Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990.
| (i)Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 9 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Total | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any unusual grants.) .... | 18,695,154 | 18,879,940 | 20,524,447 | 21,458,689 | 21,865,256 | 101,423,486 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf....... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 18,695,154 | 18,879,940 | 20,524,447 | 21,458,689 | 21,865,256 | 101,423,486 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 0 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 101,423,486 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 18,695,154 | 18,879,940 | 20,524,447 | 21,458,689 | 21,865,256 | 101,423,486 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 77,718 | 48,193 | 51,390 | 41,110 | 58,642 | 277,053 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 2,074,291 | 2,665,237 | 610,857 | 789,481 | 1,825,425 | 7,965,291 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10. | 109,665,830 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose...... | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5. | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons... | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2011 | (b) 2012 | (c) 2013 | (d) 2014 | (e) 2015 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required--see instructions) |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c | ||||
| d From 2013....... | ||||
| e From 2014....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2015 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions) |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2016. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a | ||||
| b | ||||
| c Excess from 2013....... | ||||
| d From 2014....... | ||||
| e From 2015....... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | 15000324 |
| Software Version: | 2015v3.0 |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Form 990, Part III, Line 4d: Other Program Services Description | OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 4: OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES TO PROMOTE THE RIGHTS OF, AND ADVOCACY FOR, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. OTHER PROGRAMS INCLUDE: PROTECTION & ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, PROTECTION & ADVOCACY FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, PROTECTION & ADVOCACY FOR BENEFICIARIES OF SOCIAL SECURITY, PROTECTION & ADVOCACY FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, PROTECTION & ADVOCACY FOR VOTING ACCESS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL SERVICES TRUST FUND PROGRAM - IOLTA TRUST FUND AND THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL SERVICES TRUST FUND PROGRAM - EQUAL ACCESS, US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CLIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, CALMHSA, WORK INCENTIVES PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE, STATE BAR - BANK HOUSING, AND STATE BAR - BANK PLANNING. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b: Form 990 Review Process | DRAFT IS PRESENTED TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL BOARD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO FILING. AUDITORS, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND FINANCE DIRECTOR ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. 990 TRAINING MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c: Explanation of Monitoring and Enforcement of Conflicts | CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, QUESTIONNAIRE AND STATEMENT ARE COMPLETED BY EACH BOARD MEMBER ANNUALLY, AND REVIEWED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTORS, PROGRAM DIRECTORS, MANAGING ATTORNEYS, OFFICE MANAGERS AND OTHER STAFF AS DETERMINED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ALSO ANNUALLY AND AS DETERMINED NECESSARY COMPLETE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM. A VENDOR LIST OF MAJOR PURCHASES/SERVICES IS PROVIDED TO STAFF. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 15b: Compensation Review and Approval Process for Officers and Key Employees | CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, & TOP MANAGEMENT:The Board of Directors annually evaluates the Executive Director. The Board reviews external market comparability data and determines the appropriate compensation. For the top management, each position is placed in a competitive salary scale approved by the Board, based upon grant requirements, external market rates, internal comparisons, and salary increases are based on the employee's annual performance review.OTHER OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES:EACH POSITION IS PLACED IN A COMPETITIVE SALARY SCALE APPROVED BY THE BOARD, BASED UPON BOTH THE EXTERNAL MARKET RATES AND INTERNAL COMPARISONS, AND SALARY INCREASES ARE BASED ON THE EMPLOYEE'S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW. |
| Form 990, Part VI, Line 19: Other Organization Documents Publicly Available | AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. |
| ABOUT US | Disability Rights California (DRC) works to advance the equality, dignity, independence and freedom of Californians with disabilities. We use all of our advocacy tools to eliminate discrimination, ensure that people can live in barrier-free communities of their choice and be equal, passionate, and full participants in society. We fight against policies and funding cuts that harm people with disabilities and safeguard against a return to a time when accessibility and inclusion were rare, and abuse, neglect, and segregation from mainstream society were commonplace.As the federally mandated protection and advocacy system, we protect rights and access to services by filing lawsuits, representing clients at hearings, and advocating for policy changes. We conduct investigations and monitor service delivery to prevent abuse and neglect, and empower communities by providing culturally appropriate and accessible publications while promoting self-advocacy.We have more than 30 offices statewide and employ a diverse staff of more than 200 dedicated, creative, and passionate attorneys, advocates, and support staff. More than 35% of our staff identify as having a disability and 56% of staff are from ethnic communities. |
| INDIVIDUAL ADVOCACY | Individuals with Intellectual or Developmental DisabilitiesOur Office of Clients Rights Advocacy (OCRA) provides advocacy services to people with developmental disabilities who are consumers of the 21 regional centers. OCRA resolved 9,871 issues for people with developmental disabilities, including Diane. When Diane turned 21, the state told her that the nursing hours she received at home would be reduced by 150 hours a month when she transitioned from a program serving children and young adults to an adult program. As a result, Diane risked having to move out of her familys home and into a nursing facility. OCRA represented Diane at hearing and asserted that the state should authorize an exemption because Dianes medical condition was unchanged and still required all her nursing hours each month. Prior to the judge issuing a decision, the state agreed to reinstate Dianes nursing hours to over 194 hours per month.With support of the Protection & Advocacy for Developmental Disabilities (PADD) grant, DRC served 1,219 individuals with disabilities in fiscal year 2016 and impacted nearly 698,000 others through our systemic advocacy, including Sasha. Sasha is a 13-year-old student with developmental and mental health disabilities. At his previous school, a non-public school for students with behavioral issues, he had been restrained face down 77 times over the course of the 11 months he was enrolled at the school. We filed a complaint with the United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the United States Department of Justice against the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD), and the non-public school. OCR upheld our complaint against OUSD and negotiated a settlement with the school district. As part of the agreement, Sasha will receive an assessment and compensatory services. Furthermore, OUSD has agreed to no longer place students at non-public schools that use prone restraint, and will revise its contract with non-public schools to state that the school will not use prone restraint. Individuals with Mental Health DisabilitiesWith the support of the Protection & Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) grant, DRC provided direct services to 959 individuals while 318,776 others were impacted by our systemic advocacy, including Zeke. Zeke is a kindergarten student with mental health disabilities and was hospitalized on many occasions for self-harm. Zekes mother, who was homeless, contacted DRC because she had a scheduled initial IEP meeting and wanted someone to attend to help advocate for Zekes rights. We represented Zeke at the IEP meeting and obtained the accommodations Zeke needed to benefit and access his education. Zeke and his mother are no longer homeless and are currently receiving housing assistance. Because of our help, Zeke is receiving in-home therapeutic behavioral support services, intensive home counseling, case management, and psychiatric support.DRC has been monitoring conditions at four adult jail systems and two juvenile halls throughout the state, to ensure individuals with mental health disabilities are provided effective, client-centered, culturally competent mental health care and that their rights are protected. For example, at the Sacramento County Jail, DRC documented evidence of excessive isolation of prisoners with disabilities, inadequate mental health care, and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Some of the worst conditions were in the countys main jail inpatient mental health unit that houses prisoners with the most acute mental health disabilities. In this unit, inmates languished in solitary cells with limited human contact and minimal treatment. DRC has been working with Sacramento County to address numerous constitutional and statutory violations of the inmates rights. In January 2016, DRC and Sacramento County entered into to a structured negotiation agreement, through which the county agreed to hire subject matter experts on mental health care and correctional practices to conduct detailed assessments of jail policies and practices. Our work includes Peer and Self-Advocacy work to support clients like Debra, who attended the peer self-advocacy group at a facility where she lived. She regularly participated in DRCs Peer/Self Advocacy Units self-advocacy group and at those meetings, she learned she had the right to be an active participant in her treatment and discharge planning. By attending the group, she also learned about Section 8 housing, conservatorship, and how to talk to her doctor. With this information, she took steps to advocate for herself to reach her goal of living independently.Our services to individuals with psychiatric disabilities are also provided by patients rights advocates at each of the five state psychiatric hospitals. Our California Office of Patients Rights (COPR) reviews and helps resolve patient complaints and ensures that resident rights during involuntary medication review hearings are protected. For example, this year they ensured that members of the hearing panel could not review information from other agencies about criminal history or behavioral challenges at prior facilities.Individual Advocacy for Individuals with Physical Learning or Sensory DisabilitiesUnder the Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights (PAIR) program, DRC served 1,488 individuals in a variety of problem areas such as government benefits and services, housing, health care, employment, program access, and more. For example, DRC fought for equal access for students to attend a class of their choosing in Californias Central Valley. The four students, who are deaf and hard of hearing, contacted DRC because they were denied enrollment in a cooking class. They had requested an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter for the lecture portion of the class. Before their first day, the Executive Director of the school said it would be unsafe for the students to enroll in a cooking class. The students, all of whom loved to cook and were excited about embarking on this career, were devastated. DRC drafted a demand letter to the Executive Director of the school notifying him of the schools obligation to provide equal access to students with disabilities. DRC requested that the school provide ASL interpreters and allow the students to enroll immediately. DRC ensured that the school create a reasonable accommodation policy and post it in on its website. The school agreed to enroll the students and provide the requested accommodations. The students are all enjoying their classes.Under the Client Assistance Program (CAP), our staff assisted 719 clients like Renaldo, a 32-year-old man with a congenital heart condition that requires extensive open-heart surgeries, attend the college of his dreams. Renaldo was a freelance videographer who wanted to pursue advanced training in cinematic arts. He contacted the California Department of Rehabilitation (DOR) for assistance and explained that the state college closet to his home offers this course work and that he had been accepted into California State University (CSU) Monterey Bay, which offers a Masters Degree in Cinematic Arts. Unfortunately, Monterey Bay was several hours from Renaldos home and he could not afford to pay for room and board. DOR told Renaldo that it would help with his undergraduate tuition but could not pay for his food or housing. He then contacted DRC to find additional avenues of support. DRC negotiated on Renaldos behalf and ultimately, DOR agreed to pay for Renaldos dormitory and on-campus meal plan, tuition for his Bachelors and Masters Degree completion, and his teaching credentials. Renaldo was thrilled with the outcome and began attending classes at CSU Monterey Bay in Fall of 2016. |
| LARGEST PROGRAMS 2015/ 2016 | Office of Clients' Rights Advocacy - $6,229,634Protection & Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness - $3,437,728Protection & Advocacy for Developmental Disabilities - $3,234,649Protection & Advocacy of Individual Rights - $1,913,706 |
| SYSTEMIC WORK | In 2016, DRC staff directly served more than 25,000 individuals with disabilities and our systemic advocacy work impacted millions more. We conducted over 1,000 outreach and training events, providing information and education to more than 40,000 Californians, and developed or revised 369 publications. Our disability-related information about rights as well as tools to enforce them are powerful tools that helped tens of thousands of Californians advocate for themselves or their family members. We translate accessible publications into 13 threshold languages as well as an active online presence that includes our accessible websites in English www.disabilityrightsca.org and Spanish www.disabilityrightsca.org/espanol, with nearly than 820,000 page views. In December 2016, DRCs Facebook page had 5,014 likes with 4,868 followers, and nearly 6,000 followers on Twitter. Our advocacy work advanced the civil rights of Californians with disabilities in critical areas including ending discrimination and stopping abuse and neglect, increasing access to housing, health care, education, mental health services, and other benefits. Our most significant work this year included efforts to end abuse in nursing homes, secure affordable accessible housing for Angelenos with disabilities, ensure access to materials and information for Californians who are blind, and increase access to competitive integrated employment. Individuals with disabilities are vulnerable to abuse and neglect. We completed an in-depth investigation into the deaths of seven individuals residing in skilled nursing homes and reviewed thousands of other licensing citations. The report cited, among other cases, the death of Alejandro Reynolds, a 30-year-old man with paraplegia, who died after bleeding uncontrollably from a massive pressure sore. Additionally, the deaths of two children with developmental disabilities living in a facility who died when they inadvertently dislodged their breathing tubes because of an involuntary behavior they had demonstrated many times, but that staff failed to prevent. Our report included recommendations to ensure that the Department of Public Healths Licensing Unit issues appropriate levels of citations and takes steps to suspend or revoke the license of facilities who are responsible for resident deaths. Licensing has already agreed to provide the public with greater online access to citation information, including the full content of all lower-level citations issued since January 2012 and enhanced search capabilities that will provide the public with easier access to information about facilities. We made huge strides against housing discrimination for people with disabilities with the settlement of the lawsuit we and our co-counsel brought against the City of Los Angeles for its failure to develop a minimum number of affordable and accessible housing units. The 10-year settlement Agreement, the largest of its kind in the country, requires the City to ensure that at least 4,000 of its affordable housing units meet the accessible standards required by federal law and to enforce policies to ensure that those units are rented to people who need the specific accessibility features. To achieve this result, the City committed at least $200 million to improve disability access in affordable units and agreed that all new or substantially rehabilitated housing developments will be accessible. On the employment front, we worked with three state agencies to develop a Blue Print that helps individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities obtain competitive integrated employment. Our work with the California Departments of Rehabilitation, Education, and Developmental Services resulted in a Blue Print, to make employment in an integrated setting at a competitive wage its highest priority, and ensure that workers in sheltered employment had the same protections against discrimination as other workers. The agreement calls for the cessation of placement of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in sheltered workshops and other segregated settings and the resources to effectuate those changes. Additionally, we sponsored AB 488 (Gonzalez) which extends Fair Employment and Housing Protections against harassment and discrimination based on protected statuses to individuals employed in a sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.As a result of our efforts, blind and visually impaired Californians who receive services from the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program can now read their IHSS communications and submit timesheets privately and independently. Through our collaborative work with the California Department of Health Care services (DHCS) and the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) we secured an agreement to ensure equal and effective communication for blind and visually impaired IHSS recipients and applicants. IHSS program recipients are required to sign bi-weekly timesheets verifying the hours worked by their in-home caregivers. In the past, blind recipients could not independently verify the printed timesheets or read other program notices or information. This settlement also included a $10 million investment that funded, among other things, a telephone timesheet approval system (TTS) that blind IHSS recipients can use to independently approve their workers hours and bypass paper timesheets. Visually impaired IHSS recipients can choose to receive their timesheets in a large font. IHSS recipients can also choose to receive their program notices, information, and appeal documents in accessible alternative formats including braille and electronic formats.. |
| Software ID: | 15000324 |
| Software Version: | 2015v3.0 |