Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Public Charity Status and Public Support
Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization or a section
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust.
Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ. See separate instructions.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2012
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Employer identification number
94-2581415
Part I
Reason for Public Charity Status
(All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions.
The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For lines 1 through 11, check only one box.)
1
2
3
4
5
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Complete Part II.)
6
7
8
9
receipts from activities related to its exempt functions—subject to certain exceptions, and (2) no more than 331/3% of
its support from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses
acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975. See section 509(a)(2). (Complete Part III.)
10
11
e
By checking this box, I certify that the organization is not controlled directly or indirectly by one or more disqualified persons other than foundation managers and other than one or more publicly supported organizations described in section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2).
f
If the organization received a written determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II, or Type III supporting organization, check this box
..................................................
g
Since August 17, 2006, has the organization accepted any gift or contribution from any of the following persons?
(i) A person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or together with persons described in (ii)
Yes
No
and (iii) below, the governing body of the supported organization?
................
11g(i)
(ii)
A family member of a person described in (i) above?
......................
11g(ii)
(iii)
A 35% controlled entity of a person described in (i) or (ii) above?
................
11g(iii)
h
Provide the following information about the supported organization(s).
(i) Name of supported organization
(ii) EIN
(iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions))
(iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document?
(v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support?
(vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.?
(vii) Amount of monetary support
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Total
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990EZ.
Cat. No. 11285F
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Page 2
Part II
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Sections 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part I or if the
organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the organization fails to
qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part III.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2008
(b) 2009
(c) 2010
(d) 2011
(e) 2012
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") ....
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
2,245,406
1,010,302
7,319,608
2
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.......
3
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
4
Total. Add lines 1 through 3
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
2,245,406
1,010,302
7,319,608
5
The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included
on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f)..
599,386
6
Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4.
6,720,222
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2008
(b) 2009
(c) 2010
(d) 2011
(e) 2012
(f) Total
7
Amounts from line 4..
584,773
2,083,694
1,395,433
2,245,406
1,010,302
7,319,608
8
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources...
17,506
27,515
39,870
106,062
81,324
272,277
9
Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on..
10
Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.)..
-6,203
15,584
39,360
38,665
38,665
126,071
11
Total support (Add lines 7 through 10).
7,717,956
12
Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (see instructions)
..................
12
280,953
13
First five years.
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here........................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
14
Public support percentage for 2012 (line 6, column (f) divided by line 11, column (f))
.........
14
87.070 %
15
Public support percentage for 2011 Schedule A, Part II, line 14
...............
15
82.760 %
16a
33 1/3% support test—2012.
If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box
and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.......................
b
33 1/3% support test—2011.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13 or 16a, and line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this
box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.....................
17a
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2012.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b, and line 14
is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test, check this box and stop here. Explain
in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported
organization
.....................................................
b
10%-facts-and-circumstances test—2011.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or 17a, and line
15 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test, check this box and stop here.
Explain in Part IV how the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
................................................
18
Private foundation.
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, 17a, or 17b, check this box and see
instructions
.....................................................
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Page 3
Part III
Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Section 509(a)(2) (Complete only if you checked the box on line 9 of Part I or if the organization
failed to qualify under Part II. If the organization fails to qualify under
the tests listed below, please complete Part II.)
Section A. Public Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2008
(b) 2009
(c) 2010
(d) 2011
(e) 2012
(f) Total
1
Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .
2
Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose......
3
Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513..
4
Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf...
5
The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge..
6
Total. Add lines 1 through 5.
7a
Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons...
b
Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year.
c
Add lines 7a and 7b..
8
Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.)
Section B. Total Support
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
(a) 2008
(b) 2009
(c) 2010
(d) 2011
(e) 2012
(f) Total
9
Amounts from line 6...
10a
Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources..
b
Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975.
c
Add lines 10a and 10b.
11
Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.
12
Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.)
..
13
Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.)..
14
First five years.
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and stop here.............................................
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
15
Public support percentage for 2012 (line 8, column (f) divided by line 13, column (f))
.........
15
16
Public support percentage from 2011 Schedule A, Part III, line 15
...............
16
Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage
17
Investment income percentage for 2012 (line 10c, column (f) divided by line 13, column (f))
......
17
18
Investment income percentage from 2011 Schedule A, Part III, line 17
.............
18
19a
33 1/3% support tests—2012.
If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15 is more than 33 1/3%, and line 17 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
........
b
33 1/3% support tests—2011.
If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a, and line 16 is more than 33 1/3% and line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and stop here. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
.....
20
Private foundation.
If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a, or 19b, check this box and see instructions
.....
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Page 4
Part IV
Supplemental Information.
Complete this part to provide the explanations required by Part II, line 10; Part II, line 17a or 17b; and Part III, line 12. Also complete this part for any additional information. (See instructions).
Facts And Circumstances Test
Explanation
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2012
Additional Data
Software ID:
Software Version:
-
TIN:
SCHEDULE O (Form 990 or 990-EZ)
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Supplemental Information to Form 990 or 990-EZ
Complete to provide information for responses to specific questions on
Form 990 or to provide any additional information.
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
OMB No. 1545-0047
2012
Open to Public Inspection
Name of the organization
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Employer identification number
94-2581415
Identifier
Return Reference
Explanation
EXPLANATION ON VOLUNTEERS AND TYPES OF SERVICES OR BENEFITS
FORM 990, PAGE 1, PART I, LINE 6
A MAJOR STRENGTH OF THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE IS OUR ABILITY TO LEVERAGE THE HUMAN RESOURCES OF THE PRIVATE BAR. OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST YEAR WE MOBILIZED OVER 1,000 PRO BONO ATTORNEYS WHO CONTRIBUTED MORE THAN 48,000 HOURS OF FREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE, SERVICES VALUED AT ALMOST 19 MILLION. PRO BONO ATTORNEYS PROVIDED DIRECT LEGAL SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS AND CONTRIBUTED TO LARGER IMPACT LITIGATION AND POLICY ADVOCACY PROJECTS.
FIRST ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A
RACE (DETAILED): IN 2013, LCCR'S SECOND CHANCE LEGAL CLINIC CONTINUED TO PROVIDE PROBONO LEGAL SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO OVERCOME HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT BARRIERS THAT STEM FROM PAST CONTACT WITH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. CLINICS ARE OFFERED AT TWO SAN FRANCISCO LOCATIONS, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH MO MAGIC AND GOODWILL INDUSTRIES. IN 2013, LCCR ALSO PILOTED A CLINIC AT HOSPITALITY HOUSE. DURING THE PAST YEAR, THE CLINIC SERVED 128 CLIENTS IN OVER 188 EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING, DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENSIONS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING-RELATED MATTERS. LCCR ALSO PROVIDED KNOW-YOUR-RIGHTS WORKSHOPS TO MORE THAN 378 MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY, AND TRAININGS AND WORKSHOPS ON RACIAL JUSTICE ISSUES TO OVER 702 ATTORNEYS AND LAW STUDENTS. ON BEHALF OF MINORITY-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GROUPS, LCCR SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDED ON APPEAL THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FROM A LEGAL CHALLENGE TO THE PROGRAM'S RACE-CONSCIOUS MEASURES FOR FEDERALLY-FUNDED CONTRACTS. THE APPEAL RESULTED IN A PUBLISHED NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION UPHOLDING THE PROGRAM. LCCR, THE ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, ARNOLD & PORTER, AND THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT RUBIN SUCCESSFULLY SETTLED A LAWSUIT ON BEHALF OF LATINO AND ASIAN VOTERS CHALLENGING THE DISCRIMINATORY AT-LARGE ELECTION SYSTEM THAT GOVERNED SAN MATEO COUNTY'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELECTIONS. AS A RESULT OF OUR LAWSUIT, THE COUNTY HAS NOW MOVED TO A DISTRICT-BASED SYSTEM. LCCR CONTINUED OUR ADVOCACY POST-SETTLEMENT, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISTRICT LINES ULTIMATELY ADOPTED WERE FAIR AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. LCCR PRESENTED LEGAL TRAININGS THROUGHOUT THE STATE TO EXPLAIN THE CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS ACT TO INTERESTED INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITY GROUPS. LCCR ALSO PRESENTED INFORMATION ON THE FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION ON THE ACT (SHELBY COUNTY). LCCR, TOGETHER WITH THE LAW FIRM OF GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER, ISSUED A REPORT ENTITLED "HELD BACK: ADDRESSING THE MISPLACEMENT OF 9TH GRADE STUDENTS IN BAY AREA SCHOOL MATH CLASSES." THE REPORT HIGHLIGHTED THE ISSUE OF STUDENTS OF COLOR IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTIES BEING UNFAIRLY HELD BACK IN MATH CLASSES WHEN THEY TRANSITION TO HIGH SCHOOL, AND DEMONSTRATED HOW PLACEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES THAT UNJUSTIFIABLY FALL MORE HEAVILY ON MINORITY STUDENTS VIOLATE FEDERAL AND STATE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS. SUBSEQUENT ADVOCACY EFFORTS WITH PRO BONO ASSISTANCE FROM THE GIBSON FIRM AS WELL AS WILSON, SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI HAVE FOCUSED ON UNCOVERING AND REFORMING PROBLEMATIC PRACTICES IN INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS. LCCR, TOGETHER WITH THE BINGHAM LAW FIRM, ISSUED A REPORT ENTITLED "PUSHING THE LINE," HIGHLIGHTING THE DISPARITIES IN SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S STUDENT ASSIGNMENT PLAN AND ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES, AND IN PARTICULAR HOW THESE PRACTICES DISPROPORTIONATELY AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE LARGELY MINORITY STUDENT BODY OF THE RAVENSWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. FOLLOWING OUR REPORT, SUHSD ADOPTED AN INTERIM STUDENT ASSIGNMENT PLAN THAT MITIGATED SOME OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS THAT THE REPORT HIGHLIGHTED; LCCR CONTINUES TO MONITOR HOW A PERMANENT PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. LCCR COLLABORATED WITH ALL OF US OR NONE, THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT AND OTHER GROUPS TO SECURE STATE LEGISLATION TO EXTEND "EXPUNGEMENT" REMEDIES TO ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS. THE LEGISLATION WAS SIGNED INTO LAW BY GOVERNOR BROWN IN 2013. LCCR WORKED WITH LOCAL COMMUNITY PARTNERS TO DEVELOP A SAN FRANCISCO ORDINANCE THAT WOULD REGULATE THE USE OF CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION IN EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING DECISIONS. THE ORDINANCE WAS INTRODUCED IN LATE 2013. TOGETHER WITH PUBLIC INTEREST PARTNERS, LCCR PRESSED FOR ENFORCEMENT OF A FAVORABLE COURT RULING AGAINST CALIFORNIA STATE OFFICIALS TO HALT A PRACTICE THAT DENIES MEDI-CAL TO ELIGIBLE CHILDREN AND INSTEAD PLACES THEM INTO A HIGHER-COST PROGRAM WITH FEWER BENEFITS. THE SUPERIOR COURT ISSUED A RULING THAT WILL RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF CHILD APPLICANTS BEING ENROLLED INTO NO-COST MEDI-CAL INSTEAD OF HEALTHY FAMILIES, WITH IMPROVED ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE. TOGETHER WITH MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, LCCR LITIGATED A CASE REGARDING THE CONDITIONS AND SERVICES AT THE WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL FOR AT-RISK YOUTH. LCCR PILOTED AN EDUCATION LAW CLINIC IN 2013, TO SERVE CLIENTS WITH EDUCATION-RELATED LEGAL ISSUES. THE CLINIC WAS DESIGNED WITH INPUT GATHERED AT THREE COMMUNITY MEETINGS HELD AT LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT SAN FRANCISCO. THESE MEETINGS WERE ATTENDED BY OVER 40 INDIVIDUALS FROM 20 COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS. A STEERING COMMITTEE OF PRO BONO ATTORNEYS FROM 4 LAW FIRMS IS ALSO HELPING GUIDE THE DESIGN OF THE CLINIC AND IS ASSISTING WITH PRODUCING LEGAL MATERIALS. IN DECEMBER 2013, LCCR AND OUR COMMUNITY ALLIES CONDUCTED AN EDUCATION CLINIC WORKSHOP SERIES (3 DIFFERENT WORKSHOPS). THE GOAL OF THE SERIES WAS TO INFORM COMMUNITY GROUPS ABOUT LEGAL ISSUES IN THE EDUCATION AREA, SO THAT THEY COULD IDENTIFY WHEN THEIR CLIENTS MIGHT BENEFIT FROM LEGAL ASSISTANCE ON EDUCATION MATTERS AND MAKE REFERRALS TO LCCR AS APPROPRIATE. 44 STAFF MEMBERS FROM 23 DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATED IN THIS SERIES.
SECOND ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B
2012/2013 - IMMIGRATION + ASYLUM (DETAILED) LCCR'S ASYLUM PROGRAM MATCHES REFUGEES FLEEING PERSECUTION AND TORTURE IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRIES WITH VOLUNTEER ATTORNEYS AND INTERPRETERS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. DURING THE PAST YEAR, LCCR ASSISTED 161 ASYLUM-SEEKERS. LCCR ALSO PROVIDED 19 TRAININGS AND LEGAL WORKSHOPS ON ASYLUM AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ISSUES TO OVER 567 ATTORNEYS, PARALEGALS, INTERPRETERS, AND LAW STUDENTS. LCCR, ALONG WITH WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI AND THE ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, CONTINUED TO LITIGATE A FEDERAL CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE BLANKET SHACKLING OF IMMIGRATION DETAINEES DURING THEIR IMMIGRATION COURT HEARINGS IN SAN FRANCISCO. LCCR, ALONG WITH MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON, CONTINUED TO LITIGATE A CASE ON BEHALF OF A GERMAN VISITOR OF MIDDLE EASTERN DESCENT WHO, DESPITE STRONG U.S. FAMILY TIES AND NUMEROUS PREVIOUS VISITS, WAS DENIED ENTRY TO THE U.S. BY IMMIGRATION AGENTS WHO PRESSURED HIM TO BECOME A SPY AND WAS THEN TAKEN TO A LOCAL JAIL, WHERE HE WAS SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL CAVITY SEARCH AND OTHER HARSH CONDITIONS. LCCR SETTLED THE CASE WITH THE LOCAL DEFENDANTS; NEGOTIATIONS ARE ONGOING WITH THE FEDERAL DEFENDANTS. LCCR, ALONG WITH DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, FILED AND SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATED A CASE SEEKING ACCESS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) TO ASYLUM OFFICER INTERVIEW NOTES. IN 2013, LCCR REACHED A FAVORABLE SETTLEMENT THAT WILL, ON A NATIONWIDE BASIS, ENSURE THAT THE U.S. WILL NO LONGER CATEGORICALLY DENY ASYLUM-SEEKERS ACCESS TO THESE INTERVIEW NOTES, WHICH ARE OFTEN CRUCIAL TO PURSUING A SUCCESSFUL ASYLUM CLAIM. LCCR JOINED WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS TO MONITOR ICE/DHS'S WORKPLACE AUDITS, TO DETERMINE IF THERE WAS UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOR, SUCH AS VIOLATION OF INTERNAL AGENCY RULES OR TARGETING OF UNION COMPANIES. MONITORING INCLUDED PURSUING A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST TO UNCOVER DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THESE ISSUES. TOGETHER WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS, LCCR BEGAN MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRUST ACT, A STATE LAW THAT GOES INTO EFFECT IN JANUARY 2014 AND LIMITS LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COOPERATION WITH FEDERAL DEPORTATION HOLD REQUESTS. ACTIVITY IN 2013 INCLUDED DRAFTING AND SENDING MEMORANDUM TO COUNTY COUNSELS REGARDING INTERPRETATION OF THE ACT AND SENDING PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUESTS TO COUNTIES TO GAIN ACCESS TO IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES AND OTHER KEY COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS. LCCR WORKED WITH COMMUNITY AND LEGAL ALLIES TO RESEARCH, ADVOCATE FOR, AND ULTIMATELY PASS THE DUE PROCESS FOR ALL LAW, A SAN FRANCISCO ORDINANCE THAT SUBSTANTIALLY PROHIBITS SAN FRANCISCO LAW ENFORCEMENT TO DETAIN PEOPLE SOLELY FOR IMMIGRATION PURPOSES. IT WAS SIGNED INTO LAW IN OCTOBER 2013. IN 2013, LCCR PURSUED LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ADVOCACY AND LED PUBLIC EDUCATION EFFORTS AROUND COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. ADVOCACY EFFORTS FOCUSED ON ENSURING FAIR AND INCLUSIVE REFORM, WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON ASYLUM PROVISIONS. IN 2013, LCCR ISSUED A POLICY REPORT DESCRIBING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN CONTROLLED APPLICATION REVIEW AND RESOLUTION PROGRAM (CARRP), WHICH RESULTS IN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST IMMIGRANTS FROM MUSLIM, ARAB, AND SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES. THE REPORT WAS DRAFTED AND ISSUED IN COLLABORATION WITH THE LAW FIRM OF MAYER BROWN AND ACLU-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.
THIRD ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION
FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C
2012/2013 - ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT (LONG) LCCR'S LEGAL SERVICES FOR ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM PROVIDES PRO BONO BUSINESS LAW SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE INTERESTED IN STARTING OR EXPANDING SMALL, FOR-PROFIT BUSINESSES, AS WELL AS TO OTHER BUSINESSES, INCLUDING THOSE THAT INVEST DIRECTLY IN ECONOMICALLY DISTRESSED NEIGHBORHOODS. DURING THE PAST YEAR, THE PROGRAM PROVIDED LEGAL SERVICES TO OVER 937 MICROENTREPRENEURS THROUGH WORKSHOPS AND ATTORNEY-MATCHING. THE PROGRAM ALSO PARTNERED WITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE CLINICS IN THE FILLMORE, CHINATOWN, AND MISSION NEIGHBORHOODS OF SAN FRANCISCO, AS WELL AS IN LOCATIONS IN ALAMEDA AND MARIN COUNTIES. IN ADDITION TO EXPANDING GEOGRAPHICALLY, LCCR'S LEGAL SERVICES FOR ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM TARGETED SPECIFIC POPULATIONS FOR SERVICE, INCLUDING AN EMPLOYMENT LAW ROUNDTABLE FOR RESTAURANT OWNERS; A LEGAL WORKSHOP FOR CLOTHING DESIGNERS; AND A LEGAL TRAINING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MINORITY CONTRACTORS, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. LCCR ALSO CONDUCTED TRAININGS AND WORKSHOPS IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES, TO ENSURE ACCESS FOR MICROENTREPRENEURS WHO SPEAK LANGUAGES OTHER THAN ENGLISH. IN 2013, LCCR JOINED THE OAKLAND SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS INITIATIVE, A COALITION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, FOUNDATIONS, AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FORMED TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD'S HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION OPPORTUNITIES. THERE IS A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT IN THIS OAKLAND CORRIDOR TO BRING A BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) SYSTEM, GREEN SPACES, HISTORIC LANDMARKS, AND TO ATTRACT BUSINESSES, HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND MANY MORE AMENITIES TO THE AREA. LCCR'S WORK INCLUDES ENSURING THAT AC TRANSIT'S PLANS TO MITIGATE THE BRT DEVELOPMENT'S NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON LOCAL BUSINESSES AND RESIDENTS ARE RESPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY NEEDS, AND PREPARING THE SMALL BUSINESSES ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT (I.E., WORKSHOPS AND CLINICS TO EDUCATE AND COUNSEL SMALL BUSINESSES ON STRENGTHENING EXISTING BUSINESSES).
ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS USED TO REVIEW FORM 990
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B
THE 990 IS COMPLETED BY LCCR'S BOOKKEEPER. BEFORE IT IS SUBMITTED TO THE IRS , IT IS DISTRIBUTED TO ALL OFFICERS, TRUSTEES, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR REVIEW.
COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR TOP OFFICIAL
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S COMPENSATION IS SET BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE BOARD'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. THE BOARD'S CO-CHAIRS AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (CONSISTING OF THE CHAIR OF EACH BOARD COMMITTEE) SOLICIT THE INPUT OF THE ORGANIZATION'S STAFF AND ENTIRE BOARD REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DURING THE PRIOR CALENDAR YEAR. BASED UPON THAT INFORMATION, THE BOARD CO-CHAIRS EVALUATE THE ED'S PERFORMANCE AND RECOMMEND A COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ED COMPENSATION, INCLUDING BASE SALARY AND ANY POTENTIAL BONUS, IS THEN MADE TO THE FULL BOARD, WHICH CAN THEN APPROVE, DENY OR MODIFY THE RECOMMENDATION. NOTE THAT OTHER ASPECTS OF ED COMPENSATION, SUCH AS HEALTH AND OTHER BENEFITS, ARE SET AT THE SAME LEVEL AS OTHER STAFF.
COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR OFFICERS
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B
KEY EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION IS SET BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. WHERE POSSIBLE, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WILL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO COMPENSATE ITS STAFF FAIRLY AND EQUITABLY, AND TO INSURE THAT SALARIES AND BENEFITS ARE AT MARKET RATE, COMMENSURATE WITH EMPLOYEES OF COMPARABLE EXPERIENCE AND SENIORITY IN OTHER COMPARABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER AFFILIATES OF THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS. STAFF SALARIES WILL INITIALLY BE SET BASED ON JOB CLASSIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO EMPLOYMENT WITH LCCR. NOTE THAT OTHER ASPECTS OF KEY EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION, SUCH AS HEALTH AND OTHER BENEFITS, ARE SET AT THE SAME LEVEL AS OTHER STAFF.
GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION
FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19
UPON REQUEST, AS APPROPRIATE, AND AVAILABLE THROUGH ANNUAL REPORT.