Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | 122,738,187 | 137,616,740 | 144,513,028 | 163,600,103 | 182,705,546 | 751,173,604 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 122,738,187 | 137,616,740 | 144,513,028 | 163,600,103 | 182,705,546 | 751,173,604 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 0 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 751,173,604 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 122,738,187 | 137,616,740 | 144,513,028 | 163,600,103 | 182,705,546 | 751,173,604 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 7,061,725 | 5,228,468 | 4,567,926 | 5,093,532 | 5,222,599 | 27,174,250 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 2,473,349 | 2,492,883 | 1,680,318 | 2,372,646 | 396,241 | 9,415,437 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | 787,763,291 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART I, LINE 1 | THE ASPCA WORKS TO ENSURE THE SAFETY AND PROTECTION OF ANIMALS THROUGH AN INTEGRATED ARRAY OF SERVICES INCLUDING EDUCATION TO INCREASE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF OUR WORK WHICH INCLUDES COMMUNITY OUTREACH, ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICES, ANTI-CRUELTY OPERATIONS AND GOVERNMENT RELATIONS. FORM 990, PART III, LINE 1 THE ASPCA WAS FOUNDED ON THE BELIEF THAT ANIMALS ARE ENTITLED TO KIND AND RESPECTFUL TREATMENT AT THE HANDS OF HUMANS AND MUST BE PROTECTED UNDER THE LAW. THE ASPCA'S MISSION, AS STATED BY FOUNDER HENRY BERGH IN 1866, IS 'TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE MEANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES.' FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICES (EXPENSES $42,139,017 REVENUE $15,914,207) ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICES IS COMPRISED OF RESOURCES AND PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS AND ASSIST PET OWNERS, INCLUDING THE ASPCA ANIMAL HOSPITAL, THE ASPCA ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTER, ASPCA IN LOS ANGELES, AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE (FORMERLY SPAY/NEUTER SERVICES) IN NEW YORK CITY AS WELL AS THE NEWLY ACQUIRED HUMANE ALLIANCE BASED IN ASHEVILLE, NC. THE MANHATTAN-BASED ASPCA ANIMAL HOSPITAL (AAH) REFINED OPERATIONS IN 2015 TO FOCUS MORE CLOSELY ON HELPING THE MOST AT-RISK ANIMALS IN THE COMMUNITY, INCLUDING NYPD/HUMANE LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRUELTY INTERVENTION ADVOCACY (CIA) AND TROOPER FUND CASES, AS WELL AS THE ASPCA ADOPTION CENTER AND KITTEN NURSERY ANIMALS. AAH PROVIDED CARE FOR 375 ANIMALS FROM NYPD; PERFORMED 1,731 PRE- AND POST-ADOPTION EXAMS--A 30% INCREASE OVER 2014; PERFORMED 7,736 EMERGENCY EXAMS, INCLUDING 844 EMERGENCY EXAMS OF ANIMALS RESIDING IN THE ASPCA ADOPTION CENTER (A 50% INCREASE OVER 2014); TREATED 337 MEDICALLY COMPROMISED STRAYS; PROVIDED CARE FOR 175 ANIMALS RESCUED BY CIA; AND FUNDED AND TREATED THROUGH THE AAH TROOPER FUND 2,718 ANIMALS WHOSE OWNERS WERE UNABLE TO AFFORD VETERINARY CARE. THE ASPCA ALSO PROVIDES SPECIALIZED SERVICES FOR VETERINARY-RELATED POISON SITUATIONS THROUGH ITS URBANA, ILLINOIS-BASED ASPCA ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTER (APCC). IN 2015, THE APCC FIELDED NEARLY 290,000 INCOMING CALLS AND OPENED 181,818 POISON CONTROL CENTER CASES. IN ADDITION, THE APCC STRENGTHENED OUTREACH TO THE VETERINARY AND CORPORATE COMMUNITIES, WHICH LED TO SIGNIFICANT PROGRAM GROWTH AND A RECORD YEAR IN CASE VOLUME. THROUGH NEW TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES, THE 24-HOUR HOTLINE PRIORITIZED QUALITY ASSURANCE EFFORTS AND ENSURED THE BEST POSSIBLE SERVICE FOR ANIMALS AND THEIR FAMILIES NATIONWIDE. IN 2015, THE ASPCA'S LA SPAY/NEUTER CLINIC ADDED ANOTHER SURGERY TEAM AND LAUNCHED A MOBILE CLINIC IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHICH LED TO SURPASSING TARGETS TO HIT 8,470 SURGERIES AND THE MILESTONE OF 10,000 SURGERIES TO DATE SINCE ARRIVING IN L.A. THE TEAM ALSO INCREASED THE SHARE OF CATS SPAYED/ NEUTERED AT THE ASPCA CLINIC, AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SURGERIES PERFORMED ON ALL ANIMALS, FROM 17% TO 35%. IN ADDITION, SUPPORT FROM AN ASPCA GRANT THAT COVERS PULL FEES HELPED LOCAL RESCUE GROUPS FAST-TRACK 1,393 CATS, PIT BULLS AND CHIHUAHUAS FOR ADOPTION, WHILE THE ASPCA'S SAFETY NET TEAM WORKED CLOSELY WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY TO ASSIST 3,465 ANIMALS. THE ASPCA'S SPAY/NEUTER OPERATIONS (SNO) DEPARTMENT PLAYS A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE ASPCA'S WORK TO PROTECT ANIMALS AND REDUCE OVERPOPULATION. IN 2015, IT COMPLETED 54,339 SPAY/NEUTER SURGERIES -- THE MOST EVER IN A SINGLE YEAR. IN AN EFFORT TO HELP KEEP PETS IN HOMES, THE SPAY/NEUTER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT ALSO BEGAN OFFERING OTHER BASIC HEALTH SERVICES, AND AS A RESULT, WAS RENAMED COMMUNITY MEDICINE. THEY CONTINUE TO OFFER THEIR SPAY/NEUTER STRATEGIES INCLUDING DOOR-TO-DOOR ADVOCACY, FULLY SUBSIDIZED SERVICES AND MOBILE CLINICS IN KEY AREAS, BUT IN ADDITION TO STERILIZATION, THE COMMUNITY MEDICINE TEAM NOW OFFERS SERVICES LIKE VACCINATIONS, PREVENTATIVE MEDICATIONS, TREATMENTS FOR SKIN DISEASE, EAR DISEASE AND GASTROINTESTINAL ISSUES, AND REFERRALS TO PARTNERS FOR MORE SPECIALIZED CARE --AN EFFORT TO PREVENT RELINQUISHMENT AND FOCUS ON PET RETENTION. THE PROGRAM IS AVAILABLE IN EAST NEW YORK (BROOKLYN), AND ROLLOUT IN LOS ANGELES IS ANTICIPATED FOR 2016. IN AUGUST 2015, THE ASPCA ACQUIRED ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA-BASED HUMANE ALLIANCE (HA), THE NATION'S LEADING TRAINING AND EDUCATION ORGANIZATION FOCUSED ON HIGH-QUALITY, HIGH-VOLUME SPAY/NEUTER. THE ACQUISITION WAS THE CULMINATION OF $6 MILLION IN ASPCA SUPPORT FOR HA PROGRAMS OVER THE PAST DECADE. SINCE ITS FOUNDING IN 1994, HA HAS PERFORMED 386,025 SPAY/NEUTER SURGERIES -- 23,970 IN 2015. HA'S CLINIC TRAINING PROGRAM HAS INTRODUCED SPAY/NEUTER CAPABILITIES TO 141 CLINICS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA. AS A PROGRAM OF THE ASPCA, HA WILL CONTINUE ITS IMPORTANT WORK WITH AN EXPANDED CAPACITY FOR VET STUDENTS, VETERINARIANS AND A NUMBER OF SPAY/NEUTER CLINICS AND PRACTITIONERS NATIONWIDE TO REACH MORE AT-RISK ANIMALS AND REDUCE THE NUMBER OF HOMELESS PETS ENTERING SHELTERS. |
| Form 990 Part III Line 4b | PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (EXPENSES: $40,630,292) EDUCATING THE PUBLIC AND BRINGING AWARENESS TO ITS PROGRAMS AND HOW PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS CAN GET INVOLVED IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO THE ASPCA'S MISSION. THE ASPCA HAD OVER 44.1 MILLION VISITS TO ITS WEBSITE IN 2015, BRINGING AWARENESS TO SUPPORTERS AND THE PUBLIC AT LARGE BY PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ACTION THEY CAN TAKE ON BEHALF OF ANIMALS. AS PART OF THE ASPCA'S EDUCATION PROCESS, SOCIAL MEDIA POSTINGS UPDATED THE PUBLIC OF REGULATORY WINS AND PROVIDED DETAILS OF THE ASPCA'S ANTI-CRUELTY EFFORTS. THE ORGANIZATION'S PROMOTIONS GENERATED MILLIONS OF SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS. THE PUBLIC WAS UPDATED ON ACTION THAT CAN BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT ANIMALS ARE GIVEN THE GREATEST POSSIBLE PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AND MADE AWARE OF HOW EACH PERSON CAN HELP THIS EFFORT. MORE THAN 200 ADVOCACY E-MAILS WERE SENT IN 2015 TO ASPCA SUPPORTERS URGING THEM TO TAKE ACTION ON A WIDE RANGE OF ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES. WITH THE HELP OF ADVOCATES, THE ASPCA SECURED NEW ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS AND REGULATORY WINS FOR ANIMALS AT THE NATION'S CAPITAL AND IN STATE LEGISLATURES FROM CALIFORNIA TO NEW YORK. THE ASPCA DISTRIBUTED MORE THAN 1,650,000 COPIES OF ITS MEMBER MAGAZINE, ASPCA ACTION, AND 15,000 COPIES OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT IN 2015. ASPCA ACTION INCLUDES INFORMATION ON ASPCA EVENTS AND PROGRAMS AS WELL AS PET CARE BEHAVIOR AND ADVICE. LEGISLATIVE AND ANIMAL ADVOCACY NEWS KEEPS MEMBERS UP-TO-DATE ON CURRENT AND FUTURE INITIATIVES AND HOW THEY CAN HELP ENSURE THAT ANIMALS RECEIVE NECESSARY PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. THIS MAGAZINE CAN ALSO BE OBTAINED ON THE ASPCA WEBSITE, WHICH HAS MANY ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR THE PUBLIC. IN 2015, THE ASPCA WAS ONE OF THE NATION'S LEADING VOICES IN THE MEDIA ON ANIMAL CRUELTY AND WELFARE ISSUES. HIGH-PROFILE MEDIA OUTLETS FEATURING THE WORK OF THE ASPCA FIRMLY POSITIONED THEIR EXPERTS ON CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TOPICS INCLUDING BLOOD SPORTS, THEIR GROUNDBREAKING PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT (NYPD), ANIMAL HOMELESSNESS AND SHELTERING, SPAY/NEUTER, BETTER LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR COMPANION AND FARM ANIMALS AS WELL AS SAFETY NET PROGRAMS THAT KEEP PETS OUT OF SHELTERS AND IN HOMES. IN TOTAL, THE ASPCA GENERATED MORE THAN 22,000 FAVORABLE MEDIA PLACEMENTS ACROSS TRADITIONAL MEDIA OUTLETS AND BLOGS IN 2015. IN ITS FIRST FULL SEASON OF OPERATION, THE ASPCA'S NEONATE KITTEN NURSERY GENERATED PROMINENT VISIBILITY FROM A NUMBER OF HIGH-PROFILE NATIONAL AND NYC MEDIA OUTLETS, SHEDDING LIGHT ON A VERY VULNERABLE POPULATION OF ANIMALS DURING THE KITTEN SEASON. THE ASPCA'S SECOND-ANNUAL NATIONAL DOG FIGHTING AWARENESS DAY - WITH THE ADDITION OF THE #GETTOUGH CAMPAIGN - BROUGHT INCREASED MEDIA VISIBILITY AND AWARENESS AROUND THE IMPORTANT ISSUE OF DOGFIGHTING. THE ASPCA ALSO RELEASED RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL POLL DETAILING THE STRUGGLES LAW ENFORCEMENT FACE IN ADDRESSING DOGFIGHTING, RESULTING IN DOUBLE THE MEDIA EXPOSURE GENERATED FOR THIS CAMPAIGN COMPARED TO ITS INAUGURAL YEAR. IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITS RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS AND LARGESCALE DOGFIGHTING RESCUES IN 2015, THE ASPCA'S EXPERTISE ON DOGFIGHTING WAS FIRMLY POSITIONED IN NATIONAL AND LOCAL MEDIA THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. THE ASPCA ALSO CONTINUED TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE PLIGHT OF ANIMALS RAISED FOR FOOD IN THE U.S. A COALITION INCLUDING THE ASPCA, THE HSUS, MASSACHUSETTS SPCA AND THE ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON ANNOUNCED A 2016 BALLOT INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE CONDITIONS FOR PIGS, VEAL CALVES AND EGG-LAYING HENS. THE NEWS OF THIS IMPORTANT LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE WAS REPORTED WIDELY BY BOTH NATIONAL AND LOCAL MASSACHUSETTS MEDIA OUTLETS. IN LOCAL NEWS OUTLETS ACROSS THE NATION, THE ASPCA'S SECOND-ANNUAL HELP A HORSE DAY EVENT INCLUDED MORE RESCUE GROUPS THAN IT DID IN 2014, AND RESULTED IN INCREASED MEDIA VISIBILITY FOR THE ASPCA AND PARTICIPATING GROUPS. IN AUGUST, THE ASPCA'S ACQUISITION OF NORTH CAROLINA-BASED HUMANE ALLIANCE GENERATED WIDESPREAD LOCAL COVERAGE IN THE COMMUNITY'S PRIMARY NEWS OUTLETS. |
| Form 990 Part III Line 4c | COMMUNITY OUTREACH (EXPENSES: $24,085,398) THE ASPCA ADOPTION CENTER BROKE RECORDS WHEN THEY FOUND HOMES FOR 4,601 ADOPTABLE PETS IN 2015 -- A 21% INCREASE OVER 2014. THE ASPCA ALSO TRANSFERRED 67 ANIMALS TO PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS TO FIND HOMES AND REUNITED 74 ANIMALS WITH THEIR OWNERS. IN SEPTEMBER, THE ASPCA LAUNCHED ITS ADOPTION AMBASSADORS CAMPAIGN. A TOTAL OF 750 AGENCIES NATIONWIDE SIGNED UP TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM IN THEIR SHELTERS. TO ASSIST THEM, THE ASPCA PROVIDED ONLINE RESOURCES, ACCESS TO MENTOR SHELTERS AND FUNDING TOTALING NEARLY $250,000 TO 96 AGENCIES IN 39 STATES. AS PART OF OUR COMMITMENT TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF AT-RISK ANIMALS IN NEW YORK CITY, THE ASPCA TRANSFERRED 2,435 FELINES FROM ANIMAL CARE CENTERS OF NYC -- HELPING 63% MORE CATS THAN IN 2014. MANY OF THEM BECAME RESIDENTS OF THE ASPCA KITTEN NURSERY, WHICH OPERATED ITS FIRST FULL SEASON IN 2015 AND TOOK IN MORE THAN 1,500 AT-RISK KITTENS. BY YEAR-END, 1,300 OF THESE KITTENS WERE PLACED INTO HOMES. THE ASPCA COMPLETED RENOVATIONS AT THE FACILITY THE ASPCA KITTEN NURSERY SHARES WITH OUR GLORIA GURNEY CANINE ANNEX FOR RECOVERY AND ENRICHMENT (CARE) WARD, ENABLING THE CARE PROGRAM TO REHABILITATE MORE THAN 100 DOGS RESCUED THROUGH OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NYPD. COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORTS ALSO INCLUDE ASPCA COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CITIES OR REGIONS WHOSE MAJOR ANIMAL SHELTERING AGENCIES HAVE APPLIED AND BEEN ACCEPTED TO WORK INTENSIVELY WITH ASPCA EXPERTS TO SAVE AT-RISK ANIMALS IN THEIR AREAS. IN 2015, THE ASPCA'S FOUR ACTIVE PARTNERS WERE CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA; MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY; AND ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. THROUGH THE SUCCESS OF VARIOUS PROGRAMS LIKE OFFSITE AND JOINT ADOPTION EVENTS, WAIVED ADOPTION FEES AND PET RETENTION PROGRAMS, THE COMMUNITIES COLLECTIVELY SAVED 63,333 ANIMALS IN 2015. THE ASPCA'S BI-COASTAL RELOCATION PROGRAMS TRANSPORTED A TOTAL OF 7,773 ANIMALS FROM OVERCROWDED SHELTERS TO PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS WHERE THEY HAD A BETTER CHANCE OF FINDING HOMES. THE TEAM ORGANIZED 115 RELOCATION FLIGHTS AND CONDUCTED 226 GROUND TRANSPORTS -- COVERING A TOTAL OF 207,000 MILES. THE WEST COAST TEAM EXCEEDED ITS 2015 GOAL AND TRANSPORTED 4,293 ANIMALS, ALMOST 72% MORE THAN PLANNED. ON THE EAST COAST, THE ASPCA LAUNCHED THE NANCY SILVERMAN RESCUE RIDE (NSRR) PROGRAM IN JANUARY TO TRANSPORT DOGS FROM THE SOUTHEAST TO THE NORTHEAST OVER A THREE-YEAR PERIOD. THIS NEW PROGRAM RESULTED IN 3,480 OF OUR TOTAL ANIMAL RELOCATIONS IN 2015. |
| Form 990 Part III Line 4d | OTHER PROGRAMS ANTI-CRUELTY PROGRAMS (EXPENSES: $33,749,932 INCLUDING GRANTS OF $13,476,946) FOR 150 YEARS, THE ASPCA HAS DEVELOPED INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS TO HELP END ANIMAL CRUELTY AND SAVE THE LIVES OF ANIMALS ACROSS AMERICA. IN 2015, THE ASPCA REACHED NEW MILESTONES AND EXPANDED PROGRAMS TO HELP MORE ANIMALS NATIONWIDE. SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE NYPD-ASPCA PARTNERSHIP IN 2014, MORE THAN 5,400 MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (NYPD) HAVE BEEN TRAINED BY THE ASPCA IN HOW TO RESPOND TO ANIMAL CRUELTY COMPLAINTS, ENSURING EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND PROTECTION OF NEW YORK CITY'S ANIMALS. ASPCA-TRAINED NYPD OFFICERS ARE MAKING MORE REFERRALS TO THE ASPCA THAN EVER BEFORE. IN 2015, STATISTICS SHOW ACROSS-THE-BOARD INCREASES AS COMPARED TO 2014: 10,864 CALLS TO 311, UP 1,933 CALLS; 158 ARRESTS, UP 24 ARRESTS; 63 SUMMONSES, UP THREE SUMMONS; 13 SEARCH WARRANTS, UP BY FOUR; 676 ANIMALS RESCUED, AN INCREASE OF 254 MORE ANIMALS. WHEN AN OFFICER RESPONDS TO A REPORT OF SUSPECTED ANIMAL CRUELTY AND DETERMINES THAT NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED BUT THE ANIMALS AND PEOPLE INVOLVED NEED ASSISTANCE, HE OR SHE CONTACTS THE ASPCA'S CRUELTY INTERVENTION ADVOCACY (CIA) PROGRAM. THESE REFERRALS HAVE INCREASED FROM 16 IN 2014 TO MORE THAN 70 IN 2015, AND HAVE ASSISTED APPROXIMATELY 175 ADDITIONAL AT-RISK ANIMALS. THE ASPCA FIELD INVESTIGATIONS & RESPONSE (FIR) TEAM RESPONDS TO URGENT SITUATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY INVOLVING ABUSED, NEGLECTED AND DISPLACED ANIMALS. IN 2015, FIR LED 17 DEPLOYMENTS, 45 INVESTIGATIONS, FILED 444 CRIMINAL CHARGES, AND RESCUED AND/OR ASSISTED 12,283 ANIMALS, RESPONDING TO SITUATIONS INVOLVING ANIMALS THAT WERE NEGLECTED AND/OR ABUSED. DEPLOYING FROM COAST TO COAST, FIR RESPONDERS TRAVEL YEAR-ROUND, WORKING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT TO RESCUE ANIMALS AND DECREASE THE NUMBER OF AT-RISK ANIMALS IN COMMUNITIES NATIONWIDE. IN 2015, FIR RESPONDERS ASSISTED IN THE AFTERMATH OF HISTORIC FLOODS IN SOUTH CAROLINA, STEPPED IN TO RESCUE DOGS FROM A NORTH CAROLINA DOG FIGHTING OPERATION, AND ASSISTED DURING A DEVASTATING CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE. IN MOULTON, ALABAMA, THE FIR TEAM RESCUED APPROXIMATELY 300 ANIMALS FROM DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS AT THE SITE OF AN OVERCROWDED ANIMAL SHELTER. THE ASPCA PROVIDED MEDICAL CARE, FOOD, SHELTER AND ENRICHMENT FOR THESE ANIMALS. NEARLY ONE MONTH AFTER THEIR RESCUE, THE ASPCA HELD A LARGE-SCALE ADOPTION EVENT ATTENDED BY MORE THAN 900 POTENTIAL ADOPTERS. THE FORENSIC SCIENCES AND ANTI-CRUELTY PROJECTS TEAM HELPS PROVIDE ANIMALS WITH GREATER PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. IN ADDITION, ASPCA STAFF ROUTINELY PROVIDES TRAINING AT VETERINARY COLLEGES AND CONFERENCES, AS WELL AS TRAINING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS, ON THE ROLE OF VETERINARY FORENSICS IN HANDLING, REPORTING AND DOCUMENTING ANIMAL ABUSE. IN 2015, A TOTAL OF 600 ANIMALS RECEIVED FORENSIC EXAMS BY THE ASPCA. TO SUPPORT PROSECUTORS IN DOG FIGHTING CASES, OUR FORENSIC VETERINARIANS PREPARE REPORTS AND PROVIDE PROSECUTORS WITH BACKGROUND ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ANIMAL ABUSE IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES. IN SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER OF 2015, FORENSIC SCIENCES AND ANTI-CRUELTY PROJECTS TEAMED WITH ASPCA GOVERNMENT RELATIONS TO PRESENT BRIEFINGS TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL PET AND WOMEN SAFETY (PAWS) ACT. THIS LEGISLATION WOULD INCREASE RESOURCES FOR THE CARE OF PETS FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND CREATE NEW PENALTIES FOR SOME FORMS OF ANIMAL ABUSE ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH VIOLENCE. THE ASPCA CRUELTY INTERVENTION ADVOCACY (CIA) PROGRAM HELPS DECREASE THE NUMBER OF AT-RISK DOGS AND CATS IN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING PET OWNERS WITH ACCESS TO VITAL RESOURCES SUCH AS VETERINARY CARE, PET SUPPLIES, BOARDING AND MORE. IN 2015, CIA MANAGED 517 HOARDING CASES AND ASSISTED 821 ANIMALS. PARTNERING WITH THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (NYPD) AND ANIMAL CARE CENTERS OF NYC ENABLES CIA TO IMPROVE THE WELFARE OF THOUSANDS OF PETS, ALLOWING THEM TO REMAIN WITH THEIR OWNERS. IN 2015, CIA LAUNCHED THE EAST NEW YORK PET PROJECT IN BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. LEVERAGING THE ASPCA'S COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE AND RESOURCES, THE TEAM SELECTED AN UNDERSERVED AREA TO PILOT SERVICES SUCH AS INCREASED MEDICAL SERVICES, SPAY/NEUTER PROCEDURES, DOG HOUSES AND FENCE REPAIR TO KEEP PETS IN HOMES. IN 2015, THE TEAM AT THE ASPCA'S BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION CENTER AT ST. HUBERT'S ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER IN MADISON, NEW JERSEY, CONTINUED TO HONE THEIR REHABILITATION PROGRAM PROTOCOLS AND SAVE LIVES. AFTER GRADUATING MORE THAN 200 DOGS FROM THE PROGRAM SINCE ITS 2013 LAUNCH, THE REHABILITATION CENTER MAINTAINS A HIGH SUCCESS RATE. IN 2015, WORK CONTINUED ON THE EXPANSION OF THE PROGRAM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FACILITY IN WEAVERVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, SCHEDULED TO OPEN IN 2017. THE TEAM WELCOMED 77 EXTERNAL VISITORS AND HOSTED REPRESENTATIVES FROM 22 ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT LEARNED ABOUT THE REHABILITATION CENTER'S INNOVATIONS, PROCEDURES AND PLANS FOR THE FUTURE. IN 2015, THE ASPCA FARM TEAM WORKED TO ENCOURAGE CONSUMER LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ADOPTION OF HIGHER WELFARE FARMING STANDARDS. THIS WORK CENTERED AROUND EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ON THE PLIGHT OF FACTORY FARMED ANIMALS; CONNECTING CONSUMERS WITH RESOURCES TO HELP THEM DECIPHER THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEANINGFUL AND MEANINGLESS WELFARE CLAIMS ON FOOD; AND FIGHTING FOR LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPROVED FARM ANIMALS' LIVES AND INCREASED AGRICULTURAL TRANSPARENCY. ACCOMPLISHMENTS INCLUDED EXPOSING THE DANGERS OF AG-GAG; IMPROVING THE LIVES OF BROILER CHICKENS; FIGHTING EXTREME CONFINEMENT OF HENS, SOWS AND CALVES; INCREASING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF FOOD LABELS; IMPROVING THE USDA ORGANIC LABEL; EXPANDING WELFARE-CONSCIOUSNESS; AND SHIFTING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT TO HIGHER-WELFARE SOURCES. IN 2015, LEGAL ADVOCACY CONTINUED TO PROVIDE SECOND CHAIR LEGAL SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTORS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. THE DEPARTMENT PROVIDED SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE IN APPROXIMATELY 20 CASES NATIONWIDE IN ADDITION TO ITS WORK IN NEW YORK CITY, DEVELOPING PARTICULAR EXPERTISE WITH STATE STATUTES THAT ALLOW FOR QUICKER DISPOSITION OF SEIZED ANIMALS. IN A CLEWISTON, FLORIDA, PUPPY MILL CASE, LEGAL ADVOCACY WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO FILE A PETITION FOR CUSTODY THAT ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN THE OWNERS VOLUNTARILY RELINQUISHING THE ANIMALS, THEREBY ALLOWING THE ANIMALS TO BE PLACED IN NEW HOMES SHORTLY AFTER SEIZURE. LEGAL ADVOCACY ALSO FILED 15 PETITIONS UNDER NEW YORK'S SECURITY POSTING LAW, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE TIME THAT ANIMALS SEIZED IN NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CASES ARE HELD IN LEGAL LIMBO. ON THE CIVIL LITIGATION FRONT, LEGAL ADVOCACY SUBMITTED AN AMICUS (FRIEND OF THE COURT) BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF A PLAINTIFF IN REYNOLDSBURG, OHIO, WHO IS CHALLENGING A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE BANNING PIT BULLS. THE PUPPY MILLS TEAM CONTINUED TO RAISE AWARENESS AND PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR PUPPY MILL DOGS ACROSS THE U.S. IN 2015, THE NOPETSTOREPUPPIES.COM WEBSITE WAS REDESIGNED TO MAKE IT MORE MOBILE-FRIENDLY; THE SITE NOW ALSO INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE SNAPSHOT OF LAWS AND LEGISLATION ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUPPORTERS TO TAKE ACTION. IT HOUSES MORE THAN 21,000 PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) INSPECTORS AT LICENSED BREEDING FACILITIES WHERE VIOLATIONS WERE FOUND, GIVING CONSUMERS AN INSIDE VIEW INTO THE CONDITIONS AT SUBSTANDARD BREEDING FACILITIES AND LINKING SOME OF THEM TO PET STORES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY THAT HAVE SOLD PUPPIES FROM THESE BREEDERS. THE ASPCA, IN COLLABORATION WITH OTHER ANIMAL WELFARE GROUPS, FILED A PETITION FOR RULEMAKING WITH THE USDA, URGING THE AGENCY TO IMPROVE THE STANDARDS OF CARE FOR DOGS KEPT IN FEDERALLY LICENSED COMMERCIAL BREEDING FACILITIES FOR USE IN THE PET TRADE. THE ASPCA ALSO WORKED ON FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO HELP PROVIDE MORE PROTECTIONS FOR DOGS IN PUPPY MILLS. IN 2015, THE ASPCA SUPPORTED MANY LOCALITIES IN PASSING BILLS TO PROHIBIT OR RESTRICT RETAIL PUPPY SALES TO KEEP SOME OF THE VERY WORST BREEDERS FROM SOURCING TO LOCAL PET STORES. IN 2015, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS (GR) HELPED FURTHER THE MASSACHUSETTS FARM ANIMAL CONFINEMENT BALLOT MEASURE, COLLECTING SIGNATURES TO HELP QUALIFY A MEASURE FOR THE NOVEMBER 2016 BALLOT THAT WOULD REQUIRE FARM ANIMALS TO HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO TURN AROUND AND EXTEND THEIR LIMBS. THE GR TEAM WORKED TO ENABLE MORE EFFECTIVE RESPONSES FOR ANIMAL VICTIMS OF MANMADE AND NATURAL DISASTERS. THE TEAM ALSO HELPED STRENGTHEN STANDARDS FOR DOGS AND CATS SOLD IN PET STORES, PARTICULARLY IN NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY. ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL, GR WORKED TO ENACT TOUGHER STANDARDS TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF FARM ANIMALS AT FEDERALLY RUN RESEARCH FACILITIES. THE ASPCA SUCCESSFULLY WORKED TO INCLUDE STRONG LANGUAGE IN THE FY2016 OMNIBUS BILL REQUIRING THE U.S. MEAT ANIMAL RESEARCH CENTER (USMARC) AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE'S OTHER FEDERALLY RUN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES TO COMPLY WITH IMPROVED ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS. NOW, FOR THE FIRST TIME, USMARC AND SIMILAR FACILITIES CONDUCTING FARM ANIM |
| FORM 990, PART IV, LINE 2 | THE ASPCA IS NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLETE SCHEDULE B FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 12/31/2015, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORM 990 AND 990 SCHEDULE B INSTRUCTIONS, BECAUSE NO ONE CONTRIBUTOR DONATED, IN THE AGGREGATE, AN AMOUNT GREATER THAN 2% OF THE TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED BY THE ORGANIZATION DURING THE YEAR. FORM 990, PART V, LINE 3B ASPCA will file a 2015 Form 990-T to report unrelated business gross income that exceeds $1,000 however this will be filed after the FOrm 990 is filed. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 1A | THE ASPCA HAS TWO CATEGORIES OF MEMBERS, "GOVERNING MEMBERS"MEMBERS", BUT ONLY GOVERNING MEMBERS HAVE VOTING RIGHTS. THE ASPCA'S "GOVERNING MEMBERS" CONSIST OF THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE CURRENTLY SERVING AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. ONLY GOVERNING MEMBERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO ELECT THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNDER THE ASPCA'S BY-LAWS. THE ASPCA'S "MEMBERS" CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES (E.G., CHAMPIONS, BENEFACTORS, SPONSORS, ASSOCIATES, FRIENDS, JUNIORS, ETC.) AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE MEMBERS WHO ARE ALSO GOVERNING MEMBERS, NO "MEMBER" HAS THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. ANY CONTRIBUTOR OVER AGE 18 WHO MAKES A DONATION OF $25 OR MORE TO THE ASPCA IS DEEMED A "MEMBER". |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | THE FORM 990 WAS PREPARED BY A NATIONALLY-RENOWNED ACCOUNTING FIRM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORGANIZATION'S FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT. THE DRAFT OF THE FORM 990 IS REVIEWED BY SENIOR MANAGEMENT, LEGAL COUNSEL, AS WELL AS THE AUDIT COMMITTEE [A COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS], AND A COPY IS CIRCULATED TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRIOR TO ITS FILING WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | ALL DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES COMPLETE A WRITTEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE AND DECLARATION ANNUALLY. THE SECRETARY OF THE ASPCA PROVIDES COPIES OF ALL COMPLETED DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS TO THE CHAIR OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND TO THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER. ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARE ADDED TO RECORDS MAINTAINED BY THE ASPCA'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT |
| FORM 990, PART VI, LINE 15 | The Audit Committee of the ASPCA Board is the authorized compensation-setting body that reviews and approves the compensation of the "Disqualified Persons" of the ASPCA. The ASPCA engages an independent compensation expert to conduct a compensation study to assess the reasonableness of each "Disqualified Person's" total compensation in accordance with the rebuttable presumption "safe harbor" provisions of Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code. The compensation expert assesses the reasonableness of each person's total compensation based on comparability data for the positions under review and provides such data and analysis to the Audit Committee for its review. The comparability data are drawn from industry surveys and data sources for comparable positions in organizations of similar scope, operating budget, and type. With respect to "Disqualified Persons" other than the President & CEO, the Audit Committee reviews the compensation expert's study and comparability data and the President & CEO's analysis of each individual's performance, deliberates, and votes on whether to approve the total compensation recommendation proposed by the President & CEO. (The person whose compensation is under review is not present and does not participate in the deliberations, except that such person may answer questions that will help the committee in its deliberations.) With respect to the President & CEO, the Audit Committee reviews the compensation expert's study and comparability data, deliberates, and votes on a recommendation for the President's total compensation (including performance bonus), which recommendation it provides to the full Board of Directors. The full Board of Directors assesses the Audit Committee's recommendations and votes whether to approve the total compensation (including performance bonus) for the President & CEO. For all "Disqualified Persons," the Audit Committee documents the basis for its determinations concurrently with the approval of the compensation by drafting minutes of the meeting at which the determinations were made. The minutes include the following information: 1. The terms of the approved compensation and the date approved; 2. The names of members of the Audit Committee who were present during discussion of the compensation and those who voted on it; 3. The comparability data that was relied on by the Audit Committee and how such data was obtained; and 4. Any actions (such as recusal) taken by a member of the Audit Committee having a conflict of interest. The Audit Committee then approves the minutes within a reasonable period of time after its preparation. Similarly, the board documents the basis for its determination of the president & ceo's compensation concurrently with the approval of the compensation by drafting minutes of the meeting at which the determination was made. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST AND THROUGH CHARITABLE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IN OVER 40 STATES. THE ASPCA MAKES ITS FORM 990 AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY RETAINING A COPY AT ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AND PLACING A COPY ON ITS WEBSITE. THE FORM 990 IS ALSO PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET AT WWW.GUIDESTAR.ORG. |
| FORM 990, PART XI, LINE 9 | Removal of Trust Interest (1,314,223) Pension Related Actuarial Losses (1,665) --------- (1,312,558) |
| SCHEDULE G, PART II | THE ASPCA REPORTS ALL EXPENDITURES RELATED TO ITS SPECIAL EVENTS FUNCTIONS AS "OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES" ON SCHEDULE G, PART II, LINE 9. ALL COSTS OF RUNNING THESE SPECIAL EVENTS ARE USUALLY INVOICED AS ONE FEE BY THE VENDOR, SO THAT THE RENTAL, FOOD AND OTHER COSTS ARE INEXTRICABLY COMBINED AND FURTHER CATEGORIZATION ON SCHEDULE G, PART II, IS IMPOSSIBLE. |
| SCHEDULE I, PART IV - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | ASPCA GRANTS PROVIDE SUPPORT TO A VARIETY OF U.S. BASED NON-PROFIT ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH CASH GRANTS, SPONSORSHIPS, SCHOLARSHIPS AND TRAINING. THE ASPCA DOES NOT ACCEPT UNSOLICITED GRANT PROPOSALS BY MAIL, ELECTRONICALLY, OR IN ANY OTHER FORMAT OTHER THAN BY SUBMITTING A LETTER OF INQUIRY THROUGH ITS WEBSITE. THE ASPCA CAREFULLY CONSIDERS A NUMBER OF FACTORS IN OUR GRANT REVIEW PROCESS. AMONG THOSE FACTORS IS AN ORGANIZATION'S ABILITY TO DEMONSTRATE ITS STABILITY AND PROFESSIONALISM. ORGANIZATIONS THAT CAN DEMONSTRATE THE FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS IN THEIR APPLICATION ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO RECEIVE FUNDING FROM THE ASPCA IN A TIMELY MANNER: - ACCESS TO OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING - ACTIVE FUNDRAISING EFFORTS - COLLABORATION WITH OTHER ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS - UP-TO-DATE AND ACCURATE WEBSITE THE ASPCA's FUNDING PRIORITIES INCLUDE GRANTS FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES: - ANTI CRUELTY EFFORTS - EMERGENCY AND DISASTER RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS - EQUINE PROJECTS - SHELTER AND SPAY/NEUTER PROGRAMS - ANIMAL RELOCATION INITIATIVES - ANIMAL WELFARE SPONSORSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS - RESEARCH THE ASPCA CONDUCTS REGULAR REVIEWS OF OUR APPLICANTS' NON-PROFIT STATUS. GRANTEES ARE EXPECTED TO REPORT BACK TO THE ASPCA WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF THE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSES REQUESTED. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |