Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | 92,736,241 | 110,866,444 | 116,474,388 | 134,361,787 | 127,497,252 | 581,936,112 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 92,736,241 | 110,866,444 | 116,474,388 | 134,361,787 | 127,497,252 | 581,936,112 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 48,687,771 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 533,248,341 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 92,736,241 | 110,866,444 | 116,474,388 | 134,361,787 | 127,497,252 | 581,936,112 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 2,630,293 | 3,665,731 | 4,253,331 | 2,384,492 | 3,388,753 | 16,322,600 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 868,252 | 627,920 | 475,356 | 357,842 | 250,260 | 2,579,630 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | 600,996,609 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| GOVERNING BODY AND MANAGEMENT | Part VI, Line 1B - The NRDC Board of Trustees is comprised of 36 independent voting Board Members. Board of Trustees member John Adams is not independent by virtue of receiving compensation from the organization. Board of Trustees Member Wendy Neu is not independent because of the relationship disclosed on Schedule L of the Form 990. Part VI, LINE 2 - Board of Trustees Members, Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr. and Frederica Perera, have a family relationship. Board of Trustees Member, Sarah Cogan and officers Maripat Alpuche and Lauren Colasacco, have a business relationship. Board of Trustees Members, Wendy Neu, Josephine Merck and Jonathan Rose have a business relationship. Board of Trustees member, Eric Wepsic and Board of Trustee/Vice Chair, Max Stone, have a business relationship. Board of Trustees members, Jonathan Rose and Shelly Malkin, have a business relationship. Form 990, Part VI, Line 3 STEVE BAGINSKI, SERVED AS NRDC'S INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FROM APRIL 27TH, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 21ST, 2015. DURING THAT TIME, MR. BAGINSKI WAS THE EMPLOYEE OF AN EXTERNAL THIRD PARTY EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM AND NRDC PAID THAT THIRD PARTY FOR MR. BAGINSKI'S SERVICES. STEVE BAGINSKI WAS HIRED AS NRDC'S FULL-TIME CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2015, AND HE RECEIVED HIS COMPENSATION FROM NRDC FROM THAT DATE. On the Form 990, amounts reported in Part VII, Column (d) represent a combination of amounts NRDC paid to the third party executive search firm for Mr. Baginski's services as well as amounts NRDC paid Mr. Baginski directly. Form 990, Part VI, Lines 7a & B Line 7A - NRDC's members are entitled, as part of their membership, to elect individuals to the NRDC Board of Trustees, Line 7B - The NRDC Board of Trustees acts autonomously. Nevertheless, NRDC's members have certain approval rights pursuant to the New York Not-for-Profit Corporation Law, including, approval over any amendments to NRDC's certificate of incorporation. |
| 990 REVIEW PROCESS | Form 990, part VI, section B, Line 11 The Form 990 was prepared by a nationally recognized accounting firm in conjunction with the organization's senior management and audit committee of the Board of Trustees. A copy of the Draft Form 990 was presented to the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees for discussion and comment. Once the Audit Committee approved the Form 990 for filing, a copy was circulated to the full Board of Trustees for their review. Each Board Member was provided opportunity to comment on the information contained in the Form 990 prior to its filing with the Internal Revenue Service. conflict of interest policy enforcement and monitoring form 990, part VI, Section B, LINE 12 Each officer, trustee, and key employee of the organization is required to annually disclose any conflicts of interest that arise by virtue of employment, board service, or position with the organization. The organization monitors compliance with its conflict of interest policy through an annual questionnaire/disclosure statement that is distributed to these individuals. Potential conflicts are investigated immediately. Process for determining compensation form 990, part VI, section B, LINE 15a & 15b The organization undertakes a thorough process to ensure that the executive compensation it pays to its top management official and all of its officers and key employees is reasonable, given the market in which the organization operates. In relevant part, the Board of Trustees has established a Compensation Committee of independent persons that have no personal interest in the proposed compensation. The Compensation committee contracts with a compensation consultant to complete a market assessment and competitive position analysis for the organization's top executives. The compensation consultant utilizes comparability and benchmarking surveys to ensure that the organization compensates its executives commensurate with the market. Based on its review of the analyses provided by the compensation consultant and other relevant information, the compensation committee makes recommendations to the executive committee of the board of trustees. Compensation decisions and reports are contemporaneously documented in the minutes of the meeting of the executive committee at which such decisions are made. |
| DISCLOSURE | FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 The organization makes its Form 990 available to the public by retaining a copy at its place of business. The Form 990 and audited financial statements are likewise published on NRDC's website at www.nrdc.org. The organization's governing documents and conflict of interest policy may be provided at management's discretion, if requested. Form 990, Part XI Reconciliation of Net Assets Other Changes in Net Assets or Fund Balances Change in Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreements ($817,573) Change in Value of Split-Interest Agreements ($698,330) Pension related activity other than net periodic expense ($2,762,051) Bad Debt Expense Adjustment ($615,124) Total Other Changes in Net Assets ($4,893,078) |
| program service Accomplishments | part III, line 4 The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is the most effective and influential environmental organization in the United States and around the world, combining the grassroots power of more than 2.4 million members and online activists with courtroom clout and the expertise of more than 500 scientists, advocates, lawyers, and other professionals. NRDCs priorities are: - Curbing global warming and creating a clean energy future $56,039,672 - Reviving the worlds oceans $6,879,249 - Defending endangered wildlife and wild places $15,714,551 - Protecting public health by preventing pollution $13,067,358 - Ensuring safe and sufficient water $7,110,246 - Fostering sustainable communities $13,860,453 Over the past year, we worked both in the U.S. and abroad to curb global warming, put in place clean energy solutions; protect public health; foster sustainable communities; and safeguard our natural resources. |
| Curbing Climate Change and Creating a Clean Energy Future | NRDCs climate efforts focus on helping to deliver an 80 percent reduction in U.S. carbon pollution from 1990 levels by 2050, the level that scientists say is required to keep the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change. In 2016, we drove historic climate commitments by the United States, China, and India; pushed for policies and tools that scale up clean energy and efficiency at the federal and state level; waged and won campaigns to block reckless oil and gas projects; and helped communities build their resilience to the impacts of climate change. Our climate and energy milestones included: - In August 2015, backed by overwhelming public support, President Obama released the Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan put in place nationwide regulations designed to reduce carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants by more than 30 percent by 2030. Power plants are the single biggest source of carbon pollution, which drives climate change. The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to halt enforcement of the plan in February 2016 until a lower court ruled on a lawsuit challenging it. In the meantime, NRDC has continued to work with state partners to meet its requirements by increasing their investment in clean energy and efficiency. - In California, our legislative and policy experts helped ensure the adoption of a groundbreaking law that doubles energy efficiency savings targets, increases renewable energy generation 50 percent by 2030, and puts more Californians behind the wheels of electric vehicles. A second approved measure boosts energy efficiency standards in buildings and helps residents better understand their home energy bills and use. Meanwhile, a new report by NRDC and a partner group found that Californias 40-year commitment to energy efficiency has saved Californians $90 billion on their utility bills, created hundreds of thousands of efficiency jobs, and will have avoided the pollution from 41 power plants by the end of the next decade. - On the other side of the country, New York Governor Cuomo formally set in a motion a process to enact its own new clean energy standard requiring that the state get 50 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. The action doubled the proportion of renewable energy sources. NRDC will be working to ensure the success of the standard by working with the Public Service Commission, which regulates the states utilities, to develop smart implementation plans that maximize the amount of renewable energy installed per dollar invested. - In November 2015, President Obama officially rejected the proposal for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, citing our nations obligation to be a leader on climate action. The pipeline would have moved more than 800,000 barrels of Canadian tar sands oil across six U.S. states. This win was made possible by NRDC research, advocacy, and by the dedication of a grassroots coalition of partners. When TransCanada first filed the permit for the pipeline in 2008, NRDC was one of the first environmental groups to stand up against its construction. - The U.N. climate conference in Paris culminated in December 2015 with an ambitious global agreement to tackle climate change and accelerate the shift to clean energy. On the ground at the conference, NRDC staff helped broker and secure strong climate commitments from key countries such as China and India. Meanwhile, actor and NRDC Trustee Robert Redford took the stage at UNESCO with indigenous artists, activists, and storytellers from across the globe to share stories about special places threatened by climate change. Nearly 180 countries signed the Paris climate accord on Earth Day April 22, 2016, agreeing to pursue efforts to hold the global temperature rise to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius. - In a major step forward in curbing the climate and health impacts of fossil fuels development, the Department of the Interior ordered a halt to the decades old coal-leasing program on federal lands to reexamine its health and environmental impacts. Burning coal is one of the biggest contributors to climate change and hundreds of thousands of NRDC members and activists called on President Obama in 2016 to end the development of fossil fuels on our public lands. In 2015, more than 40 percent of the 900 million tons of coal produced in America came from our public lands, mainly in the Interior West. - Methane, the primary component of natural gas, is an extremely potent climate pollutant, many times more harmful to the climate than carbon dioxide. In March 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency launched a voluntary program to address methane pollution from the oil and gas sector. NRDC and our coalition partners advocated for strengthening the proposal in several key ways, including addressing both new and existing sources of methane pollution. While the EPAs final standards, released in May 2016, applied only to new sources, we helped move the agency to announce that it would begin the process for setting existing source standards by initiating a formal information collection request that called for comprehensive data from a range of methane sources throughout the oil and gas industry. - The U.S. Department of Energy released energy efficiency standards for new rooftop air conditioners, heat pumps, and furnaces that heat and cool more than half of America's commercial floor space. The standards, which are the result of negotiations among a broad group of stakeholders that included NRDC and other environmental groups, manufacturers, utilities, and consumer groups, will save nearly enough energy over the next 30 years to offset the annual carbon dioxide emissions of more than 120 million homes. |
| Reviving the World's Oceans | Oceans help feed the world, provide a living for multitudes, and sustain most of the life on the globe. NRDC is working to protect and restore our seas from rampant exploitation. Weve worked for decades to spotlight whats happening below the surface, to strengthen laws that allow overfished species to rebound and to advocate for the protection of coastal communities from offshore drilling. From the United Nations to regional fishery councils, we promote healthy oceans by advocating for international agreements that protect ocean biodiversity and measures that restore depleted fish populations. Healthy oceans support trillions of dollars in economic activity. NRDC made important progress this year on several key fronts: - In October 2015, following powerful advocacy by NRDC, our millions of members and activists, and our environmental partner groups, the Obama administration canceled proposed oil and gas lease sales in America's Alaskan Arctic waters, the last pristine sea on the globe, whose shores are home to polar bears, seals, and other iconic wildlife. The previous month, Royal Dutch Shell abandoned drilling in the region after its exploratory well failed to yield enough oil and gas to make its mission worth the tremendous risk and cost. - In a related victory, in March 2016, the Obama administration announced it was excluding waters off the Atlantic coast from its next five-year plan for drilling and leasing. One month earlier, a coalition of groups, including NRDC, delivered more than 2 million petitions of protest, calling on the president to move beyond fossil fuels and not open any more of our federally owned offshore areas to dangerous oil and gas drilling. Over the previous year, opposition to drilling had built quickly along the southeastern coast, from Virginia to Georgia, where the local economies are heavily dependent on tourism and fishing. - Meanwhile, NRDC took the U.S. Navy to court over its high-intensity sonar and explosives training off the coasts of Southern California and Hawaii, which was threatening the wellbeing of more than 60 whale, dolphin, seal, and sea lion populations. In September 2015, following a major legal victory and extensive negotiations, the U.S. Navy agreed to designate significant habitat in the Pacific as off-limits to such military exercises. - Following advocacy by NRDC and our partners, the Obama administration announced in September 2015 that it would consider giving marine national monument status to several New England deep sea canyons and underwater mountains. The canyons and seamounts are exceptional for their diversity and abundance of deep sea corals, which, together with associated species including sponges and anemones, form the foundation of deep-sea ecosystems. They are also extremely vulnerable to disturbance. The designation would be the first ever marine monument anywhere off the continental United States. |
| Defending Endangered Wildlife and Wild Places | NRDC protects wildlife and unspoiled lands from the threats of industrial development, commercial exploitation, pollution, and climate change. We partner with ranchers, farmers, clean energy companies, and the government to promote solutions that help wild predators coexist with livestock and people. We push for international agreements and domestic policies that shield elephants, rhinos, and other animals from being killed for trade. And we fight to keep reckless oil and gas drilling out of wild areas, from Utahs red rock country to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Several long-term efforts came to fruition this year with the protection of some of the worlds most fragile and embattled wildlife and wild places: - The greater sage grouse is an icon of the American West, and a bellwether of the health of its vase sagebrush-sea ecosystem. As that grassland habitat has shrunk, so has the birds population. In recent decades, NRDC has gone to court for the sage grouse, and local conservation groups have joined forces to protect its habitat. In a major milestone in our campaign, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced in September 2015 that it would protect 35 million acres of western sagebrush habitat. - In a big victory for elephants and for NRDC members who have called for an end to our nation's role in the ivory trafficking that fuels poaching, the Obama administration issued the last in a series of regulations that add up to a near total ban on the U.S. commercial ivory trade. While commercial imports of African elephant ivory are already banned, these new rules will strengthen the ban by closing loopholes in the intrastate trade of elephant ivory and restrict the number of elephants that trophy hunters can import into the U.S. The tough new rules do not cover sales within states, but NRDC has helped enact laws shutting down the nation's three biggest ivory markets: New York, California, and Hawaii. - Meanwhile, after South Africas president introduced a plan to legalize the international rhino horn trade, a misguided move that almost certainly would have increased demand, NRDC fought back with careful analysis and tireless advocacy. As a result, South Africa announced in April 2016 that it would shelve the disastrous proposal. Over the past three years, rhino killings have risen 7,000 percent, a rate that if sustained, would push the animals to extinction within a decade. - The monarch butterflys annual migration is one of the most awe-inspiring on earth, but heavy use of herbicide called glyphosate (marketed by Monsanto as Roundup) is putting this majestic species at serious risk. NRDC filed a lawsuit in 2015 that led the EPA to admit in court that its approval of Enlist Duo, an herbicide containing glyphosate, should be withdrawn due to inadequate environmental review. And we mobilized more than 113,000 of our Members and activists to sign a petition demanding Dow AgroSciences remove Enlist Duo from the market. - After years of campaigning by NRDC and our allies, Montana agreed to expand year-round habitat outside Yellowstone National Park for Americas most famous bison. Historically, thousands of wild bison have been hazed or slaughtered in the spring as they migrated out from Yellowstone into Montana in search of food for survival. While there is still work to do to win stronger protections, expanding the bisons range is a major advance in the fight to save this icon of our natural heritage. - In November 2015, the Department of the Interior released a milestone plan for conservation and renewable energy development on public lands in Californias Mojave Desert. The long awaited plan addresses solar, wind, and geothermal development and features elements of "smart from the start" siting that NRDC has been championing for years, including landscape level planning; steering development toward areas that minimize impacts to wildlife and wildlands; coordinating transmission and generation; and strategic, regional mitigation for project impacts. - In July 2015, in a victory for our fight to protect Americas western natural heritage, President Obama designated three new national monuments, protecting an area spanning roughly 704,000 acres in central Nevadas Basin and Range and smaller ones in Californias Berryessa Snow Mountain and Texas Waco Mammoth. The three monuments will safeguard some of Americas most biodiverse mountain ecosystems, wild tracts of desert and nationally significant fossil beds. |
| Protecting public health by preventing pollution | Getting rid of toxic chemicals in our environment, in the food we eat, the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the products we buy, can help protect the health of millions of people. When public agencies fail to protect consumers, workers, and children from dangerous chemicals, NRDC takes them to court. We build pressure on major food companies to adopt safer and more sustainable practices throughout their supply chain. And we team up with local communities to eliminate health dangers in their homes. Here are some key milestones from the year: - Over the course of more than a decade, the chemical company Mallinckrodt dumped tons of toxic mercury into Maines Penobscot River. NRDC and the Maine Peoples Alliance sued the company in 2000, and in September 2015, after years of tenacious litigation and citizen action, a judge ordered Mallinckrodt to find viable effective ways to clean up the river. A shining example of community justice, the victory holds the promise of protecting the health of countless people, preserving the states longstanding tradition of lobster and crab fishing, and restoring an ecosystem that spans more than 20 miles along this great waterway. - Following years of steady advocacy by members of Congress, the White House, NRDC, and other groups, federal lawmakers unveiled an agreement to overhaul the Toxic Substances Control Act, a 1976 law governing the Environmental Protection Agencys regulation of toxic chemicals. The bill, Congress's first major rewrite of a fundamental environmental statute in two decades, will give the EPA a clear and enforceable mandate to review chemicals, and will require the agency to evaluate chemicals based on their impact on human health. It also contains loopholes and rollbacks sought by the chemical industry and NRDC will press hard to ensure the strong implementation of the bill. - Livestock producers routinely give antibiotics to animals to make them grow faster or help them survive crowded, stressful, and unsanitary conditions. When these drugs are overused, some bacteria become antibiotic-resistant, threatening the future effectiveness of these medicines for human health. In October 2015, an NRDC campaign helped persuade the restaurant chain Subway to commit to eliminate antibiotics from its meat supply and California set the strictest antibiotics standards in the nation with a measure NRDC helped strengthen. We scored another big win in April 2016 when the restaurant chain Taco Bell also pledged to eliminate antibiotics from its meat supply. - Meanwhile, a new report and scorecard released by NRDC and several consumer, health, and environmental groups graded Americas 25 largest fast food and fast casual chains on their meat and poultry antibiotics policies, with all but five of them earning "F"s for allowing routine antibiotic use by their meat suppliers. - In a tremendous victory for at-risk communities across the country, NRDC and our partners reached a legal settlement with the Environmental Protection Agency that will force the agency to put in place new safeguards to help protect communities from chemical spills at thousands of industrial facilities nationwide. Chemicals released in industrial spills can contaminate waterways and exposure to these substances can be dangerous, and in some instances, fatal. These health effects are experienced disproportionately by residents of low-income neighborhoods and communities of color, where facilities that manufacture, store, and use hazardous substances tend to cluster. - In response to a lawsuit filed by NRDC and our partners, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a ban on all agricultural uses of the pesticide chlorpyrifos due to the health risks from contaminated drinking water. The EPA had already eliminated household uses in home gardens, insect sprays and other products in 2000, in response to a lawsuit by NRDC and other groups-because the chemical damages the developing brains of children. During the public comment period on the EPAs proposal, more than 80,000 people spoke out in favor of the ban. |
| Ensuring Safe and Sufficient Water | Water is one of the most critical natural resources when it comes to sustaining our communities, economies, and health. NRDC fights for a clean, safe, and sufficient water supply. We push the federal government to strengthen protections for drinking water, and we find ways for cities to keep pollution out of rivers and lakes. Our work also helps homes, buildings, farms, and power plants use water as efficiently as possible, so that there's plenty for all of us and for future generations. - More than 18 million Americans got their drinking water from systems with lead violations in 2015, according to a report published by NRDC. The problem could be significantly more pervasive because many more water systems known to have such violations, including that in Flint, Michigan, do not show up as having lead violations in the government database designed to track such problems. Our report also highlighted that water systems can use testing methods to avoid detecting lead problems. In cities like Flint, Chicago, and Philadelphia, where localized lead spikes may put the public at risk, officials allegedly have "gamed" water testing in ways that may obscure lead contamination. - NRDC has placed special focus on the water crisis in Flint, where residents still did not have access to safe tap water more than two years after lead began leaching from water pipes. Alongside local partners, NRDC petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency in October 2015 to use its emergency powers to secure safe, lead-free water for the citys children and families. The following month, NRDC joined residents of Flint and many of the same groups and announced their intent to sue city and state officials in federal court. - President Obama acted promptly in January 2016 to veto a measure passed by Congress designed to kill the Clean Water Rule. This critical rule, issued in 2015 by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, restored protection under the Clean Water Act to lakes, streams, and wetlands that help prevent flooding, filter pollution and supply one in three Americans with safe drinking water. More than 800,000 NRDC supporters and other activists sent messages in support of the rule. - By showing how rebuilding in the wake of floods leads to steep federal costs, a new interactive map and analysis unveiled in November 2015 by NRDC illustrated why its so important for Congress to keep updated federal flood protection standards in place. The updated standards, which will guide the design of federally funded projects along coastlines or near floodplains, will require an additional margin of safety and account for the rising risk of flooding and future impacts of sea level rise and climate change. President Obama issued an executive order earlier in 2015 that updated the standards, which dated back to the 1970s. - As California continued to suffer through an epic drought, the states energy commission followed NRDCs recommendations in August 2015 and approved new standards for showerheads that go beyond the Environmental Protection Agencys WaterSense performance criteria. As new products gradually replace existing showerheads in the years ahead, water savings are expected to reach 38 billion gallons of water per year by 2028, which is approximately the amount used annually by the city of San Francisco today. Earlier in the year, at the urging of NRDC, the commission set similar standards for toilets, urinals and faucets, which will save California billions of gallons of water. - Meanwhile, a report card released by NRDC in December 2015 found that California was making mixed progress on solutions that would make the state more resistant to future droughts. Though the state had made strides in some key areas, it scored poorly in agricultural efficiency, stormwater capture and management of the Bay-Delta. Our report card described specific ways that California should improve its target-setting, implementation, enforcement, and incentives. - In a significant legal victory, a federal court sided with NRDC and our partners and ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency had failed to protect U.S. waters from aquatic invasive species. We argued successfully that the EPAs ballast water permit was ineffective and would not stave off future invasions of non-native species. The courts decision has ramifications for waters across the country, from Long Island Sound to the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico to San Francisco Bay. - Following NRDC legal action, a federal court approved a settlement in which the Environmental Protection Agency agreed to implement an earlier court order to update national regulations for stormwater runoff, one of America's most widespread forms of water pollution. In response to a 2003 NRDC lawsuit, a federal court had ordered the EPA to correct and strengthen urban runoff rules for communities with populations under 100,000 and make a science-based determination of whether polluted runoff from forest roads is so severe that national pollution control standards are necessary. - A report released in November 2015 by NRDC found that cover crops can absorb tons of carbon pollution from the air, significantly cut crop losses, and prevent the loss of a trillion gallons of water. In fact, planting cover crops on half the corn and soybean acres in the top 10 agricultural states (California, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Indiana) could sequester more than 19 million metric tons of carbon annually, which is the equivalent of taking more than 4 million cars off the road. |
| Fostering Sustainable Communities | More than 80 percent of Americans live in cities and nearby suburbs-and this number is growing rapidly. As our cities grow, NRDC works to make sure they become healthier, more sustainable places to live. Our lawyers go to court on behalf of communities seeking to defend themselves from polluters. We partner with communities to increase energy efficiency in their buildings and expand access to clean energy solutions and healthier food. We help empower communities to find solutions that work and then take the best ideas nationwide. - In an important victory for the nearly half million New Yorkers who live in public housing, a federal judge ruled in December 2015 that the New York City Housing Authority had failed to provide timely and sufficient repairs to rampant mold and moisture problems in public housing that aggravate tenants asthma, as required by a settlement reached with NRDC and the National Center for Law and Economic Justice two years earlier. As part of the settlement, the housing authority had agreed to respond to mold and moisture complaints within a specific, reasonable timeline: The simplest of repairs in seven days and more complex repairs in 15 days, among other measures. - Meanwhile, a report released by NRDC and Energy Efficiency for All, a coalition of energy, environmental, and housing organizations, detailed cost-saving strategies to upgrade the most prevalent type of heating system in New York City apartment buildings: steam generated from burning oil or natural gas. Buildings are the single largest source of climate pollution in the city, and a lot of that pollution is the result of energy used to heat them. Making the upgrades in this report is critical to helping the city reach its goal of reducing climate change pollution 80 percent by 2050. - In December 2016, the city of Los Angeles passed the most comprehensive building efficiency policy of any big city in the nation. As part of the effort, the City Energy Project, a joint initiative of NRDC and the Institute for Market Transformation, joined forces with the Department of Building and Safety and convened a transparent and inclusive stakeholder process to help develop a package of policies and programs to improve the energy and water efficiency of Los Angeles' existing buildings. The ordinance will reduce L.A.s greenhouse gas emissions by nearly 10 percent in 2025 and energy consumption by 7 percent. - A climate resilience toolkit, released by NRDC and our partners in December 2015 at the U.N. climate conference in Paris, is designed to help cities plagued by dangerous heat waves and soaring temperatures to better protect their most vulnerable citizens. The toolkit, which serves as a step-by-step guide for the development of local and regional early warning systems and heat preparedness plans, is based on the Indian city of Ahmedabad's pioneering "heat action plan," as well as international experiences and best practices. In March 2016, India launched new heat action plans in the Nagpur region of Maharashtra and the Bhubaneswar coastal region of Odisha, the first regional early warning systems and preparedness plans in South Asia. |
| BUILDING A MOVEMENT | NRDC is committed to engaging the public around solutions to environmental challenges. Our federal, national, and international media teams ensure that NRDC is cited in the press on a daily basis. Our experts are quoted in top-tier newspapers, and we are frequent guests on leading national TV and radio news outlets. Our communications team publishes more than 100 policy documents every year, ensuring that NRDCs environmental solutions are at the forefront among the professional community. We have a strong social media presence that keeps followers informed of wins, setbacks, and breaking news. We communicate via our membership newsletter, Natures Voice, and across digital channels supported by our English and Spanish websites. We also publish cutting-edge journalism on NRDCs digital news channels, Earthwire and OnEarth. In 2016, we: - Grew the audience on our global Facebook page from 345,395 fans to 581,060 fans (an increase of 68 percent) and reached an average of more than 7 million Facebook users monthly through our messaging. On Twitter, our global channel grew its audience from 179,363 followers to 201,771 followers (an increase of 13 percent) and generated 50,048,774 impressions. We began building an audience on Instagram as well, reaching more than 45,000 followers. - Launched a dynamic new version of our primary online platform, NRDC.org, which aims to help foster collective action by building awareness, driving action, and spurring donations. The site provides compelling entry points and paths for environmental enthusiasts, as well as deep, policy-specific sections for environmental experts. - Rolled out a national campaign urging Kentucky Fried Chicken, the largest fast-food chicken chain in the country, to commit to phasing out chicken raised with the routine use of antibiotics. The campaign featured a series of online videos; a mobile billboard near KFCs headquarters in Louisville, Kentucky; an online petition addressed to KFC CEO Roger Eaton; and social channels on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. - Partnered with the Ad Council to launch "Save The Food," a major national public service campaign to combat food waste from its largest source, consumers, who collectively waste more food than grocery stores, restaurants or farms. The initiative aims to encourage consumers to reduce the amount of food they trash in their homes, thereby saving the water, energy and money that are lost along with it. - Created an award-winning documentary film, Sonic Sea, about the devastating impact of human-produced ocean noise on whales and other marine life that premiered globally on the Discovery Channel and toured both the United States and Europe. The film is narrated by the Oscar-nominated actress Rachel McAdams and features interviews with Grammy Award-winning musician, human rights and environmental activist, Sting, as well as the renowned oceanographic explorers and educators, Sylvia Earle and Jean-Michel Cousteau. |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:WITNESS FEES TOTAL FEES:173286 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:CREATIVE DESIGN/ART/FILM TOTAL FEES:1135587 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING TOTAL FEES:165142 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING TOTAL FEES:345752 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:MEMBERSHIP CONSULTING TOTAL FEES:43869 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:CLEAN ENERGY TOTAL FEES:6359626 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:OCEANS TOTAL FEES:502800 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:HEALTH & TOXICS TOTAL FEES:1614862 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:WILDLIFE & WETLANDS TOTAL FEES:1026569 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:SAFE & SUFFICIENT WATER TOTAL FEES:202656 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES TOTAL FEES:2120652 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL FEE TOTAL FEES:2288880 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:CONSULTING REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL FEES:477966 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:INSTITUTIONAL CONSULTING TOTAL FEES:2819227 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:EDITORIAL TOTAL FEES:646233 |
| FORM 990 PART IX LINE 11G | DESCRIPTION:PRINTING TOTAL FEES:347722 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |