Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | ||||||
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | ||||||
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support Add lines 7 through 10. | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | 619,307 | 662,761 | 585,232 | 674,356 | 478,569 | 3,020,225 |
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | 5,191 | 17,110 | 227 | 145 | 664 | 23,337 |
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | 624,498 | 679,871 | 585,459 | 674,501 | 479,233 | 3,043,562 |
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 3,043,562 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | 624,498 | 679,871 | 585,459 | 674,501 | 479,233 | 3,043,562 |
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 9,206 | 9,352 | 11,504 | 7,592 | 6,106 | 43,760 |
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | 9,206 | 9,352 | 11,504 | 7,592 | 6,106 | 43,760 |
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | 633,704 | 689,223 | 596,963 | 682,093 | 485,339 | 3,087,322 |
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e | Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): | |||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions) | |||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2014 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2014 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2014: | ||||
| a From 2009.......X | ||||
| b From 2010.......X | ||||
| c From 2011.......X | ||||
| d From 2012.......X | ||||
| e From 2013....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2009 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2014 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2014, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2014. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2015. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a From 2010.......X | ||||
| b From 2011.......X | ||||
| c From 2012.......X | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | THE COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE IS A NONPARTISAN CIVIC ORGANIZATION THAT WORKS TO IMPROVE THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE LOCAL AND FEDERAL COURTS AND RELATED AGENCIES IN THE WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA AND THROUGHOUT THE NATION BY (1) IDENTIFYING AND PROMOTING SPECIFIC JUSTICE SYSTEM REFORMS, (2) IMPROVING PUBLIC ACCESS TO JUSTICE, AND (3) INCREASING PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORT OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | FROM THEIR PEERS WHO HAVE HIRED RETURNING CITIZENS. OVER 120 PEOPLE ATTENDED THIS EVENT WITH A PROGRAM THAT INCLUDED A PANEL OF BUSINESSPEOPLE WHO EMPLOY RETURNING CITIZENS; AN EXPERT FROM THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ON FEDERAL LAWS AND POLICIES RELATING TO HIRING; AND A PANEL WITH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DC COUNCIL AND TWO OTHERS DISCUSSING LOCAL LEGISLATION AND EFFORTS TO IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR PREVIOUSLY INCARCERATED PEOPLE RETURNING HOME. CCE'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMITTEE ALSO MET SEVERAL TIMES IN 2014 TO CONSIDER POSSIBLE FUTURE PROJECTS, INCLUDING THE "TRIAL PENALTY" FACED BY SOME CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS, THE APPOINTED COUNSEL SYSTEM IN DC, AND THE INTERSECTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND THE DISTRICT'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. THE LATTER ISSUE GARNERED THE GREATEST AMOUNT OF INTEREST, LEADING TO CCE APPLYING FOR AND BEING SELECTED TO ORGANIZE A PANEL PRESENTATION AT THE 2015 DC JUDICIAL AND BAR CONFERENCE ON EARLY DIVERSION OF PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS WHO COME IN CONTACT WITH THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B | THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMITTEE ALSO CONTINUED TO FOCUS ITS ATTENTION ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE ISSUES LIKE THE PROBLEM OF NOTARIO FRAUD, AND THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW (UPL). THE NOTARIO FRAUD WORKGROUP, THAT HAS BEEN MEETING SINCE 2012 AND HAS NOW GROWN TO MORE THAN 50 STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL STAKEHOLDERS FROM DC, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA, CONTINUED TO MEET BI-MONTHLY TO IDENTIFY AND ENFORCE AGAINST NOTARIO OR LEGAL CONSULTANT FRAUD IN THE DC-METRO REGION. NOTARIOS ARE THOSE WHO FALSELY HOLD THEMSELVES OUT AS QUALIFIED TO REPRESENT THE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY, CHARGE A FEE, AND THEN CANNOT PROVIDE THE SERVICES BECAUSE THEY ARE UNAUTHORIZED TO DO SO. AN ADDITIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE WORKING GROUP IN 2014 WAS A PRESENTATION TO 20 MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES ON THE ISSUE OF NOTARIO FRAUD. THE PRESENTATION DISCUSSED THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND EXPLAINED THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PROTECTIONS UNDER MARYLAND LAW TO COMBAT AGAINST THIS TYPE OF FRAUD. IN ADDITION, BAR LEADERS FROM DC, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA WHO OVERSEE MATTERS INVOLVING THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW (UPL) MET QUARTERLY IN 2014. THESE BAR LEADERS SHARED INFORMATION RELATED TO PENDING INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDED RESOURCES TO ASSIST WITH ENFORCING AGAINST UPL IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. AMONG THE INFORMATION SHARED WAS THE WASHINGTON LAWYER ARTICLE ON THESE BAR LEADERS AND THEIR REGIONAL UPL SYSTEMS INCLUDING MENTION OF CCE'S WORK IN THIS AREA. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C | PUBLIC CHARTER MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLS TO DETERMINE HOW SCHOOL LEADERS ARE IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINE POLICIES IN PRACTICE, AND WHICH SCHOOLS ARE ENGAGED IN BEST PRACTICES TO KEEP STUDENTS IN SCHOOL INSTEAD OF RESORTING TO EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES, SUCH AS SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION. IN EARLY 2015, CCE PLANS TO PUBLISH THIS LONG-AWAITED REPORT. MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE ALSO ORGANIZED AND LED AN EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE, WELL-ATTENDED, AND POSITIVELY-RECEIVED COURT TRAINING EARLIER IN THE YEAR ON A TRUANCY LAW THAT WENT INTO EFFECT IN 2013. THE TRAINING TOOK PLACE IN THE DC SUPERIOR COURT'S JUROR LOUNGE AND DREW MORE THAN 100 PARTICIPANTS. TRAINERS INCLUDED REPRESENTATIVES FROM DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, THE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD, DC OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SUPERIOR COURT'S FAMILY COURT SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION, AND MEMBERS OF THE DEFENSE BAR, AND ALL TRAINING MATERIALS FROM THE SESSION WERE POSTED ON CCE'S SCHOOL JURY EDUCATION PROJECT WEBPAGE. FINALLY, CCE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF TWO HISTORIC ANNIVERSARIES TO CALL ATTENTION TO ITS FOCUS ON JUSTICE, EQUITY, AND EDUCATION, WITH THE PROGRAM PORTION OF ITS JUNE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING CONSISTING OF A PANEL DISCUSSION ENTITLED "COMMEMORATING 60/50: A CONVERSATION ABOUT BROWN, THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AND ACHIEVING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA." A PANEL OF EXPERTS FOCUSED ON THE HISTORY OF SEGREGATION IN THE NATION'S CAPITAL, INTERSPERSED WITH THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TODAY. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4D | COURT IMPROVEMENTS AND JURY INITIATIVE IN 2014, THE COURT IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE MET SEVERAL TIMES TO CONSIDER SEVERAL PROJECTS FOR FUTURE EXPLORATION, INCLUDING WAYS TO IMPROVE THE DISTRICT'S GUARDIANSHIP SYSTEM; A REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, NOW IN OPERATION FOR MORE THAN A DECADE, WHOSE ESTABLISHMENT WAS BASED ON CCE'S RESEARCH AND LEGISLATIVE WORK IN THE LATE 1990'S; AND ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS. THE BENCH-BAR-MEDIA DIALOGUE COMMITTEE, NOW IN ITS 6TH YEAR, CONVENED ITS FOURTH CLOSED DOOR, OFF-THE-RECORD PROGRAM, ENTITLED "SHARING PERSPECTIVES," FOR JUDGES, REPORTERS, AND MEDIA ATTORNEYS. IN ADDITION, THE COMMITTEE MET TWICE TO DISCUSS ITS NEXT PUBLIC PROGRAM, SCHEDULED FOR EARLY 2015, ON "MEDIA ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE," REFLECTING THE GROWING USE OF BODY CAMERAS AND CELL PHONE VIDEO, AS WELL AS THE PERMANENCE AND SPREAD OF INFORMATION POSTED TO THE INTERNET. JURY REFORM: FOLLOWING A YEAR-LONG PLANNING EFFORT TO IDENTIFY ISSUES AND THE RIGHT MIX OF PROJECT COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO COVER THEM, CCE'S JURY PROJECT WAS FORMALLY LAUNCHED IN EARLY 2014 TO COMPREHENSIVELY ADDRESS SYSTEMIC ISSUES RELATED TO THE PERCEIVED BURDEN OF JURY SERVICE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JURORS, JUDGES, LAWYERS, AND EMPLOYERS. MEANT TO BE BOTH A LOOK-BACK AT CCE'S 1998 JURY PROJECT'S NUMEROUS RECOMMENDATIONS AND A LOOK-FORWARD TO NEW CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR JURY SERVICE, SUCH AS TECHNOLOGY AND CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS, THIS PROJECT WORKED THROUGHOUT 2014, AIDED BY THE HIRING OF A FULL-TIME JURY ANALYST, LEADERSHIP FROM THE PROJECT'S CO-CHAIRS, AND THE EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE OF A DIVERSE COMMITTEE OF 40, INCLUDING JURORS, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND STAKEHOLDERS FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, TRIAL CONSULTANTS, LAW SCHOOLS, LEXISNEXIS, AND FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS. THE COMMITTEE DIVIDED ITSELF INTO THREE WORKING GROUPS: JUROR CARE, TRIAL STRUCTURE, AND JURY POOL AND SUMMONING. EACH WORKING GROUP AND THE FULL COMMITTEE MET MONTHLY THROUGHOUT 2014. DATA COLLECTION WAS AN EARLY PRIORITY. CCE STAFF, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COMMITTEE, SURVEYED JURORS AT SUPERIOR COURT, AND IN ONE MONTH, COLLECTED 572 RESPONSES. SURVEYS OF JUDGES WERE ALSO CONDUCTED AT THE DC SUPERIOR COURT AND THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR DC, AS WELL AS OVER 130 ATTORNEYS COMPLETING AN ONLINE VERSION OF THE SURVEY. MOREOVER, SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED ON THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD FAILED TO ANSWER THE JURY SERVICE SUMMONS. IN ADDITIONAL TO SURVEY RESEARCH, THE COMMITTEE HELD FOCUS GROUPS WITH JURORS AND WITH JUDGES FROM BOTH THE DC SUPERIOR COURT AND THE US DISTRICT COURT. THE WORKING GROUPS SPENT A GOOD PART OF THE YEAR DISCUSSING PREVIOUSLY- SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE 1998 REPORT, AS WELL AS IDEAS FOR NEW RECOMMENDATIONS MOVING FORWARD. SOME OF THE TOPICS DISCUSSED INCLUDED FINDING WAYS TO INCREASE THE RESPONSE RATE TO JURY SUMMONS, PROVIDING JURORS WITH MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROCESS AND AMENITIES EARLY ON THROUGH AN INSERT OR BROCHURE WITH THE SUMMONS, AND TACKLING THE ISSUE OF JURORS USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO RESEARCH A CASE. LASTLY, CCE'S JURY PROJECT MANAGER ATTENDED A TWO-DAY ABA JURY SYMPOSIUM IN SAN DIEGO IN OCTOBER. THE CONFERENCE BROUGHT TOGETHER JURY ADMINISTRATORS, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND TRIAL CONSULTANTS FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY, AND WAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GATHER BEST PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS TO SHARE WITH THE JURY PROJECT COMMITTEE. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 2 | DAVID LESSER NANCY LESSER BOARD MEMBER BOARD MEMBER SPOUSE |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMITTEES REVIEW THE 990 BEFORE IT IS FILED. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | FORM 990 PART VI SECTION B LINE 12A-12C THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS EACH SIGN AN INDIVIDUAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED VIA A COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, A SUB- COMMITTEE OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEWS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FROM 3-5 SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS. SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS ARE DEEMED TO BE ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR OPERATING BUDGETS THAT HAVE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WITH THE SAME ACADEMIC AND EXPERIENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS AS CCE'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. WHILE AN EFFORT IS MADE AT FINDING SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE METRO DC AREA, THE COMMITTEE MAY LOOK TO OTHER GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS AND ADJUST COMPENSATION DATA FOUND BASED ON COMPARATIVE COST OF LIVING DIFFERENCES. ADDITIONALLY, CCE TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE SALARY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COULD EARN IN A GOVERNMENTAL OR FOR-PROFIT CAPACITY AND USES SUCH COMPENSATION RANGE AS AN UPPER LIMIT OF COMPENSATION. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED VIA A COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, A SUB- COMMITTEE OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEWS OFFICER COMPENSATION FROM 3-5 SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS. SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS ARE DEEMED TO BE ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR OPERATING BUDGETS THAT HAVE OFFICERS IN SIMILAR ROLES WITH THE SAME ACADEMIC AND EXPERIENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS AS CCE'S OFFICERS. WHILE AN EFFORT IS MADE AT FINDING SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE METRO DC AREA, THE COMMITTEE MAY LOOK TO OTHER GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS AND ADJUST COMPENSATION DATA FOUND BASED ON COMPARATIVE COST OF LIVING DIFFERENCES. ADDITIONALLY, CCE TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE SALARY THE OFFICER COULD EARN IN A GOVERNMENTAL OR FOR-PROFIT CAPACITY AND USES SUCH COMPENSATION RANGE AS AN UPPER LIMIT OF COMPENSATION. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | INTERNAL REVENUE FORMS 990 ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |