Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2015 | (b) 2016 | (c) 2017 | (d) 2018 | (e) 2019 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 4,513,699 | 4,032,516 | 3,757,484 | 3,415,317 | 3,765,340 | 19,484,356 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 4,513,699 | 4,032,516 | 3,757,484 | 3,415,317 | 3,765,340 | 19,484,356 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 1,622,556 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 17,861,800 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2015 | (b) 2016 | (c) 2017 | (d) 2018 | (e) 2019 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 4,513,699 | 4,032,516 | 3,757,484 | 3,415,317 | 3,765,340 | 19,484,356 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 148 | 323 | 356 | 55 | 846 | 1,728 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 785 | 1,054 | 1,577 | 3,069 | 2,312 | 8,797 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 19,494,881 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2015 | (b) 2016 | (c) 2017 | (d) 2018 | (e) 2019 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2015 | (b) 2016 | (c) 2017 | (d) 2018 | (e) 2019 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by .035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | ||
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
||
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | ||
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | ||
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) | ||
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | ||
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | ||
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
||
| 9 Distributable amount for 2019 from Section C, line 6 | ||
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | ||
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2019 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2019 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2019 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2019 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2019: | ||||
| a From 2014....... | ||||
| b From 2015....... | ||||
| c From 2016....... | ||||
| d From 2017....... | ||||
| e From 2018....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2019 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2014 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2019 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2019 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2019, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2019. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2020. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2015..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2016..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990. PART III, LINE 1. | RIVERKEEPER'S MISSION IS TO PROTECT THE ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF THE HUDSON RIVER, AND ITS TRIBUTARIES, AND TO SAFEGUARD THE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY OF NEW YORK CITY AND THE LOWER HUDSON VALLEY. THROUGH BOAT PATROLS, STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS, THOUSANDS OF ACTIVIST MEMBERS AND A RESPECTED LEGAL STAFF, RIVERKEEPER IS RESTORING THE HUDSON RIVER AND KEEPING CONTAMINANTS OUT OF THE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY OF 9 MILLION NEW YORKERS. RIVERKEEPER HAS HELPED TO ESTABLISH GLOBALLY RECOGNIZED STANDARDS FOR WATERSHED PROTECTION, AND SERVE AS THE MODEL AND MENTOR FOR THE GROWING WATERKEEPER MOVEMENT THAT INCLUDE MORE THAN 260 KEEPER PROGRAMS ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND AROUND THE GLOBE. RIVERKEEPER, FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS IS NEW YORK'S LEADING CLEAN WATER ADVOCATE. |
| PART III - LINE 4A | RIVERKEEPER LEGAL PROGRAM SUMMARY: RIVERKEEPER'S MISSION IS TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL, RECREATIONAL AND COMMERCIAL INTEGRITY OF THE HUDSON RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES, AND TO SAFEGUARD THE DRINKING WATER OF NINE MILLION NEW YORK CITY AND HUDSON VALLEY RESIDENTS. THE LEGAL PROGRAM ACHIEVES THESE THOUGH LITIGATION, COMMENTS ON AGENCY ACTIONS, AND ADVOCACY. LEGAL PROGRAM STAFF CURRENT INCLUDES THREE ATTORNEYS, ONE SCIENTIST, TWO OUTREACH COORDINATORS, AND A PARA-LEGAL. THESE STAFF CO-OPERATE WITH OTHER RIVERKEEPER PROGRAMS AS NEEDED TO BEST ACHIEVE OUR SHARED GOALS. CURRENT LITIGATION AND ADVOCACY CAMPAIGNS CONCERN THE NEED TO: I) FURTHER CLEAN UP THE HUDSON AS A RESULT OF PCB POLLUTION FROM GENERAL ELECTRIC; II) CLOSE THE INDIAN POINT 3 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AND THEN SAFELY DECOMMISSION ALL THREE REACTORS; III) PROVIDE SAFE RENEWABLE POWER TO REPLACE THAT CURRENTLY GENERATED BY INDIAN POINT AND FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; IV) REDUCE COMBINED SEWAGE OVERFLOW AND STORMWATER POLLUTION THROUGHOUT THE WATERSHED; V) IMPROVE THE PROTECTION FOR NEW YORK CITY'S DRINKING WATER; VI) ELIMINATE THE MOVEMENT OF CRUDE OIL ON THE HUDSON AND REDUCE THE MOVEMENT OF REFINED PRODUCT; VII) PREVENT AND REMOVE TOXICS FROM DRINKING WATER; VIII) PREVENT THE SITING OF NEW POLLUTING FACILITIES THAT WOULD DISCHARGE TO THE HUDSON OR ITS TRIBUTARIES OR ADD TO CLIMATE CHANGE; IX) PROVIDE A POSITIVE COMMUNITY VISION FOR SUPERFUND CLEAN UPS. THE LEGAL PROGRAM PROVIDES WIDE RANGING SUPPORT TO OTHER RIVERKEEPER PROGRAMS TO ADVANCE THE OBJECTIVES OF THESE CAMPAIGNS. OUR WORK CONTINUES TO DEVELOP AS NEW ISSUES EMERGE, BUR BROADLY WE ARE DEDICATED TO CLEANING UP PAST POLLUTION AND ENSURING THAT NEW SOURCES OF POLLUTION ARE PREVENTED FROM FURTHER CONTAMINATING THE HUDSON. IN 2020 MAJOR VICTORIES INCLUDED: I) CLOSURE OF INDIAN POINT 2; II) DEFEATING THE PROPOSED STORM BARRIERS IN THE HUDSON RIVER; III) ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENT FOR POLLUTING FACILITIES TO HAVE STORMWATER PERMITS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PERMITS; AND IV) INDUCING DEC TO REJECT A PROPOSED WASTE FACILITY IN TROY, NY AND CAUSING AN APPLICANT TO SIGNIFICANTLY SCALE BACK A PROPOSED WASTE IN STONY POINT, NY, BOTH OF WHICH COULD HAVE CAUSED POLLUTION TO THE HUDSON; V) WINNING LITIGATION THAT IMPROVED THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER |
| PART III - LINE 4B | FY2018 (JULY 1 2019-JUNE 30, 2020) RIVERKEEPER'S WATER QUALITY PROGRAM FOCUSES ON COORDINATING COMMUNITY SCIENCE TO GATHER WATER QUALITY DATA FROM THE HUDSON RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES, ENGAGING GRASSROOTS AND COMMUNITY-LEVEL PARTNERS IN THE PROTECTION OF WATER RESOURCES, ADVOCATING FOR POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS LOCALLY AND STATEWIDE, AND ADVOCATING FOR PROTECTING WATER - PARTICULARLY DRINKING WATER - AT ITS SOURCE THROUGH EFFECTIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT. WHILE NOT EXHAUSTIVE, THESE ACCOMPLISHMENTS DEMONSTRATE SOME OF THE IMPACT OF OUR WORK IN THIS FISCAL YEAR: WATER QUALITY MONITORING: GATHERED ROUGHLY 3,000 WATER SAMPLES FROM MORE THAN 440 LOCATIONS, WORKING WITH MORE THAN 180 INDIVIDUALS AND MORE THAN 75 PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS. MOST DATA IS REPORTED VIA AN INTERACTIVE MAP AT RIVERKEEPER.ORG,AND/OR COMPILED IN REPORTS. THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES GATHERED WAS FEWER IN SPRING 2020 DUE TO THE PANDEMIC, AND WE WORKED WITH PARTNERS TO DEVELOP SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR COMMUNITY SCIENCE THAT INFORMED DECISIONS TO SAFELY RESUME PROJECTS ACROSS OUR REGION. SUPPORTING SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: WE LAUNCHED A COLLABORATION WITH COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCHER KARTIK CHANDRAN TO MEASURE VIRUSES, INCLUDING SARS-COV-2, IN A STRETCH OF THE HUDSON RIVER IMPACTED BY COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS, AND SUPPORTED A YALE UNIVERSITY RESEARCHER, DAVID RAYMOND, IN GATHERING SAMPLES NEAR NEW YORK CITY THAT WILL BE ANALYZED FOR THE PRESENCE OF THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS. RESEARCH WE ASSISTED WITH WAS PUBLISHED IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE ON THE TOPICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SEWAGE OVERFLOWS IN THE HUDSON RIVER AND NEW YORK HARBOR (QUEENS COLLEGE), AND ON THE USE OF GENETIC MARKERS TO TRACK SOURCES OF FECAL CONTAMINATION IN HUDSON RIVER TRIBUTARIES (CORNELL UNIVERSITY). WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE: TO SUPPORT LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AND LOCAL AWARENESS, WE BUILT A DATABASE AND CREATED REPORTS ON NEEDED WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS IN EACH WATERSHED AND IN EACH SENATE AND ASSEMBLY DISTRICT IN THE AREAS WHERE OUR WORK IS FOCUSED. WE ALSO SUPPORT LOCAL APPLICATIONS FOR WASTEWATER INVESTMENTS THAT WILL IMPROVE WATER QUALITY. STATEWIDE WATER QUALITY POLICIES: WE ADVOCATED FOR THE ADOPTION OF DRINKING WATER STANDARDS FOR PFOA AND PFOS, TWO CHEMICALS FOUND IN DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES IN OUR REGION. WE ADVOCATED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATIONS THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THE DRUG TAKE BACK ACT, WHICH WILL EXPAND TAKEBACK OPTIONS FOR UNUSED MEDICATIONS AT PHARMACIES, AND SHIFT THE COST OF PROGRAMS TO THE INDUSTRY, RATHER THAN THE TAXPAYER. WE ADVOCATED FOR LEGISLATION THAT WOULD BETTER PROTECT CLASS C STREAMS AND SMALL WETLANDS IN NEW YORK STATE. WE ADVOCATED FOR THE ADOPTION OF UPDATED NUTRIENT WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR STATE WATERWAYS. WATERWAY-SPECIFIC RESTORATION PLANS: WE SERVE ON THE STATE'S MOHAWK BASIN PROGRAM STEERING COMMITTEE, WHICH DRAFTED A REVISED 5-YEAR ACTION AGENDA, INCLUDING A CLEAN WATER PLAN AND SOURCE WATER PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE RIVER. WE PARTICIPATED IN DRAFTING OF THE NEXT 10-YEAR HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY ACTION AGENDA. WE ADVOCATED FOR THE STATE TO ADVANCE A CLEAN WATER PLAN FOR THE WALLKILL RIVER. WE DESIGNED SAMPLING PLANS, TRAINED PARTNERS AND/OR GATHERED DATA FROM THE WALLKILL RIVER, SAW MILL RIVER AND SPARKILL CREEK WATERSHEDS TO UPDATE OFFICIAL STATE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS THAT PRECEDE AND CATALYZE CLEAN WATER PLANS. WATERWAY-SPECIFIC ADVOCACY: WHERE WE HAVE INVESTED IN DATA COLLECTION AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZING, WE ADVOCATE FOR OR AGAINST SPECIFIC PROJECTS, INCLUDING SUPPORT OF COMMUNITIES SEEKING GRANTS FOR WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS OR WATERSHED PLANNING; AND ADVOCACY TO REDUCE THE IMPACTS OF HYDROELECTRIC DAMS, INCLUDING SEVERAL WALLKILL RIVER AND MOHAWK RIVER PROJECTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING: WE COLLABORATE WITH WATERSHED GROUPS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE FOCUSED ON THE WALLKILL RIVER, RONDOUT CREEK, SPARKILL CREEK AND MOHAWK RIVER; COMMUNITY GROUPS LIKE NEWBURGH CLEAN WATER PROJECT, KEEP IT GREENE AND A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP; AND AD-HOC AND GOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEES LIKE THE NEW PALTZ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMISSION. WE SERVE ON THE BOARD OF THE HUDSON RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE, AND CHAIR THE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE, AND ACT IN A LEADERSHIP ROLE WITH THE LOWER HUDSON URBAN WATERS COLLABORATIVE. WITH THESE PARTNERSHIPS, WE CONDUCT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECTS TO ANSWER LOCAL QUESTIONS, SUCH AS IN HIGH FALLS AND NEW PALTZ; ADVANCE WATER PROTECTIONS SUCH AS SEWER LEAK INVESTIGATIONS IN SPARKILL CREEK AND WATERSHED AWARENESS IN RONDOUT AND WALLKILL RIVER WATERSHEDS; HELP COMMUNITIES UNDERSTAND AND USE LEGAL PROCESSES TO OPPOSE DAMAGING PROPOSALS, SUCH AS THE BIOHIGHTECH FACILITY PROPOSED IN RENSSELAER AND THE PECKHAM CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DUMP PROPOSED IN CATSKILL; ASSIST WITH STRATEGIC PLANNING, INCLUDING FOR OUR LOCAL PARTNERS WORKING IN THE WALLKILL AND IN NEWBURGH; AND/OR ADVANCE SOURCE WATER RESTORATION GOALS, SUCH AS ASSISTING THE COMMUNITY EFFECTIVELY MAKE USE OF THE STEWART AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE RESTORATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ADVOCATED FOR DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION: WE ADVOCATE FOR THE ROLLOUT OF THE STATE DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION PROGRAM, WHICH WE HELPED SHAPE AS AN ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER. WE COORDINATE DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION PLANNING EFFORTS WITH BOTH THE HUDSON 7 COMMUNITIES THAT DRAW DRINKING WATER FROM THE HUDSON RIVER, AND THE CITY OF NEWBURGH. FOR THE HUDSON 7, AMONG OTHER INITIATIVES, WE ADVOCATED TO IMPROVE THE REMEDIATION PLAN FOR A LARGE ARE OF COAL TAR POLLUTION IN POUGHKEEPSIE, TO ENSURE THE CLEANUP IS COMPREHENSIVE AND WON'T IMPERIL DRINKING WATER INTAKES, AND WE WORKED WITH COAST GUARD AND DEC STAFF TO BEGIN TO IMPROVE SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLANNING. FOR NEWBURGH, WE DRAFTED A SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS UTILIZING OUR DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION SCORECARD, COMPLETED A WATER SAMPLING PROJECT TO HELP DEFINE NUTRIENT INPUTS THAT AFFECT THE QUALITY OF THE CITY'S BROWNS POND RESERVOIR AND HELPED ENSURE THAT STATE AND COUNTY COMMITMENTS TO SOURCE WATER PROTECTION ARE MET. WE CONTINUED TO DEVELOP A CAMPAIGN WITH THE GOAL OF GETTING THE STATE TO COMMIT TO UPDATING WATERSHED RULES AND REGULATIONS TO PROTECT DRINKING WATER SOURCES FOR COMMUNITIES STATEWIDE. WATER JUSTICE: WE HAVE BEGUN TO DEVELOP PROJECTS TO ADVANCE PAIRED SOCIAL JUSTICE AND WATER QUALITY GOALS, INCLUDING ADVOCATING FOR UPDATING DEC'S ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICY TO INCLUDE DRINKING WATER SOURCES FOR IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AREAS; AND LAUNCHING THE WATER JUSTICE LAB, A PROJECT IN COLLABORATION WITH THE MEDIA SANCTUARY IN TROY THAT WILL TRAIN YOUTH IN BOTH AUDIO STORYTELLING ABOUT WATER JUSTICE ISSUES AND WATER QUALITY LAB WORK. WE ALSO HAVE SUPPORTED THE NEW YORK STATE NAACP'S NEW EFFORT TO PROMOTE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICE VIA ITS LOCAL BRANCHES. |
| PART III - LINE 4C | RIVERKEEPER'S PATROL BOAT "R. IAN FLETCHER" MAINTAINS A NEAR CONSTANT PRESENCE ON THE HUDSON RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES BETWEEN MARCH AND NOVEMBER EACH YEAR, PATROLLING NY HARBOR, THE HUDSON ESTUARY, THE MOHAWK AND UPPER HUDSON EACH MONTH AND LOGGING BETWEEN 5,000 AND 6,000 MILES. THE VESSEL HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO ENABLE IT TO BEST SERVE ITS MISSION AS A POLLUTION WATCHDOG MONITOR, A PLATFORM FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND AN AMBASSADOR FOR THE RIVER. WHILE CONDUCTING REGULAR POLLUTION AND SAMPLING PATROLS WE ALSO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR SCIENTIFIC STUDIES THAT ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF THE HUDSON'S ECOSYSTEM, SUPPORT RIVERKEEPER'S WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM AND BRING LOCAL, FEDERAL AND REGIONAL DECISION-MAKERS, ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, ACADEMICS, THE MEDIA, AND COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS OUT TO GAIN A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE WATER. ON THESE TRIPS, CAPTAIN LIPSCOMB SHARES HIS DEEP KNOWLEDGE OF THE RIVER -- ITS WILDLIFE, CRITICAL HABITAT ZONES, POLLUTION SOURCES AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUES. THE BOAT PROGRAM IS CRITICAL TO RIVERKEEPER'S WORK AND ITS ROLE IS UNIQUE ON THE HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY. IN 2016, WE COMMISSIONED AND LAUNCHED A SECOND VESSEL, A 20' OUTBOARD. THIS VESSEL NOT ONLY ALLOWS US TO RESPOND SWIFTLY TO EMERGENCIES BUT ALSO ENABLES US TO WORK IN HARD TO ACCESS AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHICH THE LARGER FLETCHER CANNOT REACH DUE TO HEIGHT OR DRAFT RESTRICTIONS. BOAT PROGRAM ALSO INCLUDES RIVERKEEPER'S RESTORATION COORDINATOR, A STAFF POSITION DEDICATED TO WORK ON BARRIER REMOVAL AND NUMEROUS OTHER FISH, WILDLIFE AND HABITAT RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE CENTRAL TO RIVERKEEPER'S MISSION. SOME OF OUR WORK IN FISCAL YEAR 2020 INCLUDES: OUR PATROLS ARE A PLATFORM TO IDENTIFY AND ENFORCE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW VIOLATIONS AND AS A DETERRENT TO WOULD-BE POLLUTERS. OUR PATROLS IN FISCAL YEAR '20 COVERED 6,000 MILES, HELPED US IDENTIFY ENFORCEMENT AND ADVOCACY OPPORTUNITIES AND COLLECT MORE THAN 1,600 WATER QUALITY SAMPLES ON BEHALF OF THE WATER QUALITY PROGRAM TAKEN BY BOAT IN THE HUDSON ESTUARY, MOHAWK RIVER AND UPPER HUDSON... FROM THESE BOAT SAMPLES, WE MADE NEARLY 22,000 MEASURES OF WATER QUALITY (MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS OF ALL MEASURES MADE). FURTHER WORK INTENDED TO DRIVE POLICY/PLANNING/REGULATION INCLUDED HELPING TO ORGANIZE A REGIONAL COALITION OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS FROM SEVEN MUNICIPALITIES ALONG THE HUDSON THAT RELY ON THE RIVER TO SUPPLY DRINKING WATER TO MORE THAN 100,000 RESIDENTS. THROUGH OUR PARTNERSHIPS IN THE AREA'S OFFICIAL FEDERAL AND STATE SPILL RESPONSE COMMITTEES (US COAST GUARD AREA COMMITTEE AND EPA-CHAIRED REGIONAL RESPONSE COMMITTEE) WE POSITIONED THE "HUDSON 7" TO HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE AT THESE MEETINGS WHERE IMPORTANT DECISIONS REGARDING OUR PREPAREDNESS TO PROTECT THE HUDSON FROM A CATASTROPHIC SPILL ARE DECIDED. IT WAS THE FIRST THAT THOUSANDS OF MEMBERS OF THE HUDSON VALLEY'S PUBLIC WERE REPRESENTED AS PARTICIPANTS ALONGSIDE THEIR STATE AND FEDERAL COUNTERPARTS TO LOBBY FOR BETTER PREPAREDNESS, FUNDING AND STRATEGIES TO PROTECT THE ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM AND THE PUBLIC DRINKING WATER SUPPLY FROM A SPILL. THIS, ALONG WITH OUR SUCCESSFUL EFFORTS IN RECENT YEARS TO AMEND THE US COAST GUARD'S WORST CASE SPILL SCENARIO TO INVOLVE A VESSEL COLLISION OUTSIDE OF NY HARBOR -- SHIFTING THE FOCUS INSTEAD TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 100 MILES UPRIVER NEAR KINGSTON-- HAS RESULTED IN A FOCUS ON THE PART OF THE COAST GUARD TO UNDERSTAND THE COMMUNITIES NEEDS UPRIVER AND HAS RESULTED IN THE PLANNING OF A BROAD BASED SPILL RESPONSE EXERCISE. WE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH RESEARCHERS FROM LAMONT DOHERTY TO COLLECT AND ANALYZE MICROPLASTICS IN NY HARBOR IN ORDER TO STUDY THE SPECIFIC HEALTH IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR SUSPECTED ROLE AS A VECTOR FOR PATHOGENS. WE THINK THIS RESEARCH HAS THE POTENTIAL TO DRIVE REGULATORY CHANGES AIMED TO REDUCE MICROPLASTICS POLLUTION IN THE NATION'S WATERS. CAPT. JOHN LIPSCOMB IS A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE HUDSON RIVER SAFETY COMMITTEE, AN ADVISORY BODY INCLUDING REPRESENTATIVES FROM INDUSTRY, RECREATION, CONSERVATION AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS FORMED AFTER OUR PARTICIPATION IN THE COAST GUARD'S PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY ASSESSMENT, WHICH WAS TRIGGERED BY RIVERKEEPER'S LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY ON A PROPOSAL BY INDUSTRY TO DESIGNATE 43 NEW ANCHORAGE GROUNDS ON THE HUDSON (A REQUEST SUSPENDED INDEFINITELY AS A RESULT OF OUR ADVOCACY). OUR WATCHDOG FUNCTION HAS COMMUNICATED WITH HUNDREDS OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, HELPING TO REPORT AND RESOLVE NUMEROUS OBSERVED CONDITIONS AFFECTING WATER QUALITY IN THE HUDSON AND ITS TRIBUTARIES. RESTORING BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY AND IMPROVING HABITAT THROUGHOUT FY 2020, RIVERKEEPER'S DAM REMOVAL PROGRAM HAS BEEN BUSY WITH A VARIETY OF ENDEAVORS THAT ALL FALL UNDER THE MANTLE OF DAM REMOVAL AND HABITAT AND SPECIES PROTECTION. MUCH OF THE USUAL FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION WITH DAM OWNERS WAS PUT ON HOLD AS THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE COVID CRISIS INCREASED. HOWEVER, THE SURVEYING OF NEW CREEKS AND DAMS ACCOUNTED FOR APPROXIMATELY THIRTY PERCENT OF THIS EFFORT. DR. GEORGE JACKMAN SURVEYED THE FOLLOWING DAMS/CREEKS AND DISCUSSED DAM REMOVAL/HABITAT RESTORATION WITH PROPERTY OWNERS: HOLLOW BROOK DAM, CEDAR POND BROOK, MCKINNEY POND DAM, BARRIER #1 ON FURNACE BROOK, MAIDEN LANE DAM ON FURNACE BROOK, PELHAM DAM ON THE HUTCHINSON RIVER (EVEN THOUGH IT IS OUT OF THE WATERSHED), LOWER AND UPPER MINKEL DAM IN NEW CASTLE, STROOKS FELT DAM ON THE QUASSAICK CREEK, STONY POINT DAM ON THE ON CEDAR POND BROOK, FIRTHCLIFF DAM, ORRS MILL DAM, AND THE SEWER TRUNK LINE ON THE MOODNA CREEK, UN-NAMED DAMS ON SPROUT BROOK, SPARKILL CREEK, QUASSAICK CREEK. IN ADDITION, JACKMAN HAS DONE OUTREACH TO THE NEW OWNERS OF THE KENDALL DAM ON MILL CREEK IN RENSSELAER. HE HAS ALSO WORKED TO CLEAR THE WAY TO REMOVE THE MT IDA AND RAIL JOINT DAMS IN TROY. IN SUPPORT OF THESE INITIATIVES, HE HAS CONDUCTED RADIO AND PODCAST INTERVIEWS ADVOCATING FOR THE REMOVAL OF MT. IDA DAM AND WROTE A LETTER TO THE CITY OF TROY'S MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL URGING THEM TO CONSIDER THE REMOVAL OF THE DAM TO BENEFIT THE FISHES AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITY. HTTPS://WWW.MEDIASANCTUARY.ORG/PODCASTS/RIVERKEEPER-GEORGE-JACKMAN-ON-DA MS/ DR. JACKMAN HAS ALSO BEEN ENGAGED IN THE ONGOING PERMITTING PROCESS FOR BOTH FURNACE BROOK AND QUASSAICK CREEK DAMS. TO FURTHER THE REMOVAL PROCESS, IN MANY CASES WE ALSO NEED TO FACILITATE AGREEMENTS AND MEETINGS BETWEEN ENGINEERS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AND MUNICIPALITIES. WE HAVE JUST RECEIVED THE NYSDEC PERMIT TO REMOVE THE STROOKS FELT DAM. THIS REPRESENTS THE FIRST DAM REMOVAL PERMIT EVER ISSUED IN THE HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY. IN ADDITION, DR. JACKMAN IS SOUGHT FOR HIS SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE IN SUCH MATTERS, INCLUDING SAMPLING FOR AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES AND SURVEYING CREEKS WHERE DAM REMOVAL WILL OCCUR. JACKMAN IS CURRENTLY SERVING ON THE HUDSON RIVER PARK ESTUARINE SANCTUARY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE HUDSON RIVER BIOLOGICAL SURVEY SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE. WITH REGARD TO HABITAT RESTORATION AND SPECIES PROTECTION WE HAVE BEEN ACTIVE AND SUCCESSFUL. WE CONTINUED TO BLOG ABOUT THE DECLINE OF THE MIGRATORY SPECIES IN THE HUDSON RIVER. WE HAVE ALSO WRITTEN COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE RELICENSING OF TWO FERC HYDROPOWER DAMS ON THE FISHKILL CREEK AND THE WALLKILL RIVER AND CONTINUE TO BE STRONG ADVOCATES FOR MITIGATING IMPACTS TO AMERICAN EELS IN BOTH CASES. WE URGED FERC AND NYPA TO TAKE RIGOROUS STUDY AND PROTECTIONS OF AMERICAN EELS AND BLUEBACK HERRING ON THE MOHAWK RIVER. IN ADDITION, WE ARE SEEKING PROTECTIONS OF AMERICAN EELS AT A FERC EXEMPT DAM ON THE POESTEN KILL WITH USFWS AND NYSDEC. ONE OF THE DAM/HABITAT RESTORATION PROGRAM'S LONG TERM GOALS IS TO CREATE ALLIANCES WITH OTHER GROUPS TO ADVANCE OUR MISSION. AS OF 2020 WE'VE SUCCESSFULLY PARTNERED WITH RENSSELAER LAND TRUST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, THREE CHAPTERS OF TROUT UNLIMITED, MEDIA SANCTUARY, MENHADEN COALITION, OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE AND CREATE STEWARDSHIP TO BUILD OFF THE SUCCESS WE HAD ON FURNACE BROOK LAST FALL. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 6 | MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN ORGANIZATION'S GOVERNANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING IN JUNE. THEY ELECT MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7A | AT EACH MEMBERSHIP ANNUAL MEETING THEREAFTER, A NUMBER OF DIRECTORS EQUAL TO THAT OF THOSE WHO TERMS HAVE EXPIRED WILL BE ELECTED BY A PLURALITY OF THE MEMBERS FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS AND THE EARLIEST OF THE ELECTION OR APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF SUCH DIRECTOR'S SUCCESSOR OR UNTIL SUCH DIRECTOR'S DEATH, RESIGNATION, OR REMOVAL. AT THE EXPIRATION OF ANY TERM OF THREE YEARS, ANY DIRECTOR MAY BE ELECTED. CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS WILL BE NOMINATED BY THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE. MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION WHO DESIRE TO NOMINATE A MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, IN ADDITION TO THOSE CANDIDATES PROPOSED BY THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE, MAY DO SO ON A PETITION SIGNED BY NOT LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED MEMBERS AND DELIVERED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION NOT LESS THAN SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS. NO MORE THAN ONE PETITION FOR ELECTION SHALL BE ACCEPTED AND THEREFORE, IF MORE THAN ONE PETITION IS SUBMITTED, THE SUBMISSION WITH THE GREATEST NUMBER OF SIGNATURES WILL APPLY; IN THE CASE OF A MORE THAN ONE PETITION WITH EQUAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURES, THE PETITION FIRST SUBMITTED WILL BE ACCEPTED. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | THE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND BOARD CHAIRMAN WILL REVIEW AND APPROVE THE FORM 990 PRIOR TO FILING. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | ON A YEARLY BASIS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEET TO COMPLETE A "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WHICH DOCUMENTS AND SIGNIFIES THAT NO CURRENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS BETWEEN THE BOARD MEMBERS AND OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS. AT EACH SUBSEQUENT MEETING, BEFORE ANY DECISIONS ARE MADE, IT IS CLARIFIED THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR ANYONE IN THE ROOM. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT, THAT PERSON WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE DECISION. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | RIVERKEEPER MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| FORM 990, PART IX, LINE 11G | OTHER PROFESSIONAL FEES: PROGRAM SERVICE EXPENSES 449,218. MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL EXPENSES 15,309. FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 35,421. TOTAL EXPENSES 499,948. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |