINANCIAL INABILITY TO PAY FOR THE COST OF THEIR CARE. -ENCOURAGING FUNDRAISING EFFORTS IN SUPPORT OF BENEVOLENT CARE. 5. FOSTERING GROWTH -COMMITTING TO MAKING THIS LIFESTYLE AVAILABLE TO AN INCREASING NUMBER OF SENIORS. -INCREASING EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE AFFORDABILITY. -DEVELOPING NEW COMMUNITIES IN CURRENT MARKETS. -DEVELOPING COMMUNITIES IN NEW MARKETS. | ||
| FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 9 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS LISTED IN PART VII, SECTION A, CAN BE REACHED AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: C/O BOARD RELATIONS MANAGER NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. 701 MAIDEN CHOICE LANE BALTIMORE, MD 21228 | ||
| FORM 990, PART VII - BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION THE COMPENSATION PAID BY RELATED ENTITIES AND THE HOURS SERVED ON RELATED ENTITIES' BOARDS FOR EACH DIRECTOR ARE AS FOLLOWS: INDIVIDUAL: HAROLD ASHBY ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. $ 37,500 OAK CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 SEABROOK VILLAGE, INC. $ 500 GREENSPRING VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 CEDAR CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 500 MARIS GROVE, INC. $ 500 LINDEN PONDS, INC. $ 500 SEDGEBROOK, INC. $ 3,250 ANN'S CHOICE, INC. $ 500 BROOKSBY VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 FOX RUN VILLAGE, INC. $ 3,250 TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 2,938 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 2,938 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 2,936 WIND CREST, INC. $ 2,938 MONARCH LANDING, INC. $ 3,250 ASHBY PONDS, INC. $ 500 ---------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $62,000 INDIVIDUAL: RODNEY COE ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. $ 10,000 OAK CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 SEABROOK VILLAGE, INC. $ 38 GREENSPRING VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 CEDAR CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 38 MARIS GROVE, INC. $ 38 LINDEN PONDS, INC. $ 38 SEDGEBROOK, INC. $ 6,503 ANN'S CHOICE, INC. $ 38 BROOKSBY VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 FOX RUN VILLAGE, INC. $ 6,503 TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 11,816 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 11,816 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 11,814 WIND CREST, INC. $ 11,816 MONARCH LANDING, INC. $ 6,503 ASHBY PONDS, INC. $ 39 ---------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $ 77,000 INDIVIDUAL: JAMES P. HAYES ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. $ 10,000 OAK CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 SEABROOK VILLAGE, INC. $ 38 GREENSPRING VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 CEDAR CREST VILLAGE, INC. $ 38 MARIS GROVE, INC. $ 38 LINDEN PONDS, INC. $ 38 SEDGEBROOK, INC. $ 14,003 ANN'S CHOICE, INC. $ 38 BROOKSBY VILLAGE, INC. $ 0 FOX RUN VILLAGE, INC. $ 14,003 TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 6,191 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 6,191 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 6,191 WIND CREST, INC. $ 6,189 MONARCH LANDING, INC. $ 14,003 ASHBY PONDS, INC. $ 39 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $ 77,000 | ||
| INDIVIDUAL: STEVE HUNSICKER ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. $ 0 TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 6,688 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 6,688 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 6,686 WIND CREST, INC. $ 6,688 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $26,750 INDIVIDUAL: ZINA JACQUE ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION SEDGEBROOK, INC. $ 7,416 FOX RUN VILLAGE, INC. $ 7,417 MONARCH LANDING, INC. $ 7,417 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $22,250 INDIVIDUAL: MIKE ROSKIEWICZ ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION SEDGEBROOK, INC. $ 7,416 FOX RUN VILLAGE, INC. $ 7,417 MONARCH LANDING, INC. $ 7,417 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $22,250 INDIVIDUAL: DAVID L. BURK ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION NATIONAL SENIOR CAMPUSES, INC. $ 0 TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 6,686 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 6,688 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 6,688 WIND CREST, INC. $ 6,688 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $26,750 INDIVIDUAL: BOONE POWELL, JR. ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION TALLGRASS CREEK, INC. $ 6,688 HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC. $ 6,688 EAGLE'S TRACE, INC. $ 6,686 WIND CREST, INC. $ 6,688 --------- INDIVIDUAL SUB-TOTAL $26,750 INDIVIDUAL: DUFFY DEARDORFF ORGANIZATION COMPENSATION WIND CREST, INC. $ 5,000 | ||
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS HOURS WORKED PER WEEK - FORM 990, PART VII NSC OCV SBV GSV RWV CCV MGC LPH ACH BBV GFM LCC R. COE 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J. HAYES 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S. HUNSICKER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. BURK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. POWELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z. JACQUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M. ROSKIEWCZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H. ASHBY 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. DEARDORFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRV TCK HSD ETH WCD APL SED MLN TWC WRC NSCF R. COE 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 J. HAYES 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 S. HUNSICKER 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. BURK 0 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. POWELL 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z. JACQUE 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 M. ROSKIEWCZ 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 H. ASHBY 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. DEARDORFF 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 | ||
| MORTGAGES AND OTHER NOTES PAYABLE - PART X, LINE 23 THE ORGANIZATION ENTERED INTO A NEW WORKING CAPITAL LOAN AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $2,000,000 TO FUND WORKING CAPITAL DEFICITS. THE NEW WORKING CAPITAL LOAN AGREEMENT PROVIDES THAT THE ORGANIZATION'S PAYMENT OBLIGATION MAY BE DEFERRED WITHOUT PENALTY TO ALLOW THE ORGANIZATION TO MAINTAIN CERTAIN REQUIRED CASH ON HAND UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IT IS ABLE TO RESUME MAKING PAYMENTS ON THE LOAN AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CASH RESERVES (IF PAYMENT WOULD CAUSE THE ORGANIZATION TO FALL BELOW REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CASH RESERVES). ONE OF THE RESULTS ACHIEVED BY THE ORGANIZATION THROUGH ERC'S BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING WAS THE ELIMINATION OF THE OUTSTANDING WORKING CAPITAL LOAN BALANCE OF APPROXIMATELY $ 24 MILLION OWED BY THE ORGANIZATION AS OF APRIL 30, 2010. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |