Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 2,317,788 | 12,038,452 | 9,970,877 | 8,537,365 | 4,037,279 | 36,901,761 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 2,317,788 | 12,038,452 | 9,970,877 | 8,537,365 | 4,037,279 | 36,901,761 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 31,849,098 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 5,052,663 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 2,317,788 | 12,038,452 | 9,970,877 | 8,537,365 | 4,037,279 | 36,901,761 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 310,389 | 325,273 | 292,505 | 611,485 | 1,500,898 | 3,040,550 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Total support Add lines 7 through 10. | 39,942,311 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e | Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): | |||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions) | |||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2014 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2014 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2014: | ||||
| a From 2009.......X | ||||
| b From 2010.......X | ||||
| c From 2011.......X | ||||
| d From 2012.......X | ||||
| e From 2013....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2009 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2014 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2014, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2014. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2015. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a From 2010.......X | ||||
| b From 2011.......X | ||||
| c From 2012.......X | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| 10% Facts and Circumstances Test | To be classified as a public charity using the 10% facts and circumstances test under Treas. Regs. Section 1.170A-9(f), two requirements must be satisfied. First, the organization must derive at least 10 percent of its support from governmental units or from direct or indirect contributions from the general public, or a combination of both. In addition, the organization must also be organized and operated so that it will attract further support on a continuous basis. This means the organization must maintain a continuous and bona fide fundraising program or carry on programs designed to attract support from governmental units or other public charities. Compliance with both requirements is mandatory in order to meet the facts-and-circumstances test. As of December 31, 2014, the Center's public support is 12.65%, above the minimum 10% requirement described above. This includes a large contribution from the Joint Commission of $3.8 million. As evidence of the Center's bona fide fundraising efforts, it should be noted that the organization has registered in 38 states across the country in those states that requires charitable organizations to register in order to solicit charitable contributions. The Center has been soliciting charitable contributions from businesses, companies, associations and charitable foundation that work in the healthcare field. In addition to satisfying the two mandatory requirements of the facts-and-circumstances test, additional facts and circumstances are evaluated to determine whether the organization is publicly supported. Based on the information below, we believe that the Center clearly satisfies the 10% facts and circumstances public support test. Actual Percentage of "Public Support" The regulations indicate that "the higher the public support percentage is above the 10% level, the more indicative of broad base public support". As indicated above, the Center's public support percentage through the end of 2014 is 12.65%. Sources of Support: The regulations indicate that the fact that "an organization meets the requirement above through support from governmental units or directly or indirectly from a representative number of persons, rather than receiving almost all of its support from the members of a single family, will be taken into consideration in determining whether the organization is publicly supported". In addition to contributions from the Joint Commission, a publicly supported organization itself, the Center has received significant contributions from thirteen contributors. The contributors represent a broad spectrum support from companies in the healthcare field, including pharmaceutical companies, equipment manufacturers, health insurance providers as well as health care trade associations and charitable foundations. Representative Governing Body: The regulations indicate that "the fact that an organization has a governing body which represents the broad interest of the public, rather than the personal or private interest of a limited number of donors" will be taken into account in determining whether an organization is publicly supported. Other factors in the regulations indicating a public board representing the broad interests of the public is whether it is comprised of individuals having special knowledge and expertise in the particular field or discipline in which the organization is operating. The Center's board of directors clearly would be considered a "representative governing body". All of its members have special knowledge and expertise in the healthcare field and with healthcare quality issues. Availability of Public Services; Public Participation in Programs: The regulations indicate the fact that an organization which provides educational services to the public through the distribution of educational materials on a continuing basis, will be considered as evidence that the organization is publicly supported. The Center's entire focus is to work with hospitals and improve the safety and quality of the healthcare services provided by these institutions. The downloadable articles, videos, podcasts and any public speaking which is done at no charge are freely available on the Center's website. The ultimate beneficiaries of these activities are the patients and the public. The active participation in, and sponsorship of these healthcare quality and safety programs by members of the board, is further evidence that the organization is publicly supported. |
| Software ID: | 14000329 |
| Software Version: | 2014v1.0 |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Form 990, Part III, Line 1 ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | THE CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING HEALTHCARE (THE CENTER) HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED TO SOLVE THE MOST PRESSING QUALITY AND SAFETY PROBLEMS THAT ARE ALL TOO PREVALENT IN HEALTH CARE TODAY. THESE ARE THE PROBLEMS THAT THREATEN LIVES AND INCREASE COSTS. WORKING WITH A CADRE OF LEADING HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS, THE CENTER DEVELOPS SOLUTIONS TO THESE PROBLEMS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF METHODS SUCH AS LEAN SIX SIGMA AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT. THE LEADING HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS IN THE CENTER'S NETWORK HAVE SIGNIFICANT EXPERTISE IN THE APPLICATION OF THESE METHODS AND TOOLS TO HEALTH CARE. ULTIMATELY, THE GOAL OF THE CENTER IS TO TRANSFORM HEALTH CARE INTO A HIGH RELIABILITY INDUSTRY. ONCE SOLUTIONS ARE DEVELOPED THROUGH THIS COLLABORATIVE METHOD, THEY ARE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CENTER'S WEB SITE. THE SOLUTIONS ARE ALSO MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE TARGETED SOLUTIONS TOOL (TST). THE TST IS A WEB-BASED TOOL THAT GUIDES JOINT COMMISSION-ACCREDITED HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS TO MEASURE THEIR OWN PERFORMANCE AND CUSTOMIZE SOLUTIONS TO ADDRESS THE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS THAT UNDERLIE THEIR OWN BREAKDOWNS IN QUALITY AND SAFETY. HAND HYGIENE IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO SAFE, HIGH QUALITY PATIENT CARE. UNFORTUNATELY, MANY INFECTIONS ARE TRANSMITTED BY HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL. THE TST PROVIDES THE FOUNDATION AND FRAMEWORK OF AN IMPROVEMENT METHOD THAT, IF IMPLEMENTED WELL, WILL IMPROVE AN ORGANIZATION'S HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE AND CONTRIBUTE SUBSTANTIALLY TO ITS EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS. THE HAND HYGIENE SOLUTIONS HAVE ACHIEVED AND CONTINUE TO SHOW MAJOR AND SUSTAINED GAINS IN HAND HYGIENE. AT THE START OF THE PROJECT IN APRIL 2009, THE RATE OF HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE AVERAGED 48 PERCENT. BY JUNE 2010 THEY HAD REACHED AN AVERAGE RATE OF 81 PERCENT THAT HAS BEEN SUSTAINED. THE TST DATA COLLECTED DEMONSTRATED THAT HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVING THEIR HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE RATES THROUGHOUT THE U.S. ON AVERAGE, ORGANIZATIONS HAVE IMPROVED 43 PERCENT OVER THEIR BASELINE MEASUREMENTS AND ARE SUSTAINING THOSE RESULTS. IN ADDITION, SOME ORGANIZATIONS HAVE LINKED USE OF THE TST TO A REDUCTION IN HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS. THE WRONG SITE SURGERY PROJECT HAS INVOLVED THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RIGOROUS PROCESS FOR REDUCING THE RISK OF WRONG-SITE SURGERY. ACROSS THE PERIOPERATIVE PROCESS, THERE ARE MANY OPPORTUNITIES FOR EVEN TINY SLIPS, LAPSES AND MISTAKES THAT CAN HEIGHTEN THE RISK OF WRONG-SITE SURGERY. BY IDENTIFYING THESE RISK POINTS, THIS PROJECT HAS RESULTED IN A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF THE MANY CONTRIBUTING FACTORS THAT CAN RESULT IN A WRONG-SITE SURGERY. THE CENTER'S PROJECT IDENTIFIED MANY CAUSES OF WRONG SITE SURGERIES THAT OCCURRED DURING SCHEDULING, IN PRE-OP/HOLDING OR IN THE OPERATING ROOM, OR WHICH STEMMED FROM THE ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE. OVER THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, THE PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS WERE ABLE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF CASES WITH RISKS BY 46 PERCENT IN THE SCHEDULING AREA, BY 63 PERCENT IN PRE-OP, AND BY 51 PERCENT IN THE OPERATING ROOM. THE HAND-OFF COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT FOCUSES ON THE QUALITY OF PATIENT INFORMATION THAT IS COMMUNICATED BETWEEN "SENDERS" AND "RECEIVERS" WHEN THE CARE OF THE PATIENT IS BEING HANDED-OFF TO ANOTHER CAREGIVER. DURING THE MEASURE PHASE OF THE PROJECT, PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS FOUND THAT HAND-OFFS WERE DEFECTIVE AND DIDN'T ALLOW THE RECEIVER TO SAFELY CARE FOR PATIENTS 37 PERCENT OF THE TIME ON AVERAGE. SENDERS WERE DISSATISFIED WITH THE QUALITY OF THE HAND-OFF 21 PERCENT OF THE TIME. BY USING SOLUTIONS TARGETED TO THE SPECIFIC CAUSES OF AN INADEQUATE HAND-OFF, ORGANIZATIONS THAT FULLY IMPLEMENTED THE SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED AN AVERAGE OF OVER 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN DEFECTIVE HAND-OFFS. USING THE TST AND THE SOLUTIONS FROM THE HAND-OFF COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT, HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS REPORTED AN INCREASE IN PATIENT AND FAMILY SATISFACTION, STAFF SATISFACTION, AND SUCCESSFUL TRANSFERS OF PATIENTS (REDUCED BOUNCE BACKS), AND A REDUCTION IN READMISSIONS. ACCORDING TO THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS (SSIS) ACCOUNT FOR APPROXIMATELY 25 PERCENT OF ALL HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS IN THE U.S. EACH YEAR. AS A CONSEQUENCE, SSIS ARE A MAJOR SOURCE OF PREVENTABLE PATIENT HARM AND UNNECESSARY HEALTH CARE COSTS. THE SCOPE OF THE SSI PROJECT HAS BEEN NARROWED TO COLORECTAL SURGERY AND PROCEDURES, WHICH IS OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH SSIS. THIS PROJECT IS IN COLLABORATION WITH PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS. DURING PILOT TESTING, THE PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS REDUCED SUPERFICIAL INCISIONAL COLORECTAL SSIS BY 45 PERCENT AND ALL TYPES OF COLORECTAL SSIS BY 32 PERCENT. THEY ATTAINED AN ESTIMATED COST SAVINGS OF MORE THAN $3.7 MILLION FOR THE 135 ESTIMATED COLORECTAL SSIS THAT WERE AVOIDED. IN ADDITION, THEY DECREASED THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY FOR HOSPITAL PATIENTS WITH ANY TYPE OF COLORECTAL SSI FROM 15 TO 13 DAYS. THE CENTER ALSO HAS A PROJECT WHICH AIMS TO PREVENT AVOIDABLE HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH HEART FAILURE. A CHRONIC DISEASE, HEART FAILURE IS THE MOST COMMON REASON FOR ADMISSION TO THE HOSPITAL AMONG OLDER ADULTS. THE GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND WHY PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE PERIODICALLY EXPERIENCE SEVERE WORSENING OF THEIR CONDITION TO A DEGREE THAT LEADS TO HOSPITALIZATION. |
| Form 990, Part III, Line 4a PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENT | (CONTINUATION) THERE ARE ELEVEN PROJECTS UNDER THIS PROGRAM: 1) HAND HYGIENE PROJECT FOR IMPROVING PATIENT SAFETY TO LIMIT HOSPITAL ACQUIRED INFECTIONS THROUGH THE INCREASED USE OF HAND HYGIENE TECHNIQUES. 2) HAND-OFF COMMUNICATIONS FOR TRANSFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF PATIENT CARE RESPONSIBILITY ACHIEVED THROUGH EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 3) WRONG SITE SURGERY TO IMPROVE THE SAFEGUARDS TO PREVENT PATIENTS FROM WRONG SITE 4) WRONG SIDE AND WRONG PATIENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES, SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS (SSI) WHICH AIMS TO REDUCE SSI'S IN PATIENTS HAVING COLORECTAL SURGERY 5) PREVENTING AVOIDABLE HEART FAILURE HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH HEART FAILURE 6) IMPROVED SAFETY CULTURE THAT REINFORCES AND SUPPORTS THE PREVENTION OF PATIENT HARM AND 7) PREVENTION OF FALLS THAT OCCUR IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES THAT RESULT IN INJURY. 8) REDUCING SEPSIS MORTALITY 9) SAFE USE OF INSULIN 10) REDUCING CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTIONS 11) AND PREVENTING VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) |
| Form 990, Part III, Line 1 ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | (CONTINUATION FROM ABOVE) THE CENTER LAUNCHED ITS SIXTH PROJECT WHICH AIMS TO OPTIMIZE BEHAVIORS AND PRACTICES RESULTING IN AN IMPROVED SAFETY CULTURE THAT REINFORCES AND SUPPORTS THE PREVENTION OF PATIENT HARM. A SAFETY CULTURE ENABLES TRUST. IT EMPOWERS STAFF TO SPEAK UP ABOUT RISKS TO PATIENTS, AND REPORT ERRORS AND NEAR MISSES, ALL OF WHICH DRIVE IMPROVEMENT. A SAFETY CULTURE WITHIN HEALTH CARE CAN BE DEFINED AS THE SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIORS AND BELIEFS THAT STAFF SHARE ABOUT THE PRIMARY IMPORTANCE OF THE WELL-BEING AND CARE OF THE PATIENTS THEY SERVE, SUPPORTED BY SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES THAT REINFORCE THE FOCUS ON PATIENT SAFETY. DESPITE WIDESPREAD ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF SAFETY CULTURE IN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT, MANY - IF NOT MOST - HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS STRUGGLE TO ACHIEVE IT. IN FACT, LACK OF SAFETY CULTURE WAS A PROMINENT UNDERLYING FACTOR OF THE ISSUES ADDRESSED BY THE FIRST FOUR CENTER PROJECTS. THE PREVENTING FALLS WITH INJURY PROJECT AIMS TO PREVENT FALLS THAT OCCUR IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AND RESULT IN INJURY TO PATIENTS. TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PATIENTS FALL IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES EVERY YEAR AND MANY OF THESE FALLS RESULT IN MODERATE TO SEVERE INJURIES. THESE INJURIES CAN PROLONG HOSPITAL STAYS AND REQUIRE THE PATIENT TO UNDERGO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT. FALLS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) AS A "NEVER EVENT" - AN EVENT THAT IS PREVENTABLE AND SHOULD NEVER OCCUR. UP TO HALF OF ALL HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS ARE AT RISK FOR FALLS, AND ALMOST HALF OF THOSE WHO FALL SUFFER AN INJURY. THESE INJURIES RESULT IN AN AVERAGE ADDITIONAL HOSPITAL STAY FOR THE PATIENT OF 6.3 DAYS OR LONGER (THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF A HOSPITAL STAY IS 4.8 DAYS) AND COST FOR A SERIOUS FALL WITH INJURY IS ABOUT $14,056 THE CENTER'S EIGHTH PROJECT AIMS TO REDUCE SEPSIS MORTALITY. SEPSIS IS THE BODY'S LIFE-THREATENING INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO AN INFECTION. THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS, SEPSIS HAS A MORTALITY RATE ESTIMATED BETWEEN 25-50 PERCENT. IN ADDITION, SEPSIS IS THE MOST EXPENSIVE DISEASE TO TREAT IN THE HOSPITAL, COSTING APPROXIMATELY $17 BILLION DOLLARS ANNUALLY. EARLY DETECTION AND APPROPRIATE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS CAN DECREASE MORTALITY, IMPROVE PATIENT OUTCOMES AND DECREASE THE LENGTH OF STAY IN HOSPITALS. THE CENTER'S NINTH PROJECT AIMS TO REDUCE INSULIN RELATED MEDICATION ERRORS IN THE HOSPITAL SETTING. HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH DIABETES WHO ARE TAKING INSULIN MAY BE UNABLE TO MANAGE THEIR GLUCOSE READINGS AND INSULIN ADMINISTRATION, AND STAFF MAY NOT BE TRAINED OR AVAILABLE TO HELP WITH THESE CRITICAL TASKS. GLYCEMIC CONTROL IS NOT ONLY FUNDAMENTAL TO THE MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES, BUT IS ALSO ESSENTIAL TO HELP PREVENT HYPERGLYCEMIC EVENTS. SAFE USE OF INSULIN TO ACHIEVE OPTIMAL BLOOD GLUCOSE HAS BEEN DIRECTLY ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED PATIENT OUTCOMES. THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES INCLUDES POOR GLYCEMIC MANAGEMENT ON ITS 2013 LIST OF 15 HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED CONDITIONS OR HACS AND WILL NO LONGER REIMBURSE HOSPITALS FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE PREVENTABLE MEDICAL ERRORS. THE OCCURRENCE OF THESE PREVENTABLE ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND EVENTS CAN BE REDUCED AND INSULIN CAN BE USED SAFELY TO ACHIEVE OPTIMAL GLYCEMIC CONTROL FOR HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS. THE CENTER IS WORKING ON A NEW TOOL FOR RELEASE IN 2015. THE HIGH RELIABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL (HRST) WILL ASSIST HOSPITALS IN THEIR TRANSFORMATION TO HIGHLY RELIABLE ORGANIZATIONS BY STRENGTHENING THE SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE PATIENT CARE THAT IS CONSISTENTLY EXCELLENT AND SAFE. THE WEB-BASED APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE HOSPITAL WITH 1) PERFORMANCE BUILDING BLOCKS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CONSISTENT EXCELLENCE IN PATIENT CARE; 2) A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL THAT WILL HELP IDENTIFY THEIR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES; AND 3) SOLUTIONS, TOOLS AND METHODS FOR PROGRESS. IN DECEMBER 2013, THE CENTER LAUNCHED ITS 10TH PROJECT, WHICH AIMS TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE (C. DIFFICILE)-RELATED INFECTIONS. THE AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY (AHRQ) ESTIMATES THAT THERE WERE APPROXIMATELY 337,000 HOSPITALIZATIONS RELATED TO CDI DURING 2009. THIS REPRESENTS A 300 PERCENT INCREASE IN THESE RATES FROM 1993. THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) ESTIMATES THAT CDI-RELATED DIARRHEA IS LINKED TO APPROXIMATELY 14,000 DEATHS PER YEAR. THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF CDI IS ALSO STAGGERING. THE JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE ESTIMATES THAT THE CURRENT RATES OF CDI ADD AN ADDITIONAL $1.5 BILLION ANNUALLY TO THE COST OF HEALTH CARE. SINCE CDI DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECTS OLDER PATIENTS, MEDICARE PAYS FOR 68 PERCENT OF ALL CDI-RELATED HOSPITAL STAYS. CDI RATES AND MORTALITY CAN BE REDUCED THROUGH A FOCUS ON A WIDE RANGE OF PATIENT CARE ASPECTS THAT INCLUDE EARLY IDENTIFICATION, ANTIBIOTIC STEWARDSHIP, AND EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE PRACTICES.The results for this project are targeted for publication in 2015. In October 2014, the Center for Transforming Healthcare launched its eleventh project, which aims to prevent rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. It has been estimated that up to 900,000 VTE's occur per year resulting in approximately 100,000 deaths. In addition to the toll on mortality, VTE is expensive to treat, costing the United States alone approximately $8-10 billion in direct medical costs each year, not including the costs of associated complications. Approximately 50-60 percent of incident VTE cases are associated with a hospital stay that occurred within the past 3-6 months, making hospital-acquired VTE a serious problem. The current accepted guidelines are not implemented consistently leading to continued VTEs in hospitalized patients. There is variation in the assessment of VTE risk factors across different hospital patient populations and in the selection of appropriate mechanical and/or pharmacological prophylaxis. The Center is collaborating with participating organizations and the Centers for Disease Control on this project. |
| Form 990, Part III, Line 2 New program services | PATIENT SAFETY & QUALITY PROGRAM (THE PROGRAM) - THE JOINT COMMISSION CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING HEALTHCARE STARTED ON A NEW PROGRAM SERVICE WHERE THE CENTER WILL PROVIDE RESOURCES TO HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS WHO STRIVE TO BUILD SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY FOR HIGHLY RELIABLE HEALTHCARE ACROSS ALL SETTINGS. THE PROGRAM COMPONENTS INCLUDE TRAINING AND GUIDANCE ON CREATING ROBUST MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, ANALYSIS, AND DEVELOPMENT OF TARGETED SOLUTIONS. THE PROGRAM INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE CENTER'S TARGETED SOLUTIONS TOOL (TST), TRAINING AND USE OF ROBUST PROCESS IMPROVEMENT TOOLS (RPI) AND THE HIGH RELIABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL (HRST). IN ADDITION, THE CENTER WILL CONDUCT ON-SITE TRAINING BY RPI TRAINERS THAT ARE EXPERIENCED IN LEAN, SIX SIGMA AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 13 WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY | ALL CENTER STAFF AND BOARD MEMBERS ARE OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW THE JOINT COMMISSION WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 14 DOCUMENT RETENTION | ALL CENTER STAFF AND BOARD MEMBERS ARE OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW THE JOINT COMMISSION RECORDS RETENTION POLICY. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 1a Delegate broad authority to a committee | As the sole member of The Center for Transforming Healthcare, The Joint Commission, a related tax-exempt organization, has broad authority to act on behalf of the governing body. Please see the narratives for Part VI, Lines 6, 7a and 7b for a description of such authority. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 6 Classes of members or stockholders | The Organization has one sole member, The Joint Commission. The Joint Commission has the power to: 1) Appoint all directors to the board of directors and remove them, with or without cause. 2) Approve the election of the Chairman and the Treasurer of the Organization and remove them, with or without cause, provided that an individual so removed may have a claim for compensation if the removal breaches any contract approved by the Organization. 3) Approve amendments to the articles of incorporation and bylaws. 4) Approve all mission and/or vision statements and all strategic or long-term plans of the organization. 5) Approve all creations of subsidiaries or controlled affiliates, mergers, consolidations, permanent or long-term affiliations and all joint ventures of the organization involving capital investments in excess of $250,000. 6) Approve the sale of encumbrance of all or substantially all the assets of the Organization and all long-term debt in excess of $250,000. 7) Approve the organization's annual operating and capital budgets and material amendments thereto. 8) Approve the dissolution of and all liquidations from the organization. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 7a Members or stockholders electing members of governing body | See response to Line 6 |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 7b Decisions requiring approval by members or stockholders | See response to Line 6 |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b Review of form 990 by governing body | The Organization's management and the management of The Joint Commission, including the CEO, CFO, Corporate Compliance & Privacy Officer, and Legal Counsel performed a detailed review of the Form 990 with the paid tax preparer. Once this level of review was performed, a thorough walk through of Form 990 was done with the Center's governing body prior to filing. A final filed copy of the return will be placed on the Organization's website for the public once accepted by the IRS |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c Conflict of interest policy | All Center staff and board members are obligated to follow The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' conflict of interest policy. The policy states that any decision that could result in an actual or perceived conflict of interest must be avoided. All staff and board members review the policy on an annual basis and complete a Conflict of Interest questionnaire each year, which is designed to identify interests that could give rise to possible conflicts. Although many such potential conflicts are and will be deemed inconsequential, every individual of the Organization has an ongoing responsibility to disclose situations that involve personal, familiar, or business relationships that could be perceived as a conflict of interest. The interests identified are reviewed by the corporate compliance officer and manager and appropriately managed. All disclosures are pursued until 100% completed. The Board is required to disclose a conflict of interest or possible conflict of interest on any matter during a meeting and then not vote or use personal influence on the matter. The minutes of the meeting reflects that a disclosure was made and the member abstained from voting. The Compliance Officer monitors and reviews the conflict of interest policy as well as the responses to the questionnaires on an annual basis. The Organization also has available an independent hotline number for staff to report any potential conflicts during the year anonymously. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 15a Process to establish compensation of top management official | The Center relies on the process of the Joint Commission for approval of top managements compensation. The officers' compensation arrangement is subject to an independent board committee review and approval referred to as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The Joint Commission engaged an independent compensation consultant to assist in determining compensation of the Center's officers. In setting the officers' compensation, the Joint Commission's Human Resources and Compensation Committee relies on recent compensation studies that provide compensation data for similarly qualified persons in comparable organizations to support its decision-making process. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee adequately documents its compensation determinations and deliberations regarding compensation in its committee minutes on a timely basis. Each voting Committee member has been determined to be independent in accordance with intermediate sanctions regulations and signs the Board's Conflict of Interest Policy annually to insure that he or she is independent. The process for determining the officers compensation is undertaken annually for all officers. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 15b Process to establish compensation of other employees | Please see the narrative for Part VI, Line 15a |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 19 Required documents available to the public | The organization does not make its governing documents available to the public. The conflict of interest policy and financial statements are available to the public on The Joint Commission website |
| Form 990, Part VIII, Line 2f Other Program Service Revenue | - Total Revenue: , Related or Exempt Function Revenue: , Unrelated Business Revenue: , Revenue Excluded from Tax Under Sections 512, 513, or 514: ; |
| Form 990, Part IX, Line 11g Other Fees | Other fees - Total Expense: 426151, Program Service Expense: 339937, Management and General Expenses: 23393, Fundraising Expenses: 62821; Mgmt Fee for Service to Related Organization - Total Expense: 1010422, Program Service Expense: 558937, Management and General Expenses: 369352, Fundraising Expenses: 82133; |
| Software ID: | 14000329 |
| Software Version: | 2014v1.0 |