Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? | (v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? | (vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? | (vii) Amount of monetary support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 2,588,718 | 2,948,525 | 3,704,758 | 3,453,345 | 2,989,502 | 15,684,848 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 2,588,718 | 2,948,525 | 3,704,758 | 3,453,345 | 2,989,502 | 15,684,848 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 0 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 15,684,848 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 2,588,718 | 2,948,525 | 3,704,758 | 3,453,345 | 2,989,502 | 15,684,848 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 3,330 | 1,921 | 2,032 | 339 | 2,452 | 10,074 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | 0 | |||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.).. | 0 | |||||
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | 15,694,922 | |||||






Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | 12000229 |
| Software Version: | 2012v2.0 |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Program Services, Projects 5 through 10 | (5) Enhancing disease resistance in soybean through the tools of biotechnology;The goal of this program is to evaluate transgenic approaches to provide resistance to viral attack, and aphid predation. The resultant genetic material from this program can then be incorporated into integrated pest management practices as a means to generate stable resistance under field conditions. Project objectives are designed to enhance genetic resistance towards the three main virus agents in the north central US, namely bean pod mottle virus (BPMV), alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) and soybean mosaic virus (SMV) and test both interfering RNAs and microRNAs directed towards critical genes of aphids as a means to combat insect predation. To this end the specific objectives are to:Conduct field trials in Ohio and Nebraska with transgenic soybean events identified with resistance towards the three major viruses that infect soybeans in the north central US, BPMV, SMV and AMV; andDesign and test strategies for expression of interfering RNA molecules in soybean that target critical genes of aphids as a means to combat predation of the insect. (6) Evaluation and development of a biological control product to control SDS and white mold; Sudden death syndrome (SDS) and Sclerotinia white mold are two of the most important fungi diseases of soybean. Managing these diseases is critical to sustainable soybean production in the North Central States. Biocontrol agents have promise of reducing the fungi causing SDS and/or white mold. The concept is to apply a biocontrol to the soil which reproduces and kill the fungi that are responsible for the disease. The projects specific objectives are to: Conduct multi-state field evaluation for fungal biological control agents that are found effective in reducing soybean sudden death syndrome and white mold;Investigate a wide-host-range bacterial bio-control agent that is effective in killing SDS and white mold pathogens for management of SDS and white mold in Illinois;Determine if biocontrol agents applied to crop residues of corn, alfalfa, or soybean can reduce inoculums production, infection and disease caused by F. virguliforme and Sclerotinia; andStudy how crop rotation affects the effectiveness of biocontrol agents/biofungicides. (7) Identification and biology of seedling pathogens of soybean; Soybean pathogens have been shown to cause seedling diseases which result in poor stands, weak plants and reduced seed yields. In the U.S., seedling diseases are reducing soybean yield by of 829,000 tons, annually. Researchers agree that information is lacking about the biology of the individual pathogens and the factors involved in disease development in the field environment. This continuing project is addressing these production constraints by identifying the causal agents of seedling disease, developing new tools for rapid diagnosis, developing new protocols for research and for germplasm screening assays, and developing management recommendations for producers and the industry.(8) Improving awareness and management of Charcoal rot in soybean in the North Central Region; Charcoal rot is caused by the soilborne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina, which has a very broad geographical distribution and can infect over 500 crop and weed species. Until more recently, M. phaseolina was considered a southern soybean pathogen and an infrequent pathogen of soybean in the North Central production region. The research presented here provides the necessary resources for presenting stakeholders in the North Central region with the most up-to-date information for understanding and managing charcoal rot in the North Central region. Most research field studies related to the companion USB-funded project are nearing completion and harvest and include Indiana, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio. This project was designed to augment an existing United Soybean Board funded project focusing on understanding resistance in soybean cultivars grown in the North Central region. The project improves the stakeholder awareness and knowledge of charcoal rot of soybean in the North Central region and begins to demonstrate suitable best management practices (BMPs) for charcoal rot.The specific research objectives are as follows:Establish a field demonstration plot in Iowa to complement those already established in Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Michigan and funded by the United Soybean Board. These plots will increase grower awareness of charcoal rot of soybean and showcase some potential best management practices (BMPs) for the disease in the North Central Region; and Develop new and up-to-date outreach materials including a feature article and video clips pertaining to charcoal rot of soybean and showcasing some potential best management practices (BMPs) for the disease in the North Central Region.(9) Increasing profits through genetic resistance to SDS; Sudden death syndrome (SDS) can cause serious soybean yield losses for growers in the north central US. Genetic resistance is the most economical way to control SDS in growers fields the development of resistant varieties is critical for controlling the disease. Knowing the locations of SDS resistance genes and how resistance is controlled will help breeders develop new high yielding, SDS resistant cultivars. The objectives of this proposal include:Map the locations on chromosomes of genes that confer resistance to SDS and develop molecular markers linked to resistance genes; Confirm the effects of mapped genes so they can be bred into elite soybean breeding lines as part of the breeding proposal; and Identify genes related to SDS resistance by gene expression profiling soybean roots and leaves. (10) Iron deficient chlorosis: Getting to the root of the problem; The purpose this continuing project is to address iron deficiency chlorosis in the upper Midwest using a combination of molecular genetics and gene cloning and manipulation. This is a coordinated project that combines the results of two distinct, but complementary approaches to solving this significant production constraint. This will be accomplished by completing the following objectives.Utilize genotype-by-sequencing and genomic selection procedures to broaden the number of markers associated with IDC tolerance in soybean and test those in breeding programs; Further refine the region associated with IDC tolerance on chromosome 3 to better understand the mechanisms of IDC tolerance; and Evaluate transgenic plants containing targeted genes involved in iron metabolism to determine their role in IDC tolerance | |
| Program Services, Projects 11 through 15 | (11) Soybean Aphid Management, Resistance, and Outreach in the North Central Region; The soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) is the most damaging insect pest to soybean production in the North Central region, capable of causing yield loss of 40% or more if not properly managed. Though there are well-researched economic thresholds and many available insecticides, producers face an increasing variety of choices for soybean aphid management. These include aphid-resistant varieties and new chemicals (notably, insecticidal seed treatments). Producers must also take into account factors such as environmental and crop variables, or the potential presence of new virulent aphid biotypes. These management factors and choices have potentially large financial implications; and yet research-based advice on many of them are still largely lacking. This project combines the multidisciplinary expertise of 28 scientists in 12 states, including entomologists, geneticists, plant breeders, agricultural economists, and Extension specialists. This multidisciplinary research proposal is organized into five large objectives, each with associated sub-objectives: Integrated pest management;Breeding and genetic resistance to soybean aphid;Soybean aphid biotypes;Biological control; and Extension and outreach.(12) The use of VIGS technology to decrease yield-limiting stress in soybeans; The projects goal is to understand the genetic pathways involved in biotic and abiotic stress resistance to enable the development of soybean germplasm with new defensive features that will lead to the breeding of soybean varieties that respond less to the variation of growing conditions. The VIGS technology uses BPMV (Bean pod mottle virus) to carry pieces of soybean gene sequences into the plant to turn off (silence) requisite target genes. In this technology, a piece of a soybean gene is placed in the BPMV virus vector and inserted in the soybean genome. Thus, VIGS technology allows for rapid screening and assessing the function of the genes being tested. The NCSRP portion of this project is the NCSRP contribution to a multi-state, multi-investigator project funded by USB, ISA, and NSF. The specific objectives are to: Optimize BPMV-DNA-based vector for developing a virus-based high-throughput gene silencing system; Use high-throughput gene silencing to identify soybean genes involved in resistance to biotic and abiotic stress; Select appropriate genes for development of soybean germplasm with new defensive features; andConduct bi-annual meetings of the collaborators to review all data, discuss difficulties, suggest alternatives, coordinate studies and plan further initiatives. (13) Mapping genes referring resistance to white mold; This research builds on two decades of research on white mold of soybean. Research has shown that there are genetic differences in resistance to this disease in soybean, however, breeding progress has been slow because it is difficult to obtain good white mold symptoms in the field on a routine basis and when the disease is present, the symptoms are inconsistent. This difficulty in screening has resulted in many of the soybean varieties marketed today being susceptible to white mold. The research in this proposal is focused on identifying locations of genes that confer resistance to white mold. Knowing the locations of these resistance genes can make breeding for white mold resistance more efficient, resulting in improved white mold resistance in varieties available to soybean growers. (14) Understanding cover crop use in soybean production systems; The goal of this research project is to increase the Midwest soybean grower understanding of the use of cover crops in their production systems. Cover crops can provide benefits to soil health and fertility, pest and disease suppression, nutrient management and improved soybean yields and profitability.(15)Plant Health Initiative; The goal of this project is to increase grower awareness of solutions for disease and insect problems by transferring knowledge gained from checkoff-funded activities to soybean producers through the electronic and print media. The project will continue to position PHI as an authoritative resource of plant health information.The specific objectives of the project are:Provide science-based information to soybean producers that can be used to reduce soybean yield loss from disease and insects;Sponsor conferences and workshops that highlight soybean disease research topics;Develop educational materials that will help soybean growers better manage soybean diseases and pests; and Facilitate and coordinate research and information transfer between industry, university, media and Midwest soybean growers. | |
| Program Services, Projects 1 through 4 | (1)Breeding to improve resistance to SDS in soybean as a means to protect yield: Delivering resistant varieties and lines; The foundational management strategy for sudden death syndrome (SDS) is using resistant cultivars. However, in years such as 2010 when environmental conditions are favorable for disease development, it is evident that resistance alone does not provide adequate control or reduce farmer risk sufficiently. Also, SDS continues to move into new areas. Thus, the main goal of this project is to investigate management options that will help ensure resistant cultivars will be as effective as possible thereby reducing risk as well as providing farmers with maximum economic return on their investment even in unusually conducive SDS conditions. Objectives:Determine the most effective diagnostic protocol for quantifying Fusarium virguliforme on roots and in soil.Evaluate if soybean root health can be improved to reduce SDS or be used as an indicator of SDS risk.Determine how shifts in soybean production practices affect the risk of SDS development.Communicate research results with farmers, agribusinesses and other soybean stakeholders.(2) Developing an integrated management and communication plan for soybean SDS; The primary management strategy for sudden death syndrome (SDS) is using resistant cultivars. However, in years such as 2010 when environmental conditions are favorable for disease development, it is evident that resistance alone does not provide adequate control or reduce farmer risk sufficiently. In addition, SDS continues to move into new areas. Thus, the main goal of this project is to investigate management options that will help ensure resistant cultivars will be as effective as possible thereby reducing risk as well as providing farmers with maximum economic return on their investment even in unusually conducive SDS conditions. The projects specific objectives are to:Determine the most effective diagnostic protocol for quantifying Fusarium virguliforme on roots and in soil;2. Evaluate if soybean root health can be improved to reduce SDS or be used as an indicator of SDS risk;Determine how shifts in soybean production practices affect the risk of SDS development; andCommunicate research results with farmers, agribusinesses and other soybean stakeholders.(3)Disease Study Group: Focus on new and emerging soybean diseases; The disease soybean vein necrosis virus (SVNV) was identified as a key disease for which farmers and agribusiness personnel need additional Extension information. SVNV was widely distributed across the North Central Region in 2012 and 2013. There is little Extension information currently available for stakeholder use on this virus disease. It is critical to provide stakeholders with factual information to prevent unwarranted management practices and improve awareness of the disease. The objectives of the project are to: Provide information on SVNV at multiple levels of Extension interface (print, web, video, etc.) to reach diverse groups of stakeholders;Create a platform to host and brand Extension material developed in conjunction with the North Central Soybean Research Program to facilitate updates and allow users to identify trusted sources of material through this branding partnership; andProvide current research summaries on emerging diseases to direct and coordinate future research priorities thereby minimizing duplication, maximizing resources and increasing response time.(4) Engineered resistance to soybean cyst nematode via induced gene silencing (RNAi); The primary goal of this research project is to establish a new set of biotech traits that have durable resistance to soybean cyst nematode (SCN). Turning off genes by a process known as RNA interference (RNAi) has tremendous potential as a new strategy to increase nematode resistance. Past research with other nematode species has demonstrated the scientific merit of the technique. This project will investigate the opportunities to insert target gene sequences in the SCN that will provide durable genetic materials that will be lethal to SCN populations.The specific objectives of this project are to:Engineer stable transgenic soybean plants with traits that can silence specific nematode genes;Evaluate transgenic lines with SCN bioassays to confirm the effectiveness of the level of SCN resistance; and Examine the durability of the transgenic traits on single and diverse populations of SCN. | |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 19 | Form 990, Part VI, Line 19: Other Organization Documents Publicly Available | Governing documents, conflict of interest policy and financial statements are available to the public upon request. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c | Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c: Explanation of Monitoring and Enforcement of Conflicts | ANNUALLY THE BOARD IS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE CONFLICTING INTERESTS. BOARD MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM ANY VOTE IF THERE IS A CONFLICT. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b | Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b: Form 990 Review Process | PRESENTED TO THE BOARD AT THE MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 4, 2013 |
| Software ID: | 12000229 |
| Software Version: | 2012v2.0 |