Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization |
(ii) EIN |
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) |
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? |
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? |
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? |
(vii) Amount of support? |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 81,804,352 | 99,819,318 | 92,860,196 | 89,098,856 | 90,868,194 | 454,450,916 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3.. | 81,804,352 | 99,819,318 | 92,860,196 | 89,098,856 | 90,868,194 | 454,450,916 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 19,006,155 | |||||
| 6 | Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 435,444,761 | |||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 81,804,352 | 99,819,318 | 92,860,196 | 89,098,856 | 90,868,194 | 454,450,916 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 2,341,064 | 2,761,904 | 1,936,546 | 1,255,287 | 727,087 | 9,021,888 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | 18,440 | 851,137 | 907,840 | 763,479 | 686,497 | 3,227,393 |
| 10 | Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets.. | 793,551 | 480,528 | 612,319 | 424,758 | 469,380 | 2,780,536 |
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | 469,480,733 | |||||






| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2006 | (b) 2007 | (c) 2008 | (d) 2009 | (e) 2010 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) | ||||||
| 13 | Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.). | ||||||




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| GOVERNING BODY AND MANAGEMENT | Line 1B - The NRDC Board of Trustees is comprised of 38 independent voting Board Members. Board of Trustees member, John Adams, is not independent by virtue of receiving compensation from the organization. Board of Trustees Members, Larry Rockefeller, Frederica Perera and Patricia Bauman are, likewise, not independent because of the relationships disclosed on Schedule L of the Form 990. LINE 2 - Board of Trustees Members, Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr and Frederica Perera, have a family relationship. Line 7A - NRDC's members are entitled, as part of their membership, to elect individuals to the NRDC Board of Trustees. Line 7B - The NRDC Board of Trustees acts autonomously. Nevertheless, NRDC's members have certain approval rights pursuant to the New York Not-for-Profit Corporation Law, including, approval over any amendments to NRDC's certificate of incorporation. Form 990, Part VII - Average Hours per week for Related Organization The following individuals listed on Part VII of the Form 990 provided services to NRDC's related organization, the NRDC Action Fund. The average hours per week devoted to the related organization are as follows: Beinecke, Frances - less than one hour per week Gutis, Phil - approximately two hours per week Keefer, Judy - less than one hour per week Lehner, Peter - approximately two hours per week Murray, Jack - less than one hour per week Sullivan, Patricia- less than one hour per week Warren, Wesley - approximately 3.5 hours per week | |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B | LINE 11 - The Form 990 was prepared by a nationally recognized accounting firm in conjunction with the organization's senior management and audit committee of the Board of Trustees. A copy of the draft Form 990 was circulated to the full Board of Trustees for discussion and comment. Each Board Member was provided ample opportunity to comment on the information contained in the Form 990 prior to its filing with the Internal Revenue Service. LINE 12 - Each officer, director, trustee and key employee of the organization is required to annually disclose any conflicts of interest that arise by virtue of employment, board service, or position with the organization. The organization monitors compliance with its conflict of interest policy through an annual questionnaire/disclosure statement that is distributed to these individuals. Potential conflicts are investigated immediately. LINE 15 - The organization undertakes a thorough process to ensure that the executive compensation it pays to its top management official and all of its officers and key employees is reasonable, given the market in which the organization operates. In relevant part, the Board of Trustees has established a Compensation Committee of independent persons that have no personal interest in the proposed compensation agreement. The Compensation committee contracts with a compensation consultant to complete a market assessment and competitive position analysis for the organization's top executives. The compensation consultant utilizes comparability and benchmarking surveys to ensure that the organization compensates its executives commensurate with the market. | |
| DISCLOSURE | FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C | LINE 19 - The organization makes its Form 990 available to the public by retaining a copy at its place of business. The Form 990 is likewise published on NRDC's website at www.nrdc.org. The organization's financial statements, governing documents and conflict of interest policy are not ordinarily made available to the public, but, if requested, may be provided at management's discretion. Form 990, Part XI, Reconciliation of Net Assets Line 5 - Other Changes in Net Assets or Fund Balances Unrealized Gains on Investments - $15,832,961 Change in value of interest rate swap agreements - $201,668 Pension related Activity - $1,464,511 Change in value of split interest agreements - $(439,799) Rounding - $1 Total change in Net assets - $17,059,342. |
| Program Service Accomplishments | Part III, Line 4 | The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), one of the most influential environmental groups in the nation, has a single purpose: To safeguard the Earth, its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. In 2011, NRDC was guided by a clear and compelling road map for the six environmental issues that are our priorities, and we demonstrated the power of joining policy expertise, law, science, and citizen action. We need this potent combination now more than ever. NRDC has prevailed in difficult times before-from the Mideast Oil Crisis to the coordinated attacks on bedrock environmental laws in the 1990s and beyond-and we did it by adapting and innovating. As we face another pivotal moment, NRDC has identified bold new strategies to achieve far-reaching success. Grounded on NRDC's widely acknowledged policy expertise and integrity, we will work to build greater influence in support of the environment. We will use targeted communications to connect environmental issues with the basic concerns of American families, especially their health, their homes, and the air they breathe. And we will reach out to strategic partners, including workers, farmers, and those in the business community who create prosperity while following sustainable practices. Together, our expert staff, our dedicated Board of Trustees, and our passionate members and activists will help promote innovation over pollution, conservation rather than destruction, and a clean future in stark contrast to our dirty past. Curbing Global Warming and Creating the Clean Energy Future Climate change is the single biggest environmental and humanitarian crisis of our time. Renewable power, conservation, clean fuels, energy efficiency in industries, appliances, buildings, and vehicles-these are among the solutions that will reduce the impacts on our climate, revive our economy, and create jobs. NRDC works to jumpstart the clean energy future not only here in America, but also in China, where we have worked on energy issues for more than a decade, and in India, where we have established a new program to promote clean energy policies. Key accomplishments in 2011 include: - Following a decade of NRDC's advocacy in the states, litigation, cutting-edge technological and economic research, and finally a broad public campaign that pulled in auto workers, manufacturers, and consumers, President Barack Obama announced an agreement with 13 automakers in July 2011 to almost double fuel-efficiency standards for cars and light trucks. These standards represent one of the largest steps yet taken anywhere in the world to reduce carbon dioxide pollution. The tougher standards will cut U.S. oil consumption by about 1.5 million barrels per day by 2030 and generate nearly $80 billion annually in consumer fuel savings by 2030. The President also announced the first-ever efficiency standards for heavy trucks, cutting their pollution by more than 14 percent. - Using research and advocacy, NRDC helped California draft and approve standards that are expected to slash power use of new flat-screen TVs in half, lowering electricity bills by an estimated $1 billion a year. And we provided technical and policy guidance to the U.S. Department of Energy on additional new energy efficiency measures, including federal standards for home water heaters that are projected to save consumers $10 billion over 30 years and reduce carbon dioxide pollution by 160 million tons. - Four years of litigation and advocacy by NRDC's Midwest Office led to the cancelation of a proposed $6.9 billion coal-to-liquid plant in eastern Ohio, avoiding more than 9 million tons of coal use, approximately 11.2 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution, and more than 2,000 tons of other harmful pollutants every year. Similarly, legal and policy advocacy by the Midwest Office led to the cancelation of a proposed 860 megawatt coal-fired power plant, the closure of multiple Eisenhower-era coal fired facilities in Michigan, and the commitment of more than $1.5 billion in energy efficiency investments in Michigan, Illinois, and Ohio, with an estimated two to three times return in consumer savings from the investments. - Working with the U.S. delegation to the International Maritime Organization, which work proved influential in the adoption of the first-ever greenhouse gas regulations for new ships, providing a projected $5 billion in total fuel cost savings by 2020 and reducing carbon dioxide pollution by an estimated 50 million tons per year by 2020. In addition, we made important headway in our three-year fight to block TransCanada's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline-a proposal that has come to symbolize a place to draw the line against dirty fuels. Our report," Tar Sands Pipelines Safety Risks", brought media and public attention to the dangers of the pipeline to U.S. waters, changing the nature of the national debate and helping to garner bipartisan support from the U.S. heartland. In October 2011, following two weeks of public hearings along the pipeline route, NRDC helped organize a rally that drew hundreds of pipeline protestors. Meanwhile, in The New York Times, we ran an ad featuring nine Nobel peace laureates and a video op-ed by NRDC Trustee Robert Redford urging President Obama to reject the pipeline. The advocacy by NRDC and our allies pushed the administration to call for a new environmental review of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline that is likely to last through early 2013. On a separate front, we are working closely with regional stakeholders in the Pacific Northwest to oppose plans by tar sands developers to transport thousands of megaload tar sands mining equipment shipments along the region's scenic rural roads. These truck loads, or megaloads, are bigger than many buildings and would be the largest truck shipments ever contemplated for transportation across North America. Joining forces with our partners, we helped secure a permanent injunction in Montana against future megaload shipments, while delaying the opening of what is slated to be the largest tar sands operation in the world: the Imperial Oil/Kearl Oil Sands Project. We are now mounting a federal legal challenge that will focus on the Obama administration's acquiescence in allowing these heavy haul shipments to proceed. Earlier in the year, tackling the threat of dirty fuels development in our western wildlands, we forced the Interior Department to establish environmental protection plans that will safeguard against destructive oil shale development. The government must also withdraw plans allowing for the commercial leasing of oil shale and tar sands resources on more than 2 million acres of iconic wildlands in the western United States. As the debate about hydraulic fracturing for gas and oil development, or fracking, widens across the country, NRDC is sending a message to lawmakers and regulators: We have already seen too much harm to communities, people, and our environment and will not support fracking without the strictest possible safeguards for health, the environment, and local communities; we will strongly fight drilling in special and sensitive areas, such as the New York Catskills Park; we will insist on adequately staff and empowered government oversight. In New York, we launched an all-out campaign to challenge a state fracking plan that could result in 1,600 drilling applications annually. We identified places of extraordinary environmental, ecological, or hydrological significance that should be placed off limits to drilling. We went to court to protect the home rule rights of communities to establish local comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances. Also, we engaged in a detailed scientific, technical, and legal review of the state's proposed environmental study on fracking. |
| Program Service Accomplishments | Part III, Line 4 | At the national level, we advised the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on regulations for fracking with diesel fuel. We also proposed methods for handling toxic fracking waste, called for more scientific research to understand the threat of fracking to drinking water supplies, and pushed for new rules to protect Americans from fracking-related air pollution. Meanwhile, we built pressure on the Obama administration to protect sensitive wildlife habitat in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah from fracking and other destructive oil and gas drilling-and succeeded in removing some lands from the industry's target list. NRDC supported final permitting of four of the six solar projects on federal lands that were fast tracked under the stimulus bill and has worked closely with the solar industry to develop recommendations to the U.S. Department of the Interior to encourage solar projects to be sited appropriately, and how to avoid proposals to site renewable energy projects in inappropriate areas. We expect this work to be a model of how to encourage more renewable projects, more quickly in environmentally appropriate areas. NRDC also helped pass a California law increasing the state's renewable portfolio standard from 20 percent to 33 percent by 2020. Finally, working with the U.S. Department of Defense, NRDC developed a first-of-its-kind mapping and analytic tool available online to help renewable energy developers identify appropriate sites for renewable projects, such as utility-scale wind, solar, and geothermal energy facilities. Reviving the World's Oceans Powerful forces have pushed the world's oceans to the brink of ecological collapse. NRDC believes we can restore marine vitality by ending overfishing, creating marine protected areas, and improving oceans governance. By focusing on these solutions, we can achieve the broadest, most long-lasting benefits for our oceans and those who rely on the more than 2 million oceans- related jobs in America. Key accomplishments in 2011 include: - Following seven years of steady pressure and oversight by NRDC and our partners, the world's leading fishing nations signed a landmark treaty to protect more than 16 million square miles of the Pacific Ocean from unregulated bottom trawling, which is by far the most destructive form of fishing. - Advocating for landmark legislation making it illegal to sell, trade, or possess shark fins in California. The practice of cutting the fins off living sharks and dumping them back into the ocean is estimated to drive as many as 70 million shark killings a year, threatening commercial fishing and disrupting the entire ocean food chain. Also in California, in October 2011, a judge in the San Diego Superior Court upheld the state's authority to create ocean refuges along the north central coast under the state's landmark Marine Life Protection Act. This victory is good news for the science-based network of protected ocean gems-the Yosemites of the sea-that NRDC has worked to create in each of four coastal regions of the state. Persistent advocacy, participation, and outreach by NRDC and many other interests, along with leadership from the state, helped bring the south coast network of protected areas over the finish line for a January 1, 2012 implementation date. With that milestone reached, California has completed a network of ocean wildlife havens along three-quarters of its coast, from southern Mendocino County to the Mexican border. We helped secure approval of a preferred alternative network for the final region, the north coast, in 2011, and will continue to participate in the regulatory process for those underwater parks, aiming to have them take effect by the end of 2012. Defending Endangered Wildlife and Wild Places Wild places across the Americas are being threatened by a surge of reckless industrialization. The destruction of these wildlands means the loss of vast troves of biological diversity, critical regulators of global climate, and irreplaceable sanctuaries for recreation and contemplation. Through our BioGems program, NRDC's advocacy team joins forces with online activists and local partners to defend some of our hemisphere's most imperiled ecosystems. NRDC scored two landmark victories for North America's last wild forests, protecting more than 11 million acres of North American forests-roughly the size of five Yellowstone National Parks-in southeast Alaska and the Canadian Boreal. We did this through extensive negotiations and partnerships with the First Nations in Canada, and through litigation protecting Southeast Alaska's Tongass National Forest roadless areas. Federal, state, and tribal agencies that manage Yellowstone's bison announced a historic agreement that will permit buffalo to graze on 75,000 acres of land in Montana's Gardiner Basin during the winter and most of the spring, following years of pressure from NRDC's 1.3 million members and online activists. Farther north in Alaska, good news came in February 2011 when the Mitsubishi Corporation withdrew from the Pebble Mine project in Alaska's Bristol Bay watershed-one of America's last and most important wild places. A consortium of mining companies, led by Britain's Anglo American, is planning to dig one of the world's largest open-pit mines in the heart of this pristine ecosystem. If it goes forward, it will inflict irreversible damage on Bristol Bay, including the permanent destruction of 60 miles of salmon habitat. That is why NRDC is joining Alaskan Natives, fishermen, sportsmen, and conservationists to help take this fight to the national and international stage, including Anglo American's annual shareholder meeting. In the past two years, our members and BioGems Defenders helped us deliver more than 300,000 letters of protest to the major investors in the Pebble Mine scheme: Anglo American, the Mitsubishi Corporation, and Rio Tinto. Protecting Our Health by Preventing Pollution Toxic chemicals in our environment, such as mercury, lead, and other manmade chemicals, have been linked to cancer, birth defects, and brain impairments. Reducing or eliminating the load of these dangerous chemicals in the products we buy, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink can help reduce the toll of human disease and suffering. NRDC's health experts use law, science, and the power of international commerce to keep the worst toxic chemicals off the market, out of the air, and away from our bodies. Key achievements in 2011 include: - After more than 20 years of advocacy, repeated lawsuits, scientific and economic testimony, and a broad public campaign, the EPA issued federal rules aimed at reducing mercury pollution from power plants by 90 percent, and a 60 percent to 80 percent reduction in other pollutants. These rules alone are projected to save more than 11,000 lives each year and up to $90 billion in costs. - NRDC and our partners filed a lawsuit to force the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to withdraw approval for most non-therapeutic uses of penicillin and tetracyclines in animal feed-almost a generation after the FDA first recognized that feeding livestock low doses of certain antibiotics could promote antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or superbugs, capable of infecting people. - Settled a four-year citizen suit that ensures the Dickson community in Tennessee will be permanently protected from well water contaminated by trichloroethylene, a known carcinogen and reproductive and neurological toxic. Dr. Robert Bullard, the father of the environmental justice movement, once called the Holt family of Dickson "the poster family for environmental racism," making this a landmark environmental justice victory. In California, the state legislature passed a bill that would ban the use of the chemical bisphenol A (BPA), capping a three-year push by NRDC's LA Leadership Council and our California-based online activists. BPA has been tied to cancer, reproductive abnormalities, and heart disease, and poses special risks to fetuses, infants, and young children. After fending off two attempts to oust a case from federal court, NRDC settled a lawsuit against industry for its toxic legacy of hexavalent chromium contamination in a densely populated community in Jersey City, New Jersey. The settlement calls for a 700,000-ton cleanup according to standards that are more protective than the state chromium guidelines. |
| Program Service Accomplishments | Part III, Line 4 | Ensuring Safe and Sufficient Water Clean and plentiful water is the cornerstone of prosperous communities. Yet as we enter the twenty-first century, swelling demand and changing climate patterns are draining rivers and aquifers, and pollution is threatening the quality of what remains. NRDC is integrating our expertise in pollution prevention, water efficiency, and climate change to sustain America's precious water resources. Key achievements in 2011 include: - Providing analysis and advocacy to help Philadelphia commit to using cutting-edge natural systems and techniques, such as green roofs, tree boxes, vegetated ditches, and preserved or restored wetlands, to clean up its rivers and other surrounding waterways, introducing the most comprehensive network of green infrastructure found in any U.S. city-and one that will yield more in benefits than it will cost. Our advocacy similarly helped New York City commit $1.5 billion to green infrastructure. - Collaborating with allies to help get new federal water efficiency standards for major home appliances that are projected to save consumers more than $1.5 billion annually and reduce water use in dish washers alone by more than 75 million gallons every day. - Achieving a settlement that requires the EPA to issue a new permit regulating ballast water discharges from commercial vessels, protecting water quality. Ballast water is the number one source for aquatic nuisances, such as the so-called "fish Ebola," the spiny water flea, and zebra and quagga mussels. These and other invasive species now sap the American economy of billions of dollars annually. - Helping keep an invasive species, the Asian carp, out of the Chicago waterway system. If introduced, the Asian carp would likely alter the habitat and food web that support aquatic life throughout the Great Lakes and threaten one-fifth of the world's fresh water. In turn, a $7 billion fishing industry and the drinking water of more than 40 million would be in jeopardy. Fostering Sustainable Communities With their dense populations, opportunities for mass transit, greater energy efficiency, and potential for green jobs, cities across the nation have the ability to become incubators for environmental innovation. NRDC is combining the expertise of our urban, health, open space, smart growth, energy, and transportation teams to promote those shifts and create more just, sustainable, and livable cities. Central to this priority is to help create incentives, data, or local programs that could be replicated in other urban areas. Key achievements in 2011 include: - Winning a victory for carbon pollution reductions when the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) voted 14 to 1 to adopt California's first Sustainable Communities Strategy to implement SB 375. SANDAG adopted many of NRDC's recommendations to the plan, including a commitment to adopt an early action measure for walking and biking by summer 2012, to develop a transit-oriented development policy to ensure its $53 billion investment in transit leads to strong ridership gains. We also committed to working with SANDAG to secure the necessary transit funding to make this goal a reality. - Following NRDC expert testimony on a suite of food bills, as well as on purchasing targets for buying regional food and defining what constitutes "sustainable" food, New York City's Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed a package of laws that will help increase the amount of fresh, local food available in the city. This package of legislation is a key component to significantly overhauling the regional food system. One bill requires the city to collect and publish metrics on how food is produced, processed, distributed, and consumed in the region. Another bill calls for the creation of procurement guidelines to encourage city agencies to buy food grown or processed in New York State. Two other bills in the package promote urban agriculture and rooftop farming. By helping urban farming to flourish, New York may someday serve as a model for the benefits of truly sustainable, local agriculture. - Launching the Green Sports Alliance, including 65 sports teams, stadiums, and organizations, to help share information about better practices and opportunities to measure and reduce environmental impacts in the sports industry. - Partnering with America's leading financial backer of urban communities to put Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development, the first set of consensus-based national standards to steer new development toward environmentally sound sites and design, to work in America's distressed inner city neighborhoods. Providing Membership Services NRDC's supporting Members and online activists-totaling 1.3 million-play a major role in NRDC's ability to take action in court and to bring influence protect the last remaining wildlands and the wildlife that depend on it, mainly through our Save BioGems citizen activist network. Since its inception in 2000, BioGems Defenders have sent more than 18 million messages to elected officials, government agencies, and corporations in support of our campaigns. And Members provide legal standing for NRDC litigation on a broad array of issues from land use to clean air and toxics. NRDC keeps Members and activists informed of all our work though our photo-filled tabloid Nature's Voice (which mails 5 times annually to all Members) and our www.SaveBioGems.org website, online newsletter BioGems News, and through social media (such as Facebook, Twitter and Pinterst). |
| Form 990, Part III Program Service Classification | In its audited financial statements, NRDC categorizes its program service expenditures by program service activity. That classification is as follows: Clean Energy Future - $39,974,599 Revive Our Ocean - $7,564,278 Protect Our Health - $6,721,900 Wild Places & Wildlife - $15,533,459 Safe & Sufficient Water - $5,807,375 Sustainable Communities - $3,420,994 Membership Services - $5,583,627 Total Program Services - $84,606,232 NRDC has received significant donated legal, consulting and other services throughout the years. Those expenditures are included in the program numbers above. Total donated services allocated to program service activities for the year ending June 30, 2011 is $2,506,820. Accordingly, net program service activities for the year ending June 30, 2011 (as reported on Part III and Part IX of the Form 990) is $84,606,232. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |