Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| DELEGATE CONTROL OVER MANAGEMENT DUTIES | PART VI QUESTION 3 | THE COMPANY HIRES DENTAQUEST, LLC (A RELATED PARTY) TO PROVIDE MANAGEMENT SERVICES. MEMBERS OR STOCKHOLDERS PART VI QUESTION 6 & 7A THE MEMBERS OF THE ORGANIZATION ELECT THE DIRECTORS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ORGANIZATION. |
| REVIEW PROCESS | PART VI QUESTION 11B | THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, A COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS, REVIEWS A FINAL FORM OF THE FORM 990 PRIOR TO ACTUAL FILING. MEMBERS OF THE EXTERNAL TAX FIRM (CURRENTLY KPMG LLP) INITIALLY DISCUSS, PREPARE AND REVIEW THE RETURN WITH MANAGEMENT. ONCE THE RETURN IS FULLY ANALYZED AND PREPARED, A PAPER COPY IS DISTRIBUTED TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS IN ADVANCE OF A SPECIFIC MEETING. AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS REVIEW THE DRAFT FORM 990 AND THEN SEND TO THE FULL BOARD WHO WILL APPROVE THE TAX RETURN IN ADVANCE OF IT BEING FILED WITH THE IRS. |
| CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY | PART VI QUESTION 12C | THE ORGANIZATION'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND PROCEDURE (THE "POLICY"), AS REVIEWED AND REVISED PERIODICALLY, REQUIRES OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES TO DISCLOSE INTERESTS THAT COULD GIVE RISE TO CONFLICTS. HISTORICALLY, THE POLICY HAS ALWAYS APPLIED TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE ORGANIZATION. THE POLICY HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE KEY EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF THE REVISED DEFINITION OF "KEY EMPLOYEE" UNDER THE NEW FORM 990. |
| COMPENSATION POLICY | PART VI QUESTION 15 | THE PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION FOR THE ORGANIZATION'S CEO AND OTHER TOP MANAGEMENT IS MODELED AFTER THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 4958 TO ESTABLISH THE PRESUMPTION OF REASONABLE COMPENSATION. COMPENSATION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY A COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ("THE COMMITTEE") OF THE BOARD, WHICH IS COMPRISED OF INDEPENDENT PERSONS. THE COMMITTEE ENGAGED AN INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT, WHICH PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE COMPARABLE MARKET DATA FROM PUBLISHED SURVEYS AND FORM 990S OF COMPARABLE ORGANIZATIONS TO ASSIST IN EVALUATING THE COMPENSATION FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL. THE COMMITTEE CONDUCTED A REVIEW OF THIS COMPARABILITY DATA AND DOCUMENTED ITS DELIBERATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS IN MINUTES THAT ARE RETAINED WITH OTHER GOVERNANCE RECORDS OF THE ORGANIZATION. THE COMMITTEE FOLLOWED THE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH THE PRESUMPTION THAT COMPENSATION PAID TO THE ORGANIZATION'S CEO AND OTHER TOP MANAGEMENT WAS REASONABLE FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 4958 BY RELYING ON PROFESSIONAL ADVICE IN A WRITTEN OPINION OF REASONABLENESS FROM INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT. THE COMMITTEE INFORMS THE BOARD OF ITS DECISIONS AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. |
| PUBLIC DISCLOSURE | PART VI QUESTION 19 | WE DO NOT PUBLISH ANY GOVERNING POLICIES OR DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION. WE DO FILE A MASSACHUSETTS FORM PC WITH AN ATTACHED FORM 990. THE FORM PC IS FILED WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE AND IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION BY ANY OF THE INTERESTED PUBLIC. |
| OTHER CHANGES IN NET ASSETS | PART XI, LINE 5 | UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN(LOSS) IN SUBSIDIARIES $10,373,547 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |