Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 2,090,679 | 5,481,666 | 1,584,330 | 1,055,735 | 1,085,472 | 11,297,882 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 2,090,679 | 5,481,666 | 1,584,330 | 1,055,735 | 1,085,472 | 11,297,882 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 4,004,667 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 7,293,215 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 2,090,679 | 5,481,666 | 1,584,330 | 1,055,735 | 1,085,472 | 11,297,882 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 120,049 | 104,247 | 102,626 | 61,223 | 64,439 | 452,584 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 1,897 | 1,897 | ||||
| 11 | Total support Add lines 7 through 10. | 11,752,363 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e | Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): | |||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions) | |||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2014 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2014 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2014: | ||||
| a From 2009.......X | ||||
| b From 2010.......X | ||||
| c From 2011.......X | ||||
| d From 2012.......X | ||||
| e From 2013....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2009 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2014 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2014, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2014. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2015. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a From 2010.......X | ||||
| b From 2011.......X | ||||
| c From 2012.......X | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL / TRADE AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE | TRADE IN 2014, IATP DEEPENED ITS WORK ON THE TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (TTIP) AND THE TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (TPP) AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS IN THE U.S. AND ABROAD. IATP PRODUCED ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS OF TTIP AND TPP ON FOOD SYSTEMS AND CONDUCTED EXTENSIVE OUTREACH TO THE MEDIA, DECISION MAKERS AND ACTIVISTS WORKING ON THOSE ISSUES. IATP REACHED OUT TO LOCAL FOOD AND FARM TO SCHOOL PROGRAMS TO EDUCATE THEM ON THE POTENTIAL RISKS OF TRADE PROCUREMENTS ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, NEW LIMITS ON GMO LABELING, AS WELL AS NEW ROADBLOCKS TO LOCAL LEGISLATION ON TOXIC CHEMICALS. IATP SPOKE AT THE NATIONAL FARM TO CAFETERIA CONFERENCE AND THE NEW ENGLAND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE AMONG OTHERS AND HELPING THOSE GROUPS TO WEIGH IN WITH TRADE NEGOTIATORS. IATP WROTE A REPORT ON TTIP AND THE IMPACTS ON AGRICULTURE IN MAINE FOR THE MAINE CITIZENS TRADE POLICY COMMISSION AND PRESENTED THE REPORT AT PUBLIC HEARINGS IN MAINE. IATP REACHED OUT TO COLLEAGUES IN THE EU, SPEAKING AT STRATEGY SESSIONS AND MAJOR PUBLIC EVENTS IN BERLIN AND BRUSSELS, AND LEADING A SPEAKING TOUR ON TTIP IN GERMANY. IATP ALSO ORGANIZED A WELL-ATTENDED SERIES OF WEBINARS INVOLVING EXPERTS FROM THE EU AND US ON TTIP AND GMOS, FOOD SAFETY, TOXIC CHEMICALS, AND OVERUSE OF ANTIBIOTICS. GLOBAL GOVERNANCE IATP ALSO ENGAGED WITH THE UN COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY, WORKING WITH PARTNERS FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TO PROMOTE AGROECOLOGY AND INSIST ON BETTER RULES ON LAND GRABS. IATP'S SHINEY VARGHESE WAS SELECTED TO THE HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS TO PRODUCE A PAPER ON WATER AND FOOD SECURITY THAT WILL PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON THE INTERSECTIONS BETWEEN THOSE ISSUES AND HOW GLOBAL AND NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CAN BETTER RESOLVE THOSE TENSIONS. IATP ALSO WORKED WITH THE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UN TO CLARIFY THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE SUPPORTING AGROECOLOGY AS A SET OF SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES THAT CAN FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUPPORT FOOD SECURITY, AND OPPOSE FALSE SOLUTIONS SUCH AS "SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION" AND CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE. FINANCIAL AND COMMODITY MARKET REFORM IN 2014, IATP CLOSELY MONITORED, ANALYZED AND SUBMITTED COMMENTS ON POLICY AND RULEMAKING DEVELOPMENTS. TO THIS END, IATP PARTICIPATED IN WEEKLY CONFERENCE CALLS WITH THE AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM DERIVATIVES AND SYSTEMIC RISK TASK FORCE AND QUARTERLY CALLS WITH THE COMMODITY MARKETS OVERSIGHT COALITION, THE FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD WATCH AND THE POLICY FINANCE, FOOD AND NANOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEES OF THE TRANSATLANTIC CONSUMERS DIALOGUE. IN ADDITION TO RULEMAKING COMMENTS SUBMITTED, WRITING INCLUDED: * "GETTING THE DATA TO REGULATE GLOBAL BANKS" * "WHY SHOULD A BANK BE ALLOWED TO OWN AND TRADE OIL, METALS AND LAND?" * "REFORMING FOR INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL STABILITY VS. THE TISA COUNTER-REFORMATION" * "TRADE ABOVE ALL: THE DRAFT FOOD SAFETY CHAPTER OF TTIP" * "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER: THE U.S.-BRAZIL DEAL TO END WTO AUTHORIZED RETALIATION" * "WALL STREET MANIPULATES MAIN STREET, AGAIN" |
| CLIMATE AND AGRICULTURE | IN 2014, IATP'S CLIMATE AND AGRICULTURE INITIATIVE HAD SEVERAL COMPONENTS, ALL ROOTED IN SUSTAINABLE LAND USES AND ECONOMIES THAT BENEFIT FARMERS, RURAL COMMUNITIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING THE RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK, RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUES, THE WORKING LANDSCAPES CERTIFICATE PROGRAM AND THE MINNESOTA GREEN CHEMISTRY FORUM. RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK THE RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK IS A GROUPING OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT COME TOGETHER TO ADVANCE PRACTICAL MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES GIVEN THE CURRENT AND ANTICIPATED EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ACROSS THE NATION. IN 2014 THE RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK GREW TO 41 MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS, WORKING TOGETHER TO DEVELOP CLIMATE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES. MEMBERS OF THE NETWORK SHARE SOCIAL AND TECHNICAL APPROACHES TO CLIMATE CHANGE AMONG AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCE DEPENDENT COMMUNITIES. THE NETWORK DOCUMENTS INNOVATIONS, BEST PRACTICES, IMPACTS AND OTHER STORIES ON THE WEBSITE WWW.RURALCLIMATENETWORK.ORG. AT THE END OF THE YEAR, 30 RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK MEMBERS GATHERED IN WASHINGTON D.C. FOR A POLICY PLANNING MEETING TO LEARN AND THINK ABOUT WHAT RURAL AMERICA WANTS INCLUDED IN UPCOMING CLIMATE POLICY. THIS WORK WILL CONTINUE INTO 2015 AS IATP DEVELOPS A COMPREHENSIVE RURAL CLIMATE POLICY PLATFORM THAT IS BASED ON THE VALUES OF LOCAL OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL, EQUITY AND DIVERSITY. IATP INITIATED AND CONTINUES TO PLAY A LEADERSHIP ROLE IN THE RCN. RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUES IATP IS ALSO WORKING AT THE DIRECT COMMUNITY LEVEL ON THE RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUES. DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE JEFFERSON CENTER, THESE RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUES ARE INTENDED TO FOSTER CONVERSATION IN RURAL COMMUNITIES ABOUT WHAT CLIMATE IMPACTS ARE MANIFESTING LOCALLY ON THE GROUND AND HOW LOCAL CITIZENS THINK THEIR COMMUNITY SHOULD HANDLE THOSE IMPACTS. IN 2014, IATP AND THE JEFFERSON CENTER COMPLETED THE FIRST RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUE IN MORRIS, MINNESOTA. THE DIALOGUE FIRST HAPPENED AT THE SCHOOL LEVEL, WHERE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS RECEIVED SEVERAL LESSONS ON THE LOCAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, AND GATHERED NEARLY 200 ENERGY SURVEYS FROM HOUSEHOLDS IN THEIR COMMUNITY. THIS INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED AT THE COMMUNITY-WIDE RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUE, WHERE A GROUP OF MORRIS CITIZENS GATHERED FOR THREE DAYS TO DISCUSS COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO CHANGING WEATHER AND CLIMATE. PLANNING FOR THE NEXT RURAL CLIMATE DIALOGUE IN GRAND RAPIDS BEGAN IN 2014 WITH SEVERAL VISITS TO THE COMMUNITY TO IDENTIFY THE MOST RELEVANT LOCAL CLIMATE IMPACTS. INFORMATION ABOUT THE DIALOGUES IS HOUSED ON THE RURAL CLIMATE NETWORK WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.RURALCLIMATENETWORK.ORG/CONTENT/RURAL-CLIMATE-DIALOGUES. WORKING LANDSCAPES CERTIFICATE PROGRAM IN 2014, IATP CONTINUED ITS COOPERATION WITH STONYFIELD, DANONE GERMANY AND OTHER RESPONSIBLE BIOPLASTIC USERS TO ENSURE THAT THEIR BIOPLASTIC USE SUPPORTED FARMERS IN PRODUCING CORN (THE BIOPLASTIC FEEDSTOCK) IN MORE SUSTAINABLE WAYS THROUGH ITS WLC PROGRAM. IT WAS ANOTHER SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTION YEAR, WITH ITS 8 WLC FARMERS MEETING OR EXCEEDING PRODUCTION EXPECTATIONS, ALL WHILE GROWING CORN IN A MORE RESPONSIBLE MANNER. MINNESOTA GREEN CHEMISTRY FORUM IATP ALSO CONTINUED TO PROMOTE AND EXPAND THE MINNESOTA GREEN CHEMISTRY SECTOR IN 2014 THROUGH ITS CO-LEADERSHIP OF THE MINNESOTA GREEN CHEMISTRY FORUM. IATP'S CONFERENCE IN JANUARY 2014 BROUGHT TOGETHER MINNESOTA BUSINESSES, NGOS, POLICYMAKERS AND RESEARCHERS TO DISCUSS AND SHARE THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AROUND GREEN CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY, SUPPORTIVE POLICIES AND RESEARCH. WHILE THE CONFERENCE IS THE MAIN OUTREACH OF THE MGCF, IATP ALSO HELD A NUMBER OF SMALLER, MORE FOCUSED EVENTS IN 2014 INTENDED TO EXPAND IATP'S NETWORK AND PROVIDE UNIQUE LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES FOR MGCF MEMBERS. EXTREME ENERGY IATP CONTINUED TO PUBLISH TAR SAND NEWS, A COMPENDIUM OF NEWS AND REPORTS RELATED TO TAR SAND OIL PRODUCTION AND OTHER EXTREME PETROCHEMICALS. IN FEBRUARY OF 2014, TWO IATP STAFF VISITED FORT MCMURRAY IN ALBERTA CANADA TO SEE FIRSTHAND THE EFFECT OF TAR SAND OIL MINING. THEY MET WITH INDIGENOUS GROUPS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS. THEY FLEW OVER THE MINE SITES AND WASTE PONDS AND TOOK VIDEOS THAT DOCUMENT THE DETRIMENTAL IMPACT OF TAR SAND PRODUCTION ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES. FOLLOWING THE VISIT, IATP STAFF PATRICK TSAI WROTE A REPORT EXAMINING HOW TRADE POLICY FROM THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IS DRIVING TAR SAND PRODUCTION. |
| AGRICULTURE AND FOOD | IN 2014, IATP'S WORK ON FOOD AND AGRICULTURE INCLUDED WORK ON AGRICULTURE POLICY, AGROECOLOGY, FARM TO INSTITUTION, THE MEAT INDUSTRY. IATP'S WORK INCLUDED HEALTH ISSUES SUCH AS FUNGICIDES, NANOTECH AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, AND ANTIBIOTIC USE IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION. INDUSTRIAL MEAT IN 2014, IATP PRODUCED A SERIES OF ANALYSES, COALITION LETTERS AND PUBLIC EVENTS ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF NEW TRADE RULES IN TTIP AND TPP ON THE GLOBAL MEAT INDUSTRY. THIS WORK FEEDS DIRECTLY INTO TRANSATLANTIC CAMPAIGN OUTREACH AND ACTION MATERIALS ON TTIP. IATP IS AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT IN THE ANIMAL AGRICULTURE REFORM COLLABORATIVE, FOCUSING ESPECIALLY ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF MEAT. IATP IS ALSO EXTENDING THE REACH OF THIS WORK INTERNATIONALLY, STARTING WITH A MAPPING EXERCISE WITH CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS IN BRAZIL, INDIA, CHINA AND THE U.S. TO LEARN HOW DIFFERENT GROUPS ARE EXPERIENCING THE EXPANSION OF THE MEAT INDUSTRY IN THEIR REGION AND WHAT CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THEY SEE IN RESPONDING TO IT. THIS WORK LED TO A SERIES OF IN-DEPTH REPORTS AND WEBINARS ON CHINA'S MEAT PRODUCTION, WHICH ATTRACTED SIGNIFICANT MEDIA ATTENTION. ON THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FRONT, IATP'S EFFORTS TO PUT INDUSTRIAL ANIMAL PRODUCTION ON THE RADAR OF THE COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY (CFS) PAID OFF WITH THEIR RECENT DECISION TO ADDRESS LIVESTOCK IN ONE OF ONLY TWO HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS REPORTS AT THE CFS ANNUAL MEETING TO BE PRESENTED IN OCTOBER 2016. FUNGICIDES IN 2014 IATP BEGAN AN EXPLORATION OF THE SCOPE AND SEVERITY OF THE GROWING REPORTS OF FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE. IATP'S WORK HAS INCLUDED A THOROUGH AND CONTINUING REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND NEWS REPORTS; THE CREATION OF A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER CALLED FUNGICIDE WATCH, SUMMARIZING NEWS ON FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE; BLOGS AND AN IN-DEPTH REPORT, FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE: RISK AND CONSEQUENCES IN MODERN AGRICULTURE; AND A WEBINAR WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION. FARM TO INSTITUTION WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF RAMSEY AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES (CAPRW), HEAD START AND THE HMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION (HAFA), IATP LAUNCHED A SUCCESSFUL "FARM TO HEAD START" PILOT PROGRAM, SERVING FRESH LOCAL FOODS AND TEACHING CHILDREN ABOUT THEIR LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM AT VARIOUS HEAD START CENTERS IN ST. PAUL. IATP HAS CONTINUED IN ITS ROLE AS FARM TO SCHOOL COMMUNITY PARTNER FOR ST. PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND HAS PARTICIPATED WITH THEM IN THE SCHOOL FOOD FOCUS UPPER MIDWEST REGIONAL LEARNING LAB TO BUILD REGIONAL CONNECTIONS AND SUPPORT FOR EXPANSION OF FARM TO SCHOOL IN THEIR DISTRICT. WITH INPUT FROM PARTNERS IN THIS GROUP, IATP CONDUCTED RESEARCH ON REGIONAL PROCUREMENT OF LOCALLY GROWN GRAINS AND PULSES FOR FARM TO SCHOOL PROGRAMS, AND PUBLISHED A REPORT OF ITS FINDINGS. ON THE STATE, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL LEVELS, IATP PARTICIPATED IN SEVERAL LEADERSHIP COALITIONS RELATED TO FARM TO INSTITUTION, INCLUDING THE NATIONAL FARM TO PRESCHOOL SUBCOMMITTEE, THE SCHOOL FOOD FOCUS UPPER MIDWEST REGIONAL LEARNING LAB, MN FARM TO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP TEAM, MN CHILDHOOD NUTRITION AND WELLNESS ADVISORY GROUP, MN HEALTHY KIDS COALITION AND MN HEALTHY LEGACY STEERING COMMITTEE. IN 2014, IATP ALSO COORDINATED THE FORMATION OF A NEW MN FARM TO CHILDCARE COALITION TO ADVANCE THIS WORK IN MINNESOTA AND HAVE CO-LED A GROUP OF 30 STAKEHOLDER GROUPS WORKING SPECIFICALLY ON ADVOCATING FOR STATE LEVEL POLICY TO SUPPORT FARM TO SCHOOL/CHILDCARE. TO EXPAND UNDERSTANDING OF FARM TO INSTITUTION, IATP PRESENTED AT SEVERAL NATIONAL AND REGIONAL CONFERENCES, INCLUDING, AMONG OTHERS, NATIONAL FARM TO CAFETERIA, NATIONAL FARM TO PRESCHOOL SUMMIT AND THE NATIONAL HEAD START PARENT CONFERENCE. AGROECOLOGY IATP CONTINUED IN ITS ROLE AS A DRIVER OF FOOD SYSTEM INNOVATION, SPECIFICALLY AS A CONVENER OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE FOOD SYSTEM AND NASCENT FOOD MOVEMENT (FARM LABOR, RESTAURANT WORKERS, FARMERS, SCIENTISTS AND URBAN CITIZEN-CONSUMERS); AS A SYNTHESIZER/TRANSLATOR OF CUTTING EDGE RESEARCH AND CASE STUDIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD TO MAKE THEM ACCESSIBLE TO MOVEMENT PARTNERS; AND AS A CATALYST/INCUBATOR BY CARRYING OUT PROJECTS AND USING EXPERIENCES TO HELP BUILD IMPORTANT INFRASTRUCTURE, POLITICAL WILL, DOCUMENTED EXPERIENCES AND EVIDENCE, AND ASSESSMENT OF BARRIERS TO INNOVATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS. SPECIFICALLY, IATP WAS INVOLVED IN SEVERAL CAMPAIGNS, INCLUDING THE OPEN SOURCE SEED INITIATIVE AND THE CAMPAIGN TO GET THE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO) OF THE UN TO EMBRACE AGROECOLOGY. IATP HELD THREE CONFERENCES ON AGRICULTURE AND AGROECOLOGY: BEYOND THE FARM BILL; TRANSATLANTIC MEETING ON FOOD, HEALTH AND AGRICULTURE AT THE BELLAGIO CENTER; AND BLUE MOUNTAIN AGROECOLOGY SUMMIT, AND PRESENTED AT NUMEROUS OTHERS: " "DEBATING THE FUTURE OF FOOD" (MORNING KEYNOTE). BREAKING BOUNDARIES: 2014 NET IMPACT CONFERENCE. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. (NOVEMBER 8, 2014) " "'SUSTAINABILITY WITHOUT JUSTICE IS SUSTAINED INJUSTICE': THE PROBLEMS OF SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION." GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE COLLOQUIUM, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, DES MOINES, IA. (OCTOBER 22, 2014) " "AGROECOLOGY AND FOOD SOVEREIGNTY AS VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO LAND-GRABBING AND CORPORATE-DOMINATED DEVELOPMENT PARADIGMS FOR AFRICA." EMPOWERED AFRICA: A PROGRESSIVE DIALOGUE, HOWARD UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, D. C. (AUGUST 4, 2014) " "SMALL-SCALE FAMILY FARMING AS A NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT FOUNDATION FOR FOOD SECURITY, FOOD SOVEREIGNTY, AND SUSTAINABILITY." INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FEEDING CITIES, 2014: RURAL-URBAN CONNECTIONS AND THE FUTURE OF FAMILY FARMING, RYERSON UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, CANADA. (JUNE 24, 2014) " "MEANS AND ENDS, AND INCOMPATIBLE MARRIAGES: THE LAND SHARING DEBATES." FOOD SECURITY, POVERTY AND DIVERSITY WORKSHOP, NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY, NEWCASTLE, UK. (APRIL 30, 2014) " THE IMPORTANCE OF THE OPEN SOURCE SEED INITIATIVE: THE NGO VIEW." MADISON, WI (APRIL 17, 2014) " "THEORY AND EVIDENCE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCALNESS." CORNELL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING PROFESSIONAL PLANNING COLLOQUIUM, ITHACA, NY. (APRIL 11, 2014) IN ADDITION TO NUMEROUS BLOG POSTINGS, IATP WROTE OR CO-WROTE SEVERAL ARTICLES, INCLUDING: " A.-M. KLEIN, V. BOREUX, M. J. CHAPPELL, S. M. PHILPOTT, AND J. FISCHER. "FOREST ISLANDS IN AN AGRICULTURAL SEA." (2014). PAGES 79-95 IN KETTLE AND L. P. KOH (EDS.), GLOBAL FOREST FRAGMENTATION. WALLINGFORD, UK: AB INTERNATIONAL. " J. LOOS, D. J. ABSON, M. J. CHAPPELL, J. HANSPACH, F. MIKULCAK, M. TICHIT, AND J. FISCHER. "PUTTING MEANING BACK INTO 'SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION.'" (2014). FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, VOL. 12(6): 356-361. " J. FISCHER, D. J. ABSON, V. BUTSIC, M. J. CHAPPELL, J. EKROOS, J. HANSPACH, T. KUEMMERLE, H. G. SMITH, AND H. VON WEHRDEN. (2014). "LAND SPARING VERSUS LAND SHARING: MOVING FORWARD." CONSERVATION LETTERS, VOL. 7(3): 149-157. IATP ALSO ORGANIZED THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY TO JOIN US IN AN OPEN LETTER TO THE FAO: M. J. CHAPPELL, D. J. ABSON, M. A. ALTIERI, AND 70 OTHERS. (2014). "SCIENTISTS' SUPPORT LETTER FOR THE FAO INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGROECOLOGY, 18-19 SEPTEMBER, 2014." (LEAD DRAFTER AND COORDINATOR.) AVAILABLE AT HTTP://SHAR.ES/1MHH7I. NANOTECHNOLOGY AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY IN 2014, IATP CONTINUED TO RESEARCH AND WRITE ABOUT THE RISKS INHERENT IN NEW TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS IN AGRICULTURE, SUCH AS NANOTECHNOLOGY AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY. IN ADDITION TO RULEMAKING COMMENTS SUBMITTED, WRITING AND PRESENTATIONS INCLUDED: " "ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH STILL SECONDARY TO PRODUCT DEVELOP IN NEW NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY STRATEGY" " "SYNTHETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS AREN'T 'NATURAL' AT ALL" " "FROM GMO TO SMO: HOW SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY EVADES REGULATION" " "FDA TO INDUSTRY: PLEASE CALL US IF YOU PUT NANOMATERIALS IN FOOD" " "BABE'S NEW DIET: NANOMATERIALS IN ANIMAL FEED" " "SYNBIO: U.S. GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY RESPONSES IN NORTH AMERICA" |
| PART VI, LINE 11B | THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WILL REVIEW AND APPROVE THE ORGANIZATION'S 990 AND DISTRIBUTE TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRIOR TO FILING. AT THIS TIME, THE FINANCE COMMITTEE ALSO APPROVES THE REPORT TO THE STATE AG'S OFFICE. |
| PART VI, LINE 12C | EMPLOYEES AND BOARD MEMBERS ARE ASKED TO REVIEW AND SIGN THE POLICY ANNUALLY. |
| PAR VI, LINE 15 A&B | PRESIDENT'S - SALARY IS COMPARED TO OTHER NONPROFITS AND THEN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD. OTHER KEY EMPLOYEES - ONLY INTERNAL |
| PART VI, LINE 19 | GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE AVALIABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. THE 990 IS AVAILABLE AT WWW.IATP.ORG. |
| PART XI, LINE 5 | OTHER CHANGES IN NET ASSETS OR FUND BALANCES- UNREALIZED LOSS ON INVESTMENTS. |
| Part XI LINE 9 | The $153,225 is the earnings of a for profit subsidiary which files a Form 1120 and pays taxes on net income. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |