Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2014 | (b) 2015 | (c) 2016 | (d) 2017 | (e) 2018 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 5,563,249 | 5,687,630 | 4,907,477 | 4,995,596 | 5,826,687 | 26,980,639 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 5,563,249 | 5,687,630 | 4,907,477 | 4,995,596 | 5,826,687 | 26,980,639 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 354,085 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 26,626,554 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2014 | (b) 2015 | (c) 2016 | (d) 2017 | (e) 2018 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 5,563,249 | 5,687,630 | 4,907,477 | 4,995,596 | 5,826,687 | 26,980,639 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 291 | 237 | 159 | 207 | 1,584 | 2,478 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 5,947 | 19,562 | 1,407 | 51,408 | 33,240 | 111,564 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 27,094,681 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2014 | (b) 2015 | (c) 2016 | (d) 2017 | (e) 2018 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2014 | (b) 2015 | (c) 2016 | (d) 2017 | (e) 2018 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2018 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2018 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2018 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Distributable amount for 2018 from Section C, line 6 |
||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2018 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2018: | ||||
| a From 2013....... | ||||
| b From 2014....... | ||||
| c From 2015....... | ||||
| d From 2016....... | ||||
| e From 2017....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2018 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2013 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2018 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2018 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2018, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2018. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2019. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2014...... | ||||
| b Excess from 2015..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2016..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART I, LINE 1 & PART III, LINE 1 | CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE (COA INSTITUTE) CARRIES OUT ITS MISSION THROUGH VARIOUS STRATEGIC LITIGATION, EDUCATION, AND TRAINING. IN ADVANCING ITS 501(C)(3) PURPOSES, COA INSTITUTE REPRESENTS ITSELF IN FIRST-PARTY LITIGATION AND INVESITAGTIONS ON COMPLEX CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW QUESTIONS ARISING UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT, AND GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT STATUTES. IT ALSO PROVIDES PRO BONO REPRESENTATION TO INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL BUSINESSES IN THIRD PARTY FEDERAL LITIGATION AND INVESTIGATIONS. ITS EFFORTS FOCUS ON THREE KEY AREAS: (1) LAW ENFORCEMENT ABUSE; (2) DISCRETIONARY DECISION-MAKING ABUSE; AND (3) INFORMATION ACCESS ABUSE. THE FOREGOING ACTIVITIES HELP DEFEND HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS SECURED BY LAW, ARE MATTERS OF SIGNIFICANT BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST, AND HAVE SUBSTANTIAL IMPACT BEYOND THE INTEREST OF THE LITIGANTS. COA INSTITUTE EDUCATES AND STIMULATES DISCUSSION TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH FILINGS AND BRIEFING IN FEDERAL COURT AND POLICY-FOCUSED REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION, AGENCY COMPLAINTS, STATEMENTS FOR THE RECORD, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS, POLICY ANALYSIS, AND COMMUNICATIONS MATERIALS. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A | THE INFORMATION BELOW PROVIDES A PARTIAL LISTING OF CASES LITIGATED DURING THE JULY 1, 2018 TO JUNE 30, 2019 PERIOD. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. D-LINK SYSTEMS INC. FOLLOWING A THREE-YEAR INVESTIGATION OF D-LINK SYSTEMS INC. ("DLS"), THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ("FTC") BROUGHT SUIT IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CLAIMING VIOLATION OF THE FTC ACT BECAUSE DLS'S ROUTERS ALLEGEDLY DID NOT USE "REASONABLE AND APPROPRIATE" DATA SECURITY. ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2017, THE COURT DISMISSED HALF THE FTC'S CLAIMS BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SUBSTANTIAL HARM OR PROSPECT OF HARM IN THE FUTURE. IN AUGUST 2019, THE PARTIES SETTLED THE DISPUTE. FTC AND FLORIDA V. VYLAH TEC, LLC ET. AL. BEFORE COA INSTITUTE BECAME INVOLVED IN THIS CASE, THE GOVERNMENT HAD SECURED ORDERS FREEZING SUBSTANTIALLY ALL ASSETS, INCLUDING THOSE OF THE PRINCIPALS, OF A SMALL FAMILY-OWNED COMPANY THAT PROVIDES COMPUTER TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES. THE COMPANY ALSO HAD BEEN PUT INTO THE HANDS OF A RECIEVER. IN AUGUST 2017, COA INSTITUTE MADE AN APPEARANCE IN THE 11TH CIRCUIT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS AND MOVED FOR STAY OF THOSE ORDERS. IN MARCH 2018, THE CIRCUIT VACATED PART OF THE ORDER WHICH APPLIED TO TWO DEFENDANTS AND A NON-DEFENDANT. THE CASE WENT TO TRIAL IN MARCH 2019 AND IN MAY 2019, THE COURT DENIED ALL OF THE FTC'S DAMAGES CLAIMS, SECURING A MAJOR VICTORY FOR VYLAH TEC AND ITS FAMILY OWNERSHIP. TABOR FOUNDATION V. COLORADO DEP'T OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING COLORADO'S TAXPAYER BILL OF RIGHTS ("TABOR") LIMITS AND CONDITIONS THE IMPOSITION OF NEW TAXES. THE STATE LEGISLATURE OFTEN SKIRTS ITS PROVISION BY STRUCTURING NEW REVENUE-GENERATING LEGISLATION AS A "FEE" RATHER THAN A TAX. COA INSTITUTE IS REPRESENTING THE TABOR FOUNDATION, A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO DEFENDING TABOR, IN A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE IMPOSITION OF NEW HEALTH CARE PROVIDER "FEES" AS A VIOLATION OF TABOR. THE CASE IS CURRENTLY ON APPEAL IN THE COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS. CAUSE OF ACTION INST. V. WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF MGMT. & BUDGET THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ("OMB") MAINTAINS A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT, WHICH OTHER AGENCIES ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW, RELATED TO FOIA FEES THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE FOIA STATUTE AND HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED SINCE 1987. COA INSTITUTE FILED A PETITION FOR RULEMAKING ASKING OMB TO UPDATE ITS GUIDANCE AND FILED SUIT UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. IN RESPONSE, OMB HAS CONCEDED IT MUST UPDATE THE GUIDANCE AND THE CASE IS STAYED PENDING OMB'S RULEMAKING. CAUSE OF ACTION INST. V. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IN DECEMBER 2015, THE IRS OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL ISSUED GUIDANCE THAT INTRODUCED NEW PROVISIONS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE MANUAL TO TREAT ALL JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION-RELATED RECORDS AS "CONGRESSIONAL RECORDSSUBJECT TO THE FOIA. COA INSTITUTE SUBMITTED TWO FOIA REQUESTS TO THE IRS IN JUNE 2016 TO CHALLENGE THE OVERBROAD CHIEF COUNSEL DIRECTIVES AND BROUGHT SUIT AFTER THE IRS REFUSED TO PROCESS THE REQUESTS. AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING, COA INSTITUTE PREVAILED AND THE IRS IS CONDUCTING A SEARCH FOR RESPONSIVE RECORDS. CAUSE OF ACTION INST. V. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE COA INSTITUTE CURRENTLY HAS TWO LAWSUITS SEEKING ACCESS UNDER THE FOIA TO THE SECRETARIAL REPORTS CREATED BY THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE IN SUPPORT OF IMPOSING TARIFFS UNDER SECTION 232 ON AUTOMOBILES AND URANIUM. DESPITE A STATUTORY REQUIREMENT IN SECTION 232 THAT THE ADMINISTRATION PUBLISH SUCH REPORTS IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER, THE AGENCY REFUSES TO DO SO. THE CASES HAVE SPAWNED SIGNIFICANT INTEREST FROM MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND AN OPINION FROM THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL. AMICUS IN ADDITION TO LITIGATING THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED CASES, COA INSTITUE FILED AMICUS BRIEFS BETWEEN JULY 1, 2018 AND JUNE 30, 2019 IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION V. COMBS, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER AGENCIES ARE DELEGATED AUTHORITY BY STATUTORY SILENCE SUCH THAT ACTIONS WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION RECEIVE CHEVRON DEFERENCE. ALLAH V. MILLING, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER QUALIFIED IMMUNITY DENIES JUSTICE TO VICTIMS OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL MISCONDUCT. FCA US LLC V. FLYNN, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER LITIGATION BASED ON SPECULATIVE HARM WILL UNDERMINE CYBERSECURITY IN IOT AND STIFLE INNOVATION. TIMBS V. INDIANA, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT IS ENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE STATES. INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE V. REILLY, GEORGIA SUPREME COURT., WHETHER THE GEORGIA GEN. ASSEMBLY IS COVERED BY THE OPEN RECORDS ACT. MCDONOUGH V. SMITH, CERT STAGE, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR A SECTION 1983 CLAIM BASED ON FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEGINS TO RUN WHEN THOSE PROCEEDINGS TERMINATE IN THE DEFENDANT'S FAVOR OR WHEN THE DEFENDANT BECOMES AWARE OF THE TAINTED EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPROPER USE. KISOR V. WILKIE, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD OVERRULE AUER V. ROBBINS AND BOWLES V. SEMINOLE ROCK, WHICH DIRECT COURTS TO DEFER TO AN AGENCY'S REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF ITS OWN AMBIGUOUS REGULATION. MCDONOUGH V. SMITH, MERITS STAGE, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHETHER THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR A SECTION 1983 CLAIM BASED ON FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEGINS TO RUN WHEN THOSE PROCEEDINGS TERMINATE IN THE DEFENDANT'S FAVOR OR WHEN THE DEFENDANT BECOMES AWARE OF THE TAINTED EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPROPER USE. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, NINTH CIRCUIT., WHETHER THE FTC EXCEEDED THE SCOPE OF ITS REMEDIAL AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 13(B). FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE V. ARGUS LEADER, U.S. SUPREME COURT., WHAT IS THE PROPER SCOPE OF THE TERM "CONFIDENTIAL" IN EXEMPTION 4 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT? ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA, U.S. SUPREME COURT, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION., DO CALIFORNIA'S EXTRATERRITORIAL ASSESSMENTS AND SEIZURES VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, COMMERCE CLAUSE, OR FOURTH AMENDMENT? COCHRAN V. SEC, FIFTH CIRCUIT., IS SECTION 25 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 A JURISDICTION-STRIPPING STATUTE THAT PREVENTS FEDERAL COURTS FROM REVIEWING CHALLENGES TO AGENCY ACTION AS A FEDERAL QUESTION UNDER SECTION 1331? COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE V. MICHAEL MANN, U.S. SUPREME COURT, ON BEHALF OF DR. JUDITH CURRY., WHETHER THE FIRST AMENDMENT PERMITS DEFAMATION LIABILITY FOR SUBJECTIVE COMMENTARY ON TRUE FACTS CONCERNING A MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN. CIC SERVICES V. IRS, SIXTH CIRCUIT., WHETHER THE ANTI-INJUNCTION ACT PREVENTS SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION TO REVIEW AN IRS RULEMAKING. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | AN INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRM PREPARED AND REVIEWED THE FORM 990. A FULL DRAFT OF THE 990 ALONG WITH ALL REQUIRED SCHEDULES IS THEN PROVIDED TO INTERNAL MANAGEMENT FOR REVIEW. ALL QUESTIONS ARE ADDRESSED AND ANY MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE, IF NECESSARY. THE FINAL FORM 990 ALONG WITH ALL REQUIRED SCHEDULES IS THEN PROVIDED TO THE BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | THE BOARD IS COVERED BY A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND, AS NECESSARY, THE BOARD AND LEGAL COUNSEL MAY MEET PERIODICALLY TO DISCUSS THE POLICY AND ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15A & 15B | & SCHEDULE J, PART III SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION THE ORGANIZATION PREVIOUSLY ENGAGED A HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING ORGANIZATION TO PERFORM A COMPENSATION STUDY PURSUANT TO THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION RULES OF SECTION 4958. THE CONSULTING ORGANIZATION USED DATA FROM, AMONG OTHER THINGS, COMPARABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TO HELP ESTABLISH A REASONABLE COMPENSATION RANGE FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO MIGHT BE CONSIDERED DISQUALIFIED PERSONS. BECAUSE SUCH PERSONS' COMPENSATION LEVELS HAVE NOT MATERIALLY CHANGED, THE ORGANIZATION DETERMINED IT WAS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE ORGANIZATION NOT TO INCUR ADDITIONAL COSTS TO HAVE ANOTHER COMPENSATION STUDY PERFORMED DURING ITS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ALL REQUIRED DISCLOSURES AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UNDER IRS REGULATIONS. |
| FORM 990, PART VII, SECTION A | David Williams was compensated on IRS Form 1099-MISC for independent contractor consulting services performed on behalf the Organization pursuant to a written contract. |
| FORM 990, PART VII, SECTION B, LINE 1 | THREE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR NAMES AND ADDRESSES ARE OMITTED FROM PART VII, SECTION B, QUESTION 1, WHICH ASKS FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ORGANIZATION'S FIVE HIGHEST PAID INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. SUCH NAMES AND ADDRESSES ARE OMITTED PER THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE. THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT PAID TO THE THREE SERVICE PROVIDERS HAVE BEEN AGGREGATED FOR SIMILAR PURPOSES. ALL SERVICES WERE PROVIDED TO ADVANCE THE ORGANIZATION'S MISSION AND PROGRAMMATIC ACTIVITIES AND ALL SERVICES WERE PROVIDED ON ARM'S LENGTH TERMS. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |