Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization |
(ii) EIN |
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) |
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? |
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? |
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? |
(vii) Amount of support? |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 1,973,913 | 2,295,660 | 2,100,376 | 2,648,429 | 1,939,270 | 10,957,648 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3.. | 1,973,913 | 2,295,660 | 2,100,376 | 2,648,429 | 1,939,270 | 10,957,648 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 2,130,678 | |||||
| 6 | Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 8,826,970 | |||||
| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 1,973,913 | 2,295,660 | 2,100,376 | 2,648,429 | 1,939,270 | 10,957,648 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 1,134 | 7,848 | 17,159 | 5,035 | 10,525 | 41,701 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets.. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | 10,999,349 | |||||






| Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2007 | (b) 2008 | (c) 2009 | (d) 2010 | (e) 2011 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) | ||||||
| 13 | Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.). | ||||||




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT (GAP) IS A 35-YEAR-OLD NON-PROFIT PUBLIC INTEREST GROUP THAT PROMOTES GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY BY ADVANCING OCCUPATIONAL FREE SPEECH, DEFENDING WHISTLEBLOWERS, AND EMPOWERING CITIZEN ACTIVISTS. WE PURSUE THIS MISSION THROUGH OUR PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY, INTERNATIONAL REFORM, NATIONAL SECURITY, ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT, CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES GAP IS THE NATION'S LEADING WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ORGANIZATION. |
| FIRST ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | OPERATES MANY SMALLER CHAINS INCLUDING ALBERTSONS, JEWEL-OSCO, AND SHOP 'N SAVE, AS WELL AS FOOD LION, GIANT FOOD, STOP & SHOP, HY-VEE AND KROGER (THE NATION'S LARGEST TRADITIONAL GROCER). OUTRAGEOUSLY, THE SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM WAS THE MOST AVID CARRIER UNTIL THIS YEAR WHEN SCHOOL DISTRICTS ASSERTED THAT THEY TOO WILL PHASE OUT THE PINK SLIME AFTER USDA MOVED TO GIVE SCHOOLS A CHOICE TO OPT OUT OF SERVING THE PRODUCT TO STUDENTS. O IN 2011 GAP ADVANCED OUR INVESTIGATIVE EFFORTS BY CONDUCTING ON-SIGHT AND IN-PERSON INTERVIEWS WITH USDA MEAT INSPECTORS FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY. THE TEAM, COMPRISED OF BOTH LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE STAFF, VISITED NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER HOTSPOTS WHERE RECENT RECALLS AND ABUSES WERE KNOWN TO OCCUR. DUE TO OUR INVESTIGATIVE EFFORTS WE MADE GREAT ADVANCEMENTS REVERSING THE INTIMIDATION THAT WHISTLEBLOWERS SUFFERED AT THE JBS SLAUGHTERHOUSE IN HYRUM, UTAH -- THE WORLDS LARGEST BEEF PROCESSOR AND DISTRIBUTOR OF BEEF ANIMAL PROTEIN. WE SUCCESSFULLY PREVAILED ON BEHALF OF CLIENTS. SINCE OUR INVOLVEMENT, MANY TRANSFERS WERE RESCINDED AND SEVERAL CRITICAL INSPECTORS JOBS WERE SAVED. THERE HAVE BEEN NO MORE EMPLOYEE THREATS OR REPRISALS, AS WELL AS NO ADDITIONAL FOOD SAFETY OR HUMANE HANDLING REPORTS. WE ALSO WORKED WITH A PUBLIC HEALTH VETERINARIAN AT USDA TO REVIEW PROBLEMS AT USDA. O GAP MET WITH THE SOUTHERN COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL JOINT COUNCIL OF MEAT INSPECTORS AND LAUNCHED INVESTIGATIONS THAT ARE CONTINUING. THE MAJORITY OF THE MEETING DISCUSSED THE USDAS PROPOSED HIMP (HACCP INSPECTION MODELS PROJECT) PLAN, WHICH EFFECTIVELY PRIVATIZES POULTRY INSPECTION. CHARACTERIZED BY HIGH LINE SPEEDS (UP TO 240 PER MINUTE), HIMP HAS A MUCH HIGHER TOLERANCE FOR ADULTERATION AND PRODUCT WHOLESOMENESS. UNLIKE TRADITIONAL INSPECTIONS, HIMP INSPECTORS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK INSIDE THE BIRD CARCASS AND THEREFORE CANNOT IDENTIFY FECAL INSIDE THE BIRD. ONE INSPECTOR ESTIMATED THAT THERE IS PROBABLY TWICE AS MUCH FECAL INSIDE THE BIRD THAN OUTSIDE. INSPECTORS SPOKE WITH US AND AGREED TO BE RECORDED AND GIVE FOLLOW-UP STATEMENTS. SOME DISCLOSURES INCLUDED: PLANT EMPLOYEES NOT BEING PROPERLY TRAINED AND FAILING TO DO THEIR JOB PROPERLY; INSPECTORS COMPLAINING TO AGENCY SUPERVISORS ABOUT PLANT EMPLOYEES FAILING TO INSPECT BIRDS; SUPERVISORS REMINDING INSPECTORS THAT THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT THE PLANT ACTUALLY INSPECT THE BIRDS, ONLY THAT THEY MEET THE STANDARDS AT THE END OF THE DAY; AND HIMP INSPECTORS LETTING BIRDS GO INTO MARKET THAT THEY WOULD HAVE REJECTED IN TRADITIONAL PLANTS BIRDS WITH BRUISES, COVERED IN SCABS, BROKEN AND FRACTURED BONES. O AS AN IMPORTANT PART OF OUR INVESTIGATIVE TEAM EFFORTS, IN 2011 WE WERE ALSO FEATURED AT A MEETING OF THE NATIONAL JOINT COUNCIL WHICH TOOK PLACE IN ARKANSAS AND COVERED TEXAS, ARKANSAS, NEW MEXICO, COLORADO, AND OKLAHOMA. DURING SEVERAL SESSIONS AND AT VARIOUS RELATED EVENTS, OUR LEGAL COUNSEL AND TOP CONTRACT INVESTIGATOR PRESENTED INFORMATION TO FEDERAL MEAT INSPECTORS ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS TO REPORT PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGE USDA MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE PLANT MANAGERS ABOUT UNSAFE CONDITIONS, FOOD SAFETY PROBLEMS AND HUMANE HANDLING VIOLATIONS. DURING BOTH GROUP AND ONE-ON-ONE SESSIONS, OUR TEAM MET WITH MANY INSPECTORS ABOUT THEIR IMMEDIATE CONCERNS. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE THAT A NON- MEAT INSPECTOR HAD BEEN INVITED TO SUCH AN EVENT. O IN 2011, GAP ALSO AUTHORED FOOD INTEGRITY OP-EDS WHICH APPEARED IN VARIOUS MEDIA OUTLETS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, INCLUDING COMMON DREAMS, YUBA, AMERICAN PROGRESSIVE NEWS, AND EAST TEXAS REVIEW. FOR EXAMPLE, ONE OP-ED WAS PARTICULARLY CRITICAL OF THE FEDERAL PROCESS OF INSPECTING IMPORTED FOOD AND ARGUED THAT THE MINISCULE INSPECTION RATE (2 %) OF ALL IMPORTED FOOD PUTS AMERICAN CITIZENS AT HIGH RISK OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS. ANOTHER OP- ED EXAMINED THE IMPORTANT ROLE THAT TRUCK DRIVERS PLAY IN KEEPING AMERICAS FOOD SAFE FROM FARM TO TABLE. THE OP-ED SPECIFICALLY ARGUED THAT MORE CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE GIVEN TO THE POTENTIAL FOOD SAFETY AND FOOD DEFENSE ISSUES INVOLVED IN TRANSPORTATION. |
| SECOND ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B | ORDER TO PREVENT THE POSSIBLE RELEASE OF INFORMATION THE GOVERNMENT BELIEVED WAS SENSITIVE. O GAP CONTINUED OUR EFFORTS IN THE CRITICAL CASE OF GAP CLIENT THOMAS DRAKE -- THE NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WHO EXPOSED THAT, POST-9/11, A NEW AGENCY PROGRAM DESIGNED TO MONITOR/ANALYZE COMPUTER DATA, CELL PHONE RECORDS, AND EMAIL WAS: A) MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE THAN AN IN-HOUSE DEVELOPED SYSTEM; B) MUCH LESS EFFECTIVE THAN THE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM; AND C) DID NOT HAVE PRIVACY PROTECTIONS IN PLACE THAT THE OTHER AVAILABLE SYSTEM DID. DRAKE MADE VALID DISCLOSURES REVEALING THE FAILINGS OF SEVERAL MAJOR NSA PROGRAMS THAT USE COMPUTERS TO COLLECT AND SORT ELECTRONIC INTELLIGENCE, COSTING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. GAPS EFFORTS CATAPULTED MR. DRAKES CASE INTO THE NATIONAL SPOTLIGHT, AND AS A RESULT, 60 MINUTES AND A NEW YORKER COVER STORY BY ACCLAIMED INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST JANE MAYER, WHICH GAP COORDINATED, PITCHED, AND ARRANGED, FEATURED MR. DRAKES STORY. IN JUNE 2011, WITH GAPS HELP, MR. DRAKE EARNED A HUGE VICTORY FOR NATIONAL SECURITY WHISTLEBLOWERS WHEN HE ACCEPTED A PLEA BARGAIN ARRANGEMENT ON THE CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST HIM BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. WHILE DRAKE WAS FACING 10 FELONY COUNTS AND 35 YEARS IN JAIL, THE GOVERNMENT DROPPED ALL THE ORIGINAL CHARGES, AND MR. DRAKE PLED TO A MINOR MISDEMEANOR (EXCEEDING AUTHORIZED USE OF A GOVERNMENT COMPUTER), AND RECEIVED A SENTENCE OF PROBATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICE. AT HIS SENTENCING HEARING, THE JUDGE FLATLY REJECTED THE GOVERNMENTS REQUESTS FOR HEAVY FINES AND LAMBASTED THE GOVERNMENT FOR ITS HANDLING OF THE CASE, STATING THAT THE 2 YEAR DELAY BETWEEN WHEN THE GOVERNMENT RAIDED DRAKES HOME AND WHEN THEY HANDED DOWN HIS INDICTMENT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE AND DID NOT PASS THE SMELL TEST. READING A STATEMENT AFTER THE SENTENCING, DRAKE SPECIFICALLY THANKED GAP, AND CONTINUED TO DO SO IN NUMEROUS PUBLIC APPEARANCES. |
| THIRD ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C | INVESTIGATORS THEN READ E-MAILS FROM JANUARY 2007, WHILE THE LEAK THEY WERE SUPPOSEDLY INVESTIGATING OCCURRED IN OCTOBER 2008, AND THEY READ PRIVILEGED E-MAILS BETWEEN THE WHISTLEBLOWER AND HIS ATTORNEY WRITTEN IN 2002. THE INTRUSIVENESS OF THE INVESTIGATION VIOLATES FEDERAL AND STATE LAW, AND THE PROCEDURES REFLECT AN UNREFORMED INVESTIGATIONS UNIT AT THE BANK. GAP REPRESENTED THIS WHISTLEBLOWER IN THE BANKS JUSTICE SYSTEM AND CHALLENGED THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS. THE BANKS INTERNAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL RULED IN 2011 THAT OUR CLIENT SHOULD BE REINSTATED. THE TRIBUNALS DECISION ESTABLISHED THE RIGHTS OF STAFF MEMBERS TO REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF ELECTRONIC PRIVACY ON THEIR WORKPLACE COMPUTERS AND REINFORCED THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONATE DISCIPLINARY ACTION. THE DECISION IN THE CASE CURTAILS THE ABILITY OF MANAGEMENT TO SINGLE OUT A STAFF MEMBER FOR DRACONIAN PUNISHMENT BECAUSE HE IS SUSPECTED OF WHISTLEBLOWING. UNTIL THIS RULING WAS MADE, BANK MANAGEMENT ENJOYED ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY TO DISCIPLINE STAFF MEMBERS CAPRICIOUSLY, WITH LITTLE REGARD FOR PAST PERFORMANCE OR THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE TRANSGRESSION SANCTIONED. O IN 2011, GAP INVESTIGATED CORRUPTION CONNECTED TO PRIVATIZATION IN EGYPT. IN THE WAKE OF THE UPRISING THAT DEPOSED THE HOSNI MUBARAK REGIME, AN EGYPTIAN WHISTLEBLOWER WITH INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRIVATIZATION OF THE HISTORIC RETAIL CHAIN OMAR EFFENDI (OE) APPROACHED GAP. IN 2011, AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ANNULLED THE DEAL PRIVATIZING THIS CHAIN BECAUSE OF ILLEGALITIES IN THE SALE FIVE YEARS BEFORE. THE RULING PARTICULARLY SINGLED OUT THE MINISTER OF INVESTMENT, MAHMOUD MOHIELDIN, AS A RESPONSIBLE PARTY. AT THE TIME OF THE PRIVATIZATION, THE WHISTLEBLOWER ACCUSED MOHIELDIN OF FORCING THE SALE TO A FOREIGN INVESTOR AT A FRACTION OF THE CHAINS REAL VALUE. WE HAVE TRACKED A DELUGE OF SIMILAR ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION SURROUNDING MOHIELDIN AND OTHER FORMER TOP-LEVEL OFFICIALS FROM THE DEPOSED MUBARAK REGIME. WE PRODUCED A SERIES OF INVESTIGATIVE BLOGS FOCUSED ON THE ROLE OF MOHIELDIN IN AT LEAST TWO OTHER SUSPICIOUS (AND POTENTIALLY CRIMINAL) PRIVATIZATIONS. ALL OF THE IDENTIFIED TRANSACTIONS SHOWED THE SAME PATTERN AS THE ANNULLED OE AFFAIR. IN ADDITION, WE TRACKED AND CHARTED FORMER COLLEAGUES OF MOHIELDINS, MANY OF WHOM WORKED WITH HIM ON THESE TRANSACTIONS. MOST OF THEM HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATED, AND MANY HAVE BEEN ARRESTED, TRIED AND INCARCERATED. MOHIELDIN, HOWEVER, WAS NEVER INVESTIGATED DESPITE CREDIBLE AND DOCUMENTED ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION. IN CONTRAST TO HIS COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR PARTS IN THE CORRUPTION OF THE MUBARAK GOVERNMENT, MOHIELDIN REMAINS UNQUESTIONED IN HIS POST AS MANAGING DIRECTOR AT THE WORLD BANK. THROUGHOUT 2011, GAP PRESSED THE WORLD BANK TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THESE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS, STILL WITHOUT SUCCESS. O IN 2011, GAP REPRESENTED A FORMER SENIOR ADVISOR TO AN INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHO WAS TERMINATED AFTER HE RAISED CONCERNS ABOUT A COBALT-NICKEL MINING PROJECT IN CAMEROON. CAMEROONS MINING SECTOR IS MARRED BY A RECORD OF MISMANAGEMENT AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN AWARDING CONCESSIONS. AS A RESULT, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTRYS ABUNDANT NATURAL RESOURCES OFTEN BENEFITS ONLY A LIMITED GROUP OF WELL-CONNECTED PEOPLE, RATHER THAN IMPROVING THE LIVING CONDITIONS OF MOST CITIZENS. O IN 2011, GAP HAS BROUGHT THREE WHISTLEBLOWER CASES BEFORE THE INTER- AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (IDB) ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. TWO OF THESE CASES BOTH OF WHICH DEMONSTRATED SYSTEMIC RETALIATION AT THE BANK HAVE RESULTED IN FAVORABLE OUTCOMES TO THE WHISTLEBLOWER AND THE THIRD IS PENDING. O IN 2011, GAP RECEIVED A SUCCESSION OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT UNETHICAL PRACTICES AT THE IDBS OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY (OII), THE UNIT RESPONSIBLE FOR INVESTIGATING ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION, WASTE AND FRAUD. GAP PUBLICIZED NUMEROUS CONCERNS ABOUT THE OII CHIEF, INCLUDING HER LACK OF EXPERIENCE IN FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS AND A COMPLAINT SENT TO FOUR SENIOR MANAGERS IN THE BANK THAT ALLEGED THAT THE CHIEF HAD ALTERED THE SEARCH CRITERIA FOR THE POSITION OF PRINCIPAL INTEGRITY OFFICER IN ORDER TO SELECT A PERSONAL FRIEND. GAP ALSO PUBLICIZED ALLEGATIONS REGARDING HOW THE OII CHIEF WAS REFERRING FEW, IF ANY, CASES TO THE SANCTIONS CASE OFFICER. AFTER GAP PUBLISHED A SERIES OF BLOG ENTRIES ABOUT THESE CONCERNS, AND HIGHLIGHTED THE MISCONDUCT OF THE OII CHIEF, THE OII CHIEF DEPARTED THE BANK. HER CONTRACT WAS NOT RENEWED. MEANWHILE, GAP CONDUCTED SEVERAL INVESTIGATIONS OF ISSUES THAT THE OII FAILED TO EFFECTIVELY REVIEW. |
| ALL OTHER ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4D | ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT O GAP PRODUCED A 28-PAGE, HEAVILY DOCUMENTED ARTICLE: SECRECY, COMPLICITY, AND RESISTANCE: POLITICAL CONTROL OF CLIMATE SCIENCE COMMUNICATION UNDER THE BUSH-CHENEY ADMINISTRATION, WHICH WAS PUBLISHED IN A SPECIAL ISSUE ON GOVERNMENT SECRECY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PROBLEMS AND PUBLIC POLICY. WE ALSO PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE IN THE AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION NEWSPAPER EOS (TOWARD A SECOND U.S. NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT), AND, SUBMITTED POSITION PAPERS AND BRIEFING MEMORANDA DIRECTLY TO OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE CHAIRS. O IN 2011, GAP CONTINUED TO WORK WITH ALLIES TO ADVANCE A NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE PREPAREDNESS INITIATIVE (NCCPI) FRAMEWORK FOR FEDERAL ACTION TO CONNECT EXPERTS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY WITH STATES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES TO SUPPORT MORE INFORMED AND EFFECTIVE DECISIONS AND ACTIONS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE. AT THE INVITATION OF THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, WE PARTICIPATED IN A NATIONAL CLIMATE ADAPTATION SUMMIT CONFERENCE HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC. THIS CONFERENCE BROUGHT TOGETHER STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS AND ADAPTATION POLICY EXPERTS AND STAKEHOLDERS TO DISCUSS KEY ISSUES AND COMMUNICATE WITH ADMINISTRATION REPRESENTATIVES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGY. WE USED THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GET REACTIONS TO OUR PREPAREDNESS PROPOSAL, DEVELOPED DURING THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS PARTICULARLY OUR PROPOSAL FOR THE CREATION OF A NEW FEDERAL CLIMATE PREPAREDNESS CENTER AS A COORDINATING ENTITY FOR AN INTEGRATED FEDERAL ADAPTATION STRATEGY AND AS A ONE-STOP POINT OF ENTRY FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO OBTAIN FEDERAL TECHNICAL AND FUNDING SUPPORT. WE FOUND DURING PUBLIC DISCUSSION THAT OUR PROPOSAL WAS SUPPORTED BY STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS, E.G., THOSE WHO DIRECT CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGY FOR NEW YORK CITY AND SAN FRANCISCO. O IN 2011, GAP'S KNOW YOUR RIGHTS CAMPAIGN (KYRC) RECEIVED A TREMENDOUS OUTPOURING OF SUPPORT FOR OUR EFFORTS IN THE GULF COAST REGION IN THE WAKE OF THE BP OIL SPILL DISASTER. THE KYRC BROADLY DISSEMINATED YOUTUBE VIDEOS, AND COLORFUL WALL POSTERS AND BROCHURES TO PUBLICIZE THE RIGHT OF INDIVIDUALS TO SPEAK OUT ABOUT HEALTH AND SAFETY AND RELATED CONCERNS. WE PARTNERED WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LAW SCHOOL CLINICS, ENVIRONMENTAL AND COASTAL RESTORATION ACTIVISTS, AND UNIONS TO QUICKLY SPREAD THE WORD AND BUILD MOMENTUM. WE ALSO ATTENDED MULTIPLE CONFERENCES IN THE REGION DURING WHICH WE SPOKE ABOUT THE CRITICAL NEED TO EDUCATE AND PROTECT COURAGEOUS INDIVIDUALS WHO TAKE RISKS FOR THE COMMON GOOD, AND HOLD THE ENVIRONMENTAL DESPOILERS LEGALLY ACCOUNTABLE. SIGNIFICANTLY, IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING EXTENSIVE PUBLIC EDUCATION WHEN REQUESTED IN THE GULF COAST, THROUGH OUR INVESTIGATION WE CONTINUED TO CAST MUCH NEEDED LIGHT ON THE EVERYDAY PLIGHT OF THOSE SO PERILOUSLY AFFECTED BY THIS SENSELESS TRAGEDY. O IN 2011, GAP CLOSELY COORDINATED THE EFFORTS OF OUR KNOW YOUR RIGHTS CAMPAIGN AND CLIMATE SCIENCE WATCH PROJECT IN AN INVESTIGATION INVOLVING BP WORKPLACE SAFETY ABUSES, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL CLEANUP. THIS INVESTIGATION WAS PROMPTED BY A LITANY OF WORKER AND RESIDENT REPORTS THAT THEIR EXPOSURE TO CHEMICALS FROM THE CRUDE OIL AND DISPERSANTS HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED BY ACUTE HEALTH PROBLEMS, THAT ARE NOW SWEEPING ACROSS THE GULF COAST. NOTABLY, THE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS) THAT COMPRISE THESE CHEMICALS ARE BEING FOUND IN MARINE LIFE, GULF COAST SEAFOOD, AND IN BLOOD TEST RESULTS FOR RESIDENTS IN DIRE HEALTH. IN AUGUST 2011 WE CONDUCTED AN INVESTIGATION IN THE KEY GULF STATES AFFECTED. WE TOOK AFFIDAVITS FROM OIL SPILL CLEAN-UP PERSONNEL (FORMER AND CURRENT, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE-SECTOR), AND RESIDENTS WITH HEALTH CONCERNS BELIEVED TO BE RELATED TO CHEMICAL EXPOSURE, TO DOCUMENT: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY VIOLATIONS; PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY THREATS; SUBSEQUENT HEALTH AFFECTS; AND RETALIATION EXPERIENCED FOR REPORTING WORKPLACE OR CITIZEN CONCERNS. WE ALSO TOOK STATEMENTS FROM TOXICOLOGISTS, CHEMISTS, PHYSICIANS AND SCIENTISTS TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE EMPIRICAL REASONING BEHIND CHEMICAL EXPOSURE AND SUBSEQUENT HEALTH PROBLEMS. |
| ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS USED TO REVIEW FORM 990 | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | THE DRAFT 990 WAS REVIEWED BY THE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND THE DIRECTOR OF ADMIN AND FINANCE AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE BOARD AND CHANGES ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DRAFT. |
| ENFORCEMENT OF CONFLICTS POLICY | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | ANNUALLY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS REQUESTED TO UPDATE AND SIGN OUR CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE, AND REPORT POSSIBLE CONFLICTS TO THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD WHENEVER THEY ARE DETECTED OR OBSERVED. |
| COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR TOP OFFICIAL | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | THE BOARD CHAIR AND DIRECTOR SUPERVISED AN INDEPENDENT WRITTEN AND ORAL PERFORMANCE EVAULATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AND TOGTHER THEY APPROVE THE SALARY INCREASE. |
| COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR OFFICERS | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS ARE PERFORMED BY THEIR SUPERVISORS AND THEN REVIEWED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. |
| STATES WHERE COPY OF RETURN IS FILED | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 17 | MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, MISSISSIPPI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE, UTAH, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN |
| GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPIES OF THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE IRS FORM 990 AND FORM 1023 ARE KEPT IN THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. UPON REQUEST COPIES ARE MADE AND SENT OUT TO THE REQUESTING PERSON. |
| CHANGE IN FINANCIAL REVIEW PROCESS | FORM 990, PAGE 12, PART XII, LINE 2C | IN 2012 THE ORGANIZATION FORMED AN AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD TO REVIEW ALL FINANCIAL MATTERS FORWARDED TO IT BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THE BOARD OR THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE REVIEWS ITS BUDGET BEFORE IT IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD, INTERVIEWS THE AUDITORS AT THE END OF EACH ANNUAL AUDIT OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR OTHER OFFICERS OR STAFF AND OVERSEES THE SELECTION OF AUDITORS. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |