Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Public Charity Status and Public Support
Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization or a section
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust.
Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ. See separate instructions.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2010
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM
Employer identification number
52-2175544
Part I
Reason for Public Charity Status
(All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions
The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For lines 1 through 11, check only one box.)
1
2
3
4
5
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Complete Part II.)
6
7
8
9
receipts from activities related to its exempt functions—subject to certain exceptions, and (2) no more than 331/3% of
its support from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses
acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975. See section 509(a)(2). (Complete Part III.)
10
11
e
By checking this box, I certify that the organization is not controlled directly or indirectly by one or more disqualified persons other than foundation managers and other than one or more publicly supported organizations described in section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2).
f
If the organization received a written determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II or Type III supporting organization, check this box
..................................................
g
Since August 17, 2006, has the organization accepted any gift or contribution from any of the following persons?
(i) a person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or together with persons described in (ii)
Yes
No
and (iii) below, the governing body of the the supported organization?
................
11g(i)
(ii)
a family member of a person described in (i) above?
......................
11g(ii)
(iii)
a 35% controlled entity of a person described in (i) or (ii) above?
................
11g(iii)
h
Provide the following information about the supported organization(s).
(i) Name of supported organization
(ii) EIN
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions))
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document?
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support?
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.?
(vii) Amount of support?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Total
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.
Cat. No. 11285F
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 2
Part II
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part I or if the
organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the organization fails to
qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part III.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") ....
5,395,855
8,667,714
11,716,718
14,127,738
20,962,589
60,870,614
2
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.......
3
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
4
Total. Add lines 1 through 3..
5,395,855
8,667,714
11,716,718
14,127,738
20,962,589
60,870,614
5
The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included
on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f)..
6,138,540
6
Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4.
54,732,074
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
7
Amounts from line 4..
5,395,855
8,667,714
11,716,718
14,127,738
20,962,589
60,870,614
8
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
221,690
237,418
174,027
31,430
16,453
681,018
9
Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on..
10
Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets..
0
55,206
3,605
55,059
27,569
141,439
11
Total support (Add lines 7 through 10).
61,693,071
12
Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (See instructions.)
..................
12
2,126,952
13
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here..........................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
14
Public Support Percentage for 2010 (line 6 column (f) divided by line 11 column (f))
.........
14
88.717 %
15
Public Support Percentage for 2009 Schedule A, Part II, line 14
...............
15
79.947 %
16a
33 1/3% support test—2010.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box
and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
......................
b
33 1/3% support test—2009.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13 or 16a, and line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this
box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.....................
17a
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2010.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b and line 14
is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here. Explain
in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported
organization
..................................................
b
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2009.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or 17a and line
15 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here.
Explain in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..............................................
18
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, 17a or 17b, check this box and see
instructions
...................................................
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 3
Part III
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 509(a)(2) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 9 of Part I or if the organization
failed to qualify under Part II. If the organization fails to qualify under
the tests listed below, please complete Part II.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .
2
Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose......
3
Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513..
4
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf...
5
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
6
Total. Add lines 1 through 5.
7a
Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons...
b
Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year.
c
Add lines 7a and 7b..
8
Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.)
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
9
Amounts from line 6...
10a
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
b
Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975.
c
Add lines 10a and 10b.
11
Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.
12
Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.)
13
Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.).
14
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here.............................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
15
Public Support Percentage for 2010 (line 8 column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
.........
15
16
Public support percentage from 2009 Schedule A, Part III, line 15
...............
16
Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage
17
Investment income percentage for 2010 (line 10c column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
......
17
18
Investment income percentage from 2009 Schedule A, Part III, line 17
.............
18
19a
33 1/3% support tests—2010.
If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15 is more than 33 1/3% and line 17 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..........
b
33 1/3% support tests—2009.
If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a, and line 16 is more than 33 1/3% and line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
....
20
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a or 19b, check this box and see instructions
.....
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 4
Part IV
Supplemental Information.
Supplemental Information. Complete this part to provide the explanation required by Part II, line 10; Part II, line 17a or 17b; or Part III, line 12. Also complete this part for any additional information. (See instructions).
Facts And Circumstances Test
Explanation
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Additional Data
Software ID:
Software Version:
-
TIN:
SCHEDULE O (Form 990 or 990-EZ)
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Supplemental Information to Form 990 or 990-EZ
Complete to provide information for responses to specific questions on
Form 990 or to provide any additional information.
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2010
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM
Employer identification number
52-2175544
Identifier
Return Reference
Explanation
ORGANIZATION'S MISSION AND PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FORM 990, PART III, LINE 1 AND 4A - 4B
LINE 1: THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM (NQF) IS A UNIQUE, MULTI-STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION INSTRUMENTAL IN ADVANCING EFFORTS TO IMPROVE QUALITY THROUGH PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PUBLIC REPORTING. NQF IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION WITH MORE THAN 400 MEMBERS REPRESENTING VIRTUALLY EVERY SECTOR OF THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. NQF OPERATES UNDER A THREE-PART MISSION TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF AMERICAN HEALTHCARE BY SETTING NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND GOALS FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT, ENDORSING NATIONAL CONSENSUS STANDARDS FOR MEASURING AND PUBLICLY REPORTING ON PERFORMANCE AND PROMOTING THE ATTAINMENT OF NATIONAL GOALS AND THROUGH EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS. LINE 4A: PERFORMANCE MEASURES: OUR PERFORMANCE MEASURES PROGRAMMATIC AREA IS WHERE WE DO THE IMPORTANT, HIGHLY TECHNICAL WORK OF EVALUATING PERFORMANCE MEASURES SUBMITTED FOR NQF-ENDORSEMENT CONSIDERATION - A MARK THAT CARRIES MUCH WEIGHT IN THE MARKETPLACE AS WE STRIVE TO CREATE A MORE STANDARDIZED WAY TO EVALUATE IF OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS PERFORMING AT ITS BEST TO GENERATE HIGH QUALITY, SAFE CARE. IN 2010, OUR PERFORMANCE MEASURES GROUP - WORKING WITH COUNTLESS NATIONAL SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS, NQF MEMBER VOLUNTEERS, AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS - UNDERTOOK A NUMBER OF DIVERSE, COMPLEX PROJECTS, FREQUENTLY UNDER TIGHT TIMELINES, AS WELL AS ADDRESSED SOME FOUNDATIONAL WORK IN SUPPORT OF ENSURING A RIGOROUS AND EFFICIENT CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (CDP). CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS NQF TAKES VERY SERIOUSLY THE RIGOR OF OUR ENDORSEMENT PROCESS. IN 2010, WE CONVENED TWO TASK FORCES TO UPDATE CRITICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MEASURES' EVIDENCE AND THEIR TESTING REQUIREMENTS. WE ALSO CREATED AND PUT IN PLACE A NEW 'ENDORSEMENT MAINTENANCE' PROCESS, WHICH WILL HELP LEAD US TO A PLACE WHERE WE CAN COMPARE SIMILAR MEASURES AND ATTEMPT TO HARMONIZE MULTIPLE MEASURES OF SELECTING "BEST IN CLASS" MEASURES. NQF ALSO EXPANDED ITS COMMUNICATION WITH THE MEASURE DEVELOPER COMMUNITY AND ITS SET OF PLANNING TOOLS DEVELOPED TO ASSIST MEASURE DEVELOPERS IN THEIR QUEST FOR ENDORSEMENT. FINALLY, WE DEVELOPED AN EXPEDITED REVIEW PROCESS FOR NEW MEASURES REQUIRED UNDER A LEGISLATIVE MANDATE, SO THAT NQF IS POISED TO BE AS RESPONSIVE AS POSSIBLE TO NEW PERFORMANCE MEASURE NEEDS CREATED AS A BY-PRODUCT OF NEWLY ENACTED LEGISLATION. ENDORSEMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS IN 2010, NQF ACCOMPLISHED SIGNIFICANT WORK ON SEVERAL ENDORSEMENT PROJECTS. IMPORTANTLY, THIS WORK ADDRESSES CERTAIN VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, SUCH AS CHILDREN AND THE ELDERLY; ISSUES THAT HARM PEOPLE OR DRIVE WASTE IN THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, SUCH AS PATIENT SAFETY, OVERUSE, AND CARE COORDINATION ("HAND OFFS" BETWEEN ONE SETTING OF CARE TO ANOTHER); AND COSTLY AND PREVALENT CONDITIONS SUCH AS MENTAL HEALTH AND CARDIAC CARE. 1) PROJECTS IN RADIOLOGY AND CARDIAC IMAGING FILLED GAPS FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND GOALS IN CARE COORDINATION, PATIENT SAFETY, AND OVERUSE. 2) WE COMPLETED A MULTI-PHASE PROJECT THAT FOCUSED ON CONDITION-SPECIFIC AND CROSS-CUTTING OUTCOMES FOR ADULTS, CHILD HEALTH, AND MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOMES AND GAP AREAS IN CONDITION-SPECIFIC OUTCOMES. 3) WE COMPLETED THE NECESSARY FOUNDATIONAL WORK TO SUPPORT SUBMISSION OF RESOURCE USE MEASURES IN 2011. 4) WE UPDATED OUR PATIENT SAFETY PORTFOLIO INCLUDING AN UPDATED PUBLICATION OF ENDORSED SAFETY SAFE PRACTICES, DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENDORSED FRAMEWORK FOR SAFETY REPORTING, AND ONGOING REASSESSMENT OF THE LIST OF SERIOUS REPORTABLE EVENTS. 5) WE EXPANDED THE PORTFOLIO OF CULTURAL COMPETENCY PRACTICES AND WE BEGAN THE WORK TO DEVELOP AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR CULTURAL COMPETENCY PRACTICES. LINE 4B: STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS: NATIONAL PRIORITIES PARTNERSHIP - THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAMMATIC AREA, IN RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DELIVERED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL PRIORITIES PARTNERSHIP (NPP) PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRIORITIES AND GOALS FOR THE SECRETARY'S NATIONAL QUALITY STRATEGY. IN ADDITION, OVER 200 STAKEHOLDERS REPRESENTING MULTIPLE ASPECTS OF THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS FOR THE ORIGINAL SIX NPP PRIORITY AREAS: PATIENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT, POPULATION HEALTH, SAFETY, CARE COORDINATION, PALLIATIVE CARE/END OF LIFE CARE, AND OVERUSE. THIS REPORT PROVED TO BE AN EXTREMELY FORMATIVE DOCUMENT RELATIVE TO SHAPING OUR FIRST EVER NATIONAL QUALITY STRATEGY, RELEASED IN MARCH 2011. MEASURE GAP ANALYSIS - AS THE FIELD OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ADVANCES TO ADDRESS CHANGES IN HEALTHCARE, NQF IS ALWAYS EVALUATING TO SEE WHERE THERE MIGHT BE GAPS - THUS INFORMING NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW MEASURE DEVELOPMENT. TO ASSIST IN FUTURE MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS, NQF CONSTRUCTED A CONSENSUS MEASURE DEVELOPMENT AND ENDORSEMENT AGENDA THAT IDENTIFIES HIGH-LEVERAGE MEASURE GAP AREAS THAT MAP TO THE NPP PRIORITIES, ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF DIVERSE POPULATIONS, AND PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR PLANNING AND ONGOING MONITORING OF PROGRESS. MEASURE APPLICATIONS - IN ANTICIPATION OF REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCOUNTABLE CARE ACT, NQF NEARLY COMPLETED THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR THE MEASURE APPLICATIONS PARTNERSHIP (MAP), A NEW ENTITY BEING FORMED IN RESPONSE TO STATUTORY DEVELOPMENTS. BY LAUNCHING THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS IN 2010, NQF STANDS POISED TO QUICKLY ACTIVATE THE PARTNERSHIP UPON REQUEST OF HHS FOR INPUT ON THE SELECTION OF MEASURES FOR FEDERAL PUBLIC REPORTING AND PAYMENT PROGRAMS. TO INFORM THE WORK OF THE MAP, WHICH WILL START IN 2011, WE COMPLETED A FOUNDATIONAL REPORT THAT CATALOGS PAYMENT REFORM MODELS AND ANALYZES THE MEASURE IMPLICATIONS. COMMUNITY ALLIANCES - NQF IS VERY COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH STATES, LOCAL COMMUNITIES, AND REGIONAL GROUPS HOW TO ON SELECT AND APPLY PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE. THESE COMMUNITIES ARE WHERE THE RUBBER OFTEN MEETS THE ROAD, AND WHERE THERE IS MUCH ENERGY AND CREATIVITY BEING APPLIED TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF CARE. NQF LAUNCHED A NEW INITIATIVE TO HELP THESE COMMUNITIES -- COMMUNITY ALLIANCES - AND STARTED WORK ON DEVELOPING NEW WEB-BASED TOOLS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO HELP MEET THESE COMMUNITIES' NEEDS.
ORGANIZATION'S PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4C - 4D
LINE 4C: HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: AS OUR COUNTRY MOVES CLOSER TO ACHIEVING THE GOAL OF A MORE ELECTRONICALLY-DRIVEN HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT, SUCH AS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS, NQF HAS INVESTED CONSIDERABLE RESOURCES IN OUR HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY WORK. IN THE CURRENT WORLD, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT RELIES ON PAPER RECORDS SUCH AS MEDICAL CLAIMS AND PATIENT CHARTS. IN THE FUTURE, AS MORE PROVIDERS AND PATIENTS ADAPT TO AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM, WE MUST MOVE THE WORLD OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INTO THAT ELECTRONIC PLATFORM. OUR WORK IN 2010 WAS FOUNDATIONAL TOWARD ACHIEVING THAT GOAL. QUALITY DATA MODEL - THE LACK OF A SET OF PRECISELY DEFINED, UNIVERSALLY ADOPTED ELECTRONIC QUALITY MEASURES IS AN OBSTACLE TO AUTOMATING MEASUREMENT AND TO COMPARING AND IMPROVING QUALITY USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH INFORMATION. THE QUALITY DATA MODEL (QDM) IS AN "INFORMATION MODEL" THAT DEFINES AND DESCRIBES CLINICAL CONCEPTS IN A STANDARDIZED FORMAT SO INDIVIDUALS MONITORING CLINICAL PERFORMANCE AND OUTCOMES CAN COMMUNICATE NECESSARY INFORMATION CLEARLY AND CONCISELY. IN RESPONSE TO EVOLVING QUALITY MEASUREMENT, ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR), AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, NQF MADE SIGNIFICANT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE QDM AND SOUGHT PUBLIC COMMENTS. BI-ANNUAL UPDATES ARE PLANNED FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. EMEASURE DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW - NQF DEVELOPED THE HEALTH QUALITY MEASURE FORMAT, A STANDARDIZED FORMAT AND METHOD OF DEVELOPING ESPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE QDM INFORMATION MODEL. USING THIS NEW STANDARDIZED FORMAT, EXISTING PAPER-BASED MEASURES CAN BE CONVERTED INTO AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT-REFERRED TO AS AN "EMEASURE"-FOR AUTOMATIC USE IN EHRS. AT THE DIRECTION OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NQF IS WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH MEASURE STEWARDS TO RETOOL A LARGE SET OF MEASURES THAT WERE PUBLISHED IN THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES' NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING REGARDING MEANINGFUL USE. THE FIRST 44 MEASURES WERE COMPLETED IN JUNE AND REFERENCED IN THE CMS FINAL RULE FOR MEANINGFUL USE PUBLISHED IN JULY. A SECOND GROUP OF 69 MEASURES (FOR A TOTAL OF 113 RETOOLED MEASURES) WERE COMPLETED IN DECEMBER 2010. NQF ALSO ESTABLISHED A PROCESS AND CONVENED THE EMEASURE FORMAT REVIEW PANEL TO EVALUATE THE SPECIFICATIONS (STRUCTURE) AND INTENT (CONTENT) OF RETOOLED MEASURES. THIS EVALUATION ENSURES THAT A MEASURE'S INTENT REMAINS INTACT FOR CONTINUED NQF ENDORSEMENT. IN THE FUTURE, EMEASURES WILL BE PART OF NQF'S MEASURE SUBMISSION, ENDORSEMENT, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. MEASURE AUTHORING TOOL - THE DEVELOPMENT OF EMEASURES REQUIRES A USER-FRIENDLY METHOD FOR MEASURE DEVELOPERS TO PRODUCE THEIR MEASURE IN A HIGHLY STRUCTURED FORMAT. NQF IS SPONSORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SOFTWARE TOOL THAT MEASURE DEVELOPERS WILL USE TO CREATE THE EMEASURE. THE TOOL WILL CREATE A COMPUTER READABLE VERSION OF A MEASURE IN XML AND A HUMAN READABLE VERSION. NQF ADVANCED THIS PROJECT IN 2010 BY HIRING A DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO BUILD THE TOOL. HEALTH IT UTILIZATION - HEALTH IT ALSO CAN HAVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND INTRODUCE SAFETY HAZARDS. NQF CONVENED THE HEALTH IT UTILIZATION EXPERT PANEL TO ESTABLISH A MODEL OF DATA TYPES IN PERFORMANCE MEASURES THAT MIGHT BE DEVELOPED TO ASSESS WHETHER CLINICIANS AND OTHERS ARE USING HEALTH IT PROPERLY, INCLUDING ASSESSING WHETHER DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS AND METHODS OF DETECTING HAZARDS ARE BEING USED EFFECTIVELY. CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT - TO IMPROVE QUALITY, CLINICIANS MUST RECEIVE FEEDBACK IN REAL TIME AT THE POINT OF CARE. USING THE QDM AS A FOUNDATION, NQF CONVENED A PANEL OF CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT (CDS) EXPERTS AND DEVELOPED A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ENSURE "CRITICAL EVENTS" (E.G., REQUISITE SCREENINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS) ARE TRACKED AND ACTED UPON BY THE PROVIDER. THE CDS TAXONOMY ALSO WILL SERVE AS A FRAMEWORK OF REQUIREMENTS FOR CDS TO FUNCTION EFFECTIVELY WITHIN AN EHR OR OTHER ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS. LINE 4D: THE OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES INCLUDE CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS HELD BY NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM.
MEMBERS OF ORGANIZATION AND MEMBERS VOTING RESPONSIBILITIES
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 6 AND LINE 7A
LINE 6 THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM HAS OVER 400 MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS. THEY REPRESENT ALL SECTORS IN THE HEALTHCARE QUALITY LANDSCAPE INCLUDING: CONSUMERS; PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PURCHASERS; PHYSICIANS, NURSES, PHARMACISTS, AND OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS; HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES, AND OTHER PROVIDER ORGANIZATIONS; ACCREDITING AND CERTIFYING BODIES; SUPPORTING INDUSTRIES; AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS. LINE 7A MEMBERS VOTE ON A SLATE OF CANDIDATES TO FILL BOARD OF DIRECTOR VACANCIES.
DECISIONS OF GOVERNING BODY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 7B
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A SLATE OF CANDIDATES TO FILL BOARD VACANCIES. THIS RECOMMENDATION GOES TO THE GENERAL MEMBERSHIP FOR A VOTE. MEMBERSHIP MUST APPROVE CHANGES TO GOVERNING DOCUMENTS.
FORM 990 REVIEW PROCESS
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 11A
THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE, A COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD, REVIEWS AND APPROVES THE FORM 990 AFTER WHICH IT IS SENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ALL PRIOR TO FILING.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 12C
ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS ARE SENT TO BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF TO COMPLETE. THE SUBMISSIONS ARE REVIEWED.
DETERMINING COMPENSATION
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 15A
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, COMPRISED OF INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DETERMINES THE CEO'S COMPENSATION PACKAGE BY USING COMPARABLE DATA APPROVED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THERE WAS CONTEMPORANEOUS SUBSTANTIATION OF THE DELIBERATION AND DECISION. THE CEO DETERMINES THE SALARIES OF OTHER OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEE BASED ON OUTSIDE COMPARABILITY DATA. THE RESULTS ARE DOCUMENTED IN PERSONNEL FILES.
AVAILABILITY OF OTHER DOCUMENTS
FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 19
THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST.
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990-EZ.