Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
0 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2016 | (b) 2017 | (c) 2018 | (d) 2019 | (e) 2020 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 2,907,383 | 2,949,940 | 4,035,727 | 3,624,010 | 13,517,060 | |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 2,907,383 | 2,949,940 | 4,035,727 | 3,624,010 | 13,517,060 | |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f).. | 6,545,559 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 6,971,501 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2016 | (b) 2017 | (c) 2018 | (d) 2019 | (e) 2020 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 2,907,383 | 2,949,940 | 4,035,727 | 3,624,010 | 13,517,060 | |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 16,324 | 16,324 | ||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 1,025 | 1,025 | ||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 13,534,409 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2016 | (b) 2017 | (c) 2018 | (d) 2019 | (e) 2020 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 0 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2016 | (b) 2017 | (c) 2018 | (d) 2019 | (e) 2020 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2020 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2020 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2020 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2020 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2019 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2020: | ||||
| a From 2015....... | ||||
| b From 2016....... | ||||
| c From 2017....... | ||||
| d From 2018....... | ||||
| e From 2019....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2020 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2015 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2020 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2020 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2020, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2020. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2021. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2016..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pt II Ln 10 | Other Income Part II, Line 10 Description: Other income 2020: 1025. |
| Software ID: | 20011577 |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pt VI, Line 7a | NCLA has three members who select the Board of Directors. Two of those members also serve on the Board of Directors. |
| Pt VI, Line 7b | The Board of Directors would need the agreement of the members to change the mission of the Organization. |
| Pt VI, Line 11b | The Executive Director and the Board review the Form 990, which is prepared by the Organization's outside CPAs. The Form 990 is filed after the Board gives its final approval. |
| Pt VI, Line 12c | The Organization requires officers and key employees to sign a document saying that they have read and will follow the conflict of interest policy. The conflict of interest policy is completed as part of the organization's annual audit. |
| Pt VI, Line 19 | The governing documents and financial statements are available to the public upon request. |
| Pt VI, Line 6 | The Organization has members, one of whom is not on the Board of Directors, who select the members of the governing body and fill vacancies. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Dr. Mukund Vengalattore v. Cornell University and the U.S. Department of Education-NCLA continued its suit in the Second Circuit against Cornell University and the Department of Education (USED) for discriminating against Dr. Mukund Vengalattore and depriving him of his right to due process. Our action will impact students and faculty across the country by re-enshrining due process in the university adjudication system and halting the unconstitutional Title IX guidance issued by USED. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Ral Mas Canosa v. City of Coral Gables and FL Depts. of State and Law Enforcement-NCLA continued its suit in the 11th Judicial Circuit in Miami-Dade County on behalf of Ral Mas Canosa because Coral Gables has collected, compiled, and stored sensitive license plate information without warrants and beyond reasonable time limits. This litigation will protect the public's right to privacy guaranteed in the Constitution of the State of Florida and the Constitution of the United States. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Barry D. Romeril v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission-NCLA continued its pursuit of relief for Barry Romeril in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in order to get his unconstitutional "gag" order removed. By defending Mr. Romeril, NCLA will be able to end the SEC's use of unconstitutional prior restraint on Americans' speech. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Raymond J. Lucia v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission-NCLA filed a complaint seeking declarative and injunctive relief to halt the SEC from compelling Ray Lucia to submit to a proceeding before an Administrative Law Judge who is unconstitutionally protected from removal. In standing with Mr. Lucia, NCLA stood with all Americans against unconstitutional appointments and procedures that threaten their civil liberties. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raymond J. Lucia-NCLA defended Ray Lucia in an administrative proceeding at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the ground that the administrative law judge (ALJ) tasked with deciding the case was unconstitutionally protected from removal. By defending Mr. Lucia, NCLA defended civil liberties such as fair court proceedings and due process afforded to all Americans in the Constitution. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: W. Clark Aposhian v. William Barr, et al.-NCLA continues to represent Clark Aposhian in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit against U.S. Attorney General William Barr, in his official capacity, DOJ, ATF, and the acting director of ATF, in his official capacity, for unilaterally rewriting a statute without authority from Congress. By defending Mr. Aposhian, NCLA will limit administrative agencies' ability to rewrite statutes that turn Americans into felons overnight absent Congressional approval. Having lost in D. Utah, the PI was pending in CA10. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Michelle Cochran v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission-NCLA filed a complaint against the SEC to halt Michelle Cochran from being compelled to submit to a proceeding before an unconstitutionally appointed and protected Administrative Law Judge. By defending Ms. Cochran, we are standing with all Americans against unconstitutional appointments and procedures that threaten their civil liberties. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michelle Cochran-NCLA is also defending Cochran in the related ALJ proceeding, but that proceeding has been stayed by CA5 for the time being. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Michael Cargill v. William Barr, U.S. Department of Justice, Thomas Brandon, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives-NCLA has filed a complaint in W.D.Tex. against Attorney General William Barr, in his official capacity, DOJ, ATF, and the acting director of ATF, in his official capacity, for unilaterally rewriting a statute without authority from Congress. By defending Mr. Cargill, NCLA will limit administrative agencies' ability to rewrite statutes that turn Americans into felons overnight absent Congressional approval. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., Island Capital Mgmt., Carl Dilley, Micah Eldred, and David Lopez-NCLA represented Spartan Securities and some of the firm's managers against the SEC, arguing the SEC sought to unlawfully enforce agency guidance against the investment firm. By defending Spartan, NCLA defended the right of all Americans to be bound by laws set out by elected legislators rather than administrative agencies that operate outside statutory authority. NCLA has not sought attorney's fees, but we will be recovering some litigation costs from the clients in this case. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Baldwin v. U.S.-NCLA filed a petition for certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Howard and Karen Baldwin in their complaint against the IRS for its refusal to issue the Baldwins' tax refund by relying on Brand X deference. NCLA tried to do away with Brand X deference to administrative agencies, which CA9 relied on to rule in favor of the IRS. NCLA wanted to secure the Baldwins' tax refund and restore due process for all Americans. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: R-CALF USA v. United States Department of Agriculture-NCLA filed a complaint against USDA for trying to create binding guidance without formal rulemaking on the topic of RFID ear tags for livestock. By filing this complaint on behalf of cattle ranchers, NCLA will stop the unconstitutional use of binding guidance by USDA and other agencies against Americans. NCLA also alleges that USDA violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act in the process of drafting the guidelines. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Phillip B. v. Gregory McKay and Arizona Department of Child Safety-NCLA has filed a complaint to limit the ability of the head of the Arizona Department of Child Safety to review ALJ decisions. By doing this, NCLA will protect due process rights from being disregarded by heads of administrative agencies. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Joel Fleming v. FDRLST Media, LLC-NCLA is representing The Federalist website co-founder Ben Domenech and FDRLST Media to insist that the NLRB limit its enforcement jurisdiction to the complaints of employees aggrieved by an allegedly unfair labor practice. By doing this NCLA will limit NLRB's proper scope of authority and defend the right to free speech from overzealous bureaucrats and agencies. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Law Offices of Crystal Moroney v. Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection-This case challenges the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. NCLA also contends that CFPB denied Ms. Moroney's right to due process. NCLA's lawsuit seeks to return the spending power to Congress and stop the CFPB from causing irreparable harm to Americans by denying due process. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Christopher Gibson v. Securities and Exchange Commission-NCLA filed a cert. petition in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Christopher Gibson in his complaint against the SEC to halt Mr. Gibson from being compelled to submit to a proceeding before an unconstitutionally appointed and protected Administrative Law Judge. By representing Mr. Gibson, NCLA stood with all Americans against unconstitutional appointments and procedures that threaten their civil liberties. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Lisa Milice v. Consumer Product Safety Commission-This case challenged the Consumer Product Safety Commission's rules that incorporate by reference a private company's safety standards behind a paywall, effectively charging Americans a fee to access the law. By representing Lisa Milice, NCLA stood with Americans seeking access to the law which belongs to the citizenry, not a private company or administrative agency. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Relentless Inc., et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, et al.-NCLA is challenging the Department of Commerce, NOAA's and NOAA Fisheries' effort to force fishing companies to pay for a new agency enforcement program through a mandate. By defending Relentless from the unlawful enforcement action, NCLA is standing with Americans who value due process. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Asphalt Specialty Company Inc. v. Laramie County Planning Commission-This case challenged Laramie County Planning Commission's unlawful decision to treat a mere "vision documentX like restrictive zoning rules. By bringing suit against the Commission, NCLA reinforced the idea that regulators cannot restrict people's conduct based on nonbinding guidance. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Kevin Gubbels v. U.S. Department of Agriculture-NCLA challenged the U.S. Department of Agriculture's efforts to suspend and debar Mr. Gubbels's participation in the federal crop insurance program through inappropriately delayed administrative adjudication that violated his due process rights. By standing with Mr. Gubbels, NCLA stood for the due process rights of all Americans who face unconstitutional administrative proceedings. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Dawn Desrosiers, et al. v. Charlie Baker-This case challenged Governor Baker's unlawful use of the Civil Defense Act to declare a state of emergency and unilaterally determine which businesses in Massachusetts were "essential" to stay open and which must close. By acting against Baker, NCLA defended the due process rights of Bay Staters and sought to put proper constitutional limits on Baker's actions in response to COVID-19. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Matthew Johnson v. Phil Murphy-This case challenges Governor Murphy's unlawful executive order that allows renters to use security deposits as a form of rent payment. By representing landlords in a challenge to the Governor's executive order, NCLA is defending the private contract and due process rights of New Jerseyans. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Carmen's Corner Store v. Small Business Administration, et al.-NCLA successfully challenged the Small Business Administration's restrictions on PPP loans that lacked statutory authority. By acting on behalf of Carmen's Corner Store, NCLA stood with small business owners across the country who had been barred from applying for PPP loans because of arbitrary SBA rules. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Movecorp, et al. v. Small Business Administration, et al.- NCLA successfully challenged the Small Business Administration's restrictions on PPP loans that lacked statutory authority. By acting on behalf of Movecorp, NCLA stood with small business owners across the country who had been barred from applying for PPP loans because of arbitrary SBA rules. NCLA is not charging fees and sought attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act unsuccessfully in this case. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Ali M. Taha v. U.S.-NCLA represents Mohamad Taha and Sanaa Taha in a case against the IRS for its refusal to issue a refund of overpaid taxes relying on Brand X deference. NCLA is trying to do away with Brand X deference to administrative agencies, which CA9 relied on to rule in favor of the IRS. NCLA wants to secure Mr. Taha's tax refund and restore due process for all Americans. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: James Harper v. Charles P. Rettig, et al.-NCLA represents Jim Harper in his case against the IRS, which issued an unwarranted demand for and seized Mr. Harper's cryptocurrency transaction data without his knowledge. NCLA took this case to protect the Fourth Amendment and due process rights of cryptocurrency holders across America. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, et al. v. Department of Commerce, et al.-NCLA is challenging the Department of Commerce, NOAA and NOAA Fisheries' effort to force fishing companies to pay for a new agency enforcement program and intrusive GPS monitoring through a regulatory mandate. By defending Mexican Gulf Fishing Company and other charter boat outfits from the unlawful mandate, NCLA is standing with Americans who value due process and the right to privacy. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Brown, Rondeau, Krausz, Jones and the National Apartment Association v. CDC-This case seeks to end CDC's unlawful eviction moratorium causing economic damages to rental property owners across the country. By standing with Americans like Rick Brown, NCLA protects all Americans' right to access the courts to obtain a writ of eviction to take possession of their own property by the only lawful means available to them to evict a delinquent tenant. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: KC Tenants v. Byrn-NCLA defended the authority of a local landlord-tenant court to remain open despite the CDC's eviction moratorium. By defending the authority of the court to remain open and hear complaints, NCLA protects all Americans' right to access state courts to retake possession of their own property by the only lawful means available to them. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Joel Fleming, et al. v. Daily Wire LLC-NCLA defended Ben Shapiro and his company, the Daily Wire from attempts to silences him from expressing his views on a topic of public interest. By defending Mr. Shapiro and the Daily Wire, NCLA protected all Americans' right to free speech and sought to put constitutional limits on the National Labor Relations Board's enforcement authority. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Marcus Broadway v. United States-This case challenged a district court's reflexive deference (Stinson deference) to commentary on the United States Sentencing Guidelines in determining Mr. Broadway's prison sentence. By representing Mr. Broadway in filing a cert. petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, NCLA sought to put an end to Stinson deference that has denied due process to so many. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Other | 990 page 2 part III line 4a: Charles Kravitz, et al. v. Phil Murphy-NCLA is challenging the Governor's Executive Order that rewrote lease agreements between private parties leasing and renting properties in New Jersey. By representing Mr. Kravitz, NCLA protects all Americans' due process and private contract rights from Administrative State intervention. NCLA is not charging fees and has not sought attorney's fees. |
| Software ID: | 20011577 |
| Software Version: |