Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 20,962,589 | 25,138,722 | 25,940,132 | 13,925,356 | 21,291,143 | 107,257,942 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 20,962,589 | 25,138,722 | 25,940,132 | 13,925,356 | 21,291,143 | 107,257,942 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 4,914,872 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 102,343,070 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 20,962,589 | 25,138,722 | 25,940,132 | 13,925,356 | 21,291,143 | 107,257,942 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 16,453 | 133,817 | 98,590 | 76,525 | 79,827 | 405,212 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 27,569 | 11,827 | 9,457 | 5,750 | 3,000 | 57,603 |
| 11 | Total support Add lines 7 through 10. | 107,720,757 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e | Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): | |||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions) | |||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2014 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2014 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2014: | ||||
| a From 2009.......X | ||||
| b From 2010.......X | ||||
| c From 2011.......X | ||||
| d From 2012.......X | ||||
| e From 2013....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2009 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2014 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2014, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2014. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2015. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a From 2010.......X | ||||
| b From 2011.......X | ||||
| c From 2012.......X | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| ORGANIZATION'S MISSION - FORM 990, PART III, LINE 1 | THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM (NQF) IS A UNIQUE, MULTI-STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION INSTRUMENTAL IN ADVANCING EFFORTS TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE QUALITY THROUGH PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PUBLIC REPORTING. NQF IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION WITH MORE THAN 400 MEMBERS REPRESENTING VIRTUALLY EVERY SECTOR OF THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. NQF's MISSION IS TO LEAD NATIONAL COLLABORATION TO IMPROVE HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE QUALITY THROUGH MEASUREMENT. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS - FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A | MEASURE ENDORSEMENT AND MEASUREMENT SCIENCE NQF reviews and endorses healthcare performance measures that underpin federal and private-sector initiatives focused on enhancing the value of healthcare services. In concert with others, NQF has contributed to a more information-rich healthcare system, and demonstrated that measures-particularly in tandem with delivery changes and payment reform-can lead to improvement in performance. NQF's endorsement projects use volunteer committees of experts from the public and private sectors-including physicians, consumers, and purchasers, as well as representatives of hospitals, health plans, and healthcare suppliers-to review and endorse measures of quality, cost, and efficiency. In 2014, NQF endorsed/re-endorsed 98 measures, bringing its portfolio to more than 600 measures for use in public reporting, payment, and care delivery reform programs. NQF also removed 93 measures -approximately 15 percent of its portfolio-further streamlining its measurement set. This year, NQF endorsed measures that will help the nation accomplish the following goals: 1) Drive the system to be more responsive to patient/ family needs-NQF conducted Person- and Family-Centered Care and Care Coordination endorsement projects, which included patient-reported outcomes and patient experience surveys. The endorsed measures are part of federal quality reporting programs such as Hospital Compare, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR), and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). 2) Improve care for highly prevalent conditions- NQF's Cardiovascular, Endocrine, and Musculoskeletal endorsement projects yielded endorsed measures that are integral part of the Hospital IQR program and of PQRS. 3) Emphasize cross-cutting areas to foster better care and coordination-NQF's Behavioral Health and Patient Safety endorsement projects endorsed measures that are used in the Home Health Quality Reporting Program, Hospital IQR program, the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting program, and PQRS. 4) Support new accountability efforts coming online- NQF reviewed measures of Cost/Resource Use and Readmission. CMS' Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Physician Value Based Payment Modifier program include measures endorsed in these projects. Performance measurement has become more sophisticated but remains a developing science. NQF's work helps drive this progress. Over the last few years, NQF has doubled the proportion of outcome measures in its portfolio to 34 percent. NQF is also facilitating the transition to electronic quality measurement by endorsing eMeasures that take advantage of new electronic sources of clinical information in EHRs. With the support of federal funds in 2014, NQF charted a path forward with an approach to adjusting measures for socio economic status (SES) and other demographic factors. The NQF trial of SES risk-adjusted measures will be completed in 2016, at which time the organization will evaluate the trial outcomes and decide whether to permanently change its policy. In 2014, NQF also completed groundbreaking work in defining what criteria to use in evaluating episode groupers and how to risk adjust resource use measures. Private foundation support allowed NQF to convene an expert committee to 4) in defining how to link cost and quality measures and how to define affordability from the patient's perspective. These efforts will become increasingly important as more individuals move into high deductible plans and public or private exchanges, and seek information on both cost and quality. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS - FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4B | USE OF MEASURES TO IMPROVE QUALITY In addition to its work endorsing measures and improving the science of measurement, NQF focuses on use of measures to improve quality at the patient and population levels. NQF convened its Measure Applications Partnership (MAP) for the third year in a row to evaluate all of the measures that CMS was considering for 20-plus federal programs. CMS seeks MAP's advice and buy-in on which measures to use in particular programs in advance of issuing related regulations. In 2014, MAP reviewed 234 unique measures under consideration for hospital, clinician, post-acute care and long-term care programs, many of which were under consideration for multiple programs (which nearly doubled the number of measures reviewed by MAP). In the 2014 pre-rulemaking report, MAP gave 75 recommendations of full "support" for measures for use in a given federal program. MAP also facilitates consensus between the public and private sectors around how to align "like measures" that are being used in more than one federal program, with the goal of paring down many measures to an essential few. Private sector leaders participating in MAP are also encouraged to use the same measures in their own programs. MAP's efforts help to reduce duplication and administrative burden within the federal sector, and to some degree, across the public and private sectors. Expanding its work on measures of quality of care for low-income and vulnerable populations, MAP provided input to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on a core set of healthcare measures used to monitor and improve the quality of services provided to children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). MAP also completed its second report on measures to improve care for Medicaid-eligible adults, and issued new report on improving care for Americans who are eligible to be covered by both Medicare and Medicaid. As part of this work, NQF will begin gathering stakeholder experience in applying performance measures in Medicare and Medicaid programs to inform future recommendations to HHS. MAP will continue its efforts to align, when possible and appropriate, key measures across the Medicaid Adult and Child Core Sets as well as measures related to Medicare-Medicaid dual eligible beneficiaries. To spur consolidated action towards improving quality at the community level, NQF launched in 2014 its Population Health Framework project, an important initiative to strengthen population health efforts in communities across the country. A key outgrowth of this initiative, the Guide for Community Action1.0 is a handbook designed to support individuals and groups working together at all levels-local, state and national-to successfully promote and improve population health over time. Ten groups located around the nation tested the guide in their population health work and provided feedback and improvements to make it more relevant and actionable. The 2.0 version of the guide was published in July 2015. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS - FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4C | NQF worked with healthcare stakeholders to examine initiatives involving patients, community health, public reporting and the study of anti-biotics. |
| PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS - FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4D | THE OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES INCLUDE CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS HELD BY NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM. |
| BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP - FORM 990, PAGE VI, LINE 2 | JOYCE DUBOW - MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF THE INFORMED PATIENT INSTITUTE CAROL CRONIN - THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INFORMED PATIENT INSTITUTE ELIZABETH MITCHELL - THE CEO OF NRHI. JIM CHASE AND LOUISE PROBST ARE ON THE NRHI BOARD. |
| MEMBERS OF ORGANIZATION - FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 6 | THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM HAS OVER 430 MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS. THEY REPRESENT ALL SECTORS IN THE HEALTHCARE QUALITY LANDSCAPE INCLUDING: CONSUMERS; PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PURCHASERS; PHYSICIANS, NURSES, PHARMACISTS, AND OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS; HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES, AND OTHER PROVIDER ORGANIZATIONS; ACCREDITING AND CERTIFYING BODIES; SUPPORTING INDUSTRIES; AND HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS. |
| FORM 990 REVIEW PROCESS - FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 11A AND 11B | THE ORGANIZATION'S FORM 990 UNDERGOES A NUMBER OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REVIEWS BEFORE IT IS FILED WITH THE IRS. THE RETURN IS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION'S PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, BDO USA. A FINAL DRAFT OF THE FORM 990 IS THEN PROVIDED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE ORGANIZATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT, BEFORE IT IS FILED WITH THE IRS. |
| CONFLICTS OF INTEREST - FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 12C | ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS ARE SENT TO BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF TO COMPLETE. THE GENERAL COUNSEL REVIEWS CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS SUBMITTED BY BOARD MEMBERS AND BOARD MEMBERS ORALLY DISCLOSE ANY RELAVANT INFORMATION ANNUALLY IN A PUBLIC BOARD SESSION. EMPLOYEE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS ARE SCREENED BY THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT AND ANY DISCLOSURES MADE BY EMPLOYEES ARE REFERRED TO THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR FOLLOW-UP AND RESOLUTION. |
| DETERMINING COMPENSATION - FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 15A & 15B | THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COMPRISED OF INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DETERMINES THE CEO'S COMPENSATION PACKAGE BY USING COMPARABLE DATA APPROVED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. CONTEMPORANEOUS SUBSTANTIATION OF THE DELIBERATION AND DECISION IS ALSO MAINTAINED. THE CEO DETERMINES THE SALARIES OF OTHER OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEE BASED ON OUTSIDE COMPARABILITY DATA AND THE RESULTS ARE DOCUMENTED IN PERSONNEL FILES. |
| AVAILABILITY OF OTHER DOCUMENTS - FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |