Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Public Charity Status and Public Support
Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization or a section
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust.
Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ. See separate instructions.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2011
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
UTAH FOUNDATION
Employer identification number
87-0199245
Part I
Reason for Public Charity Status
(All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions
The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For lines 1 through 11, check only one box.)
1
2
3
4
5
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Complete Part II.)
6
7
8
9
receipts from activities related to its exempt functions—subject to certain exceptions, and (2) no more than 331/3% of
its support from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses
acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975. See section 509(a)(2). (Complete Part III.)
10
11
e
By checking this box, I certify that the organization is not controlled directly or indirectly by one or more disqualified persons other than foundation managers and other than one or more publicly supported organizations described in section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2).
f
If the organization received a written determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II or Type III supporting organization, check this box
..................................................
g
Since August 17, 2006, has the organization accepted any gift or contribution from any of the following persons?
(i) a person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or together with persons described in (ii)
Yes
No
and (iii) below, the governing body of the the supported organization?
................
11g(i)
(ii)
a family member of a person described in (i) above?
......................
11g(ii)
(iii)
a 35% controlled entity of a person described in (i) or (ii) above?
................
11g(iii)
h
Provide the following information about the supported organization(s).
(i) Name of supported organization
(ii) EIN
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions))
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document?
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support?
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.?
(vii) Amount of support?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Total
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.
Cat. No. 11285F
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Page 2
Part II
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part I or if the
organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the organization fails to
qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part III.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2007
(b) 2008
(c) 2009
(d) 2010
(e) 2011
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") ....
2
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.......
3
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
4
Total. Add lines 1 through 3..
5
The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included
on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f)..
6
Public Support. Subtract line 5 from line 4.
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2007
(b) 2008
(c) 2009
(d) 2010
(e) 2011
(f) Total
7
Amounts from line 4..
8
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
9
Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on..
10
Other income. (Explain in Part IV.) Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets..
11
Total support (Add lines 7 through 10).
12
Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (See instructions.)
..................
12
13
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here..........................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
14
Public Support Percentage for 2010 (line 6 column (f) divided by line 11 column (f))
.........
14
15
Public Support Percentage for 2009 Schedule A, Part II, line 14
...............
15
16a
33 1/3% support test—2011.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box
and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
......................
b
33 1/3% support test—2010.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13 or 16a, and line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this
box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.....................
17a
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2011.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b and line 14
is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here. Explain
in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported
organization
..................................................
b
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2010.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or 17a and line
15 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test, check this box and stop here.
Explain in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts and circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..............................................
18
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, 17a or 17b, check this box and see
instructions
...................................................
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Page 3
Part III
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in IRC 509(a)(2) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 9 of Part I or if the organization
failed to qualify under Part II. If the organization fails to qualify under
the tests listed below, please complete Part II.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2007
(b) 2008
(c) 2009
(d) 2010
(e) 2011
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .
291,443
303,229
205,725
250,915
256,345
1,307,657
2
Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose......
28,517
10,160
27,570
106,304
41,237
213,788
3
Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513..
4
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf...
5
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
6
Total. Add lines 1 through 5.
319,960
313,389
233,295
357,219
297,582
1,521,445
7a
Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons...
190,200
185,200
122,700
145,000
145,200
788,300
b
Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year.
5,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
c
Add lines 7a and 7b..
195,200
185,200
122,700
150,000
150,200
803,300
8
Public Support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.)
718,145
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2007
(b) 2008
(c) 2009
(d) 2010
(e) 2011
(f) Total
9
Amounts from line 6...
319,960
313,389
233,295
357,219
297,582
1,521,445
10a
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
1,717
2,236
800
530
409
5,692
b
Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975.
c
Add lines 10a and 10b.
1,717
2,236
800
530
409
5,692
11
Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.
12
Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.)
13
Total support (Add lines 9, 10c, 11 and 12.).
321,677
315,625
234,095
357,749
297,991
1,527,137
14
First Five Years
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here.............................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
15
Public Support Percentage for 2011 (line 8 column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
.........
15
47.030 %
16
Public support percentage from 2010 Schedule A, Part III, line 15
...............
16
44.700 %
Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage
17
Investment income percentage for 2011 (line 10c column (f) divided by line 13 column (f))
......
17
0 %
18
Investment income percentage from 2010 Schedule A, Part III, line 17
.............
18
19a
33 1/3% support tests—2011.
If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15 is more than 33 1/3% and line 17 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
..........
b
33 1/3% support tests—2010.
If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a, and line 16 is more than 33 1/3% and line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
....
20
Private Foundation
If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a or 19b, check this box and see instructions
.....
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Page 4
Part IV
Supplemental Information.
Supplemental Information. Complete this part to provide the explanation required by Part II, line 10; Part II, line 17a or 17b; or Part III, line 12. Also complete this part for any additional information. (See instructions).
Facts And Circumstances Test
Explanation
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2011
Additional Data
Software ID:
Software Version:
-
TIN:
SCHEDULE O (Form 990 or 990-EZ)
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Supplemental Information to Form 990 or 990-EZ
Complete to provide information for responses to specific questions on
Form 990 or to provide any additional information.
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2011
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
UTAH FOUNDATION
Employer identification number
87-0199245
Identifier
Return Reference
Explanation
ORGANIZATION'S MISSION
FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION
TO PROMOTE A THRIVING ECONOMY, A WELL-PREPARED WORK FORCE, AND A HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE FOR UTAHNS BY PERFORMING THOROUGH, WELL-SUPPORTED RESEARCH THAT HELPS POLICY MAKERS, BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS, AND CITIZENS BETTER UNDERSTAND COMPLEX ISSUES AND PROVIDING PRACTICAL, WELL-REASONED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY CHANGE.
FIRST ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A
THE FACT THAT THE LARGEST PORTION OF UTAH'S STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES IS FOR EDUCATION-RELATED SERVICES-SERVICES UTAH HAS THE HIGHEST DEMAND FOR IN THE COUNTRY-PUTS UTAH'S COMPARATIVELY HIGH TAX BURDEN IN PERSPECTIVE. 2. EDUCATION FUNDING EFFORT UPDATE UTAH FOUNDATION HAS PUBLISHED SEVERAL REPORTS ON UTAH'S FUNDING EFFORT IN THE PAST, EVEN COINING THE TERM "UTAH'S EDUCATION PARADOX," REFERRING TO THE FACT THAT THOUGH OUR PER PUPIL EXPENDITURE WAS CONSISTENTLY THE LOWEST IN THE COUNTRY, UTAH SPENT A HIGH PROPORTION OF PERSONAL INCOME ON K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION. HOWEVER, THE PORTION OF PERSONAL INCOME SPENT ON EDUCATION HAS BEEN DECLINING OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES, AND UTAH'S RANKING HAS FALLEN FROM AMONG THE LEADERS IN EDUCATION FUNDING EFFORT TO RIGHT ABOUT THE NATIONAL AVERAGE. THIS REPORT FOUND THAT UTAH'S FUNDING EFFORT REBOUNDED IN 2008 AS A SIZABLE BUDGET SURPLUS WAS INVESTED IN K-12 EDUCATION. THE SUBSEQUENT RECESSION REDUCED THE FUNDING EFFORT, BUT UTAH'S RANKING HELD STEADY AS OTHER STATES ALSO REDUCED FUNDING. IN ADDITION, UTAH'S FUNDING EFFORT HAS FALLEN MOST AT THE STATE LEVEL, WITH A MODERATE DECLINE IN LOCAL TAX EFFORT. FEDERAL FUNDING HAS BEEN FAIRLY STABLE, EXCEPT FOR A RECENT BUMP FROM THE FEDERAL STIMULUS LEGISLATION. 3. REPORT ON THE FEDERAL DEFICIT DURING THE FEDERAL BUDGET CRISIS THIS SUMMER, MANY CONCERNED CITIZENS HAD IMPORTANT QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FEDERAL DEFICIT AND DEBT AND WANTED TO KNOW WHAT HAD CONTRIBUTED TO ITS GROWTH AND WHAT PROJECTIONS SHOW ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE DEFICIT. UTAH FOUNDATION PROVIDED A REPORT THAT ANSWERED THESE QUESTIONS AND FOUND THAT THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORY, THE U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS OFTEN OPERATED UNDER A DEFICIT, AND HAS ALWAYS HELD A FEDERAL DEBT. FROM 1971 TO 1997, THE U.S. CONSISTENTLY OPERATED UNDER A DEFICIT, FLUCTUATING FROM 22 BILLION TO 221 BILLION. BETWEEN 1998 AND 2001, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RAN SURPLUSES, EVEN REACHING 236 BILLION IN 2000. SINCE THEN, A DEFICIT HAS BEEN INCURRED EACH YEAR, REACHING AS HIGH AS 1.4 TRILLION IN 2009, OR 10% OF THE NATION'S GDP. THE INCREASE IN DEFICIT PENDING WAS CAUSED BY BOTH INCREASED OUTLAYS AND DECREASED RECEIPTS, WITH THE TWO BIGGEST CONTRIBUTORS BEING THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN AND THE BUSH TAX CUTS. 4. TEACHER COMPENSATION SIMPLY COMPARING AVERAGE TEACHER SALARIES FOR ALL FULL-TIME TEACHERS ACROSS STATES CAN PROVIDE A MISLEADING PICTURE OF THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TEACHERS FACE FOR WORKING IN DIFFERENT STATES. MOST TEACHING SALARIES ARE BASED UPON A SALARY SCHEDULE THAT PAYS ACCORDING TO EXPERIENCE AND EDUCATION. IN THIS REPORT, UTAH FOUNDATION COMPARED SALARIES FOR TEACHERS WITH SIMILAR LEVELS OF EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE, TO REDUCE THE VARIATION IN SALARY LEVELS DUE TO DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES. THE REPORT FOUND THAT UTAH TEACHERS PLACE NEAR THE MIDDLE OF THE MOUNTAIN STATES FOR MOST CATEGORIES OF EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE. LIKE MOST STATES, UTAH HAS INCREASED BEGINNING TEACHER SALARIES IN THE LAST DECADE MORE SIGNIFICANTLY THAN SALARIES FOR VETERAN TEACHERS WITH ADVANCED DEGREES. HOWEVER, THESE INCREASES HAVE LAGGED BEHIND NATIONAL TRENDS AND MOST OTHER MOUNTAIN STATES. RECENTLY, STEVE KROES PRESENTED THE FINDINGS OF THIS REPORT AT THE INVITATION OF THE LEGISLATURE'S EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE. IT WAS WELL RECEIVED, AND THE COMMITTEE ASKED FOR SOME FOLLOW-UP DATA. 5. MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN UTAH, UTAH FOUNDATION COLLABORATED WITH INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE TO CREATE THE UTAH FOUNDATION QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX, A MEASURE THAT WILL BE UPDATED EVERY TWO YEARS TO TRACK HOW QUALITY OF LIFE CHANGES AND THE REASONS FOR THOSE CHANGES. THE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX WAS CREATED BY SURVEYING UTAHNS ABOUT 20 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COMMUNITY QUALITY OF LIFE. QUALITY SCORES WERE CALCULATED FOR EACH FACTOR AND AN OVERALL INDEX, WITH A POSSIBLE 100 POINTS. USING THIS METHODOLOGY, THE FIRST BIENNIAL UTAH FOUNDATION QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX STANDS AT 77.2 FOR 2011. ON OCTOBER 12TH, WE HELD A BREAKFAST DISCUSSION ON QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUES, WHICH WAS ATTENDED BY ABOUT 100 PEOPLE, GENERATED THOUGHTFUL DIALOGUE, AND GARNERED ADDITIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION FOR THE RESEARCH. 6. UTAH'S DELEGATE SYSTEM THE OUSTING OF SENATOR BENNETT FROM THE STATE CONVENTION HIGHLIGHTED THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTY DELEGATES AND THE POPULATION AT-LARGE. IT ALSO HAS MADE THE CONVENTION THE CENTER OF DEBATE AND POSSIBLE REFORM OVER THE LAST YEAR. THIS MADE OUR REPORT ON UTAH'S SYSTEM OF NOMINATING CANDIDATES EXTREMELY TIMELY. THIS REPORT INCLUDED A SUMMARY OF THE HISTORY OF UTAH'S CANDIDATE SELECTION SYSTEMS, COMPARED OUR SYSTEM TO OTHER STATES, AND MODELED HOW DIFFERENT SYSTEMS COULD GIVE MORE POWER TO VOTERS, AND PERHAPS EVEN CHANGE OUTCOMES. WE FOUND THAT UTAH IS ONE OF ONLY SEVEN STATES THAT STILL USES A CONVENTION, AND THE ONLY ONE THAT ALLOWS POLITICAL PARTIES TO PRECLUDE A PRIMARY ELECTION FOR MAJOR OFFICES IF CANDIDATES RECEIVE ENOUGH DELEGATE VOTES. IF UTAH'S CONVENTION SYSTEM ALLOWED ALL CANDIDATES WHO RECEIVE AT LEAST 20% OF DELEGATE VOTES TO PROCEED TO THE PRIMARY ELECTION, AT LEAST FIVE MORE PRIMARY ELECTIONS WOULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE SINCE 2002. IN ADDITION, FOUR PRIMARIES WOULD HAVE HAD MORE THAN TWO CANDIDATES. WE ARE HOLDING A LUNCHEON ON THIS TOPIC ON DECEMBER 16TH, WITH PRESENTERS INCLUDING THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC STATE CHAIRS AND THE DIRECTOR OF THE HINCKLEY INSTITUTE OF POLITICS. CURRENT PROJECTS: 7. ENERGY INITIATIVE EARLIER THIS YEAR, THE BOARD DECIDED THAT UTAH FOUNDATION WOULD CONDUCT RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY. UTAH FOUNDATION WILL ANALYZE THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY BY ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL COSTS OF BUILDING THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS, ASSESSING WHAT BENEFITS COULD BE RECEIVED VIA FEDERAL SUBSIDIES, THE COSTS OF TRANSPORTING THE ENERGY, THE COSTS OF CHANGING OR UPDATING THE ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, THE INTERMITTENT AVAILABILITY OF RENEWABLE ENERGY, THE EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND UTAH'S WILDERNESS, AND THE POTENTIAL REDUCTION IN CONSUMPTION OF NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY. UTAH FOUNDATION WILL ALSO PERFORM A LITERATURE REVIEW TO UNDERSTAND WHAT TYPES OF RENEWABLE PROJECTS AND ENERGY ARE USED IN OTHER STATES, AND WHAT THE COSTS AND BENEFITS HAVE BEEN. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN UNDERWAY SINCE MID-SUMMER, AND OUR FORMER STAFF RESEARCHER, DAVID NEWELL IS CONDUCTING THE RESEARCH ON CONTRACT. DAVID HAS FINISHED A FIRST DRAFT OF THE REPORT, WHICH HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD AND AN OUTSIDE READER IN THE RENEWABLE ENERGY INDUSTRY. HE IS CURRENTLY REVISING THE DRAFT AND INCORPORATING THEIR FEEDBACK. 8. EVALUATION OF RAISING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LAST YEAR, OUR STUDY ON SCHOOL TESTING RESULTS REVEALED THAT UTAH IS UNDERPERFORMING COMPARED TO STATES WITH SIMILAR DEMOGRAPHICS. A BYU EDUCATION PROFESSOR AND PHD STUDENT HAVE VOLUNTEERED THEIR TIME TO RESEARCH POLICIES THESE PEER STATES HAVE IMPLEMENTED TO IMPROVE STUDENT PERFORMANCE. STATISTICS HAVE BEEN GATHERED, AND A QUESTIONNAIRE IS NOW BEING DEVELOPED, ALONG WITH A LIST OF TARGETED EDUCATION OFFICIALS IN THOSE STATES, TO COMPILE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR EDUCATION SYSTEMS. THIS PROJECT IS PROCEEDING SLOWER THAN WE ANTICIPATED, AND WE NOW EXPECT TO PUBLISH EARLY IN 2012.
ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS USED TO REVIEW FORM 990
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B
THE 990 IS REVIEWED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD TREASURER, AND BOARD CHAIRMAN FOR ACCURACY AND PROPER PRESENTATION. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WILL ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS AND RELAY ANY SUGGESTIONS FOR CHANGE.
COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR TOP OFFICIAL
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (A NINE-MEMBER COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD GIVEN THE TASK OF GOVERNING THE FOUNDATION'S OPERATIONS MORE CLOSELY THAN THE ENTIRE BOARD.) THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS INDEPENDENT OF THE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE COMPENSATION IS BEING DETERMINED. IN DETERMINING A REASONABLE LEVEL OF COMPENSATION, BOARD MEMBERS CONSIDER SALARIES PAID TO OTHER SIMILAR POSITIONS IN THE REGION. THE DELIBERATION AND DETERMINATION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS DONE WITHOUT STAFF PRESENT. THEIR FINAL DECISION IS RECORDED IN THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES.
GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19
THE ORGANIZATION'S GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION UPON REQUEST AT THE ORGANIZATION'S OFFICES.
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990-EZ.