Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | 901,188 | 1,094,984 | 1,129,507 | 1,620,134 | 1,649,388 | 6,395,201 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 901,188 | 1,094,984 | 1,129,507 | 1,620,134 | 1,649,388 | 6,395,201 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 3,938,005 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 2,457,196 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 901,188 | 1,094,984 | 1,129,507 | 1,620,134 | 1,649,388 | 6,395,201 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 1,389 | 853 | 674 | 2,132 | 5,048 | |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | 6,407,749 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | 15000324 |
| Software Version: | 2015v2.0 |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Client Note 1 | Client Note 1 - Headwaters Economics 2015 Form 990 AccomplishmentsHeadwaters Economics analyzed the more than 15,000 wildfires that burned in the continental United States from 2000-2013, finding that such fires increasingly are threatening urban areasoften repeatedlyputting more homes, lives, infrastructure, and other resources at risk. To more fully address future wildfire risks, Headwaters Economics authored a white paper that offers nine ideas for how best to alter the pace, scale, and pattern of future home development. Headwaters Economics also published a related journal article, in the March-April 2015 edition of The Solutions Journal, that describes the trends in wildfires, the challenge of defending private property, the solutions tried to date, and new ideas that could significantly reduce costs and risks by altering the pattern of future home building on fire-prone lands. Headwaters Economics wrote a report in cooperation with Summit County, Colorado that provides recommendations for how that community can improve and strengthen its approach to addressing wildfire risks. The lessons from this case study can help other local governments and federal policy makers develop best practices, lessons, and tools to reduce future wildfire risks.Headwaters Economics continued to update and host online the Economic Profile System (EPS)created in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Servicewith the latest published statistics from federal data sources. This free, easy-to-use software produces detailed socioeconomic reports of communities, counties, states, and regions, including custom aggregations and comparisons.In a related effort, Headwaters Economics updated the data interactive, West-Wide Economic Atlas, that allows the public to better understand socioeconomic trends (e.g., sources of personal income, population, employment and growth by industry, land ownership) at the county and state level for the continental U.S. West. Headwaters Economics created a set of national interactive maps that show how federal land payments (Payments in Lieu of Taxes, Secure Rural Schools, etc.) are distributed to counties and states. The data include more than twenty years of payments history and trends as well as programs receiving payments; the percent of a county or states budget that comes from federal land payments; and projections of what would happen to federal land payments if the Secure Rural Schools program is not reauthorized. As part of Headwaters Economics work with rural communities, we again updated and published data and two interactive maps that show the range of commercial activities on National Forests, and details on the timber economy, including gross receipts, timber harvest sales, and timber cuts. Both maps show U.S. Forest Service activity at three levels: National Forests, National Forest Regions, and states. Headwaters Economics updated the Payments from Federal Lands report that is part of the Economic Profile System (EPS) to include the latest available data for federal land payments to county governments from programs such as Payments in Lieu of Taxes. Headwaters Economics also assisted various congressional and county staff with data and research as background to county payment legislative proposals, and provided local and state officials with county and state-level analysis. Headwaters Economics published a graphical and data analysis of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) for the years 2011-2014. The report offers a comprehensive data base and state-level visualization that shows the variety of LWCF benefits provided to the public, and also the number, acreage, and funding involved with all projects during this time frame. Headwaters Economics later updated this research to analyze how much LWCF funding went to federal or non-federal projects; and to assess which congressional districts most benefited from LWCF spending during the 2011-2015 timeframe.Headwaters Economics updated the interactive analysis of the economic impact of every National Park Service unit in the country, National Park Service Units: Economic Impacts of Visitation and Expenditures, to include 2014 visitation, spending, employment, and income data. These data are used widely by gateway communities to understand and track the economic impacts of nearby National Park Service units. Headwaters Economics produced a report that summarizes Montanas economy, analyzing how it has grown and what is driving its performance, including a description of how federal lands help attract people, investment, and businesses.Headwaters Economics completed work on three major research projects about federal royalty policies concerning coal and other fossil fuels. The first report reviews problems with the current federal royalty system for coal, estimates current effective royalty rates, and offers several reform options. The analysis found that moving valuation from the mine price to the market price simplifies the process, creates transparency, lowers administrative costs, and allows for a more accurate assessment of whether taxpayers are receiving a fair return.The second report reviews proposals to reform the way federal coal is valued for federal royalty assessment. The research found that reforms would have substantial revenue benefits for federal and state governments, and limited impact on coal production or prices on federal lands. It would also increase the transparency of the assessment process. The third report provides an analysis that shows how proposed federal royalty reforms will increase the cost of delivering natural gas to domestic power plants by a greater amount than coal. As a result, the potential reforms are unlikely to cause additional fuel switching from coal to natural gas in the electric power sector.Headwaters Economics also published an updated interactive analysis showing what local governments in eleven oil and natural gas producing states receive from associated production taxes. The analysis shows how revenues and distributions vary by state policy, land ownership, and well productivity. Local governments, which bear the greatest impacts of energy production, rely on energy revenues to help them mitigate impacts and plan for long-term economic development. Headwaters Economics published a Trails Research and Searchable Benefits Library with more than 90 studies on the impacts of trails sortable by type of benefit, use, year, and region. The library helps community leaders, elected officials, trail users, and others better understand the benefits of trails, and focuses on four main themes: business, quality of life, property value, and public health impacts.Headwaters Economics also conducted a survey for Teton County, Wyoming, finding that nine out of ten respondents utilized the regions trails and pathways. The survey was part of ongoing research by Headwaters Economics to provide comprehensive information on trails and pathways to help community leaders, elected officials, trail users, and others better understand the uses and benefits of area trails and pathways.Headwaters Economics published an interactive map and related explanatory post on the Three Wests. The updated study shows that there are three distinct types of counties in the WestMetro, Connected, and Isolateddefined by their access to major markets and population centers. The three types of western counties were shown to have different economic performance and socioeconomic characteristics. For future rural development, access to major cities is an important indicator of likely economic and demographic performance.Headwaters Economics conducted a study on the economic development opportunities in Wheeler County, Oregon. Like many rural counties in the West, Wheeler County faces economic difficulties. It also has untapped resources and opportunities, which suggest the possibility of a brighter economic future. The study recommends a focus on existing businesses to increase opportunities through infrastructure improvements to better access markets or by capturing spending from new visitors. It also proposes approaches that can help the county capitalize on its public lands, including: new attractions; promoting tourism; translating visitation to residency; appealing to people who can work remotely; and reaching out to retirees.To better understand the economic value of public lands in Grand County, Utah, Headwaters Economics updated an earlier study commissioned at the request of a number of local interests, businesses, and officials to inform discussions about how to develop, protect, and manage nearby public lands so that they benefit local companies, the county, and diverse users into the future.Headwaters Economics published an analysis and interactive graphics looking at the increase of new residents and home construction in the changing landscape of the High Divide region along the Idaho and Montana border. The study loo |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b: Form 990 Review Process | Each member of the board reviewed Form 990 before it was filed with the IRS. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c: Explanation of Monitoring and Enforcement of Conflicts | Each director, principal officer and member of a committee with board delegated power is required annually to sign a statement which affirms that the person (a) has received a copy of the Conflict of Interest Policy, (b) has read and understands the Policy, (c) has agreed to comply with the Policy, and (d) understands that Headwaters Economics is a charitable tax-exempt organization and to maintain its federal tax-exempt status must engage in activities which accomplish one or more of its tax-exempt purposes.Each staff member, volunteer(other than casual volunteers who perform no regular services), and contractor is required to sign an Acknowledgement of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Policy. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 15b: Compensation Review and Approval Process for Officers and Key Employees | The Executive Director annually reviews the performance and compensation of each employee of the Organization, other than himself. The Board reviews the performance and compensation of the Executive Director on an annual basis. The Executive Director and the Board review published salary surveys and compare employees' current wages with comparable positions in other professions to determine reasonableness. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 19: Other Organization Documents Publicly Available | The Organization makes its governing documents, conflict of interest policy, and financial statements available for inspection at its office upon approval by the Board. |
| Software ID: | 15000324 |
| Software Version: | 2015v2.0 |