Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | 743,962 | 432,862 | 753,060 | 578,110 | 1,009,588 | 3,517,582 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 743,962 | 432,862 | 753,060 | 578,110 | 1,009,588 | 3,517,582 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 1,824,108 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 1,693,474 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 743,962 | 432,862 | 753,060 | 578,110 | 1,009,588 | 3,517,582 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 2,652 | 1,379 | 994 | 738 | 724 | 6,487 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 3,820 | 3,635 | 702 | 1,631 | 4,885 | 14,673 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | 3,538,742 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| PART II, LINE 10 | 14,673 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | THE ALLIANCE FOR METROPOLITAN STABILITY (AMS) WAS INCORPORATED AS A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION UNDER THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA IN 2000. AMS IS A COALITION OF ORGANIZATIONS ADVOCATING FOR PUBLIC POLICIES THAT PROMOTE EQUITY IN LAND USE. OUR MISSION IS TO SUPPORT GRASSROOTS COALITIONS IN CAMPAIGNS FOR RACIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN ECONOMIC GROWTH AND LAND DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS IN THE TWIN CITIES REGION. AMS WAS FORMED BY A GROUP OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT RECOGNIZED THAT TRUE STABILITY FOR THE TWIN CITIES COULD ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO REGIONAL PROBLEMS. WE HAVE 34 MEMBER GROUPS AND DOZENS OF ALLIED ORGANIZATIONS THAT UNITE UNDER THE RECOGNITION THAT OUR REGIONS PEOPLE, PLACES AND ISSUES ARE INTERCONNECTED, AND THAT WE CAN BUILD MORE POWER BY WORKING TOGETHER TOWARD OUR SHARED GOALS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | THE ALLIANCE FOR METROPOLITAN STABILITY IS A COALITION OF ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZING GROUPS FORMED IN 1994. WE WORK TOGETHER TO ADVANCE RACIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN URBAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE TWIN CITIES REGION. THE TWIN CITIES REGION IS RICH WITH RESOURCES. WE WANT ALL PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THEM, AND WE BELIEVE EVERYONE IN OUR REGION WILL BENEFIT WHEN ALL COMMUNITIES HAVE ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY. WE BELIEVE THE PEOPLE AND PLACES OF OUR REGION ARE DEEPLY CONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT. WE WORK TO ENSURE THAT OUR REGIONAL INVESTMENTS LIKE HOUSING, TRANSIT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BENEFIT EVERYONE - ESPECIALLY LOW-WEALTH COMMUNITIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, PEOPLE WHO ARE OFTEN LEFT BEHIND WHEN RESOURCES ARE ALLOCATED. THESE COMMUNITIES HAVE BEEN HISTORICALLY EXCLUDED FROM LAND-USE AND PROJECT DECISION MAKING TABLES, AND WE ARE WORKING WITH PUBLIC SECTOR LEADERS TO CHANGE THAT. THE ALLIANCE BRINGS GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS TOGETHER TO BUILD MORE POWER AND CREATE A REGION THAT ALLOWS EVERYONE IN THE TWIN CITIES REGION TO THRIVE. IN ADDITION, WE PLAY A BROADER ROLE IN THE REGIONAL LANDSCAPE OF ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY-BASED GROUPS BY OFFERING ACTIVITIES THAT HELP BUILD THE CAPACITY OF INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT WORK FOR REGIONAL EQUITY. FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2015 WE: O SHARED LEARNING: CONVENED MONTHLY ORGANIZER ROUNDTABLE FORUMS THAT OFFERED SHARED LEARNING AND CROSS-SECTOR NETWORKING OPPORTUNITIES OVER 300 COMMUNITY RESIDENTS, LEADERS AND STAFF ATTENDED THESE LIVELY FORUMS O COMMUNICATING BEST PRACTICES: PRODUCED A BI-WEEKLY E-NEWSLETTER, THE LINK, AND PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUAL PRINT NEWSLETTERS THAT OFFER THE LATEST INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS ON RACIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY ISSUES O BUILDING THE FIELD: PROMPTED BY THE ALLIANCE, LOCAL FUNDERS SUPPORTED BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF A TWIN CITIES DELEGATION TO ATTEND POLICYLINKS NATIONAL EQUITY SUMMIT, A PROCESS THAT WE ORGANIZED AND ADMINISTERED. WE INCREASED THE CAPACITY OF TWO DOZEN DELEGATES WHO NEEDED ASSISTANCE TO ATTEND, PARTNERED FOR THE FIRST TIME WITH THE MET COUNCIL (WHO BROUGHT THREE DOZEN STAFF MEMBERS TO THE CONFERENCE) TO ENGAGE DELEGATES BEFORE/DURING/AFTER THE CONFERENCE, AND ATTRACTED MORE THAN 170 ATTENDEES FROM MINNESOTA. ALLIANCE STAFF PRESENTED AT THE SUMMIT ON RACE AND DISAGGREGATING DATA, AND WERE INVITED UPON RETURN TO MINNESOTA TO GIVE THE PRESENTATION TO THE MINNEAPOLIS CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT. O FUNDING FOR GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS: WORKING WITH OUR ALLIED PARTNER GROUPS, THE ALLIANCE HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN PERSUADING PUBLIC AGENCIES TO INVEST MORE DEEPLY IN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT BY PROVIDING FUNDS DIRECTLY TO COMMUNITY-BASED GROUPS. WE HAVE SECURED MULTIPLE NEW FUNDING STREAMS THAT WILL ENCOURAGE INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN COMMUNITY GROUPS AND LOCAL OR REGIONAL AGENCIES, INCLUDING: 256,000 FROM THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR ENGAGEMENT IN REGIONAL PLANNING; 97,000 FOR NORTH MINNEAPOLIS GREENWAY ENGAGEMENT; AND 229,000 FOR ENGAGEMENT AROUND BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS. GOVERNMENT ENTITIES ARE TURNING TO GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS AS A SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE FOR EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES AND BUILDING MORE AUTHENTIC PARTNERSHIPS AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL. OUR PRIMARY CAMPAIGNS AND PROJECTS IN 2015 INCLUDE: 1. HIRE MINNESOTA: THE ALLIANCE PROVIDES CORE STAFF SUPPORT TO HIRE MINNESOTA, A CAMPAIGN TO END EMPLOYMENT DISPARITIES IN MINNESOTA. MINNESOTA HAS SOME OF THE WORST RACIAL DISPARITIES IN EMPLOYMENT IN THE COUNTRY. BUT HIRE MINNESOTA HAS SET AN AMBITIOUS GOAL: TO BRING OUR STATE FROM WORST TO FIRST IN EMPLOYMENT EQUITY. HIRE MINNESOTA HAS HELPED LARGE PUBLIC AGENCIES LIKE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE OF COLOR AND WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE THAT BUILDS OUR STATES ROADS, BRIDGES AND TRANSITWAYS AND OTHER .MAJOR CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE STATE. HIRING GOALS ON PUBLIC PROJECTS: ON THE VIKINGS STADIUM, HIRE MINNESOTA, THE PROJECTS EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE FIRM (EAF, WHICH IS LED BY SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC), GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE CONTRACTORS HAVE WORKED TOGETHER TO EXCEED THE 32 PERCENT GOAL FOR HOURS PERFORMED BY PEOPLE OF COLOR. AS OF DECEMBER 2015, PEOPLE OF COLOR HAVE WORKED 37 PERCENT OF THE HOURS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STADIUM AND THE RELATED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BEING MANAGED BY RYAN COMPANIES. WE ESTIMATE THAT THIS HAS CREATED WELL OVER 1,000 JOBS FOR PEOPLE OF COLOR. MORE THAN 800 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN RECRUITED INTO THE EAF, INCLUDING 165 WHO ARE READY TO WORK. TO DATE, 74 EAF ENROLLEES HAVE BEEN HIRED TO WORK ON THE STADIUM. THIS WORK HAS BROUGHT AN ESTIMATED 33 MILLION IN WAGES TO COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. MNDOTS PROGRESS IN HIRING PEOPLE OF COLOR, WHICH HAD IMPROVED WITH THE SUSTAINED SUPPORT FROM HIRE MINNESOTA SINCE 2009, SLIGHTLY DIPPED IN 2014 WHEN ATTENTION TURNED TO THE VIKINGS STADIUM PROJECT. SO IN 2015, HIRE WORKED CLOSELY WITH MNDOT TO ENSURE ITS CONTRACTORS IMPROVE THEIR PERFORMANCE. WE SECURED THE COMMISSIONERS COMMITMENT TO USE HIS LEADERSHIP POSITION TO CONVENE ALL THE CEOS OF THE PRIME CONTRACTORS IN A CONSTRUCTION WORKFORCE SUMMIT WITH HIRE TO EXPLORE WAYS TO ACHIEVE HIRING GOALS. AS A RESULT, WE SAW A RESURGENCE OF PROGRESS, WITH 10.8 PERCENT OF HOURS PERFORMED BY PEOPLE OF COLOR IN 2015, AN INCREASE FROM THE 8.6 PERCENT ACHIEVED IN 2014. EQUITABLE HIRING AND WORKFORCE SYSTEMS CHANGE: HIRE MINNESOTA CONNECTED WITH SEVERAL MEMBERS OF MSPWIN TO COORDINATE EFFORTS TO BUILD THE POLITICAL WILL TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ITS WHITE PAPER ON SNAP EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING IMPROVEMENTS. THROUGH A VARIETY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MEETINGS AND TESTIMONIES, HIRE HELPED SECURE THE ATTENTION OF THE GOVERNORS OFFICE, AS WELL AS DEED AND DHS LEADERSHIP. THE GOVERNORS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET RECOMMENDED REDIRECTING EXISTING FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENTS BACK FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE SNAP EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM IN ORDER TO EXPAND OPPORTUNITIES FOR "ABLE BODIED ADULTS WITHOUT DEPENDENTS." THESE FUNDS ARE INTENDED TO JUMPSTART OUR WORK TO OVERCOME BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT AND CREATE GREATER SELF-SUFFICIENCY THROUGH WORK TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT. FURTHER, DHS LEADERSHIP IS NOW COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH US AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM THAT SUCCESSFULLY CAPTURES THE TENS OF MILLIONS IN FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENTS AVAILABLE FOR SNAP E AND T, WHICH MINNESOTA HAS BEEN LEAVING ON THE TABLE. WHEN WE ADVANCE SYSTEMS CHANGE WITHIN HIRE MINNESOTA, WE CAN OFTEN SEE THE EFFECTS IN FUTURE PROJECTS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE MET COUNCIL USED OUR WORKFORCE PROJECTION TOOL ON THE GREEN LINE AND HAS NOW COMMITTED TO USING IT ON ALL FUTURE PROJECTS, ALONG WITH IMPLEMENTING OTHER HIRE-RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES ON THE BOTTINEAU AND SWLRT PROJECTS. IN ADDITION, WITH OUR SUCCESS ON THE VIKINGS PROJECT, WE ARE NOW WORKING WITH THE ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL TO INCLUDE HIRING GOALS IN ITS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER STADIUM DEVELOPMENT, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE CITY IS NOT DIRECTLY SUBSIDIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STADIUM FACILITY. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4B | 2. TRANSIT EQUITY: OUR TRANSIT EQUITY WORK IS DRIVEN BY THE GOAL OF INCLUDING COMMUNITY-BASED LEADERSHIP IN REGIONAL PLANNING, PROJECT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT DECISIONS. ORGANIZING EFFORTS HAVE HAD BOTH A WEST METRO AND EAST METRO FOCUS AND PROMOTE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE METROPOLITAN LEVEL PLANNING, EXPAND OUR REGIONAL TRANSIT AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, AND CREATE AN UNPRECEDENTED NETWORK OF CONNECTIVITY TO ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL OPPORTUNITY. THIS WORK INCLUDES: BUS TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS: IN COORDINATION WITH METRO TRANSIT AND OUR TWO ALLIED PARTNER GROUPS (NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS; CURA), THE ALLIANCE HELPED TO LAUNCH THE BETTER BUS STOPS INITIATIVE, A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROCESSES THAT WILL IMPACT DECISIONS TO ADD SHELTERS TO ELIGIBLE BUS STOPS, EXPLORE BROADER TRANSIT EQUITY ISSUES AND IMPLEMENT CONCRETE WAYS TO IMPROVE THE BUS RIDER EXPERIENCE. USING A COMMUNITY-LED PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS, COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS WERE INVITED TO SUBMIT PROPOSALS FOR TRANSIT SHELTER/TRANSIT SERVICE PLAN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. THE MICRO-CONTRACTS WILL ENSURE THAT LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND BUS RIDERS SHAPE AND DEFINE PLANS FOR THE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF 275+ NEW BUS STOP SHELTERS AND TO PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT INPUT INTO METRO TRANSIT'S TRANSIT SERVICE PLAN. THE ALLIANCE IS PART OF A THREE ORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION, THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TEAM (CET), WHICH CONVENES THE COHORT QUARTERLY, AND WORKS TO HELP BUILD RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FUNDED ORGANIZATIONS AND METRO TRANSIT STAFF. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL: OUR WORK WITH THE MET COUNCIL OVER THE PAST YEAR IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE CHANGES THAT WILL HAVE A BIG IMPACT ON OUR REGION. EARLY LAST YEAR, THE MET COUNCIL WAS UPDATING ITS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN, REQUIRED BY THE U.S. DOT. THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE (CESC), WHICH THE ALLIANCE PROVIDES STAFF SUPPORT TO, WORKED WITH THE MET COUNCIL TO DEVELOP AN UNPRECEDENTED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN, WHICH WILL NOW APPLY TO ALL OF THE MET COUNCIL'S WORK, NOT JUST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. IT ALSO INCLUDES AN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR MUNICIPALITIES, WITH INFORMATION ON HOW TO BETTER ENGAGE COMMUNITY. WE HOPE THIS WILL ELEVATE THE MET COUNCIL'S LEADERSHIP ON PUBLIC COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN OUR REGION. THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN IS ONE WAY WE ARE ENSURING COMMUNITIES HAVE A VOICE IN PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING. THE CESC ALSO WORKED WITH MET COUNCIL LEADERSHIP TO ESTABLISH AN EQUITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH WILL REVIEW THE EQUITY IMPACT OF ALL OF THE MET COUNCIL'S WORK. THE COMMITTEE INCLUDES MET COUNCIL MEMBERS, GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATIVES, AND COMMUNITY-BASED LEADERS TO ENSURE THAT IT REFLECTS THE REGION'S DIVERSITY. MORE THAN 100 PEOPLE WERE INTERVIEWED FOR THOSE POSITIONS. THE CESC SECURED COMMUNITY SEATS ON THE INTERVIEW COMMITTEE, INCLUDING A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE EQUITY IN PLACE COALITION, THE CESC, THE SWLRT EQUITY COMMITMENTS COALITION, AND THE BLUE LINE COALITION. THE ALLIANCE HELPED PERSUADE THE MPCA TO CREATE A SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT SCORECARD: THE CESC ALSO CREATED AN EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND SCORECARD TOOL TO HELP COMMUNITIES EVALUATE CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THEIR COMMUNITIES USING AN EQUITY LENS. WE HEARD THAT THE VALUE OF THIS TOOL FOR COMMUNITIES IS TO PROVIDE THEM WITH A STARTING POINT TO SECURE PREDICTABLE COMMUNITY BENEFITS. WE HEARD FROM GOVERNMENT THERE IS VALUE IN HAVING SPECIFIC INDICATORS OF EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT. WE HEARD FROM DEVELOPERS THAT IT IS GOOD TO HAVE SPECIFIC TARGETS TO AIM FOR WHEN THE COMMUNITY OR PUBLIC SECTOR ASKS FOR EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED THE SCORECARD INTO THE WORKPLAN FOR THE OFFICE OF TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUDED IT IN ITS TOOLKIT FOR LOCAL PLANNING. AGENCIES LIKE METRO TRANSIT AND THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARE EVALUATING THE USE OF THE SCORECARD IN THEIR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS. THE U.S. EPA HAS ALSO EXPRESSED INTEREST IN IT AND IS CONSIDERING ADOPTING IT AS A TOOL TO PROMOTE TO OTHER COMMUNITIES. ADVANCING EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT NEAR SWLRT: THE ALLIANCE WORKED WITH A BROAD COLLECTION OF GROUPS TO INTRODUCE EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS INTO SWLRT DISCUSSIONS RELATED TO THE MUNICIPAL CONSENT PROCESS FOR THIS LIGHT RAIL PROJECT. THE EQUITY COMMITMENTS COALITION PERSUADED EACH PUBLIC ENTITY (THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE MET COUNCIL) ADDRESS SPECIFIC REQUESTS RELATED TO PROJECT PLANNING, STATION LOCATIONS, ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY, BUS SERVICE IMPROVEMENT, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, JOBS AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE ALLIANCE CREATED AN EQUITY COMMITMENTS MATRIX THAT TRACKS OUR SPECIFIC ASKS AND LISTS SPECIFIC AGENCY PLEDGES TO IMPROVE THE PROJECT. SOUTHWEST LRT BUDGET PRESERVATION: MANY OF THESE CONSIDERATIONS CAME INTO PLAY AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS EXPLORED COST-CUTTING MEASURES IN THE SUMMER OF 2015 TO ATTEMPT TO MAINTAIN A PROJECT BUDGET OF 1.6 BILLION. IN THE BATTLE TO REIGN IN GROWING COSTS AND BALANCE THE PROJECT BUDGET, COALITION LEADERS SUCCESSFULLY ARGUED THAT PROJECT CUTS AND COST SAVINGS MEASURES MUST NOT HARM LOW-WEALTH COMMUNITIES OF COLOR OR THE STATIONS THAT SERVE THEM. THE EFFORT TO TRIM BUDGET COST OVERRUNS GAVE COMMUNITY LEADERS A CHANCE TO WORK WITH POLICYMAKING AND PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEES TO SHAPE AND DEFINE BUDGETING STRATEGIES. SOUTHWEST EQUITY COMMITMENT LEADERS PERSUADED THE SWLRT COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) TO EMBRACE OUR PROJECT PRESERVATION ARGUMENTS, WHICH THEY QUOTED IN THEIR OFFICIAL LETTER TO THE PROJECT'S GOVERNING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. THE CAC ECHOED OUR REQUEST THAT MANY PROJECT ELEMENTS SHOULD BE RETAINED, RATHER THAN ATTEMPTING TO HOLD THE BUDGET TO 2014 LEVELS IN A WAY THAT WOULD ELIMINATE CRUCIAL STATION STOPS AND CONNECTIONS FOR THESE COMMUNITIES. OVERCOMING SIGNIFICANT OPPOSITION, PROJECT LEADERS AGREED AND RAISED THE BUDGET TO 1.77 BILLION, PRESERVING 110 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS THAT WILL SERVE LOCAL COMMUNITIES. THE MET COUNCIL ALSO AGREED TO OUR REQUEST THAT TWO SEATS BE CREATED ON THE POWERFUL CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE SPECIFICALLY FOR REPRESENTATIVES FROM LOW-WEALTH COMMUNITIES OF COLOR (A GLARING OMISSION IN THE INITIAL MAKE-UP OF THE CMC). NORTH MINNEAPOLIS GREENWAY: THE ALLIANCE SUPPORTED NORTH MINNEAPOLIS LEADERS IN WORKING WITH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS TO EXPLORE THE POTENTIAL OF A GREENWAY CONCEPT THAT WOULD PROVIDE A SAFE PATHWAY FOR BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS. THE ALLIANCE PROVIDED TECHNICAL AND ORGANIZING SUPPORT TO THE NORTHSIDE GREENWAY COUNCIL, A COALITION OF COMMUNITY GROUPS AND LOCAL LEADERS WORKING TO STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS AROUND THE PROPOSED BIKE/PEDESTRIAN GREENWAY TRAIL AND LINEAR PARK CONCEPT. IF IMPLEMENTED, THE PROJECT COULD BENEFIT USERS BY SAFELY CONNECTING THEM TO TRAILS, PARKWAYS, COMMUNITY GARDENS, COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS, SCHOOLS, SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES, CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS, THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND THE NORTHERN SUBURBS. WE COMPLETED ANOTHER ROUND OF OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT IN 2015, AND INCLUDED AN EFFORT TO DISCUSS THE CONCEPT WITH RESIDENTS LIVING SOUTH OF PLYMOUTH AVE. N. TO GUIDE THIS PROJECT, WE CREATED THE NORTHSIDE GREENWAY COUNCIL TO LEAD DECISION-MAKING AND LONG-TERM VISIONING. ALONG WITH GRANTEES, CHOSEN THROUGH A COMMUNITY-BASED GRANTMAKING PROCESS THAT WE LED (WHERE 97,000 WAS CYCLED IN LOCAL GROUPS TO PROMOTE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT), WE GENERATED FEEDBACK TO BETTER UNDERSTAND PEOPLE'S OPINIONS ABOUT THE GREENWAY, ENGAGED RESIDENTS, AND SHARED DATA ABOUT WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED. THE ALLIANCE HAS MADE PRESENTATIONS ON THIS PROJECT AT THE RAILVOLUTION AND EQUITY SUMMIT CONFERENCES IN 2015, AS WELL AS BEING INVITED TO PRESENT AT AN INTERNATIONAL GATHERING OF THE WINTER CYCLING CONFERENCE. MOVEMN: THE ALLIANCE PLAYED A LEAD ROLE IN FOUNDING MOVEMN, A LARGE COALITION OF ORGANIZATIONS DEDICATED TO SECURING A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT FUNDING SOLUTION IN OUR STATE. MOVEMN ASKED STATE AND LOCAL LEADERS TO JOIN TRANSIT ADVOCATES, COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, BUSINESSES, LABOR UNIONS AND OTHER LOCAL OFFICIALS TO FASHION A LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO FIX OUR CRUMBLING ROADS AND BRIDGES, BUILD OUT A WORLD-CLASS TRANSIT SYSTEM, AND ENSURE THAT EVERY MINNESOTAN HAS RELIABLE AND AFFORDABLE ACCESS TO REACH CRITICAL DESTINATIONS LIKE WORK, SCHOOL, HEALTH CARE, SHOPPING AND RECREATION. OUR ORGANIZING EFFORTS IN THIS CAMPAIGN SOUGHT TO GROW OUR REGION'S BUS SYSTEM, EXPAND OUR RAIL TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE, CONNECT WORKERS OF COLOR TO CONSTRUCTION JOBS, SPUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND MAKE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD BENEFIT OUR REGION'S LOW-WEALTH, COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. THESE IMPROVEMENTS COULD INCLUDE ADDING MORE HEATED BUS SHELTERS, ENHANCING BUS SERVICE ON URBAN CORRIDORS, EXPANDING OUR NETWORK OF BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND FUNDING STREET CARS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4C | 3. EQUITY IN PLACE: WORKING WITH THE CENTER FOR URBAN AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS, THE ALLIANCE CO-CONVENED THE EQUITY IN PLACE COALITION TABLE, A COLLECTION OF ORGANIZATIONS REPRESENTATIVE OF AND LED BY COMMUNITIES OF COLOR THAT ARE COORDINATING EFFORTS WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO IDENTIFY AND ENGAGE COMMUNITY EFFORTS TO INCREASE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL OPPORTUNITIES IN THE REGION. THE GOAL OF THIS EFFORT IS TO SHAPE EQUITY- DRIVEN INVESTMENTS, POLICIES AND PLANS; AND WE ARE WORKING TO CHANGE THE DYNAMICS OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT BY LEADING WITH COMMUNITY VOICES AND WITH A RACE AND CLASS ANALYSIS. EQUITY IN PLACE IS A DIVERSE GROUP OF STRATEGIC PARTNERS FROM PLACE-BASED, HOUSING, AND ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS. WE BELIEVE THAT EVERYONE IN THE TWIN CITIES REGION DESERVES TO LIVE WHERE THEY WISH TO LIVE AND HAVE ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY. OUR REGION BENEFITS FROM MANY ASSETS, BUT WE CONTINUE TO BE UNABLE TO TRANSLATE THESE BENEFITS TO EVERYONE, SPECIFICALLY TO COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. EQUITY IN PLACE ENGAGES COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN INFLUENCING PLANNING AND INVESTMENTS THAT WILL SHAPE THE FUTURE OF THE TWIN CITIES REGION. THROUGHOUT 2015, THE ALLIANCE PARTNERED WITH COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS TO WORK DIRECTLY IN LOW-WEALTH COMMUNITIES OF COLOR IN SEVERAL GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS: BROOKLYN PARK AND BROOKLYN CENTER; THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF ST. PAUL, THE FROGTOWN/RONDO NEIGHBORHOODS OF ST. PAUL; AND THE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS NEIGHBORHOODS. IN COLLABORATION WITH THESE COMMUNITY GROUPS, WE PREPARED PLANS FOR A SERIES OF COMMUNITY MEETINGS WITH THE MET COUNCIL TO IDENTIFY STRATEGIC EQUITABLE INVESTMENTS AND POLICIES THAT ALIGN WITH THE COMMUNITY'S VISIONS FOR HOW BEST TO ALLEVIATE POVERTY, BUILD WEALTH, AND CREATE HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES. EQUITY IN PLACE LEADERS HAVE MET WITH FEDERAL HUD STAFF AND LOCAL OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS CONCERNS WITH RECENT FAIR HOUSING COMPLAINTS AND TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACTUAL TENANTS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARE HEARD AND CONSIDERED. THE COMMUNITY LEADERS WORKING WITH EQUITY IN PLACE INTEND TO BE A PART OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINTS. CAMPAIGN MEMBERS ALSO PARTICIPATED IN A COMMUNITY FORUM IN MINNEAPOLIS WHERE OVER 200 PEOPLE TURNED OUT TO DISCUSS GENTRIFICATION CONCERNS. IN THE NEXT YEAR, WE ARE ALSO BEING ASKED TO COMPLETE A NEW AREA OF WORK WITH HUD THAT MAY BE OF INTEREST TO OTHER REGIONS NATIONALLY. HUD IS ASKING THE TWIN CITIES TO RE-DO ITS REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS (RAI), FINDING THAT THE ONE MOST RECENTLY SUBMITTED FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS RCAPS, SEGREGATION AND ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY. ALLIANCE STAFF AND OTHER EQUITY IN PLACE MEMBERS HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH LOCAL AND REGIONAL HUD STAFF ABOUT THIS PROCESS AS WELL AS OTHER ASPECTS OF THE FAIR HOUSING COMPLAINTS FILED LAST YEAR. HUD IS TRYING TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RAI PROCESS HERE THAT EMPHASIZES INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CAN SERVE AS A NATIONAL MODEL. THE AGENCY HAS OFFERED EQUITY IN PLACE 4 (OF 12) SEATS ON AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF STAKEHOLDERS FOR THIS PROCESS, AND MINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP WILL RECEIVE A TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANT TO STAFF THIS TABLE. EQUITY IN PLACE IS NEGOTIATING WITH HUD TO DEFINE THE DETAILS OF THIS NEW PROCESS, OUR TERMS OF PARTICIPATION AND WHAT RESOURCES MIGHT BE FOUND FOR ENGAGEMENT. THE GOAL IS TO HAVE A NEW RAI BY APRIL 2017, AND TIE THE RESULTS TO LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4D | THESE PROGRAMS ARE FUNDED LARGELY BY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS, LOCAL AND NATIONAL FOUNDATIONS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | THE BOARD'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE FORM 990 FOR APPROVAL. ONCE APPROVED, THE 990 IS SIGNED AND SUBMITTED. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | EACH YEAR, BOARD MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILL OUT THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS. KEY STAFF MEMBERS IN POSITIONS OF MAKING SPENDING OR CONTRACTING DECISIONS ALSO FILL THEM OUT. THE STAFF COLLECTS THE FORMS AND KEEPS THEM ON FILE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OVERSEES THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND ASKS ALL STAFF, BOARD MEMBERS AND KEY COALITION MEMBER REPRESENTATIVES AND ALLIED ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVES TO FILL OUT AN EVALUATION FORM. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THEN MEETS WITH THE DIRECTOR TO DISCUSS THE COLLECTIVE EVALUATION FORM, COMPARES THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S PERFORMANCE WITH ANNUAL WORK PLAN GOAL AND OUTCOMES, SETS NEW GOALS AND WORK PLAN OUTCOMES FOR THE COMING YEAR, AND MAKES DECISIONS ON COMPENSATION AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SUPERVISES THE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR AND PERFORMS A SIMILAR EVALUATION OF HER EFFORTS AND MAKES DECISIONS ABOUT HER COMPENSATION AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |