Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Public Charity Status and Public Support
Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization or a section
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust.
Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ. See separate instructions.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2010
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Employer identification number
94-2581415
Part I
Reason for Public Charity Status
(All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions
The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For lines 1 through 11, check only one box.)
1
2
3
4
5
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Complete Part II.)
6
7
8
9
receipts from activities related to its exempt functions—subject to certain exceptions, and (2) no more than 331/3% of
its support from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses
acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975. See section 509(a)(2). (Complete Part III.)
10
11
e
By checking this box, I certify that the organization is not controlled directly or indirectly by one or more disqualified persons other than foundation managers and other than one or more publicly supported organizations described in section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2).
f
If the organization received a written determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II or Type III supporting organization, check this box
..................................................
g
Since August 17, 2006, has the organization accepted any gift or contribution from any of the following persons?
(i) a person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or together with persons described in (ii)
Yes
No
and (iii) below, the governing body of the the supported organization?
................
11g(i)
(ii)
a family member of a person described in (i) above?
......................
11g(ii)
(iii)
a 35% controlled entity of a person described in (i) or (ii) above?
................
11g(iii)
h
Provide the following information about the supported organization(s).
(i) Name of supported organization
(ii) EIN
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions))
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document?
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support?
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.?
(vii) Amount of support?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Total
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.
Cat. No. 11285F
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 2
Part II
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part I or if the
organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the organization fails to
qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part III.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") ....
1,344,508
1,326,760
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
6,735,168
2
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.......
3
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
4
Total. Add lines 1 through 3..
1,344,508
1,326,760
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
6,735,168
5
The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included
on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f)..
625,698
6
Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4.
6,109,470
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
7
Amounts from line 4..
1,344,508
1,326,760
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
6,735,168
8
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
100,925
69,845
17,506
27,515
39,870
255,661
9
Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on..
10
Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets..
1,800
1,975
-6,203
15,584
39,360
52,516
11
Total support (Add lines 7 through 10).
7,043,345
12
Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (See instructions.)
..................
12
226,828
13
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here..........................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
14
Public Support Percentage for 2010 (line 6 column (f) divided by line 11 column (f))
.........
14
86.740 %
15
Public Support Percentage for 2009 Schedule A, Part II, line 14
...............
15
87.120 %
16a
33 1/3% support test—2010.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box
and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
......................
b
33 1/3% support test—2009.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13 or 16a, and line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this
box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.....................
17a
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2010.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b and line 14
is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here. Explain
in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported
organization
..................................................
b
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2009.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or 17a and line
15 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here.
Explain in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..............................................
18
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, 17a or 17b, check this box and see
instructions
...................................................
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 3
Part III
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 509(a)(2) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 9 of Part I or if the organization
failed to qualify under Part II. If the organization fails to qualify under
the tests listed below, please complete Part II.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .
2
Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose......
3
Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513..
4
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf...
5
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
6
Total. Add lines 1 through 5.
7a
Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons...
b
Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year.
c
Add lines 7a and 7b..
8
Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.)
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2006
(b) 2007
(c) 2008
(d) 2009
(e) 2010
(f) Total
9
Amounts from line 6...
10a
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
b
Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975.
c
Add lines 10a and 10b.
11
Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.
12
Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.)
13
Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.).
14
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here.............................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
15
Public Support Percentage for 2010 (line 8 column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
.........
15
16
Public support percentage from 2009 Schedule A, Part III, line 15
...............
16
Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage
17
Investment income percentage for 2010 (line 10c column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
......
17
18
Investment income percentage from 2009 Schedule A, Part III, line 17
.............
18
19a
33 1/3% support tests—2010.
If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15 is more than 33 1/3% and line 17 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..........
b
33 1/3% support tests—2009.
If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a, and line 16 is more than 33 1/3% and line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
....
20
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a or 19b, check this box and see instructions
.....
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Page 4
Part IV
Supplemental Information.
Supplemental Information. Complete this part to provide the explanation required by Part II, line 10; Part II, line 17a or 17b; or Part III, line 12. Also complete this part for any additional information. (See instructions).
Facts And Circumstances Test
Explanation
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2010
Additional Data
Software ID:
Software Version:
-
TIN:
SCHEDULE O (Form 990 or 990-EZ)
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Supplemental Information to Form 990 or 990-EZ
Complete to provide information for responses to specific questions on
Form 990 or to provide any additional information.
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2010
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Employer identification number
94-2581415
Identifier
Return Reference
Explanation
EXPLANATION ON VOLUNTEERS AND TYPES OF SERVICES OR BENEFITS
FORM 990, PAGE 1, PART I, LINE 6
A MAJOR STRENGTH OF THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE IS OUR ABILITY TO LEVERAGE THE HUMAN RESOURCES OF THE PRIVATE BAR. OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST YEAR WE MOBILIZED OVER 1,000 PRO BONO ATTORNEYS WHO CONTRIBUTED MORE THAN 48,000 HOURS OF FREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE, SERVICES VALUED AT ALMOST 19 MILLION. PRO BONO ATTORNEYS PROVIDED DIRECT LEGAL SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS AND CONTRIBUTED TO LARGER IMPACT LITIGATION AND POLICY ADVOCACY PROJECTS.
FIRST ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A
RACE: "IN 2011, LCCR LAUNCHED THE SECOND CHANCE LEGAL CLINIC, WHICH PROVIDES PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO OVERCOME HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT BARRIERS THAT STEM FROM PAST CONTACT WITH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. CLINICS ARE OFFERED AT TWO SAN FRANCISCO LOCATIONS, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH MO MAGIC AND GOODWILL INDUSTRIES. DURING THE PAST YEAR, THE CLINIC SERVED 73 CLIENTS ON EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING, DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENSIONS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING-RELATED MATTERS. LCCR ALSO PROVIDED TRAININGS AND LEGAL WORKSHOPS ON RACIAL JUSTICE ISSUES TO OVER 200 ATTORNEYS AND LAW STUDENTS. "LCCR'S LEGAL SERVICES FOR ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM PROVIDES PRO BONO BUSINESS LAW SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE INTERESTED IN STARTING OR EXPANDING SMALL, FOR-PROFIT BUSINESSES, AS WELL AS BUSINESSES THAT INVEST DIRECTLY IN ECONOMICALLY DISTRESSED NEIGHBORHOODS. DURING THE PAST YEAR, THE PROGRAM PROVIDED LEGAL SERVICES TO 209 MICROENTREPRENEURS AND REACHED ANOTHER 425 SMALL BUSINESSES THROUGH OUR WORKSHOPS. THE PROGRAM ALSO PARTNERED WITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE NEW CLINICS IN THE FILLMORE, CHINATOWN, AND MISSION NEIGHBORHOODS OF SAN FRANCISCO. "LCCR'S FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM TRAINS PRO BONO ATTORNEYS TO LEAD WORKSHOPS FOR LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY MEMBERS ON A RANGE OF FINANCIAL ISSUES, INCLUDING IMPROVING CREDIT SCORES, WHY TO BANK, AND HOW TO BANK. DURING THE PAST YEAR, LCCR PROVIDED FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT WORKSHOPS TO OVER 150 PARTICIPANTS. "LCCR, ALONG WITH THE IMPACT FUND, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, PUBLIC ADVOCATES, AND THE BINGHAM AND COVINGTON LAW FIRMS, LITIGATED A CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST THE CITY OF ANTIOCH FOR ITS POLICY AND PRACTICE OF HARASSING AFRICAN-AMERICAN SECTION 8 TENANTS. "LCCR SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDED THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FROM A LEGAL CHALLENGE TO THE PROGRAM'S RACE-CONSCIOUS GOALS FOR FEDERALLY-FUNDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS. "LCCR FILED A TITLE VI COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY (CHSRA), WHICH RESULTED IN THE FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION ORDERING CHSRA TO OPEN UP ITS CONTRACTING SYSTEM TO MINORITY-OWNED BUSINESSES. THE HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT IS THE NATION'S LARGEST PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT. "LCCR, WITH ASSISTANCE FROM REED SMITH, FILED A LAWSUIT ON BEHALF OF LATINO VOTERS AGAINST THE CITY OF TULARE, CHARGING THAT THE CITY'S AT-LARGE SYSTEM THAT GOVERNS THE SELECTION OF ITS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS IS PLAGUED BY RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING AND VIOLATES THE CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT. AS A RESULT OF THE LAWSUIT, THE CITY OF TULARE BEGAN PREPARATIONS TO TRANSITION FROM AT-LARGE ELECTIONS TO DISTRICT-BASED VOTING SYSTEMS. LCCR LAUNCHED THE CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS INSTITUTE (CVRI) TO ADDRESS CUTTING EDGE ISSUES IMPACTING THE RIGHT TO VOTE. UTILIZING PROTECTIONS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT, CVRI SEEKS TO PROTECT THE VOICE OF EVERY VOTER, ENSURING THAT THE ELECTORAL PROCESS ALLOWS FOR THE FULL POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT OF CALIFORNIA'S DIVERSE COMMUNITIES. "LCCR, THE ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, ARNOLD & PORTER, AND ATTORNEY JOAQUIN AVILA FILED A LAWSUIT ON BEHALF OF LATINO AND ASIAN VOTERS CHALLENGING THE DISCRIMINATORY AT-LARGE ELECTION SYSTEM THAT GOVERNS SAN MATEO COUNTY'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELECTIONS. "LCCR REACHED A SETTLEMENT WITH THE CITY OF MODESTO AND STANISLAUS COUNTY TO REMEDY DISCREPANCIES IN PUBLIC SERVICES FOR THE CITY'S LATINO NEIGHBORHOODS. THESE NEIGHBORHOODS HAD BEEN EXCLUDED IN PREVIOUS CITY ANNEXATIONS THAT BENEFITED BORDERING AREAS; THEY REMAINED UNINCORPORATED AND WITHOUT SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS IN ADJACENT COMMUNITIES. THE LAWSUIT HAD BEEN FILED BY LCCR, CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, ATTORNEY BRIAN BROSNAHAN AND THE COVINGTON AND COBLENTZ LAW FIRMS. "LCCR, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE AND ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, ENDED THE SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY'S PRACTICE OF BANNING CERTAIN FORMERLY INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS FROM BEING WITHIN 150 YARDS OF ANY PUBLIC HOUSING PROPERTY. DUE TO OUR COLLECTIVE EFFORTS, THESE INJUNCTIONS WERE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT. "LCCR COLLABORATED WITH ALL OF US OR NONE, THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT AND THE NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT, AND OTHER GROUPS TO PROPOSE LOCAL LEGISLATION THAT WOULD EXTEND SAN FRANCISCO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROTECTIONS TO PEOPLE WITH CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE AREAS OF HOUSING, EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC SERVICES. "TOGETHER WITH PUBLIC INTEREST PARTNERS, LCCR SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATED A CASE AGAINST CALIFORNIA STATE OFFICIALS TO HALT A PRACTICE THAT DENIES MEDI-CAL TO ELIGIBLE CHILDREN AND INSTEAD PLACES THEM INTO A HIGHER-COST PROGRAM WITH FEWER BENEFITS. THE SUPERIOR COURT ISSUED A RULING THAT WILL RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF CHILD APPLICANTS BEING ENROLLED INTO NO-COST MEDI-CAL INSTEAD OF HEALTHY FAMILIES, WITH IMPROVED ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE.
SECOND ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B
IMMIGRATION: "LCCR'S ASYLUM PROGRAM MATCHES REFUGEES FLEEING PERSECUTION AND TORTURE IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRIES WITH VOLUNTEER ATTORNEYS AND INTERPRETERS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. DURING THE PAST YEAR, LCCR ASSISTED 205 ASYLUM-SEEKERS AND ACHIEVED SUCCESSFUL OUTCOMES IN OVER 95% OF OUR CASES. LCCR ALSO PROVIDED TRAININGS AND LEGAL WORKSHOPS ON ASYLUM AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ISSUES TO OVER 500 ATTORNEYS, PARALEGALS, INTERPRETERS, AND LAW STUDENTS. "LCCR, ALONG WITH WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI AND THE ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INVESTIGATED THE BLANKET SHACKLING OF IMMIGRATION DETAINEES DURING THEIR IMMIGRATION COURT HEARINGS IN SAN FRANCISCO, WHICH CULMINATED IN THE FILING OF A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT. "LCCR, ALONG WITH THE MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, SUCCESSFULLY PETITIONED THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO REHEAR A FREE SPEECH CASE BROUGHT BY DAY LABORER ORGANIZATIONS. THE COURT ISSUED A PRECEDENT-SETTING DECISION RECOGNIZING DAY LABORERS' FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SEEK WORK IN PUBLIC AREAS. "LCCR, WITH THE FIRM OF TALAMANTES VILLEGAS AND CARRERA, SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATED A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CHALLENGING UNLAWFUL WAGE-AND-HOUR VIOLATIONS IN 8 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS IN MONTEREY COUNTY. "LCCR, ALONG WITH MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON, LITIGATED A CASE ON BEHALF OF A VISITOR OF MIDDLE EASTERN DESCENT WHO WAS DENIED ENTRY TO THE U.S. BY IMMIGRATION AGENTS AND TAKEN TO A LOCAL JAIL, WHERE HE WAS SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL CAVITY SEARCH, DENIED ACCESS TO HIS HEART MEDICATIONS AND ASKED TO SPY FOR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. "LCCR, ALONG WITH O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP AND ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGAL OUTREACH, REPRESENTED A CHINESE DOMESTIC WORKER WHO WAS TRAFFICKED INTO THE U.S. AND FORCED INTO SERVITUDE FOR A FAMILY IN FREMONT. LCCR ASSISTED THE CLIENT WITH POTENTIAL CIVIL REMEDIES. "LCCR, ALONG WITH MALDEF AND MUNGER TOLLES, FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF STUDENTS AND STUDENT GROUPS, WITH THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT IN A CASE THAT INVOLVES THE ABILITY OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS TO ATTEND STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND PAY IN-STATE RESIDENT TUITION RATES UNDER A CHALLENGED STATE LAW (AB 540). THE LAW WAS UPHELD BY THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. "ALONG WITH A COALITION OF LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS, LCCR SUCCESSFULLY ADVOCATED WITH THE OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT TO MODIFY ITS CAR IMPOUNDMENT PRACTICES, WHICH SHOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF IMPOUNDS AND IMPROVE RELATIONS BETWEEN IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES AND POLICE. "LCCR WORKED WITH THE CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC WORKERS COALITION TO HELP DRAFT A RESOLUTION THAT WAS PASSED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE. THE RESOLUTION RECOGNIZES THE KEY CONTRIBUTIONS THAT DOMESTIC WORKERS MAKE TO CALIFORNIA FAMILIES AND THE ECONOMY, THEIR VULNERABILITY TO EXPLOITATION AND THE NEED FOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGES TO BETTER PROTECT WORKERS. "LCCR WORKED WITH A COALITION OF OVER 30 COMMUNITY GROUPS TO RESTORE DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR IMMIGRANT YOUTH IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. AS A RESULT OF OUR COLLECTIVE ADVOCACY, THE MAYOR OF SAN FRANCISCO MADE CHANGES TO THE JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT'S PROCEDURES TO BETTER PROTECT THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANT YOUTH.
ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS USED TO REVIEW FORM 990
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B
THE 990 IS COMPLETED BY LCCR'S BOOKKEEPER AND OPERATIONS MANAGER. BEFORE IT IS SUBMITTED TO THE IRS , IT IS DISTRIBUTED TO ALL OFFICERS, TRUSTEES, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR REVIEW.
COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR TOP OFFICIAL
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S COMPENSATION IS SET BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE BOARD'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. THE BOARD'S CO-CHAIRS AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (CONSISTING OF THE CHAIR OF EACH BOARD COMMITTEE) SOLICIT THE INPUT OF THE ORGANIZATION'S STAFF AND ENTIRE BOARD REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DURING THE PRIOR CALENDAR YEAR. BASED UPON THAT INFORMATION, THE BOARD CO-CHAIRS EVALUATE THE ED'S PERFORMANCE AND RECOMMEND A COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ED COMPENSATION, INCLUDING BASE SALARY AND ANY POTENTIAL BONUS, IS THEN MADE TO THE FULL BOARD, WHICH CAN THEN APPROVE, DENY OR MODIFY THE RECOMMENDATION. NOTE THAT OTHER ASPECTS OF ED COMPENSATION, SUCH AS HEALTH AND OTHER BENEFITS, ARE SET AT THE SAME LEVEL AS OTHER STAFF.
COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR OFFICERS
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B
KEY EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION IS SET BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. WHERE POSSIBLE, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WILL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO COMPENSATE ITS STAFF FAIRLY AND EQUITABLY, AND TO INSURE THAT SALARIES AND BENEFITS ARE AT MARKET RATE, COMMENSURATE WITH EMPLOYEES OF COMPARABLE EXPERIENCE AND SENIORITY IN OTHER COMPARABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER AFFILIATES OF THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS. STAFF SALARIES WILL INITIALLY BE SET BASED ON JOB CLASSIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO EMPLOYMENT WITH LCCR. NOTE THAT OTHER ASPECTS OF KEY EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION, SUCH AS HEALTH AND OTHER BENEFITS, ARE SET AT THE SAME LEVEL AS OTHER STAFF.
GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19
UPON REQUEST, AS APPROPRIATE, AND AVAILABLE THROUGH ANNUAL REPORT.
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990-EZ.