Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
See separate instructions.| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization in col. (i) listed in your governing document? | (v) Did you notify the organization in col. (i) of your support? | (vi) Is the organization in col. (i) organized in the U.S.? | (vii) Amount of monetary support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| Total | |||||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | ||||||
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | ||||||
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support (Add lines 7 through 10). | ||||||






Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | 690,901 | 671,209 | 676,440 | 999,127 | 958,655 | 3,996,332 |
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | 16,900 | 32,822 | 20,937 | 10,201 | 5,740 | 86,600 |
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | 707,801 | 704,031 | 697,377 | 1,009,328 | 964,395 | 4,082,932 |
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | 32,820 | 27,000 | 31,600 | 20,000 | 111,420 | |
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | 32,820 | 27,000 | 31,600 | 20,000 | 111,420 | |
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 3,971,512 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2008 | (b) 2009 | (c) 2010 | (d) 2011 | (e) 2012 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | 707,801 | 704,031 | 697,377 | 1,009,328 | 964,395 | 4,082,932 |
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | 4,461 | 4,461 | ||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part IV.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | 707,801 | 704,031 | 697,377 | 1,009,328 | 968,856 | 4,087,393 |




| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| Identifier | Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| FIRST ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | MINNESOTANS. AFTER ELECTION DAY, MPIRG'S COMMUNITY ORGANIZING DEPARTMENT DID EXTENSIVE OUTREACH TO EDUCATE MINNESOTANS ON ESTABLISHING A RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD OF 40% BY 2030, A SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD OF 10% BY 2030, AND OTHER RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY INCENTIVES. IN THE END, MPIRG AND OUR COALITION PARTNERS WERE SUCCESSFUL IN ESTABLISHING THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS OUR SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD, BY ESTABLISHING A GOAL OF 1.5% BY 2030. ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY INCENTIVES WERE ALSO PASSED INTO LAW. AT THE SAME TIME, THE FIELD CANVASS REACHED OUT TO MINNEAPOLITANS AND ST. PAULITES TO GAIN CITIZEN SUPPORT FOR CURBSIDE COLLECTION OF COMPOSTABLE WASTE AND TO OPPOSE THE EXPANSION OF THE DOWNTOWN GARBAGE BURNER, THE HENNEPIN ENERGY RECOVERY CENTER (HERC). THE FIELD AND PHONE CANVASSES ALSO EDUCATED, ENGAGED, AND ACTIVATED MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENTS IN SUPPORT OF TAKING CHARGE OF THE CITY'S ENERGY FUTURE. MPIRG KNOCKED ON OVER 55,000 DOORS, DISCUSSED THE ISSUE WITH OVER 18,000 RESIDENTS, AND SECURED OVER 3,500 CALLS TO ACTION FROM MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENTS. AS A RESULT, MPIRG SECURED COMMITMENTS FROM BOTH MAJOR UTILITIES TO DO MORE FOR THE CITY'S RESIDENTS. |
| SECOND ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B | TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE 2012 ELECTIONS, MPIRGSTUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIESLAUNCHED A NONPARTISAN VOTER ENGAGEMENT EFFORT THAT REGISTERED OR PLEDGED TO VOTE 7,624 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, EDUCATED 915 THROUGH DIRECT COMMUNICATION AND ELECTION ISSUES RELATED PROGRAMMING, AND MADE 18,110 DIRECT CONTACTS REMINDING STUDENTS OF THEIR POLLING PLACES AND TO GO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY. WHILE DOING THIS WORK, MPIRGERSENGAGED THEIR PEERS IN OPPOSITION TO THE TWO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1) THE ANTI-MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND 2) THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT. AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION MPIRGERS AT UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES ENGAGED THEIR PEERS AND LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE CAPITOL IN SUPPORT OF AN AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION. TWO STUDENTS FROM THE CHAPTER BECAME LEGISLATIVE INTERNS WITH MPIRG AND THEN WORKED WITH THE MINNESOTA SENATE AND HOUSE TO INTRODUCE HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT RELIEF LEGISLATION. IN ADDITION, MPIRG STUDENTS WORKED WITH AN APPLIED ECONOMIST TO RELEASE A REPORT, AND TESTIFY, ON THE POSITIVE ECONOMIC BENEFITS THAT WOULD ACCRUE TO MINNESOTA UNDER THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION. THIS REPORT WAS RELEASED ALONG WITH A DEBT YEARBOOK IN WHICH THE FACES OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN WERE SHOWN TO HIGHLIGHT THE REAL, PERSONAL IMPACT THIS DEBT IS HAVING. THEY ALSO ADVOCATED IN SUPPORT OF INCREASING STATE INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE STATE GRANT PROGRAM, WHICH ULTIMATELY LED TO BUDGET ALLOCATIONS THAT FROZE TUITION FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE. ENVIRONOMICS MPIRG STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ACTIVE IN SUPPORT OF THE CLEAN ENERGY AND JOBS CAMPAIGN, A COALITION OF OVER 30 NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS THAT PUSHED FOR A SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD OF 10% BY 2030. THE COALITION WAS SUCCESSFUL IN GETTING A START ON THIS OBJECTIVE BY ESTABLISHING A 1.5% SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD, WHILE ALSO ADVANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOALS, AND OTHER POLICIES THAT CREATE THE RIGHT INCENTIVES AND BEGIN THE TRANSITION TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY. SEVERAL STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES CAMPUS WERE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE MINNEAPOLIS ENERGY OPTIONS CAMPAIGN TO BRING CLEAN, LOCAL, EFFICIENT, AFFORDABLE, AND RELIABLE ENERGY TO THE CITY. THEY ASSISTED IN DIRECT ADVOCACY, COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORTS. CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY MPIRGERS CONTINUED TO PUSH FOR GREATER CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY ON CAMPUS BY RAISING AWARENESS AND TAKING ACTION TO MOVE AWAY FROM PREDATORY BANKS TO MORE RESPONSIBLE BANKING OPTIONS. THE ALSO BEGAN WORK TO EXAMINE THE SIZE AND NATURE OF THE INVESTMENTS IN THE ENDOWMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES. THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS IDENTIFY THOSE INVESTMENTS WHICH RUN COUNTER TO THE VALUES OF STUDENTS, AND THE UNIVERSITY AS A WHOLE, AND TO TRANSITION TO MORE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH 44 EVENTS, 7,378 REACHED, AND 432 VOLUNTEER HOURS. DEMOCRACY - VOTE NOVEMBER 6 TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE 2012 ELECTIONS, MPIRG STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH LAUNCHED A NONPARTISAN VOTER ENGAGEMENT EFFORT THAT REGISTERED OR PLEDGED TO VOTE 2,514 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, EDUCATED 100S THROUGH DIRECT COMMUNICATION AND ELECTION ISSUES RELATED PROGRAMMING, AND MADE 1000S OF DIRECT CONTACTS REMINDING STUDENTS OF THEIR POLLING PLACES AND TO GO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY. WHILE DOING THIS WORK, MPIRGERS ENGAGED THEIR PEERS IN OPPOSITION TO THE TWO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1) THE ANTI-MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND 2) THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT. ENVIRONOMICS MPIRGERS COMPLETED THEIR WORK SURVEYING STUDENT NEEDS FOR THE TRANSIT SYSTEM IN DULUTH. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS WERE SHARED WITH THE DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF DULUTH, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH ADMINISTRATION. STUDENTS ARE CURRENTLY WORKING TO COMPLETE A REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY AND ADVOCATE FOR REASONABLE REFORMS THAT IMPROVE THE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN TRANSIT AND CLASS SCHEDULES. THE TASK FORCE AT THE CHAPTER ALSO BEGAN WORK TO SUPPORT FOSSIL FUEL DIVESTMENT BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH TO MORE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS. AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION MPIRGERS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - DULUTH ENGAGED THEIR PEERS AND LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE CAPITOL IN SUPPORT OF AN AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION. THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE DEBT YEARBOOK IN WHICH THE FACES OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN WERE SHOWN TO HIGHLIGHT THE REAL, PERSONAL IMPACT THIS DEBT IS HAVING. THEY ALSO ADVOCATED IN SUPPORT OF INCREASING STATE INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE STATE GRANT PROGRAM, WHICH ULTIMATELY LED TO BUDGET ALLOCATIONS THAT FROZE TUITION FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE. CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY MPIRGERS CONTINUED TO PUSH FOR GREATER CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY ON CAMPUS BY RAISING AWARENESS AND TAKING ACTION TO MOVE AWAY FROM PREDATORY BANKS TO MORE RESPONSIBLE BANKING OPTIONS. THE ALSO BEGAN WORK TO EXAMINE THE SIZE AND NATURE OF THE INVESTMENTS IN THE ENDOWMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA. THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS IDENTIFY THOSE INVESTMENTS WHICH RUN COUNTER TO THE VALUES OF STUDENTS, AND THE UNIVERSITY AS A WHOLE, AND TO TRANSITION TO MORE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - MORRIS 42 EVENTS, 1,703 REACHED, 494 VOLUNTEER HOURS DEMOCRACY - VOTE NOVEMBER 6 TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE 2012 ELECTIONS, MPIRG STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - MORRIS LAUNCHED A NONPARTISAN VOTER ENGAGEMENT EFFORT THAT REGISTERED OR PLEDGED TO VOTE 713 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, EDUCATED 100S THROUGH DIRECT COMMUNICATION AND ELECTION ISSUES RELATED PROGRAMMING, AND MADE 100S OF DIRECT CONTACTS REMINDING STUDENTS OF THEIR POLLING PLACES AND TO GO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY. WHILE DOING THIS WORK, MPIRGERS ENGAGED THEIR PEERS IN OPPOSITION TO THE TWO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1) THE ANTI-MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND 2) THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT. MPIRGERS CARRIED FORWARD THEIR INTEREST IN DEMOCRACY ISSUES TO THE STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION, IN WHICH THEY SUPPORTED SEVERAL VOTING REFORMS THAT WOULD IMPROVE THE EXPERIENCE OF STUDENTS AND THE BROADER COMMUNITY IN THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. ENVIRONOMICS MPIRG STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND ACTIVE IN SUPPORT OF THE CLEAN ENERGY AND JOBS CAMPAIGN, A COALITION OF OVER 30 NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS THAT PUSHED FOR A SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD OF 10% BY 2030. THE COALITION WAS SUCCESSFUL IN GETTING A START ON THIS OBJECTIVE BY ESTABLISHING A 1.5% SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD, WHILE ALSO ADVANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOALS, AND OTHER POLICIES THAT CREATE THE RIGHT INCENTIVES AND BEGIN THE TRANSITION TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY. AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION MPIRGERS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - MORRIS ENGAGED THEIR PEERS AND LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE CAPITOL IN SUPPORT OF AN AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION. THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE DEBT YEARBOOK IN WHICH THE FACES OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN WERE SHOWN TO HIGHLIGHT THE REAL, PERSONAL IMPACT THIS DEBT IS HAVING. THEY ALSO ADVOCATED IN SUPPORT OF INCREASING STATE INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE STATE GRANT PROGRAM, WHICH ULTIMATELY LED TO BUDGET ALLOCATIONS THAT FROZE TUITION FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE. CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY MPIRGERS CONTINUED TO PUSH FOR GREATER CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY ON CAMPUS BY RAISING AWARENESS AND TAKING ACTION TO MOVE AWAY FROM PREDATORY BANKS TO MORE RESPONSIBLE BANKING OPTIONS. THE ALSO BEGAN WORK TO EXAMINE THE SIZE AND NATURE OF THE INVESTMENTS IN THE ENDOWMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA. THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS IDENTIFY THOSE INVESTMENTS WHICH RUN COUNTER TO THE VALUES OF STUDENTS, AND THE UNIVERSITY AS A WHOLE, AND TO TRANSITION TO MORE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS. AUGSBURG COLLEGE 28 EVENTS, 1,081 REACHED, AND 305 VOLUNTEER HOURS DEMOCRACY - VOTE NOVEMBER 6 TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE 2012 ELECTIONS, MPIRG STUDENTS AT AUGSBURG COLLEGE LAUNCHED A NONPARTISAN VOTER ENGAGEMENT EFFORT THAT REGISTERED OR PLEDGED TO VOTE 791 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, EDUCATED 100S THROUGH DIRECT COMMUNICATION AND ELECTION ISSUES RELATED PROGRAMMING, AND MADE 100S OF DIRECT CONTACTS REMINDING STUDENTS OF THEIR POLLING PLACES AND TO GO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY. WHILE DOING THIS WORK, MPIRGERS ENGAGED THEIR PEERS IN OPPOSITION TO THE TWO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1) THE ANTI- MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND 2) THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT. AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION MPIRGERS AT AUGSBURG COLLEGE ENGAGED THEIR PEERS AND LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE CAPITOL IN SUPPORT OF AN AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION. THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE DEBT YEARBOOK IN WHICH THE FACES OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN WERE SHOWN TO HIGHLIGHT THE REAL, PERSONAL IMPACT THIS DEBT IS HAVING. THEY ALSO ADVOCATED IN SUPPORT OF INCREASING STATE INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE STATE GRANT PROGRAM, WHICH ULTIMATELY LED TO BUDGET ALLOCATIONS THAT FROZE TUITION FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE |
| THIRD ACCOMPLISHMENT DESCRIPTION | FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C | AT THE HENNEPINENERGY RECOVERY CENTER (HERC). A REPORT OUTLINING THE PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS, THE DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT THE GARBAGE BURNER HAS ON LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, THE GLOBAL WARMING IMPACTS, AND THE ALTERNATIVES TO APPROVING SUCH AN EXPANSION WAS FINALIZED FOR RELEASE IN LATE 2013. MPIRG EDUCATED, ENGAGED, AND ACTIVATED MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENTS IN SUPPORT OF TAKING CHARGE OF THE CITY'S ENERGY FUTURE IN A CAMPAIGN CALLED MINNEAPOLIS ENERGY OPTIONS. THE GOAL WAS CLEAN, AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE, AND LOCAL ENERGY THAT BENEFITS ALL COMMUNITIES. THE CAMPAIGN GREW OUT OF A COALITION THAT WANTED TO EMPLOY A NEW STRATEGY TO ACCELERATE THE TRANSITION TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY. THE CAMPAIGN CONNECTED MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENTS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF GREATER FREEDOM IN FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CITY'S TWO MAJOR UTILITY PROVIDERS, XCEL ENERGY FOR ELECTRICITY AND CENTERPOINT ENERGY FOR GAS. MPIRG KNOCKED ON OVER 55,000 DOORS, DISCUSSED THE ISSUE WITH OVER 18,000 RESIDENTS, AND SECURED OVER 3,500 CALLS TO ACTION FROM MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENTS. AS A RESULT, MPIRG SECURED A COMMITMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BY 25% BY 2030, REDUCING HIRING DISPARITIES, AND WORK TO ENHANCE THEIR ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS. THESE EFFORTS ALSO BROUGHT XCEL ENERGY TO THE TABLE TO NEGOTIATE WITH CITY LEADERS ABOUT HOW THEY CAN SUPPORT LOCAL CLEAN ENERGY DEPLOYMENT, PROMOTE AND ACHIEVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOALS, AND PROVIDE GREATER TRANSPARENCY IN ENERGY USAGE DATA TO FACILITATE ACHIEVING THESE GOALS. AT THE CAPITOL, MPIRG STUDENTS, AS PARTNERS IN THE CLEAN ENERGY AND JOBS COALITION, SUPPORTED A SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD OF 10% BY 2030. THE COALITION WAS SUCCESSFUL IN GETTING A START ON THIS OBJECTIVE BY ESTABLISHING A 1.5% SOLAR ELECTRICITY STANDARD, WHILE ALSO ADVANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOALS, AND OTHER POLICIES THAT CREATE THE RIGHT INCENTIVES AND BEGIN THE TRANSITION TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY. AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION MPIRG WORKED WITH LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE CAPITOL TO INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO REDUCE THE HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN FELT BY SO MANY STUDENTS IN MINNESOTA. THE LEGISLATION, KNOWN AS OPPORTUNITY MINNESOTA, CREATES A TAX CREDIT FOR PAYMENTS MADE ON ELIGIBLE HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT PAYMENTS FOR STUDENTS FROM HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN MINNESOTA THAT CONTINUE TO LIVE IN THE STATE POST-GRADUATION. MPIRG WAS SUCCESSFUL IN MOVING THE LEGISLATION THROUGH TWO KEY COMMITTEES IN THE SENATE, BUT WORK REMAINS TO ADVANCE THE BILL IN THE STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. ACCOMPANYING THE INTRODUCTION OF THE LEGISLATION AND COMMITTEE ACTION, MPIRG FINALIZED AND RELEASED AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE POLICY THAT SHOWED HOW THE BILL WOULD, IN THE LONG TERM, PAY FOR ITSELF BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO WOULD PURSUE AND OBTAIN A HIGHER EDUCATION. MPIRG WORKED CLOSELY WITH AN APPLIED ECONOMIST AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA WHO PROVIDED THE OVERALL DIRECTION AND FINAL ANALYSIS OF THE POLICY PROPOSAL. MPIRG RELEASED A DEBT YEARBOOK IN WHICH THE FACES OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN WERE SHOWN TO HIGHLIGHT THE REAL, PERSONAL IMPACT THIS DEBT IS HAVING ON STUDENTS IN MINNESOTA. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT - VOTE NOVEMBER 6 MPIRG WORKED WITH STUDENTS AT OUR SEVEN COLLEGE CAMPUSES AND ENGAGED COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO OPPOSE TWO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1) THE ANTI-MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND 2) THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT. MPIRG'S WORK IN OPPOSITION TO THE VOTER RESTRICTION AND ANTI-MARRIAGE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES WAS A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THEIR ULTIMATE REJECTION BY MINNESOTANS. WHILE OVERALL OPPOSITION TO THE VOTER RESTRICTION AMENDMENT ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES WAS 69.5%, CAMPUSES WITH MPIRG CHAPTERS WERE 12 POINTS MORE LIKELY TO VOTE AGAINST IT, AVERAGING 76.9% VOTING "NO". LIKEWISE, OVERALL OPPOSITION TO THE ANTI-MARRIAGE AMENDMENT ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES WAS 78.8%, CAMPUSES WITH MPIRG CHAPTERS WERE 7 POINTS MORE LIKELY TO VOTE AGAINST IT, AVERAGING 82.8% VOTING "NO". THIS REFLECTS THE BROAD OPPOSITION BY YOUNGER GENERATIONS TO RESTRICTIONS ON LOVING RELATIONSHIPS AND RESTRICTIONS ON EXERCISING THEIR FRANCHISE TO VOTE. RESEARCH AND PUBLIC EDUCATION AS NOTED IN PROGRAM SERVICE ONE, MPIRG RELEASED AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OUR PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO REDUCE THE HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT BURDEN FOR COLLEGE GRADUATES IN MINNESOTA. MPIRG ALSO FINALIZED A REPORT, FOR RELEASE IN LATE 2013, THAT EXAMINES SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MINNEAPOLIS AND THE MANY CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH A PROPOSED INCREASE TO GARBAGE INCINERATION IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. KEY FINDINGS AND CONCERNS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT OUTLINE THE PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS, THE DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT THE GARBAGE BURNER HAS ON LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, THE GLOBAL WARMING IMPACTS, AN ANALYSIS OF THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES, AND THE ALTERNATIVES TO APPROVING SUCH AN EXPANSION. ALSO NOTED IN PROGRAM SERVICE ONE, MPIRG FINALIZED AND RELEASED AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION DEBT RELIEF POLICY THAT SHOWED HOW THE BILL WOULD, IN THE LONG TERM, PAY FOR ITSELF BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO WOULD PURSUE AND OBTAIN A HIGHER EDUCATION. MPIRG WORKED CLOSELY WITH AN APPLIED ECONOMIST AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA WHO PROVIDED THE OVERALL DIRECTION AND FINAL ANALYSIS OF THE POLICY PROPOSAL. MPIRG HOSTS NUMEROUS PUBLIC EDUCATION EVENTS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. MPIRG'S ORGANIZING WORK, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, HAS A PRIMARY PURPOSE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION ON KEY PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES. |
| POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING CHAPTERS | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 10B | MOST LOCAL CHAPTERS HAVE THEIR OWN BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OPERATE AUTONOMOUSLY. MPIRG IS IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS PROCESS. |
| ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS USED TO REVIEW FORM 990 | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | EVERY YEAR, AFTER MPIRG'S AUDITOR PREPARES THE ORGANIZATION'S 990, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVIEWS THE DOCUMENT WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE AUDITOR, WHO IS ALSO PRESENT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS. BOARD MEMBERS ARE GIVEN A DRAFT COPY OF THE 990 PRIOR TO THE BOARD MEETING FOR REVIEW. ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS ARE RAISED DURING THAT MEETING AND, IF NECESSARY, REVISIONS ARE MADE TO 990. UPON COMPLETION OF THE REVIEW PROCESS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FORMALLY APPROVES THE 990 FOR SUBMISSION TO THE IRS. |
| ENFORCEMENT OF CONFLICTS POLICY | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | BEFORE EACH BOARD MEMBER'S FIRST MEETING, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO READ OUR THREE-PAGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THEY UNDERSTAND THE POLICY, AGREEING TO DISCLOSE ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THAT MAY ARISE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. THERE IS ALSO AN AGENDA ITEM DEDICATED TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST REVIEW AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH BOARD MEETING, REMINDING BOARD MEMBERS TO DISCLOSE ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTERESTS WITH THE ITEMS ON THAT WEEK'S AGENDA. IF A BOARD MEMBER RAISES A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THE ENTIRE BOARD DISCUSSES WHETHER THERE IS A CONFLICT PRESENT, DECIDING BY MAJORITY VOTE (WITH THE CHAIR AND MEMBER IN QUESTION NOT VOTING) IF NECESSARY. IF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS FOUND IN REGARDS TO A SPECIFIC ITEM, THEN THAT BOARD MEMBER ABSTAINS FROM PARTICIPATING DURING THAT AGENDA ITEM. |
| COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR TOP OFFICIAL | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ED), THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS CHARGED WITH RECOMMENDING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE POSITION BASED ON COMPARABILITY DATA AND RESEARCH INTO ED COMPENSATION LEVELS OF ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR MISSIONS AND SIZE. MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE SALARY AND BENEFITS SURVEY FROM THE MINNESOTA COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS WAS USED ALONG WITH RESEARCH INTO ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS, SUCH AS CLEAN WATER ACTION AND OTHER STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUPS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, TO DETERMINE OVERALL SALARY RANGES FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. IN ADDITION TO THESE CONSIDERATIONS, BOARD MEMBERS ALSO TOOK INTO ACCOUNT PAST COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR THE POSITION AND WHETHER OR NOT THE RECOMMENDED COMPENSATION LEVEL COULD BE SUPPORTED UNDER THE BUDGET. THEN, BASED ON THE SALARY RANGE PROVIDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE HIRING COMMITTEE DETERMINES THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF COMPENSATION BASED ON THE APPLICANTS WORK EXPERIENCE. FOR A RETURNING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RAISES AND COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR THE COMING YEAR ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE BUDGET APPROVAL PROCESS. COMPENSATION INCREASES ARE DISCUSSED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SUGGESTED INCREASES ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE BUDGET. |
| COMPENSATION PROCESS FOR OFFICERS | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | FOR KEY EMPLOYEES, A SIMILAR PROCESS IS USED. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS CHARGED WITH RECOMMENDING SALARY RANGES FOR THESE POSITIONS BASED ON COMPARABILITY DATA AND RESEARCH INTO THE COMPENSATION LEVELS IN ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR MISSIONS AND SIZE. MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE SALARY AND BENEFITS SURVEY FROM THE MINNESOTA COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS WAS USED ALONG WITH RESEARCH INTO ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS, SUCH AS CLEAN WATER ACTION AND OTHER STATE PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUPS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, TO DETERMINE OVERALL SALARY RANGES FOR ALL KEY EMPLOYEES. IN ADDITION TO THESE CONSIDERATIONS, BOARD MEMBERS ALSO TOOK INTO ACCOUNT PAST COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR THE POSITION AND WHETHER OR NOT THE RECOMMENDED COMPENSATION LEVEL COULD BE SUPPORTED UNDER THE BUDGET. THEN, BASED ON THE SALARY RANGE PROVIDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE HIRING COMMITTEE DETERMINES THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF COMPENSATION BASED ON THE APPLICANTS WORK EXPERIENCE. FOR RETURNING EMPLOYEES, RAISES AND COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR THE COMING YEAR ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE BUDGET APPROVAL PROCESS. COMPENSATION INCREASES ARE DISCUSSED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SUGGESTED INCREASES ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE BUDGET. |
| GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION | FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | UPON REQUEST THE ORGANIZATION WILL PROVIDE COPIES OF ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |