Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above or IRC section (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") .... | 13,743,786 | 33,966,936 | 18,165,216 | 21,264,333 | 20,191,540 | 107,331,811 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 13,743,786 | 33,966,936 | 18,165,216 | 21,264,333 | 20,191,540 | 107,331,811 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 35,748,702 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 71,583,109 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 13,743,786 | 33,966,936 | 18,165,216 | 21,264,333 | 20,191,540 | 107,331,811 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 17,512 | 109,073 | 41,338 | 77,974 | 86,463 | 332,360 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 12,686 | 187,366 | 8,720 | 208,772 | ||
| 11 | Total support Add lines 7 through 10. | 107,872,943 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513.. | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2010 | (b) 2011 | (c) 2012 | (d) 2013 | (e) 2014 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e | Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): | |||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions) | |||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2014 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2014 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2014 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2014: | ||||
| a From 2009.......X | ||||
| b From 2010.......X | ||||
| c From 2011.......X | ||||
| d From 2012.......X | ||||
| e From 2013....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2009 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2014 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2014 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2014, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2014. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2015. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a From 2010.......X | ||||
| b From 2011.......X | ||||
| c From 2012.......X | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| SCHEDULE A, PART II, LINE 10, EXPLANATION OF OTHER INCOME: | MISCELLANEOUS INCOME - 2010 AMOUNT: $ 12,686. 2013 AMOUNT: $ 187,366. 2014 AMOUNT: $ 8,720. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| PART III, LINE 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D | FY15 HIGHLIGHTS IN FY15, TNTP WAS ACTIVE IN 30 CITIES, PARTNERING WITH SCHOOLS, DISTRICTS AND STATE DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION ON THEIR MOST PRESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT CHALLENGES. WE PRODUCED 1,679 NEW TEACHERS THROUGH OUR 11 TEACHING FELLOWS PROGRAMS, PREPARED 864 NEW TEACHERS (INCLUDING NON-FELLOWS) THROUGH OUR 10 TNTP ACADEMY PROGRAMS, AND ADAPTED OUR TEACHER TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT WORK TO ADDRESS SERIOUS TEACHER SHORTAGES. IN ADDITION TO OUR CORE SUPPORT FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHER HIRING AND EVALUATION, WE ALSO DEEPENED OUR EXPERTISE IN ACADEMICS BY EXPANDING OUR COMMON CORE QUALITY REVIEW, AND SCALED UP BOTH OUR PRINCIPAL TRAINING AND SURVEY OF SCHOOL CULTURE. IN ADDITION, WE PRODUCED A SIGNATURE REPORT ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS BEEN DOWNLOADED 10,000 TIMES SINCE LAUNCH, A RECORD FOR TNTP PUBLICATIONS. FY15 RESULTS TEACHER RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING WE HELP SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND STATES RECRUIT, SELECT, AND TRAIN EXCELLENT NEW TEACHERS FOR HIGH-NEED CLASSROOMS. THIS YEAR, OUR TEACHING FELLOWS PROGRAMS DREW MORE THAN 15,000 APPLICANTS. TNTP ACADEMY, OUR RIGOROUS, HANDS-ON PREPARATION PROGRAM, HOLDS A HIGH BAR FOR PASSING SUMMER TRAINING AND EARNING CERTIFICATION. DATA SHOWS THAT WE SCREEN TEACHERS WELL-IN 2015, 82 PERCENT OF PARTICIPANTS COMPLETED ALL REQUIREMENTS TO BEGIN TEACHING, 8 PERCENT OF STRUGGLING PARTICIPANTS DID NOT MAKE IT INTO A CLASSROOM, AND 9 PERCENT SELF-SELECTED OUT OF TEACHING. IN FALL OF 2015, 1,679 NEW TEACHERS COMPLETED OUR TEACHING FELLOWS PROGRAMS AND BEGAN TEACHING. WE ALSO CONTINUED TO EVALUATE NEW TEACHERS WITH OUR ASSESSMENT OF CLASSROOM EXCELLENCE (ACE) SCREEN. ACE EVALUATES TEACHERS DURING THEIR FIRST YEAR OF TEACHING BASED ON MULTIPLE MEASURES AND DETERMINES WHETHER THEY SHOULD BE RECOMMENDED FOR LICENSURE. IN 2015, WE INCREASED FOCUS ON RIGOROUS CONTENT AND INCORPORATED PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE TNTP CORE TEACHING RUBRIC, WHICH DESCRIBES EXCELLENT INSTRUCTION ALIGNED TO THE COMMON CORE. IN ITS FOURTH YEAR, WE EVALUATED 917 TEACHERS WITH ACE AND RECOMMENDED 79 PERCENT OF THEM FOR CERTIFICATION; ANOTHER 10 PERCENT WERE GIVEN A YEAR EXTENSION. TNTP IS THE FIRST PREPARATION PROVIDER IN THE COUNTRY TO SCREEN TEACHERS FOR DEMONSTRATED EFFECTIVENESS AT THIS SCALE. WE ALSO ADAPTED OUR TEACHER TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT WORK TO ADDRESS SERIOUS TEACHER SHORTAGES. IN MANY PARTS OF THE COUNTRY, TRADITIONAL TEACHER PIPELINES ARE DWINDLING, AND DISTRICTS ARE SCRAMBLING TO FILL VACANCIES BEFORE THE START OF SCHOOL. THIS YEAR, WE PARTNERED WITH FIVE DISTRICTS TO ANALYZE THE ROOT CAUSES OF THEIR TEACHER SUPPLY ISSUES, MAP OUT THEIR LONG-TERM NEEDS AND CRAFT A HOLISTIC STRATEGY TO MEET THOSE NEEDS. WE ALSO EXPLORED NEW APPROACHES TO MAKE RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING MORE FLEXIBLE-AND MORE SUSTAINABLE-THAN EVER BEFORE. WE PROVIDED DISTRICT-WIDE TRAINING TO NEW TEACHERS IN SITES LIKE PINELLAS COUNTY, FL, AND DESIGNED NEW WAYS TO DELIVER TEACHER TRAINING CONTENT ONLINE. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE IN 2015, WE LAUNCHED SAN FRANCISCO PLUS, TNTP'S THIRD SCHOOL LEADER RECRUITMENT AND PREPARATION PROGRAM. TO DATE ACROSS ALL THREE PROGRAMS (SAN FRANCISCO PLUS, CAMDENPLUS AND PHILLYPLUS) WE HAVE PLACED 21 RESIDENTS IN SCHOOL-BASED LEADERSHIP POSITIONS AND BUILT A COHORT MODEL TO CAPITALIZE ON THE BEST PRACTICES ACROSS SCHOOL TYPES AND ADDRESS PROBLEMS TOGETHER THAT ILLUSTRATE THE COMMON ASPECTS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP. ALREADY, WE ARE SEEING THAT OUR PLUS LEADERS ARE HOLDING A HIGH BAR FOR STAFFING DECISIONS THAT WILL SUPPORT EXCELLENT INSTRUCTION. DURING THE 2014-15 SCHOOL YEAR, PLUS LEADERS IN CAMDEN AND PHILADELPHIA RETAINED 100 PERCENT OF THEIR BEST TEACHERS AND COUNSELED OUT THE MAJORITY OF LOW-PERFORMING TEACHERS (83 PERCENT IN PHILADELPHIA AND 63 PERCENT IN CAMDEN). WE'RE HELPING INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL LEADERS MAKE MORE INFORMED DECISIONS ABOUT TEACHERS AND CREATE STRONG TEACHING TEAMS. IN 2015, WE CONTINUED TO HELP OUR TARGET PARTNER DISTRICTS RETAIN MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS FOR A SECOND YEAR IN OUR TARGET DISTRICTS. IN SHELBY COUNTY, WE SAW MORE PRINCIPALS DISMISSING LOW PERFORMERS THIS YEAR (82 PERCENT) COMPARED TO LAST YEAR (66 PERCENT). THE DISTRICT ALSO RETAINED 91 PERCENT OF ITS HIGHEST PERFORMING TEACHERS, COMPARED TO 90 PERCENT LAST YEAR. WE ALSO OFFER SCHOOLS INVALUABLE INSIGHT INTO THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL CULTURE WITH OUR VALIDATED TEACHER SURVEY TOOL, INSIGHT. AFTER ANALYZING THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY, WE PROVIDE SCHOOLS WITH A ROADMAP OF CLEAR ACTION ITEMS TO IMPROVE THEIR TALENT MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND RETENTION EFFORTS. IN FY15, WE PROVIDED THIS SERVICE TO 1,300 SCHOOLS (A 44 PERCENT INCREASE OVER LAST YEAR'S NUMBER OF SCHOOLS). DISTRICT AND STATE SYSTEMS A CRITICAL PART OF OUR WORK INCLUDES HELPING STATES BUILD, PILOT AND IMPLEMENT RIGOROUS, FAIR AND ACCURATE EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS CENTERED ON HOW EDUCATORS ARE PERFORMING IN THEIR MOST CRITICAL ROLE: ADVANCING STUDENT LEARNING. OUR STATE-LEVEL PARTNERS HAVE INCLUDED LOUISIANA, INDIANA, ILLINOIS, RHODE ISLAND AND TENNESSEE AS WELL AS NUMEROUS DISTRICTS. IN SIX OF OUR PARTNER DISTRICTS ACROSS SIX STATES, WE DESIGNED OR HELPED OUR DISTRICT PARTNERS IMPLEMENT RIGOROUS EVALUATION SYSTEMS. FOR EXAMPLE, IN NEW YORK CITY, WE SUPPORTED THE FINAL STAGES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES AS A PART OF THE DISTRICT'S EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR 80,000 TEACHERS, ENCOURAGING THE USE OF DATA-DRIVEN INSTRUCTION IN THE CLASSROOM. WE HELP SCHOOL DISTRICTS IMPROVE THE FLOW OF QUALIFIED TEACHERS INTO THEIR LOWEST-PERFORMING SCHOOLS, ENSURING THAT THESE SCHOOLS, OFTEN IN THE POOREST NEIGHBORHOODS, OPEN FULLY STAFFED. FOR EXAMPLE, THIS YEAR IN THE HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, WHERE WE SUPPORTED THE DISTRICT IN ITS EFFORTS TO STRENGTHEN ITS RECRUITMENT AND STAFFING PRACTICES TO ATTRACT TOP TALENT, THE DISTRICT TOOK FULL OWNERSHIP OF ITS EARLY HIRING EFFORTS, AND 97 PERCENT OF TEACHING POSITIONS WERE STAFFED BY JULY 1. WE ALSO CONTINUED TO BUILD OUT OUR COMMON CORE QUALITY REVIEW, OUR DIAGNOSTIC DESIGNED TO IDENTIFY BARRIERS TO STANDARDS IMPLEMENTATION AND STUDENT SUCCESS. WE NOW HAVE A ROBUST DATASET FROM MORE THAN 1,200 CLASSROOMS THAT INCLUDES 3,700 SAMPLES OF STUDENT WORK, REVEALING A WIDESPREAD LACK OF ACADEMIC RIGOR IN CLASSROOMS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. WE BUILT ON THIS DIAGNOSTIC TO WORK WITH OUR CLIENTS TO IMPROVE THE RIGOR OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS. SPECIFICALLY IN ALGIERS, LOUISIANA, AND DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, WE HELPED OUR CLIENTS ADOPT NEW LITERACY CURRICULA THAT IS MORE ALIGNED TO THE STANDARDS AND DEMANDS MORE OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK AND DISTRICT, RESPECTIVELY. POLICY, RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY AS WE WORK ALONGSIDE EDUCATORS AROUND THE COUNTRY, WE IDENTIFY COMMON CHALLENGES AND PUBLISH PROMISING SOLUTIONS. IN 2015, WE PUBLISHED THE MIRAGE: CONFRONTING THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT OUR QUEST FOR TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, OUR LATEST MAJOR ORIGINAL RESEARCH REPORT. THE MIRAGE CHALLENGES CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON TEACHER DEVELOPMENT AND ASKS WHAT IT WILL TAKE TO HELP TEACHERS IMPROVE AT SCALE. IN THE THREE MONTHS SINCE LAUNCH, THE MIRAGE HAS SEEN 10,000 DOWNLOADS AND NEWS COVERAGE IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, BOSTON GLOBE AND WASHINGTON POST. AS WITH PAST PUBLICATIONS, WE EXPECT FINDINGS FROM THE MIRAGE TO SHAPE OUR OWN APPROACH TO TEACHER DEVELOPMENT; WE'RE INVESTING IN DEVELOPING A NEW SERVICE TO MEASURE WHAT REALLY HELPS TEACHERS IMPROVE SO WE CAN HELP OUR DISTRICT PARTNERS DO THE SAME. THE REACH AND DIVERSITY OF OUR PUBLICATIONS CONTINUES TO GROW. IN 2013, WE LAUNCHED A BLOG THAT RUNS TWO POSTS PER WEEK. THIS YEAR, OUR BLOG SUBSCRIBER LIST GREW TO 5,000 RECIPIENTS, MORE THAN DOUBLED SINCE 2014. IN 2015, MANY OF OUR POSTS-PARTICULARLY THOSE FOCUSED ON TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATIONS IN THE TEACHING PROFESSION (SUCH AS BLENDED LEARNING AND REDESIGNED TEACHER ROLES), AND ISSUES OF RACIAL AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY AFFECTING THE COMMUNITIES WE SERVE-HAVE CIRCULATED WIDELY ONLINE. IN 2015, WE ALSO FORMED TNTP'S EDUCATOR EDITORIAL BOARD, GIVING WINNERS OF TNTP'S FISHMAN PRIZE-OUR ANNUAL AWARD THAT RECOGNIZES AND PUBLICIZES EXCELLENT TEACHERS WITH A $25,000 AWARD AND PARTICIPATION IN A SUMMER RESIDENCY PROGRAM-MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO AUTHOR POSTS AND SHAPE EDITORIAL DECISIONS ON THE TNTP BLOG. EDUCATOR EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS ALSO PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON TNTP'S REPORTS; THIS YEAR, THEY SHARED EARLY REACTIONS TO THE MIRAGE AND HELPED US CONSIDER HOW TO ENSURE THE PAPER WOULD RESONATE WITH TEACHER AUDIENCES. WITH GREATER TEACHER INPUT INTO OUR PUBLICATIONS, WE'VE SEEN OUR REACH TO TEACHERS CONTINUE TO GROW: TODAY, THEY ARE THE SINGLE LARGEST AUDIENCE SEGMENT ON THE TNTP BLOG. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11 | TNTP'S FORM 990 IS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION'S CONTROLLER AND REVIEWED INTERNALLY BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER. THE DRAFT FORM 990 IS THEN REVIEWED EXTERNALLY BY AN INDEPENDENT PAID TAX PREPARER. ANY REVISIONS ARE PRESENTED TO THE ORGANIZATION AND ONCE REVISED, THE FINAL DRAFT FORM 990 IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ORGANIZATION'S AUDIT COMMITTEE. ONCE APPROVED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, COPIES OF THE COMPLETED FORM 990 ARE PROVIDED TO EACH VOTING MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BOARD PRIOR TO SUBMISSION AND FILING WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | TNTP ASKS ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES TO REVIEW AND SIGN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. TNTP'S FINANCE STAFF FOLLOWS UP TO RESOLVE ANY DISCLOSED CONFLICTS. IF A CONFLICT IS IDENTIFIED, THE INTERESTED INDIVIDUAL MAY NOT VOTE ON THE RELATED MATTER. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15 | THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVIEWS AND APPROVES THE COMPENSATION OF ALL OFFICERS. FOR ALL POSITIONS, TNTP'S TALENT AND CULTURE TEAM PERFORMS REGULAR MARKET ANALYSIS UTILIZING COMPARABILITY DATA FROM INDUSTRY SURVEYS, DOCUMENTED COMPENSATION OF PERSONS HOLDING SIMILAR POSITIONS IN SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS, AND/OR INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION STUDIES. THE MARKET ANALYSIS IS SHARED WITH THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD, AND IS CONSIDERED IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF COMPENSATION CHANGES FOR THE ORGANIZATION'S OFFICERS. A COMPENSATION REVIEW WAS LAST CONDUCTED IN NOVEMBER 2014. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | TNTP MAKES ITS FORM 990 AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 6104 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CODE BY POSTING IT ON WWW.GUIDESTAR.ORG. IN ADDITION, THE FORM 990, AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO 186 JORALEMON STREET, SUITE 300, BROOKLYN, NY 11201 OR BY CALLING THE ORGANIZATION DIRECTLY AT (718)233-2800 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |