Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | ||||||
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | ||||||
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | 662,761 | 585,232 | 674,356 | 478,569 | 370,045 | 2,770,963 |
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | 17,110 | 227 | 145 | 664 | 177 | 18,323 |
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | 679,871 | 585,459 | 674,501 | 479,233 | 370,222 | 2,789,286 |
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 2,789,286 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | 679,871 | 585,459 | 674,501 | 479,233 | 370,222 | 2,789,286 |
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | 9,352 | 11,504 | 7,592 | 6,106 | 7,034 | 41,588 |
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | 9,352 | 11,504 | 7,592 | 6,106 | 7,034 | 41,588 |
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | 689,223 | 596,963 | 682,093 | 485,339 | 377,256 | 2,830,874 |
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | THE COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE IS A NONPARTISAN CIVIC ORGANIZATION THAT WORKS TO IMPROVE THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE LOCAL AND FEDERAL COURTS AND RELATED AGENCIES IN THE WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA AND THROUGHOUT THE NATION BY (1) IDENTIFYING AND PROMOTING SPECIFIC JUSTICE SYSTEM REFORMS; (2) IMPROVING PUBLIC ACCESS TO JUSTICE; AND (3) INCREASING PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORT OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | RETURNING CITIZENS. REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION AND TWO UNIVERSITIES ALSO ATTENDED. THIS BREAKFAST PRODUCED SEVERAL IDEAS, TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN 2016, FOR CONTINUING TO EDUCATE DC EMPLOYERS ON THE BENEFITS OF HIRING PEOPLE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD. MENTAL HEALTH/DC BAR JUDICIAL CONFERENCE PANEL ON MENTAL HEALTH AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE. MEMBERS OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMITTEE AND A LARGE GROUP OF STAKEHOLDERS ORGANIZED A PANEL ON MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION FOR THE DC JUDICIAL AND BAR CONFERENCE IN APRIL 2015. THIS PANEL, WHICH FOCUSED ON THE INTERSECTION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WAS MODERATED BY JUDGE MICHAEL RYAN OF THE DC SUPERIOR COURT, AND PANELISTS INCLUDED COLLEEN KENNEDY FROM THE US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, LAURA ROSE FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE, JONATHAN WARD FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INSPECTOR MARIO PATRIZIO FROM THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND AYESHA DELANEY- BRUMSEY FROM THE VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE. COMMUNITY PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CPDC) COMMUNITY SAFETY PROJECT. CCE WAS SELECTED BY THE NONPROFIT HOUSING PROVIDER, COMMUNITY PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CPDC) TO PARTNER ON A PROJECT TO SURVEY DC RESIDENTS ABOUT THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS. CCE DEVELOPED THE SURVEY IN THE SPRING OF 2015 AND THEN SPENT THE SUMMER ADMINISTERING IT TO NEARLY 1,000 PEOPLE. THE RAW DATA WAS ANALYZED DURING THE FALL AND A MORE THOROUGH ANALYSIS AND WRITING OF THE REPORT WILL BE DONE IN 2016. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B | AGAINST NOTARIO OR LEGAL CONSULTANT FRAUD IN THE DC-METRO REGION. DURING 2015, THE WORKING GROUP FOCUSED TO A GREAT EXTENT ON THE BEST WAYS TO EDUCATE CONSUMERS ABOUT MISINFORMATION AND FALSE ADVERTISING THROUGH TWO OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON IMMIGRATION, THE DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) AND DEFERRED ACTION FOR PARENTAL ACCOUNTABILITY (DAPA). IN ADDITION, CCE SUPPORTED EFFORTS TO AMEND THE DC COURT OF APPEAL'S RULE 49 TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS NOTARIO FRAUD, AND COLLABORATED WITH DC'S OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE HISPANIC BAR ASSOCIATION, AYUDA, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS TO PURSUE A DC NOTARIO FRAUD STATUTE. DURING THE LATTER HALF OF 2015, CCE RECEIVED A GRANT FROM THE BROKELL FOUNDATION WHICH WILL PERMIT THIS PROJECT TO CONTINUE IN 2016. UPL. BAR LEADERS FROM DC, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA WHO OVERSEE MATTERS INVOLVING THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW CONTINUED TO MEET SEVERAL TIMES IN 2015. THESE BAR LEADERS SHARED INFORMATION RELATED TO PENDING INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDED RESOURCES TO ASSIST WITH ENFORCING AGAINST UPL IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C | RELEVANT TO SCHOOL DISCIPLINE AND ASSESSED BOTH THE TRADITIONAL AND CHARTER SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY SYSTEMS; PRESENTED AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS AFFORDED TRADITIONAL AND CHARTER SCHOOL STUDENTS FACING SUSPENSIONS OR EXPULSIONS; AND SHARED BEST PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING SCHOOL DISCIPLINE. ON MARCH 23, 2015, THE PROJECT COMMITTEE HOSTED AN EVENT AT THE HISTORIC CHARLES SUMNER SCHOOL MUSEUM AND ARCHIVES, WHICH INCLUDED THE FORMAL RELEASE OF THE REPORT AND A PANEL OF DISCUSSION AMONG DC EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING SOME OF THE REPORT'S KEY FINDINGS. THE PANEL WAS MODERATED BY ALLISON BROWN, OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS AND INCLUDED COUNCILMEMBER DAVID GROSSO (I-AL), CHAIRPERSON, COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION; JENNIFER NILES, DEPUTY MAYOR OF EDUCATION; JEFFREY NOEL, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF DATA, ASSESSMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND RESEARCH AT THE OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION; TIMOTHY RIVERIA, ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE AND EDUCATION, INC.; JOYANNA SMITH, OMBUDSMAN FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION; AND RASHIDA YOUNG, DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4D | COURT IMPROVEMENTS AND JURY INITIATIVE OAH. DURING THE SUMMER OF 2015, THE DC AUDITOR RETAINED CCE UNDER A CONTRACT TO UNDERTAKE A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ESTABLISHMENT ACT OF 2001. THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT WAS TO EXAMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE ORIGINAL LEGISLATIVE INTENT HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED AND TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO ENSURE THE DISTRICT'S SYSTEM TO MANAGE AND RESOLVE ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION ARISING UNDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAW WAS FAIR, EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE. A STEERING COMMITTEE, CO- CHAIRED BY CHARLES PATRIZIA AND MICHAEL HAYS, WAS CONVENED TO OVERSEE THE PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY, FIVE WORKING GROUPS WERE CONVENED TO BEGIN TO GATHER INFORMATION AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS: LITIGANT INPUT; OAH INPUT; OPERATIONS; CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON; AND LEGISLATIVE REVIEW. CCE PLANNED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT IN AUGUST, 2016. BENCH-BAR-MEDIA DIALOGUE PROJECT. IN JANUARY 2015, CCE'S BENCH-BAR-MEDIA DIALOGUE PROJECT COMMITTEE HELD A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC EVENT AT THE NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO BUILDING ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC COURT EVIDENCE, MODERATED BY ASHLEY MESSENGER OF NPR. PANELISTS INCLUDED DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL JIM MCLAUGHLIN AND CRIME REPORTER PETER HERMANN FROM THE WASHINGTON POST; PRINCIPAL US ASSISTANT ATTORNEY VINCENT COHEN, JR.; SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE HERBERT DIXON; SAM STEIN, POLITICAL EDITOR FOR THE HUFFINGTON POST; RETIRED MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN FACCIOLA; BRIAN M. HEBERLIG OF THE DC OFFICE OF STEPTOE & JOHNSON, AND BILL LORD, STATION MANAGER AND NEWS DIRECTOR FOR CHANNEL 9. IN SEPTEMBER 2015, CCE HELD ITS FIFTH "SHARING PERSPECTIVES" DISCUSSION AT WILMERHALE, WHICH WAS MODERATED BY BRUCE BROWN FROM THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. THIS ANNUAL EVENT WAS WELL ATTENDED BY SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE BENCH, AS WELL AS LOCAL AND NATIONAL PRESS, AND MEDIA ATTORNEYS, AND TOPICS INCLUDED PUBLIC ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC COURT RECORDS, MEDIA USE OF POLICE BODYCAM AND OTHER AUDIO AND VISUAL MATERIAL, AND EVOLVING STANDARDS OF COURTROOM SOCIAL MEDIA ETIQUETTE. JURY REFORM. THE JURY PROJECT COMMITTEE PUBLISHED ITS REPORT, JURY SERVICE REVISITED: UPGRADES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, IN DECEMBER 2015, AND HELD A "RELEASE EVENT" AT ARNOLD & PORTER LAW FIRM. THE PANEL OF SPEAKERS FROM THE DC SUPERIOR COURT, THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND FROM THE JURY PROJECT COMMITTEE HIGHLIGHTED RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE'S THREE WORKING GROUPS: JUROR CARE, JURY POOL AND SUMMONING, AND TRIAL STRUCTURE. THE JURY PROJECT WAS CO-CHAIRED BY IRVIN NATHAN AND JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, AND INCLUDED REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS WELL AS REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE OF DC, THE SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, THE US ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR DC, THE DC BAR, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS, THE DC OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AND THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. EFFORTS PLANNED FOR 2016 INCLUDE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REPORT'S 25 RECOMMENDATIONS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 2 | DAVID LESSER NANCY LESSER BOARD MEMBER BOARD MEMBER SPOUSE |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMITTEES REVIEW THE 990 BEFORE IT IS FILED. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | FORM 990 PART VI SECTION B LINE 12A-12C THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS EACH SIGN AN INDIVIDUAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED VIA A COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, A SUB- COMMITTEE OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEWS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FROM 3-5 SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS. SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS ARE DEEMED TO BE ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR OPERATING BUDGETS THAT HAVE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WITH THE SAME ACADEMIC AND EXPERIENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS AS CCE'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. WHILE AN EFFORT IS MADE AT FINDING SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE METRO DC AREA, THE COMMITTEE MAY LOOK TO OTHER GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS AND ADJUST COMPENSATION DATA FOUND BASED ON COMPARATIVE COST OF LIVING DIFFERENCES. ADDITIONALLY, CCE TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE SALARY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COULD EARN IN A GOVERNMENTAL OR FOR-PROFIT CAPACITY AND USES SUCH COMPENSATION RANGE AS AN UPPER LIMIT OF COMPENSATION. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINED VIA A COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, A SUB- COMMITTEE OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEWS OFFICER COMPENSATION FROM 3-5 SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS. SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS ARE DEEMED TO BE ORGANIZATIONS WITH SIMILAR OPERATING BUDGETS THAT HAVE OFFICERS IN SIMILAR ROLES WITH THE SAME ACADEMIC AND EXPERIENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS AS CCE'S OFFICERS. WHILE AN EFFORT IS MADE AT FINDING SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE METRO DC AREA, THE COMMITTEE MAY LOOK TO OTHER GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS AND ADJUST COMPENSATION DATA FOUND BASED ON COMPARATIVE COST OF LIVING DIFFERENCES. ADDITIONALLY, CCE TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE SALARY THE OFFICER COULD EARN IN A GOVERNMENTAL OR FOR-PROFIT CAPACITY AND USES SUCH COMPENSATION RANGE AS AN UPPER LIMIT OF COMPENSATION. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | INTERNAL REVENUE FORMS 990 ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |