Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization |
(ii) EIN |
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) |
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? |
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? |
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? |
(vii) Amount of support? |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 502,326 | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 2,760,686 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3.. | 502,326 | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 2,760,686 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 1,114,130 | |||||
| 6 | Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 1,646,556 | |||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 502,326 | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 2,760,686 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 47,686 | 64,931 | 40,917 | 31,898 | 22,003 | 207,435 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets.. | 3,379 | 3,301 | 1,000 | 1,100 | 1,806 | 10,586 |
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | 2,978,707 | |||||






| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) | ||||||
| 13 | Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.). | ||||||




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS | FORM 990, PART III | STATEMENT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH IN 2011 IMPROVING PUBLIC POLICY EVEN WITH ALL THE CHANGES IN NORTH CAROLINA'S POLITICAL LANDSCAPE, 2011 WAS ANOTHER GREAT YEAR FOR THE CENTER IN HAVING OUR RESEARCH AFFECT PUBLIC POLICY AND IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THE CITIZENS OF NORTH CAROLINA. * MAKING FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO MORE STUDENTS IN MORE OF NC'S COMMUNITY COLLEGES - IN 2009, THE CENTER WAS SHOCKED TO FIND THAT ONLY 20 OF NORTH CAROLINA'S 58 COMMUNITY COLLEGES MADE FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO THEIR STUDENTS. IN 2010, WE WERE INVITED TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE LEGISLATURE'S JOINT SELECT STUDY COMMITTEE ON STATE-FUNDED STUDENT FINANCIAL AID, AND WE RECOMMENDED REQUIRING ALL COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO PARTICIPATE. THE 2010 LEGISLATURE AGREED AND PASSED A LAW THAT REQUIRED ALL 58 COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO MAKE FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO THEIR STUDENTS. BUT THEN IN 2011, THE LEGISLATURE PASSED A BILL THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED ALL 58 COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO OPT OUT OF OFFERING FEDERAL LOANS TO THEIR STUDENTS. THE CENTER THEN WROTE GOVERNOR BEVERLY PERDUE AND ASKED HER TO VETO THAT BILL. WE POINTED OUT THAT FEDERAL LOANS ARE THE CHEAPEST AND SAFEST WAY FOR STUDENTS TO BORROW MONEY FOR COLLEGE. FEDERAL LOANS CHARGE 4.5 PERCENT INTEREST COMPARED TO THE 18 PERCENT INTEREST STUDENTS WERE PAYING ON THEIR CREDIT CARDS FOR TUITION. IN APRIL 2011, THE GOVERNOR VETOED THE BILL, CITING THE CENTER'S RESEARCH IN HER VETO MESSAGE. HOWEVER, THE LEGISLATURE THEN CAME BACK WITH A LEGALLY QUESTIONABLE TACTIC OF DIVIDING WHAT HAD BEEN A STATEWIDE BILL INTO FOUR LOCAL BILLS. A GOVERNOR CANNOT VETO MOST LOCAL BILLS. THOSE FOUR LOCAL BILLS ALLOWED A TOTAL OF 26 COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO OPT OUT OF OFFERING FEDERAL STUDENT LOANS. LUCKILY, NOT ALL CHOSE TO OPT OUT. AS A RESULT OF THE CENTER'S RESEARCH AND EFFORTS TO EDUCATE POLICYMAKERS AND THE PUBLIC, 40 COMMUNITY COLLEGES (DOUBLE THE NUMBER IN 2010) MADE FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO 117,500 MORE STUDENTS IN 2011. * HELPING PARENTS AND STUDENTS SAVE FOR COLLEGE - OUR RESEARCH ON FINANCIAL AID POLICY ALSO FOUND THAT FAMILIES WERE ABOUT TO LOSE A TAX DEDUCTION THAT HELPS THEM PAY FOR COLLEGE. FAMILIES WHO ARE SAVING FOR A CHILD'S COLLEGE EDUCATION IN A PARENTAL SAVINGS TRUST FUND OR 529 COLLEGE SAVINGS PLAN GET A DEDUCTION ON THEIR STATE INCOME TAXES, BUT THIS WAS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE IN JANUARY 2012. OUR RESEARCH PROMPTED A SUCCESSFUL BIPARTISAN EFFORT IN THE 2011 LEGISLATURE TO REPEAL THE EXPIRATION DATE AND MAKE THE 529 PLAN MORE ATTRACTIVE TO PARENTS. BECAUSE OF OUR KEY ROLE IN THE 2011 LEGISLATION, WE WERE INVITED TO THE CEREMONY WHEN THE GOVERNOR SIGNED THE BILL INTO LAW. IN 2006, MUTUAL FUND EVALUATOR MORNINGSTAR INC. RATED NORTH CAROLINA'S 529 PLAN AS ONE OF THE WORST IN THE COUNTRY, AND OUR STATE THEN RANKED ONLY 44TH IN CITIZENS' USE OF THE SAVINGS PLAN. BUT, WITH CHANGES ADVOCATED BY THE CENTER, MORNINGSTAR ALREADY HAS RAISED N.C.'S RATING TO "ABOVE AVERAGE." CNN'S MONEY MAGAZINE NOW RANKS THE STATE'S 529 PLAN AS ONE OF THE TOP 3 IN THE COUNTRY. THE NUMBER OF N.C. 529 ACCOUNTS INCREASED IN 2011 BY 16 PERCENT, AND THE FUND VALUE GREW BY 20 PERCENT. N.C.'S PLAN NOW HAS 94,516 ACCOUNT OWNERS WITH MORE THAN $766 MILLION INVESTED. * CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL AID AND LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAMS: SAVING STATE FUNDS, HELPING PARENTS AND STUDENTS - IN OUR RESEARCH ON FINANCIAL AID POLICY, WE FOUND 14 DIFFERENT STATE PROGRAMS THAT USE FINANCIAL AID TO ADDRESS WORK FORCE SHORTAGES IN SUCH FIELDS AS TEACHING AND NURSING. STUDENTS RECEIVING AID IN THESE PROGRAMS HAVE THEIR LOANS FORGIVEN IF THEY WORK IN THE NEEDED OCCUPATIONS IN N.C. BUT, PARENTS AND STUDENTS FOUND IT DIFFICULT AND CONFUSING TO APPLY FOR 14 DIFFERENT PROGRAMS, SO THE CENTER RECOMMENDED CONSOLIDATING THEM. IN ANOTHER BIPARTISAN EFFORT, THE 2011 LEGISLATURE PASSED LEGISLATION COMBINING 12 OF THE 14 INTO ONE PROGRAM. THIS WILL BE EASIER TO ADMINISTER AND MUCH SIMPLER FOR PARENTS AND STUDENTS THAT DREAM OF A COLLEGE DEGREE. IT ALSO WILL SAVE TAXPAYERS' MONEY. * REDUCING FRAUD AGAINST THE ELDERLY - IN 2010, THE CENTER RELEASED RESEARCH SHOWING THAT FRAUD COMMITTED AGAINST THE ELDERLY IS ON THE RISE IN N.C. WE MADE FOUR RECOMMENDATIONS TO PREVENT AND REDUCE FRAUD AND TESTIFIED BEFORE THE LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMISSION ON AGING IN JANUARY 2011. IN RESPONSE, SEN. STAN BINGHAM (R-DAVIDSON) SPONSORED SUCCESSFUL LEGISLATION TO CREATE A TASK FORCE ON FRAUD AGAINST OLDER ADULTS WITHIN THE CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE. THAT GROUP IS CHARGED TO STUDY ALL OUR RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAKE A FINAL REPORT WITH DRAFT LEGISLATION BY OCT. 1, 2012. CENTER STAFF WERE INVITED TO THE GOVERNOR'S SIGNING CEREMONY, AND THE CENTER'S DIRECTOR, RAN COBLE, AND INSIGHT EDITOR MEBANE RASH WERE BOTH APPOINTED TO THE TASK FORCE. * PREVENTING AND REDUCING HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS - IN RESPONSE TO OUR 2007 STUDY OF WAYS TO PREVENT AND REDUCE HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS, THE LEGISLATURE APPROPRIATED $13-15 MILLION EACH YEAR FOR FOUR YEARS FOR DROPOUT PREVENTION GRANTS. AND, AS WE RECOMMENDED, THE LEGISLATURE EVALUATED THE RESULTS OF THE PREVIOUS YEARS' GRANTS. AS A RESULT, THE STATEWIDE DROPOUT RATE NOW HAS DECLINED FOR 4 YEARS IN A ROW, AND THE GRADUATION RATE HAS INCREASED 5 YEARS IN A ROW. EDUCATING THE PUBLIC * WE CONTINUED WORKING TO ENHANCE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND EDUCATE VOTERS BY PUBLISHING ARTICLE II: A CITIZEN'S GUIDE TO THE 2011-2012 NORTH CAROLINA LEGISLATURE. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE GUIDE HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ONLINE AND VIA MOBILE INTERNET-CAPABLE HANDHELD DEVICES. THIS CITIZENS' GUIDE HAS PROFILES AND PHOTOS OF ALL 170 MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WITH THEIR BUSINESS AND HOME ADDRESSES, PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS, COUNTIES IN THEIR DISTRICTS, THE NUMBER OF TERMS SERVED, AND EDUCATIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUNDS. FOR MEMBERS SERVING IN THE PREVIOUS SESSION, THE GUIDE LISTS FIVE BILLS THEY INTRODUCED IN THAT SESSION AND THEIR VOTES ON 12 BILLS OF STATEWIDE INTEREST. IT ALSO INCLUDES PAST RANKINGS OF EACH RETURNING LEGISLATOR'S ATTENDANCE, ROLL CALL VOTING PARTICIPATION, AND EFFECTIVENESS. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CONTINUED) | FORM 990, PART III | CONDUCTING NONPARTISAN RESEARCH ON KEY PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES FACING NORTH CAROLINA * CENTER ASSESSES KEY COMPONENTS OF THE STATE'S MENTAL HEALTH REFORM STRATEGY - A DECADE AGO, THE N.C. GENERAL ASSEMBLY PASSED MENTAL HEALTH REFORM LEGISLATION IN RESPONSE TO A U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION. THAT DECISION REQUIRED ALL STATES TO SERVE PATIENTS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES IN THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE SETTING POSSIBLE -- IN COMMUNITIES RATHER THAN STATE INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS. IN 2011, THE CENTER RELEASED AN EVALUATION OF THE PROS AND CONS OF THREE KEY COMPONENTS OF THE STATE'S CURRENT MENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY: (1) THE FEDERAL MEDICAID INNOVATIONS WAIVER; (2) THE CREATION OF LARGE PROVIDERS OF SERVICES CALLED CABHAS (CRITICAL ACCESS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AGENCIES); AND (3) THREE-WAY CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE STATE, LOCAL MENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT ENTITIES, AND LOCAL HOSPITALS TO BUY BED SPACE FOR MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS IN CRISIS. (1) THE FEDERAL MEDICAID INNOVATIONS WAIVER - MEDICAID IS THE LARGEST FUNDER OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES BOTH NATIONALLY AND IN NORTH CAROLINA. NORTH CAROLINA OFFERS OPTIONAL MEDICAID SERVICES ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUCH AS OUTPATIENT PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC CARE FOR THOSE UNDER 21, AND PERSONAL CARE SERVICES THAT ENABLE PEOPLE TO LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY RATHER THAN IN MORE EXPENSIVE INSTITUTIONS. ON ONE HAND, IMPLEMENTING THE MEDICAID WAIVER STATEWIDE HAS THE ADVANTAGE OF GIVING THE STATE THE ABILITY TO PREDICT AND CONTROL COSTS. ON THE OTHER HAND, IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATEWIDE WAIVER THIS QUICKLY MAY LEAD TO CUTS IN SERVICES. (2) CABHAS: CRITICAL ACCESS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AGENCIES - CRITICAL ACCESS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AGENCIES, OR CABHAS, WILL BE THE NEW COMPREHENSIVE PROVIDERS OF SERVICES FOR CLINICAL ASSESSMENT, MEDICATION MANAGEMENT, AND OUTPATIENT THERAPY. THE ADVANTAGES OF THIS APPROACH INCLUDE MAKING SURE THAT APPROPRIATE MEDICAL AND CLINICAL TREATMENTS ARE AVAILABLE AND THAT INEFFECTIVE OR UNWARRANTED SERVICES ARE NOT PROVIDED. BUT, CRITICS WORRY ABOUT CONSUMER CHOICE IF DISSATISFACTION ARISES WITH THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CABHA IN THEIR COUNTY, ESPECIALLY IN RURAL AREAS. AND, MANY SMALL PROVIDERS ALREADY HAVE BEEN FORCED OUT OF BUSINESS. (3) THREE-WAY CONTRACTS FOR CRISIS BEDS IN LOCAL HOSPITALS - THESE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS LET THE STATE PURCHASE BED SPACE IN LOCAL HOSPITALS TO PROVIDE SHORT-TERM INPATIENT CARE FOR MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS IN CRISIS. THIS GIVES CONSUMERS WHO NEED INPATIENT TREATMENT AN ALTERNATIVE TO STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS. HOWEVER, LOCAL HOSPITAL WORKERS WILL NEED MORE SPECIALIZED TRAINING TO DEAL WITH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES. ALSO, STATE PAYMENTS TO LOCAL HOSPITALS HAVE NOT ALWAYS BEEN TIMELY. THE CENTER WILL PUBLISH A MAJOR EVALUATION OF THESE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS IN 2012. HOW THE STATE BUDGET SHORTFALL AFFECTS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY - THE SUCCESS OF THESE THREE POLICY SHIFTS DEPENDS ON STABLE SOURCES OF FUNDING, BUT MENTAL HEALTH FUNDING HAS BEEN ON A ROLLER COASTER RIDE DURING THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN. THE STATE INCREASED FUNDING FOR THE DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH FROM $581 MILLION IN 2001-02 TO $743 MILLION IN 2008-09, BUT THEN REDUCED IT TO $705 MILLION IN 2010-11 AND $666 MILLION IN 2011-12. FUNDS ARE SHIFTING FROM STATE INSTITUTIONS TO LOCAL COMMUNITY PROGRAMS - THE CENTER FOUND THAT 96 PERCENT OF THOSE SERVED BY THE PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM ARE SERVED IN THE COMMUNITY, AND ONLY 4 PERCENT ARE SERVED IN STATE INSTITUTIONS. AND, 77 PERCENT OF TOTAL FUNDING FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES GOES TO COMMUNITY SERVICES AND 21 PERCENT TO STATE INSTITUTIONS. BY CONTRAST, A PREVIOUS CENTER STUDY IN 1996-97 FOUND THAT 43 PERCENT OF ALL MENTAL HEALTH FUNDING WENT TO STATE INSTITUTIONS, THOUGH THEY SERVED ONLY 7 PERCENT OF THE CLIENTS. IN 1982-83, TWO-THIRDS OF THE FUNDING WENT TO INSTITUTIONS, WHICH THEN SERVED ONLY 15 PERCENT OF THE CLIENTS. CENTER WINS NATIONAL AWARD * IN 2011, THE CENTER WON ANOTHER PRESTIGIOUS NATIONAL AWARD FROM THE GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (GRA), A NONPARTISAN GROUP OF 33 PUBLIC POLICY NONPROFITS IN 22 STATES. GRA ORGANIZATIONS PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY IN STATE AND LOCAL BUDGETS AND PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CITIZENS ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS. THE CENTER'S STUDY OF FINANCIAL AID POLICY WON THE TOP NATIONAL AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING POLICY ACHIEVEMENT, WHICH GOES TO THE POLICY GROUP WHOSE RESEARCH LEADS TO "TANGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC POLICY." THIS RECOGNIZED THE CENTER'S WORK IN GETTING THE LEGISLATURE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' ABILITY TO ATTEND AND PAY FOR COLLEGE. THIS IS THE SEVENTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR THE CENTER HAS WON NATIONAL GRA AWARDS. LOOKING AHEAD TO 2012 * FINANCIAL AID POLICY FOR STUDENTS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES - THE CENTER'S PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON STUDENT FINANCIAL AID POLICY ALREADY HAS LED TO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE POLICY AND INCREASED ACCESS TO FEDERAL LOANS FOR STUDENTS AT NORTH CAROLINA'S COMMUNITY COLLEGES. IN 2012, WE'LL CONTINUE OUR RESEARCH ON TUITION AND FINANCIAL AID POLICY, FOCUSING ON ISSUES THAT WILL INCREASE ACCESS TO FINANCIAL AID, IMPROVE OUR STATE'S COLLEGE-GOING RATES, AND EVENTUALLY IMPROVE OUR COLLEGE COMPLETION RATES. * EVALUATING THE STATE'S MENTAL HEALTH REFORM EFFORTS - WE'LL CONTINUE TO EVALUATE THE STATE'S MENTAL HEALTH REFORM EFFORTS. PART II OF OUR STUDY WILL FEATURE NEW RESEARCH ON: (1) EVALUATION OF THE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE STATE, LOCAL MENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT ENTITIES, AND LOCAL HOSPITALS TO PURCHASE BEDS AT LOCAL HOSPITALS FOR MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS IN CRISIS; AND (2) THE DEMOGRAPHICS AND STRUCTURE OF THE PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN NORTH CAROLINA. PART III WILL ANALYZE KEY WORK FORCE ISSUES AND EXAMINE HOW MENTAL HEALTH REFORM HAS WORKED OR NOT WORKED IN OTHER STATES. WE ALREADY HAVE VISITED SIX STATES - THREE THAT HAVE BETTER MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS (MASSACHUSETTS, MINNESOTA, AND KANSAS), AND THREE THAT HAVE WORSE SYSTEMS (GEORGIA, MICHIGAN, AND NEVADA). * ISSUES AFFECTING THE AGING - IN 2011, THE BABY BOOM GENERATION BEGAN TURNING 65, WHICH WILL LEAD TO THE AGING POPULATION IN NORTH CAROLINA ALMOST DOUBLING BY 2030. IN CONTINUING OUR RESEARCH, WE'LL LOOK AT SHORTAGES IN NURSING AND OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONS AND HOW OUR STATE CAN INCREASE ITS CAPACITY TO TRAIN AN ADEQUATE NUMBER OF HEALTH CARE WORKERS. WE WANT TO EXAMINE POLICY OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING LONG-TERM CARE AND IN-HOME CARE. AND, WE'LL EXAMINE THE IMPACT OF THE GROWING AGING POPULATION ON THE STATE BUDGET. * LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBYIST RANKINGS - WE'LL CONTINUE OUR EFFORTS TO ENHANCE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND EDUCATE VOTERS BY PUBLISHING THE 18TH EDITION OF RANKINGS OF EFFECTIVENESS, ATTENDANCE, AND ROLL CALL VOTING PARTICIPATION FOR MEMBERS OF THE N.C. GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE 16TH EDITION OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. * STATE WATER POLICY - NORTH CAROLINA HAS THE FOURTH MOST SURFACE WATER OF ANY STATE. BUT, SINCE 2008, ALL 100 COUNTIES IN N.C. HAVE BEEN IN A DROUGHT AT SOME TIME. AND, SOUTH CAROLINA SUED NORTH CAROLINA IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT ON THE ISSUE OF INTER-BASIN WATER TRANSFERS. THE CENTER'S STUDY OF STATE WATER POLICY WILL ASSESS THE CAPACITY OF ALL RESERVOIRS, WHICH PROVIDE A THIRD OF THE STATE'S DRINKING WATER. WE ALSO WILL LOOK AT WHAT STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING TO DEAL WITH WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND AND HOW TO MOVE FROM CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN TIMES OF DROUGHT TO A LONG-TERM STATE WATER POLICY. |
| FORM 990 REVIEW PROCESS | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 11B | THE ACCOUNTING FIRM SUBMITS A DRAFT TAX RETURN TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT TREASURER, WHO REVIEW THE DRAFT AND PREPARE COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOR THE FIRM. AFTER THESE COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED AND RESOLVED, THE RETURN IS FINALIZED BY THE ACCOUNTING FIRM, A COPY IS SENT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR REVIEW, COMMENTS, AND QUESTIONS, AND THEN THE FINAL 990 IS SUBMITTED TO THE IRS. |
| PROCESS FOR MONITORING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 12C | POLICY AND PRACTICES 1. EACH MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS ASKED TO SIGN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS/HER TERM. BOARD MEMBERS ARE REMINDED AT QUARTERLY BOARD MEETINGS OF THE NEED TO DISCLOSE ANY CONFLICTS. FULL DISCLOSURE IN WRITING SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONFLICTED PARTIES TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A. A BOARD MEMBER IS RELATED TO ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER OR STAFF MEMBER BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE, OR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP. B. A STAFF MEMBER IN A SUPERVISORY CAPACITY IS RELATED TO ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER WHOM SHE/HE SUPERVISES. C. A BOARD MEMBER OR A STAFF MEMBER, OR THEIR ORGANIZATION, STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM A TRANSACTION WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH. D. A BOARD MEMBER OR STAFF MEMBER IS A MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH. 2. FOLLOWING FULL DISCLOSURE OF A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS, AND IF SO, THE BOARD SHALL VOTE TO AUTHORIZE OR REJECT THE TRANSACTION OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION DEEMED NECESSARY TO ADDRESS THE CONFLICT AND PROTECT THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH'S BEST INTERESTS. THE VOTE SHALL BE BY A MAJORITY VOTE WITHOUT COUNTING THE VOTE OF ANY INTERESTED DIRECTOR, EVEN IF THE DISINTERESTED DIRECTORS ARE LESS THAN A QUORUM, PROVIDED THAT AT LEAST ONE CONSENTING DIRECTOR IS DISINTERESTED. ANY ACTION TAKEN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING. 3. A BOARD MEMBER WHO IS FORMALLY CONSIDERING EMPLOYMENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH MUST TAKE A TEMPORARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE FROM THE BOARD UNTIL THE POSITION IS FILLED. SUCH A LEAVE WILL BE TAKEN WITHIN THE BOARD MEMBER'S ELECTED TERM WHICH WILL NOT BE EXTENDED BECAUSE OF THE LEAVE. THE BOARD MEMBER MUST SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE BOARD INDICATING THE TIME PERIOD OF THE LEAVE. THE SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH WILL INFORM THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF SUCH A REQUEST. THE CHAIR WILL BRING THE REQUEST TO THE BOARD FOR ACTION. THE REQUEST AND ANY ACTION TAKEN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING. 4. AN INTERESTED BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, OR STAFF MEMBER SHALL NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY DISCUSSION OR DEBATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OR OF ANY COMMITTEE OR SUBCOMMITTEE THEREOF IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION IS A CONTRACT, TRANSACTION, OR SITUATION IN WHICH THERE MAY BE A PERCEIVED OR ACTUAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST. HOWEVER, THEY MAY BE PRESENT TO PROVIDE CLARIFYING INFORMATION IN SUCH A DISCUSSION OR DEBATE UNLESS OBJECTED TO BY ANY PRESENT BOARD OR COMMITTEE MEMBER. 5. ANYONE IN A POSITION TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT SPENDING RESOURCES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH (I.E., TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS PURCHASES OR CONTRACTS) - WHO ALSO STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM THAT DECISION - HAS A DUTY TO DISCLOSE THAT CONFLICT AS SOON AS IT ARISES OR BECOMES APPARENT. S/HE SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY FINAL DECISIONS. 6. A COPY OF THIS POLICY SHALL BE GIVEN TO ALL BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF MEMBERS UPON COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH PERSON'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH OR AT THE OFFICIAL ADOPTION OF STATED POLICY. EACH BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, AND STAFF MEMBER SHALL SIGN AND DATE THE POLICY AT THE BEGINNING OF HER/HIS TERM OF SERVICE OR EMPLOYMENT. FAILURE TO SIGN DOES NOT NULLIFY THE POLICY. |
| PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 15B | PROCESS FOR EVALUATING AND DETERMINING THE COMPENSATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT SECRETARY/ASSISTANT TREASURER THE 10-MEMBER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVIEWS THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND DETERMINES COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS AT THAT TIME. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SENDS A SELF-EVALUATION TO THE COMMITTEE THAT INCLUDES THE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE POSITION'S RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OR FAILURES DURING THE YEAR. THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD INVITES COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO SEND COMMENTS RELATED TO THE DIRECTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND RELATED CENTER OBJECTIVES. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETS WITH THE DIRECTOR TO DISCUSS HIS PERFORMANCE AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK PERTAINING TO ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. COMPARABILITY DATA IS PROVIDED FROM 990 FORMS ON DIRECTORS OF OTHER STATE-LEVEL POLICY CENTERS IN N.C. AND IN OTHER STATES. THE COMMITTEE THEN MEETS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION WITHOUT THE DIRECTOR OR OTHER STAFF TO DECIDE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD MEETS WITH THE DIRECTOR AFTER THE COMMITTEE MEETING TO COMMUNICATE THE COMMITTEE'S FEEDBACK AND ANY COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTS. THE CHAIR THEN SENDS A LETTER TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SUMMARIZE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS DETERMINED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, WHICH THEN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS PART OF THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. THE STAFF DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION ALSO SERVES AS ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND ASSISTANT TREASURER OF THE BOARD. REVIEWS OF HER PERFORMANCE AND OF COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS ARE CONDUCTED ANNUALLY BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. A SALARY SURVEY OF DATA FOR NONPROFITS IN NC PUBLISHED BY THE N.C. CENTER FOR NONPROFITS IS ALSO USED IN DETERMINING COMPENSATION. THE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS ARE INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL BUDGET SUBMITTED TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR AND ARE SUBJECT TO THEIR FINAL APPROVAL. |
| MAKING INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, AT THE CENTER'S OFFICE, AND ON GUIDESTAR'S WEBSITE. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |