Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? | (v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? | (vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? | (vii) Amount of monetary support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 375,749 | 2,634,109 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 375,749 | 2,634,109 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 1,018,910 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 1,615,199 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 496,098 | 663,456 | 419,123 | 679,683 | 375,749 | 2,634,109 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 64,931 | 40,917 | 31,898 | 22,003 | 27,814 | 187,563 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | 0 | |||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.).. | 3,301 | 1,000 | 1,100 | 1,806 | 2,000 | 9,207 |
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | 2,830,879 | |||||






Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS | FORM 990, PART III | STATEMENT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH IN 2012 THIS WAS ANOTHER GREAT YEAR FOR THE N.C. CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH IN HAVING OUR RESEARCH AFFECT PUBLIC POLICY AND IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THE CITIZENS OF NORTH CAROLINA. IMPROVING PUBLIC POLICY * PROGRESS IN REDUCING FRAUD AGAINST THE ELDERLY - IN 2010, THE CENTER RELEASED RESEARCH SHOWING THAT FRAUD COMMITTED AGAINST THE ELDERLY IS ON THE RISE IN NORTH CAROLINA. IN RESPONSE, SEN. STAN BINGHAM (R-DAVIDSON) SPONSORED SUCCESSFUL LEGISLATION IN 2011 TO CREATE A TASK FORCE ON FRAUD AGAINST OLDER ADULTS WITHIN THE CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE. THE TASK FORCE WAS CHARGED TO STUDY THE ISSUE AND ALL OF THE CENTER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND THEN MAKE A FINAL REPORT WITH DRAFT LEGISLATION. CHAIRED BY SEN. BINGHAM AND REP. HUGH BLACKWELL (R-BURKE), THE TASK FORCE HAS PRODUCED A FINAL REPORT AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE 2013 LEGISLATURE. THESE INCLUDE WORKING WITH BANKS TO PREVENT FRAUD AND WORKING WITH THE N.C. CONFERENCE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEYS TO PROSECUTE MORE FRAUD CASES. * MAKING FEDERAL LOANS AVAILABLE TO MORE STUDENTS IN N.C.'S COMMUNITY COLLEGES - IN 2009, WE WERE SHOCKED TO FIND THAT ONLY 20 OF NORTH CAROLINA'S 58 COMMUNITY COLLEGES MADE FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO THEIR STUDENTS. AFTER THREE YEARS AND LEGISLATIVE WINS AND LOSSES, OUR WORK HAS LED TO MORE COLLEGES OFFERING FEDERAL LOAN PROGRAMS. NOW, 32 COMMUNITY COLLEGES (12 MORE THAN WHEN WE BEGAN) OFFER FEDERAL LOANS TO THEIR STUDENTS, GIVING 50,238 MORE STUDENTS ACCESS TO THE SAFEST AND CHEAPEST WAY TO BORROW MONEY FOR COLLEGE. * PREVENTING AND REDUCING HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS - RESPONDING TO OUR 2007 STUDY OF WAYS TO PREVENT AND REDUCE HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS, THE LEGISLATURE APPROPRIATED $13-15 MILLION EACH YEAR FOR FOUR YEARS (2007-10) FOR DROPOUT PREVENTION GRANTS. AND, AS WE RECOMMENDED, THE LEGISLATURE EVALUATED THE RESULTS OF THE PREVIOUS YEARS' GRANTS. AS A RESULT, THE STATEWIDE DROPOUT RATE NOW HAS DECLINED FOR 5 YEARS IN A ROW, AND THE GRADUATION RATE HAS INCREASED 6 YEARS IN A ROW. THE GRADUATION RATE REACHED AN ALL-TIME HIGH OF 80 PERCENT IN NORTH CAROLINA IN NEW DATA RELEASED IN AUGUST 2012. * EVALUATION OF JUDGES' PERFORMANCE - IN 1980, THE CENTER PUBLISHED "ARTICLE IV" - AN EVALUATION OF ALL SUPERIOR COURT AND APPELLATE JUDGES IN THE STATE. SINCE THEN, THE CENTER HAS QUIETLY URGED LEADERS IN THE N.C. BAR ASSOCIATION TO PICK UP THIS IDEA AND MAKE MORE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDGES, ALL OF WHOM ARE ELECTED IN N.C. IN 2012, THE N.C. BAR ASSOCIATION PUBLISHED COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF DISTRICT COURT JUDGES UP FOR ELECTION, JUST AS THE CENTER PIONEERED 32 YEARS AGO. CONDUCTING NONPARTISAN RESEARCH ON KEY PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES FACING NORTH CAROLINA * CENTER EVALUATES THE STATE'S PROGRAM TO SERVE MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS AT LOCAL HOSPITALS - IN DECEMBER 2012, THE CENTER RELEASED THE FIRST INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF A STATEWIDE INITIATIVE TO PURCHASE BED SPACE AND BUILD CAPACITY FOR MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS IN CRISIS AT LOCAL HOSPITALS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA. THE GOAL OF THE PROGRAM IS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF BEDS AVAILABLE FOR MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS, KEEPING THEM OUT OF HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOMS AND OUT OF THE STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS. IN 2008, THE LEGISLATURE FIRST FUNDED "THREE-WAY CONTRACTS" BETWEEN THE STATE, LOCAL MENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT ENTITIES (ALSO CALLED LMES), AND HOSPITALS ACROSS THE STATE. LMES ARE THE LOCAL AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING THE PROVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN THE AREA SERVED. THE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS WERE DEVELOPED AS A WAY OF MOVING NORTH CAROLINA CLOSER TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LOCAL SERVICE SYSTEM ENVISIONED UNDER THE STATE'S 2001 MENTAL HEALTH REFORM LEGISLATION. THE CENTER'S RESEARCH FINDINGS INCLUDE: (1) THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS SERVED UNDER THREE-WAY CONTRACTS IS ALMOST AS MANY AS THE TOTAL SERVED EACH YEAR BY THE THREE STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS COMBINED. (2) READMISSION RATES FOR PEOPLE SERVED UNDER THE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS ARE LOWER THAN FOR THOSE SERVED IN STATE HOSPITALS. (3) SHORT-TERM ADMISSIONS (SEVEN DAYS OR LESS) TO STATE HOSPITALS HAVE DROPPED FROM 51 PERCENT OF TOTAL ADMISSIONS IN 2008-09 TO 21 PERCENT IN 2011-12. (4) THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS FOR PATIENTS THAT WERE TRANSFERRED TO A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL WAS MORE THAN 12 HOURS SHORTER THAN THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY FOR THOSE THAT WERE TRANSFERRED TO A STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL. (5) THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY FOR PATIENTS SERVED THROUGH THE THREE-WAY CONTRACTS AT ALL HOSPITALS IS LESS THAN SEVEN DAYS - AS INTENDED. BASED ON ITS RESEARCH, THE CENTER MADE FOUR RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE PROGRAM: (1) IMPROVE THE TIMELINESS OF THE PAYMENTS TO HOSPITALS, (2) DESIGNATE A STATE LIAISON AND INCLUDE HOSPITALS IN THE STATE'S WORKING GROUP ON THE CONTRACTS, (3) OPEN STATE TRAINING PROGRAMS TO LOCAL HOSPITAL STAFF, AND (4) EVALUATE PATIENT OUTCOMES. * HIGH LEGISLATIVE TURNOVER - THE MODERN RECORDS FOR HIGHEST LEGISLATIVE TURNOVER WERE SET IN 1973 AND 1975, WHEN 65 AND 70 NEW LEGISLATORS, RESPECTIVELY, CAME TO THE 170-MEMBER GENERAL ASSEMBLY. NORTH CAROLINA'S LEGISLATIVE TURNOVER IN 2013 APPROACHED BUT DID NOT SURPASS THE RECORD TURNOVER OF THE MID-1970S. THE CENTER'S RESEARCH SHOWED THERE WERE FOUR REASONS FOR THIS YEAR'S LEGISLATIVE TURNOVER - RETIREMENTS, RUNS FOR HIGHER OFFICE, ACCEPTING OTHER JOBS, AND, MOST OF ALL, REDISTRICTING. IN THE 2011-12 LEGISLATURE, THERE WERE ALREADY 46 FRESHMAN LEGISLATORS (27 PERCENT). SIXTY-ONE MORE LEGISLATORS ARE NOT RETURNING AT ALL OR ARE NOT RETURNING TO THE SAME CHAMBER IN 2013. THUS, IN THE 2013-14 GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 102 LEGISLATORS (60 PERCENT) WILL NOT HAVE BEEN THERE JUST THREE YEARS AGO. A COMBINED 652 YEARS OF INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY AND POLICY EXPERTISE WILL BE LOST WITH THIS MUCH TURNOVER. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE WILL BE ROOM FOR LOTS OF NEW IDEAS. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CONTINUED) | FORM 990, PART III | ENHANCING GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY * RANKINGS OF LEGISLATORS' EFFECTIVENESS, ATTENDANCE, AND ROLL CALL VOTING PARTICIPATION - IN APRIL, THE CENTER CONTINUED TO ENHANCE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND EDUCATE VOTERS BY PUBLISHING THE 18TH EDITION OF OUR RANKINGS OF LEGISLATORS' EFFECTIVENESS, ATTENDANCE, AND ROLL CALL VOTING PARTICIPATION. OUR EFFECTIVENESS RANKINGS ARE BASED ON SURVEYS OF ALL 170 LEGISLATORS THEMSELVES, REGISTERED LOBBYISTS BASED IN N.C., AND ALL CAPITAL NEWS MEDIA. WE ALSO RELEASED RANKINGS OF LEGISLATORS' ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION IN ROLL CALL VOTES. THE RANKINGS OF ATTENDANCE AND VOTING PARTICIPATION TELL CITIZENS HOW OFTEN THEIR LEGISLATOR WAS THERE TO REPRESENT THEM. THE EFFECTIVENESS RANKINGS TELL CITIZENS HOW EFFECTIVE THEIR LEGISLATOR WAS WHEN HE OR SHE WAS THERE. BOTH HELP CITIZENS ASSESS THEIR LEGISLATORS' PERFORMANCE. * RANKINGS OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS - IN JULY, WE RELEASED THE 16TH EDITION OF OUR RANKINGS OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS IN THE LEGISLATURE, ALSO BASED ON SURVEYS OF THE LEGISLATORS, LOBBYISTS, AND CAPITAL NEWS MEDIA. A RECORD-SETTING 22 LOBBYISTS WERE RANKED AMONG THE MOST INFLUENTIAL FOR THE FIRST TIME. THE NEW FACES INCLUDE FORMER LEGISLATORS, CORPORATE LOBBYISTS, AND SOME STATE AGENCY LEGISLATIVE LIAISONS. DANA SIMPSON, AN ATTORNEY WITH A RALEIGH LAW FIRM, EARNED THE TOP SPOT AS NORTH CAROLINA'S MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYIST. SIMPSON HAS BEEN RANKED AMONG THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS SINCE 2006 AND WAS LAST RANKED 14TH. AT AGE 38, SIMPSON IS THE YOUNGEST LOBBYIST EVER TO CLAIM THE TOP RANKING. ANOTHER RALEIGH ATTORNEY, JOHN MCMILLAN, WHO WAS AT THE TOP OF THE RANKINGS IN 2010, IS STILL RANKED 4TH IN THIS YEAR'S RANKINGS. WITH THE FIRST REPUBLICAN MAJORITY IN BOTH CHAMBERS OF THE LEGISLAURE SINCE 1898, LOBBYISTS WITH REPUBLICAN TIES FARED WELL IN THE LATEST RANKINGS. JOINING THE LIST OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS FOR THE FIRST TIME WERE TOM FETZER (2ND), CONNIE WILSON (7TH), AND JIMMY BROUGHTON (43RD). FETZER PREVIOUSLY SERVED AS CHAIRMAN OF THE N.C. REPUBLICAN PARTY AND MAYOR OF RALEIGH. WILSON IS A FORMER REPUBLICAN LEGISLATOR (1989-90 AND 1993-2004). BROUGHTON SERVED FOR 12 YEARS ON THE STAFF OF FORMER REPUBLICAN U.S. SENATOR JESSE HELMS. TOP-RANKED SIMPSON SERVED AS THE COMMUNICATIONS AND POLICY DIRECTOR FOR THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE MAJORITY IN THE MID-1990S. THE CENTER PUBLISHES THE RANKINGS OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LOBBYISTS TO HELP CITIZENS UNDERSTAND WHICH KEY INTERESTS AND ORGANIZATIONS HAVE CLOUT WITH LEGISLATORS IN NORTH CAROLINA. THE RANKINGS SHED LIGHT ON WHAT IS OFTEN AN INVISIBLE PROCESS. CENTER WINS NATIONAL AWARD * IN 2012, THE CENTER WON ANOTHER NATIONAL AWARD FROM THE GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (GRA), A NONPARTISAN GROUP OF 33 PUBLIC POLICY NONPROFITS IN 22 STATES. GRA ORGANIZATIONS PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY IN STATE AND LOCAL BUDGETS AND PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CITIZENS ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS. THE CENTER WON AN AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING POLICY ACHIEVEMENT IN RECOGNITION OF THE CHANGES IN STATE POLICY RESULTING FROM THE CENTER'S WORK ON ISSUES AFFECTING THE AGING (SUCH AS THE LEGISLATION ON FRAUD AGAINST THE ELDERLY). EDUCATING THE PUBLIC * INCREASING OUR USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND STORYTELLING - THE CENTER'S NEW STRATEGIC PLAN INCLUDES A GOAL OF EXPANDING THE CENTER'S REACH, VISIBILITY, AND IMPACT BY INCREASING OUR USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA, STORYTELLING, AND TECHNOLOGY. THE PURPOSE IS TO EXPAND THE UNIVERSE OF PEOPLE WHO KNOW OF AND USE THE CENTER'S RESEARCH. WE BEGAN BY INTRODUCING OUR NEW WEBSITE IN 2010, WITH ALL 35 YEARS OF THE CENTER'S RESEARCH AND EXPERTISE AVAILABLE FREE ONLINE. THEN IN 2011, FOR THE FIRST TIME, WE PUBLISHED OUR CITIZENS' GUIDE TO THE LEGISLATURE ONLINE AND FOR HANDHELD DEVICES SUCH AS SMART PHONES. IN 2012, WITH A SPECIAL GRANT FROM IBM, THE CENTER FOCUSED ON INCREASING OUR PRESENCE ON SOCIAL MEDIA THROUGH SITES SUCH AS FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE, AND LINKEDIN. WE ALSO INCREASED OUR USE OF STORYTELLING IN ORDER TO HELP THE PUBLIC BETTER UNDERSTAND ISSUES, TO ILLUSTRATE TO POLICYMAKERS HOW A POLICY IMPACTS PEOPLE, AND TO CONNECT THE CENTER'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS TO CHANGES THAT IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THE CITIZENS OF NORTH CAROLINA. LOOKING AHEAD TO 2013 * CITIZEN'S GUIDE TO THE LEGISLATURE - IN 2013, WE WILL PRODUCE A NEW "CITIZENS' GUIDE TO THE 2013-2014 N.C. LEGISLATURE." IT WILL HAVE BIOGRAPHICAL PROFILES AND PHOTOS OF ALL 170 MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AS WELL AS THEIR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND COUNTIES IN THEIR DISTRICTS. FOR LEGISLATORS SERVING IN THE PREVIOUS SESSION, THE GUIDE WILL LIST FIVE BILLS THEY INTRODUCED IN THE 2011-12 SESSION AND THEIR VOTES ON 12 BILLS OF STATEWIDE INTEREST. THE GUIDE WILL BE AVAILABLE IN BOOK FORM AND ONLINE. * ISSUES AFFECTING NORTH CAROLINA'S AGING POPULATION - IN 2011, THE BABY BOOM GENERATION BEGAN TURNING 65, WHICH WILL LEAD TO THE STATE'S AGING POPULATION ALMOST DOUBLING BY 2030. IN CONTINUING OUR RESEARCH, WE'LL LOOK AT SHORTAGES IN NURSING AND OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONS AND HOW OUR STATE CAN TRAIN AN ADEQUATE NUMBER OF HEALTH CARE WORKERS. WE ALSO WILL EXAMINE POLICY OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LONG-TERM CARE AND IN-HOME CARE. AND, WE'LL EXAMINE THE IMPACT OF THIS FAST-GROWING AGING POPULATION ON THE STATE BUDGET. * FINANCIAL AID FOR STUDENTS IN COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES - OUR PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON STUDENT FINANCIAL AID LED TO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE POLICY FOR OUR 16 PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND INCREASED ACCESS TO FEDERAL LOANS FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS. IN 2013, WE'LL EXPAND OUR RESEARCH TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND EXAMINE TUITION AND FINANCIAL AID POLICY, AS WELL AS WAYS TO IMPROVE OUR STATE'S COLLEGE-GOING RATES AND EVENTUALLY IMPROVE OUR COLLEGE COMPLETION RATES. * EVALUATING THE STATE'S EFFORTS IN MENTAL HEALTH REFORM - PART III OF OUR EVALUATION OF THE STATE'S EFFORTS IN MENTAL HEALTH REFORM IN 2013 WILL (1) ANALYZE HOW TO PRODUCE AND RETAIN ENOUGH WORKERS TO TREAT AND SERVE PATIENTS AND (2) EXAMINE HOW MENTAL HEALTH REFORM HAS WORKED OR NOT WORKED IN OTHER STATES. WE WILL FOCUS ON SIX STATES - THREE WITH BETTER MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS THAN US AND THREE WITH WORSE SYSTEMS. BASED ON OUR RESEARCH ON THE NEEDS OF THE PATIENTS, THE FUNDING STREAMS, THE EXPERIENCES IN OTHER STATES, AND INTERVIEWS WITH THOSE IN THE FIELD, WE WILL MAKE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DESIGNED TO IMPROVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN NORTH CAROLINA. * STATE WATER POLICY - WE HAVE NOW BEGUN RESEARCH ON THIS THREE-YEAR PROJECT FOR AN IN-DEPTH EXAMINATION OF STATE WATER POLICY IN NORTH CAROLINA, INCLUDING WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY, INTER-BASIN WATER TRANSFERS FROM ONE RIVER BASIN TO ANOTHER, AND HOW TO MOVE FROM CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN TIMES OF DROUGHT TO A LONG-TERM STATE WATER POLICY. |
| FORM 990 REVIEW PROCESS | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 11B | THE ACCOUNTING FIRM SUBMITS A DRAFT TAX RETURN TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT TREASURER, WHO REVIEW THE DRAFT AND PREPARE COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOR THE FIRM. AFTER THESE COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED AND RESOLVED, THE RETURN IS FINALIZED BY THE ACCOUNTING FIRM. A COPY IS SENT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR REVIEW, COMMENTS, AND QUESTIONS, AND THEN THE FINAL 990 IS SUBMITTED TO THE IRS. |
| PROCESS FOR MONITORING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 12C | POLICY AND PRACTICES 1. EACH MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS ASKED TO SIGN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS/HER TERM. BOARD MEMBERS ARE REMINDED AT QUARTERLY BOARD MEETINGS OF THE NEED TO DISCLOSE ANY CONFLICTS. FULL DISCLOSURE IN WRITING SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONFLICTED PARTIES TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A. A BOARD MEMBER IS RELATED TO ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER OR STAFF MEMBER BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE, OR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP. B. A STAFF MEMBER IN A SUPERVISORY CAPACITY IS RELATED TO ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER WHOM SHE/HE SUPERVISES. C. A BOARD MEMBER OR A STAFF MEMBER, OR THEIR ORGANIZATION, STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM A TRANSACTION WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH. D. A BOARD MEMBER OR STAFF MEMBER IS A MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH. 2. FOLLOWING FULL DISCLOSURE OF A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS, AND IF SO, THE BOARD SHALL VOTE TO AUTHORIZE OR REJECT THE TRANSACTION OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION DEEMED NECESSARY TO ADDRESS THE CONFLICT AND PROTECT THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH'S BEST INTERESTS. THE VOTE SHALL BE BY A MAJORITY VOTE WITHOUT COUNTING THE VOTE OF ANY INTERESTED DIRECTOR, EVEN IF THE DISINTERESTED DIRECTORS ARE LESS THAN A QUORUM, PROVIDED THAT AT LEAST ONE CONSENTING DIRECTOR IS DISINTERESTED. ANY ACTION TAKEN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING. 3. A BOARD MEMBER WHO IS FORMALLY CONSIDERING EMPLOYMENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH MUST TAKE A TEMPORARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE FROM THE BOARD UNTIL THE POSITION IS FILLED. SUCH A LEAVE WILL BE TAKEN WITHIN THE BOARD MEMBER'S ELECTED TERM WHICH WILL NOT BE EXTENDED BECAUSE OF THE LEAVE. THE BOARD MEMBER MUST SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE BOARD INDICATING THE TIME PERIOD OF THE LEAVE. THE SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH WILL INFORM THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF SUCH A REQUEST. THE CHAIR WILL BRING THE REQUEST TO THE BOARD FOR ACTION. THE REQUEST AND ANY ACTION TAKEN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING. 4. AN INTERESTED BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, OR STAFF MEMBER SHALL NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY DISCUSSION OR DEBATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OR OF ANY COMMITTEE OR SUBCOMMITTEE THEREOF IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION IS A CONTRACT, TRANSACTION, OR SITUATION IN WHICH THERE MAY BE A PERCEIVED OR ACTUAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST. HOWEVER, THEY MAY BE PRESENT TO PROVIDE CLARIFYING INFORMATION IN SUCH A DISCUSSION OR DEBATE UNLESS OBJECTED TO BY ANY PRESENT BOARD OR COMMITTEE MEMBER. 5. ANYONE IN A POSITION TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT SPENDING RESOURCES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH (E.G., TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS PURCHASES OR CONTRACTS), WHO ALSO STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM THAT DECISION, HAS A DUTY TO DISCLOSE THAT CONFLICT AS SOON AS IT ARISES OR BECOMES APPARENT. S/HE SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY FINAL DECISIONS. 6. A COPY OF THIS POLICY SHALL BE GIVEN TO ALL BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF MEMBERS UPON COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH PERSON'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH OR AT THE OFFICIAL ADOPTION OF STATED POLICY. EACH BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, AND STAFF MEMBER SHALL SIGN AND DATE THE POLICY AT THE BEGINNING OF HER/HIS TERM OF SERVICE OR EMPLOYMENT. FAILURE TO SIGN DOES NOT NULLIFY THE POLICY. |
| PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 15B | PROCESS FOR EVALUATING AND DETERMINING THE COMPENSATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT SECRETARY/ASSISTANT TREASURER THE 10-MEMBER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE 23-MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVIEWS THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND DETERMINES COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS AT THAT TIME. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SENDS A SELF-EVALUATION TO THE COMMITTEE THAT INCLUDES THE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE POSITION'S RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OR FAILURES DURING THE YEAR. THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD INVITES COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO SEND COMMENTS RELATED TO THE DIRECTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND RELATED CENTER OBJECTIVES. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETS WITH THE DIRECTOR TO DISCUSS HIS PERFORMANCE AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK PERTAINING TO ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. COMPARABILITY DATA IS PROVIDED FROM 990 FORMS ON DIRECTORS OF OTHER STATE-LEVEL POLICY CENTERS IN N.C. AND IN OTHER STATES. THE COMMITTEE THEN MEETS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION WITHOUT THE DIRECTOR OR OTHER STAFF TO DECIDE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD MEETS WITH THE DIRECTOR AFTER THE COMMITTEE MEETING TO COMMUNICATE THE COMMITTEE'S FEEDBACK AND ANY COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTS. THE CHAIR THEN SENDS A LETTER TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SUMMARIZE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS DETERMINED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, WHICH THEN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS PART OF THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. THE STAFF DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION ALSO SERVES AS ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND ASSISTANT TREASURER OF THE BOARD. REVIEWS OF HER PERFORMANCE AND OF COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS ARE CONDUCTED ANNUALLY BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. A SALARY SURVEY OF DATA FOR NONPROFITS IN NC PUBLISHED BY THE N.C. CENTER FOR NONPROFITS IS ALSO USED IN DETERMINING COMPENSATION. THE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS ARE INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL BUDGET SUBMITTED TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR AND ARE SUBJECT TO THEIR FINAL APPROVAL. |
| MAKING INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC | FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, AT THE CENTER'S OFFICE, AND ON GUIDESTAR'S WEBSITE. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |