Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 219,969,109 | 243,128,195 | 254,185,353 | 287,167,570 | 351,249,754 | 1,355,699,981 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 219,969,109 | 243,128,195 | 254,185,353 | 287,167,570 | 351,249,754 | 1,355,699,981 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 1,355,699,981 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 219,969,109 | 243,128,195 | 254,185,353 | 287,167,570 | 351,249,754 | 1,355,699,981 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 5,149,538 | 6,362,100 | 8,276,288 | 7,694,169 | 10,032,853 | 37,514,948 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 1,595,302 | 1,325,513 | 973,879 | 248,805 | 375,448 | 4,518,947 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 1,398,238,005 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2021 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2021 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2021: | ||||
| a From 2016....... | ||||
| b From 2017....... | ||||
| c From 2018....... | ||||
| d From 2019....... | ||||
| e From 2020....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2016 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2021 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2021, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2021. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2022. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| SCHEDULE A, PART II, LINE 10, EXPLANATION OF OTHER INCOME: | LIST RENTALS - 2017 AMOUNT: $ 311,653. 2018 AMOUNT: $ 341,899. 2019 AMOUNT: $ 254,737. 2020 AMOUNT: $ 243,805. 2021 AMOUNT: $ 369,386. FUNDRAISING INCOME - 2017 AMOUNT: $ 1,283,649. 2018 AMOUNT: $ 983,614. 2019 AMOUNT: $ 719,142. 2020 AMOUNT: $ 5,000. 2021 AMOUNT: $ 6,062. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| PART III, LINE 1: DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION MISSION | THE ASPCA'S MISSION, AS STATED BY FOUNDER HENRY BERGH IN 1866, IS "TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE MEANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES." THE ASPCA WAS FOUNDED ON THE BELIEF THAT ANIMALS ARE ENTITLED TO KIND AND RESPECTFUL TREATMENT AT THE HANDS OF HUMANS AND MUST BE PROTECTED UNDER THE LAW. ALL OF THE ASPCA'S SERVICES AND RESOURCES ARE FOCUSED ON INITIATIVES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO PREVENTING AND COMBATING ANIMAL CRUELTY ACROSS THE COUNTRY THROUGH THREE PRIMARY AREAS OF ACTION: SHELTER AND VETERINARY SERVICES; PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATIONS; AND POLICY, RESPONSE, AND ENGAGEMENT. WITHIN THESE AREAS OF ACTIVITY, THE ASPCA'S WORK SPANS A BROAD SPECTRUM IN SERVICE OF ITS MISSION TO PREVENT CRUELTY AND SUFFERING. THE CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF ANIMAL CRUELTY ARE COMPLEX, AND THE ASPCA'S WORK IS EXPANSIVE AND WIDE-RANGING ACROSS ALL OF THE ASPCA'S PROGRAMS TO MEET THESE MULTIFACETED CHALLENGES. THE ASPCA'S PROGRAMS TACKLE ISSUES FACING ANIMAL WELFARE ON A NATIONAL SCALE WITH OPERATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY UNDER A VISION THAT ANIMALS ARE VALUED BY SOCIETY, PROTECTED BY ITS LAWS, AND FREE FROM CRUELTY, PAIN, AND SUFFERING. THAT VISION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS ADDRESSING CRITICAL ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES INCLUDING ANIMAL HOMELESSNESS, ACCESS TO VETERINARY CARE, BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION, HUMANE LEGISLATION, RESCUE FROM ABUSIVE SITUATIONS, AND RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND OTHER MAJOR CRISES. THE ASPCA MAINTAINS A PHYSICAL PRESENCE IN LOCATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY INCLUDING IN NYC; MIAMI, FL; GAINESVILLE, FL; CHAMPAIGN, IL; LOS ANGELES, CA; WEAVERVILLE, NC; ASHEVILLE, NC; COLUMBUS, OH; WASHINGTON, DC; OKLAHOMA CITY, OK; OVERLAND PARK, KS; AND UNION, MO. AS AN ESTABLISHED NATIONAL ORGANIZATION WITH A BROAD PERSPECTIVE ON ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES, THE ASPCA INCREASES ITS IMPACT BY FILLING STRATEGIC AND GEOGRAPHIC VOIDS WHERE NECESSARY TO PREVENT ANIMAL SUFFERING. THE ORGANIZATION CAN QUICKLY MOBILIZE TEAMS AND RESOURCES IN SUPPORT OF REGIONAL EFFORTS IN A DISASTER LIKE A HURRICANE OR WILDFIRE. THE ASPCA COLLABORATES WITH LOCAL AND REGIONAL PEERS ON LARGE-SCALE RELOCATION OF HOMELESS ANIMALS, ASSISTS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AROUND THE COUNTRY WITH THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE IN ANIMAL CRUELTY CASES, AND TRAINS THOUSANDS OF ANIMAL WELFARE PROFESSIONALS AROUND THE COUNTRY ON HOW TO REHABILITATE SUFFERING ANIMALS TO GIVE THEM THE BEST CHANCE OF FINDING SAFE AND LOVING HOMES. THE ASPCA BENEFITS ANIMALS NATIONWIDE BY TACKLING SOME OF THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES FACING ANIMALS IN SOCIETY INCLUDING CHAMPIONING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LEGISLATION AND POLICIES THAT INCREASE LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR ANIMALS AND BY ADVANCING RESEARCH AND PROGRAMS TO HELP MAKE VETERINARY CARE MORE AFFORDABLE AND ACCESSIBLE TO ALL. SERVICES INCLUDING THE ASPCA'S BEHAVIOR REHABILITATION CENTER, LEARNING LAB, NATIONAL RELOCATION PROGRAM, AND SPAY/NEUTER ALLIANCE DISSEMINATE LIFESAVING VETERINARY RESEARCH, INSIGHT, AND TRAINING THROUGHOUT THE ANIMAL WELFARE FIELD, IMPACTING ANIMALS IN NEARLY EVERY STATE IN THE COUNTRY. THE ORGANIZATION ALSO WORKS ALONGSIDE HUNDREDS OF OTHER LOCAL ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS, RESCUE GROUPS, ANIMAL CONTROL, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS UNITED IN THE ASPCA'S ANTI-CRUELTY MISSION. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4C | FEDERAL EFFORTS 2022 APPROPRIATIONS BILLS WITH ASPCA SUPPORT, FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2022 APPROPRIATIONS BILLS TO FUND THE USDA AND THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT INCLUDED CRUCIAL PROTECTIONS FOR ANIMALS AND INCREASED FUNDING FOR IMPORTANT ANIMAL WELFARE PROGRAMS, SUCH AS MEASURES THAT PROTECT DOGS IN PUPPY MILLS, CURB EXTREME-SPEED SLAUGHTER AT CHICKEN SLAUGHTERHOUSES, END HORSE SLAUGHTER AND PREVENT HORSE CRUELTY, ADDRESS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE-RELATED ANIMAL ABUSE, SUPPORT FARMERS WHO USE HIGHER-WELFARE STANDARDS, AND FUND A SUSTAINABLE WILD HORSE AND BURRO MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT INCLUDES FERTILITY CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION, WHICH THE ASPCA STRONGLY SUPPORTS AS THE MOST HUMANE MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO PROTECTING WILD HORSES. ASPCA LAWSUIT AGAINST THE USDA ON JUNE 11, THE ASPCA LEGAL ADVOCACY & INVESTIGATIONS (LAI) TEAM FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) FOR ABANDONING ITS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENFORCE THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT (AWA)A FEDERAL LAW PASSED MORE THAN 50 YEARS AGO TO ENSURE HUMANE TREATMENT AND CARE OF COMMERCIALLY BRED DOGS. APPROXIMATELY 2,000 COMMERCIAL DOG BREEDERS AND DEALERS ARE LICENSED BY THE USDA AND HOUSE ROUGHLY 250,000 DOGS AND PUPPIES, MOST OF WHOM ARE SOLD AT PET STORES OR OVER THE INTERNET. BECAUSE THESE BUSINESSES ARE RARELY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, CONGRESS PREVIOUSLY DIRECTED THE USDA TO INSPECT THEIR FACILITIES TO ENSURE THEY PROVIDE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF CARE. DESPITE THIS CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE, THE USDA HAS ADOPTED POLICIES THAT ALLOW VIOLATIONS TO GO UNREPORTED AND UNPUNISHED. DESPITE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF CRUELTY, THE USDA HAS NOT IMPOSED A SINGLE PENALTY AGAINST A DOG DEALER SINCE 2017. AS A RESULT OF THESE POLICIES, THE NUMBER OF REPORTED VIOLATIONS HAS DECLINED SIGNIFICANTLY, GIVING BOTH THE PUBLIC AND LAWMAKERS THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT DEALERS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW. LAI'S LAWSUIT SEEKS TO COMPEL THE USDA TO RECORD ALL OBSERVED VIOLATIONS OF THE AWA AND END ITS POLICIES OF NON-ENFORCEMENT. SUPPORTING THE FARM SYSTEM REFORM ACT IN JULY 2021, THE ASPCA SUPPORTED THE REINTRODUCTION OF THE FARM SYSTEM REFORM ACT, FEDERAL LEGISLATION SPONSORED BY SEN. CORY BOOKER AND REP. RO KHANNA THAT WILL HELP CREATE A MORE HUMANE FOOD SYSTEM BY MOVING AWAY FROM DESTRUCTIVE SEVERE CONFINEMENT PRACTICES AND SUPPORTING FARMER TRANSITIONS TOWARD HIGHER WELFARE CONDITIONS. THE ASPCA HELPED SECURE ADDITIONAL SPONSORS FOR THIS LEGISLATION AND RAISED ITS PROFILE WITH DOZENS OF LETTERS TO EDITORS AND MEETINGS BETWEEN VOLUNTEERS AND REPRESENTATIVES. SUPPORTING THE SAFE ACT IN MAY 2021, THE ASPCA'S LONGSTANDING EFFORTS TO END HORSE SLAUGHTER ENABLED THE INTRODUCTION OF THE SAVE AMERICA'S FORGOTTEN EQUINES (SAFE) ACT IN THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY AND REP. VERN BUCHANAN. ASPCA STAFF ALSO WORKED CLOSELY WITH SENATORS ROB MENENDEZ AND SENATOR LINDSAY GRAHAM, WHO INTRODUCED A SENATE BAN ON HORSE SLAUGHTER. THE ASPCA HELPED BUILD STRONG COSPONSOR SUPPORT FOR THE LEGISLATION, WORKING WITH EQUINE INDUSTRY NETWORKS AND RESCUE ORGANIZATIONS AND PROVIDING CRITICAL NATIONAL DATA AND BACKGROUND RESEARCH TO DEMONSTRATE THE URGENCY AND JUSTIFICATION FOR PREVENTING HORSE SLAUGHTER. SUPPORTING GOLDIE'S ACT IN DECEMBER, FOLLOWING YEARS OF ASPCA LEADERSHIP AND BACKGROUND WORKING ON PUPPY MILL ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS, A BIPARTISAN GROUP OF FEDERAL LAWMAKERS INTRODUCED GOLDIE'S ACT, WHICH REQUIRES MEANINGFUL PENALTIES FOR ANIMAL WELFARE ACT VIOLATIONS UNCOVERED BY USDA INSPECTORS AND ENSURES THEY SHARE FINDINGS OF CRUELTY AND NEGLECT WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT. TURNING LESSONS FROM COVID-19 INTO STRONGER PROTECTIONS FOR ANIMALS IN MAY, THE ASPCA RELEASED THE REPORT "LESSONS LEARNED FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE ASPCA'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDRESSING IMPACTS ON ANIMALS THROUGH FEDERAL POLICY." THE REPORT SHARES THE ASPCA'S PERSPECTIVE ON HOW THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC HAS IMPACTED ANIMALS AND RECOMMENDS ACTIONS CONGRESS AND THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION CAN TAKE TO KEEP THESE VULNERABLE ANIMALS SAFE FROM SUFFERING AND ABUSE. SUCCESSFUL EFFORTS TO HAVE THE USDA REPOST CRITICAL INSPECTION REPORTS. IN 2020, AFTER LAWSUITS BY MULTIPLE ANIMAL WELFARE GROUPSINCLUDING TWO FILED BY THE ASPCAAND A LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS, THE USDA WAS FORCED TO REPOST THOUSANDS OF ANIMAL WELFARE INSPECTION REPORTS AND ENFORCEMENT RECORDS THAT THE AGENCY ABRUPTLY PURGED FROM ITS ONLINE DATABASE IN 2017. ON MARCH 25, 2022, IN RESPONSE TO AN ASPCA LAWSUIT, THE FEDERAL COURT IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOUND THAT THE USDA HAD UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD ANIMAL WELFARE RECORDS FROM THE ASPCA FOR SEVERAL YEARS. AS A RESULT OF THE COURT'S DECISION, THE ASPCA RECEIVED ACCESS TO THESE CRITICAL RECORDS ON JUNE 21. SUPPORTING REINTRODUCTION OF THE HEART ACT AND THE PREPARED ACT IN MARCH 2021, THE ASPCA SUPPORTED THE REINTRODUCTION OF THE HELP EXTRACT ANIMALS FROM RED TAPE (HEART) ACT, FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS OF CARING FOR ANIMAL VICTIMS SEIZED IN FEDERAL ANIMAL FIGHTING CASES. THE HEART ACT WILL PREVENT UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL DELAYS IN THE REHABILITATION OF THESE ANIMALS. IT WILL ALSO REQUIRE DEFENDANTS TO REIMBURSE THE COSTS OF CARING FOR ANIMALS SEIZED IN FEDERAL ANIMAL FIGHTING CASES FOLLOWING A FORFEITURE PROCEEDING. THE ASPCA ALSO SUPPORTED THE REINTRODUCTION OF THE PREPARED ACT, WHICH WILL REQUIRE BUSINESSES THAT PROFIT OFF ANIMALSSUCH AS ANIMAL DEALERS, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, LARGE-SCALE COMMERCIAL DOG BREEDERS, AND ZOOSTO CREATE WELL-FORMED CONTINGENCY PLANS FOR EMERGENCIES TO BETTER PROTECT ANIMALS IN THEIR CARE DURING DISASTER SITUATIONS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE USDA ANNOUNCED A FINALIZED RULE TO REQUIRE THESE PLANS OF ALL LICENSEES, ESSENTIALLY TAKING THE VERY ACTION DEMANDED BY THIS LEGISLATION. 3. GIVING VULNERABLE AND VICTIMIZED ANIMALS SECOND CHANCES THROUGH BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION IN 2021, ASPCA ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION WORK AND TRAINING FACILITIES, SUPPORTED BY THE ONLINE RESOURCES OF THE ASPCA WEBSITE FOR PROFESSIONALS, ASPCAPRO, HELPED ANIMALS IN NEED AND ENABLED THE NATIONWIDE EXPANSION OF EFFECTIVE ANIMAL REHABILITATION PRACTICES. BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION CENTER AT THE BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION CENTER (BRC) IN NORTH CAROLINA, SELECT DOGS ARE TREATED WITH INNOVATIVE AND PROVEN PROTOCOLS TO HELP THEM OVERCOME EXTREME FEAR THAT PREVENTS ADOPTABILITY OR DIMINISHES THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE. THE LEARNINGS AND RESEARCH DEVELOPED THROUGH THIS WORK IS THEN SHARED WITH SHELTERS AND RESCUE ORGANIZATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY THROUGH PUBLICATIONS, TRAININGS, STUDIES, AND OTHER RESOURCES OF THE ASPCA LEARNING LAB (SEE BELOW) AND ASPCAPRO, THE ASPCA INFORMATIONAL AND TRAINING WEBSITE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE PROFESSIONALS. A MAJOR ASPCA SCIENTIFIC STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF AN INTENSIVE TREATMENT PROGRAM FOR FEARFUL DOGS WAS CONCLUDED IN 2021. IT SHOWED THAT THE BRC'S BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION PROGRAM SUCCESSFULLY REHABILITATED 86% OF DOGS IN THE STUDY, 99% OF WHOM WERE ADOPTED AFTER PLACEMENT WITH SHELTER PARTNERS. THE STUDY RESULTS SUGGEST THAT INCREASING THE AVAILABILITY OF TREATMENT FOR MODERATELY TO EXTREMELY FEARFUL, UNDERSOCIALIZED DOGS MAY CONTRIBUTE TO REDUCING THE EUTHANASIA OF ANIMALS WITH BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS. AS MOST DOGS IN THE BRC STUDY CAME FROM HOARDING SITUATIONS AND PUPPY MILLS, THESE FINDINGS INSPIRE HOPE FOR UNADOPTABLE ANIMALS SUFFERING FROM A POOR QUALITY OF LIFE DUE TO CRUELTY AND NEGLECT. (THIS STUDY WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE IN 2022). FROM THE BRC'S LAUNCH IN 2013 THROUGH DECEMBER 2021, THE PROGRAM TREATED AND GRADUATED MORE THAN 500 AT-RISK ANIMALS, GENERATING VALUABLE ANIMAL BEHAVIOR INSIGHT THAT WAS DISSEMINATED NATIONWIDE. CRUELTY RECOVERY CENTER IN 2021, THE ASPCA CRUELTY RECOVERY CENTER IN OHIO SHELTERED MORE THAN 350 ANIMALS RESCUED FROM SCENES OF CRUELTY, NEGLECT, AND NATURAL DISASTERS AROUND THE COUNTRY. IN ADDITION TO DAILY CARE AND ENRICHMENT, THESE ANIMALS RECEIVED MEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL CARE. THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, CRC MEDICAL, BEHAVIOR, AND SHELTERING STAFF ALSO DEPLOYED TO ASSIST AND PROVIDE CONSULTATION FOR SEVERAL OTHER AGENCIES IN 2021, PROVIDING CARE FOR AN ADDITIONAL 768 RESCUED ANIMALS. ASPCA LEARNING LAB THE ASPCA LEARNING LAB SHARED CRITICAL ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL CARE STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES WITH THE PROFESSIONAL ANIMAL WELFARE COMMUNITY. IN 2021, THESE INSIGHTS WERE EXPERIENCED THROUGH MORE THAN 10,000 INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL INTERACTIONS, INCLUDING ONLINE ROUNDTABLES, WORKSHOPS, COURSES, AND CONFERENCES. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4C | 4. STOPPING ANIMAL CRUELTY THROUGH THE ASPCA-NYPD PARTNERSHIP THE ASPCA-NYPD PARTNERSHIP LAUNCHED CITYWIDE IN 2014, WITH THE NYPD TAKING THE LEAD ROLE IN RESPONDING TO ALL ANIMAL CRUELTY COMPLAINTS IN THE FIVE BOROUGHS, AND THE ASPCA PROVIDING DIRECT CARE FOR ANIMAL VICTIMS, AS WELL AS LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AND VETERINARY FORENSIC AND LEGAL SUPPORT. THE ASPCA AND NYPD ALSO PARTICIPATE COLLABORATIVELY IN COMMUNITY EVENTS ACROSS THE CITY. FROM ITS CITYWIDE INCEPTION IN 2014 THROUGH THE END OF 2021, THE ASPCA-NYPD PARTNERSHIP HAS RESULTED IN THE RESCUE AND TREATMENT OF MORE THAN 3350 VULNERABLE ANIMALS. OVERALL IN 2021, THE ASPCA-NYPD PARTNERSHIP RESULTED IN NEARLY 400 DOGS AND CATS BEING SEIZED BY THE NYPD AND TREATED BY ASPCA VETERINARY AND BEHAVIOR PROFESSIONALS. IN ADDITION, THE NYPD MADE 101 ANIMAL CRUELTY ARRESTS, AND ASPCA VETERINARY FORENSIC SCIENCE TEAMS IN NYC AND GAINESVILLE TOOK ON MORE THAN 300 CASES TO SUPPORT ANIMAL CRUELTY PROSECUTIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, IN LATE SEPTEMBER, AT THE REQUEST OF THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (NYPD), THE ASPCA ASSISTED WITH THE RESCUE OF 21 DOGS, INCLUDING PUPPIES, FROM A CRUELTY SITUATION IN BROOKLYN, NY. SEVERAL DOGS WERE FOUND CRAMMED IN SMALL CAGES, COVERED IN FECES AND URINE IN AN APARTMENT WITH POOR VENTILATION AND A STRONG ODOR OF AMMONIA. ASPCA EXPERTS SUPPORTED THIS CASE WITH BOOTS-ON-THE-GROUND ASSISTANCE TO REMOVE THE DOGS FROM THE PROPERTY AND TRANSPORT THEM TO ASPCA CARE, WHERE VETERINARY AND BEHAVIOR EXPERTS CONDUCTED FORENSIC EXAMS. ASPCA MEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL EXPERTS PROVIDED THE DOGS WITH MEDICAL CARE, BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT, AND ENRICHMENT. 5. EQUINE WELFARE: EXPLORING AND APPLYING THE BEST WAYS TO HELP AT-RISK HORSES THE ASPCA EQUINE WELFARE TEAM FINDS AND LEVERAGES INNOVATIVE AND COLLABORATIVE WAYS TO HELP EQUINES IN NEED SECURE NEW HOMES AND CAREERS. ASPCA RIGHT HORSE ACROSS 2021, ASPCA RIGHT HORSE PARTNERS PLACED MORE THAN 3,577 HORSES IN ADOPTIVE HOMES. THEY ALSO ADDED SIX NEW ASPCA RIGHT HORSE ADOPTION PARTNERS AND 13 NEW INDUSTRY/TRAINING PARTNERS TO IDENTIFY AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF NEW EQUINE ADOPTION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES. ASPCA HORSE ADOPTION EXPRESS THE ASPCA HORSE ADOPTION EXPRESS, WHICH MOVES HORSES TO AND FROM ASPCA ADOPTION PARTNER FACILITIES, TRANSPORTED 188 HORSES TO ADOPTION PARTNERS AND TRAINING PARTNERS. WE'VE OBSERVED THAT THE BIGGEST BARRIER TO ADOPTION IS OFTEN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE ADOPTER AND THEIR RIGHT HORSE. THE HORSE ADOPTION EXPRESS REMOVES THAT BARRIER AND ENSURES MORE HORSES ARE HELPED THROUGH STRATEGIC RELOCATION. ASPCA REGIONAL SUPPORT CENTER THE PILOT ASPCA REGIONAL SUPPORT CENTER (RSC) PROVIDED FULLY SUBSIDIZED SERVICES TO HORSE OWNERS IN NEED IN THE OKLAHOMA CITY AREA. IN COLLABORATION WITH A LOCAL VETERINARY CLINIC AND SEVERAL REHOMING PARTNERS, THE OPEN-ADMISSION CENTER WAS A SAFE PLACE FOR HORSE OWNERS TO RELINQUISH HORSES FOR ADOPTION INTO NEW HOMES, OFFERING ACCESS TO BASIC VETERINARY SERVICES AND HUMANE EUTHANASIA FOR SUFFERING HORSES, MULES, AND DONKEYS. OVER 100 EQUINES WERE HELPED THROUGH THIS PROGRAM IN 2021. ASPCA EQUINE TRANSITION AND ADOPTION CENTER TOWARD THE END OF THE YEAR, THE ASPCA ENDED THE RSC PROGRAM AND LAUNCHED THE EQUINE TRANSITION AND ADOPTION CENTER, WHICH CONTINUES TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES THE RSC PROVIDED WHILE ALSO ADDRESSING SPECIFIC CHALLENGES IN EQUINE REHOMING, INCLUDING BEHAVIOR REHABILITATION AND THE MARKETING OF OLDER AND MEDICALLY COMPROMISED EQUINES. 6. FARM ANIMAL WELFARE: PROTECTING ANIMALS ABUSED IN CRUEL FARM SYSTEMS IN 2021, THE ASPCA CONTINUED TO HELP THE PUBLIC, FOOD COMPANIES, AND LAWMAKERS IMPROVE FARM ANIMALS' LIVES THROUGH THE CREATION AND PROMOTION OF CONSUMER RESOURCES AND CORPORATE ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY EFFORTS AIMED AT ELIMINATING CRUEL FACTORY FARMING PRACTICES AND TRANSITIONING THEM TO HIGHER WELFARE FARMING METHODS LIKE THOSE REQUIRED BY MEANINGFUL WELFARE CERTIFICATIONS. NEW FOOD COMPANY COMMITMENTS THE FARM ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECURED 36 NEW FOOD INDUSTRY COMMITMENTS TO MEANINGFULLY IMPROVE FARM ANIMAL WELFARE. ONE OF THESE COMPANIES, THE HONEST KITCHEN, BECAME THE FIRST MAJOR PET FOOD COMPANY AVAILABLE IN NATIONAL RETAILER STORES TO ADOPT THE BETTER CHICKEN COMMITMENT AND PUBLICLY STATE THEIR INTENTION TO CERTIFY THE WELFARE OF ALL PRODUCTS FROM CHICKENS. IN ADDITION, 16 COMPANIES FROM WHOM THE ASPCA PREVIOUSLY SECURED COMMITMENTS REPORTED FULL IMPLEMENTATION OR SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTING THEIR FARM ANIMAL WELFARE IMPROVEMENTS. GRANTS SUPPORTING FARMERS' TRANSITION TO HIGH WELFARE FOR THE FOURTH YEAR, THE ASPCA GRANTED FUNDS TO THE FOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT) TO HELP FARMERS TRANSITION TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF MEANINGFUL ANIMAL WELFARE CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS AND EXPAND THEIR EXISTING WELFARE-CERTIFIED OPERATIONS TO MEET THE GROWING DEMAND FOR MORE HUMANELY FARMED ANIMAL PRODUCTS. NEARLY 32,000 ANIMALS HAVE BENEFITED FROM FACT GRANTS IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS. FACT GRANTS ARE A CRITICAL RESOURCE FOR HIGHER-WELFARE FARMS AND FARMERS OFTEN EXCLUDED FROM THE MAJORITY OF FEDERAL FUNDING AND RELIEF PROGRAMS. THIS YEAR, SEVEN OF THE 19 ASPCA-FUNDED GRANTS GIVEN TO FARMERS IN 15 STATES WENT TO FARMERS IDENTIFIED AS BLACK, INDIGENOUS, OR PERSON OF COLOR (BIPOC), COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE HISTORICALLY FACED ADDITIONAL BARRIERS TO ACCESSING FUNDS. TAKING ACTION DURING FARM ANIMAL AWARENESS WEEK IN SEPTEMBER, THE ASPCA CELEBRATED FARM ANIMAL AWARENESS WEEK TO SHOWCASE PRACTICAL STEPS PEOPLE CAN TAKE TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF FARM ANIMALS. TO SUPPORT THE EVENT, THE ASPCA CREATED A SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN THAT URGED A RANGE OF ACTIONS, INCLUDING MAKING MORE HUMANE FOOD CHOICES AND SUPPORTING THE FARM SYSTEM REFORM ACT. THESE POSTS WERE SHARED BY HIGHER-WELFARE FOOD COMPANIES, CHEFS, CELEBRITIES, AND INFLUENCERS WITH A COMBINED FOLLOWING OF MORE THAN ONE MILLION PEOPLE. THIS CAMPAIGN ALSO HELPED US DEEPEN RELATIONSHIPS WITH THESE ALLIES AND REACH NEW AUDIENCES WITH ASPCA FARM ANIMAL WELFARE MESSAGING AND CAMPAIGNS. NEW ASPCA MEDIA FELLOWSHIP EDUCATES JOURNALISTS ON FARMED ANIMAL LAW IN APRIL 2021, THE ASPCA AND VERMONT LAW SCHOOL (VLS) LAUNCHED A NEW ANIMAL LAW MEDIA FELLOWSHIP THAT OFFERS JOURNALISTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND A VLS SUMMER COURSE FOCUSING ON THE INTERSECTIONS OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE, FACTORY FARMING, MEDIA, AND THE LAW. AN ASPCA GRANT COVERED THE TOTAL COST OF THE FELLOWSHIP, WHICH IS THE FIRST MEDIA FELLOWSHIP FOCUSING SPECIFICALLY ON FARMED ANIMAL LAW. THIS FELLOWSHIP IS ALSO AN EXCITING OPPORTUNITY TO FOSTER GREATER TRANSPARENCY AND SPARK DIALOGUE AROUND THE DEPICTION OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE IN THE MEDIA. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 1A | THE ASPCA SHALL HAVE TWO CLASSES OF MEMBERS: GOVERNING MEMBERS, WHO SHALL HAVE FULL VOTING RIGHTS RESERVED TO "MEMBERS" UNDER THE NEW YORK NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW, AND AFFINITY MEMBERS, WHO SHALL NOT HAVE VOTING RIGHTS. GOVERNING MEMBERS SHALL CONSIST AT ANY TIME OF THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE SERVING AT THAT TIME AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. ONLY GOVERNING MEMBERS SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ELECT THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TO VOTE ON ANY OTHER TRANSACTION OR MATTER THAT SHALL PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASPCA'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, ITS BY-LAWS, OR APPLICABLE LAW. AFFINITY MEMBERS SHALL CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. AFFINITY MEMBERS SHALL MAKE SUCH ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS OR PAY SUCH ANNUAL DUES AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE ASPCA MAY OFFER AFFINITY MEMBERS CERTAIN BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP, BUT AFFINITY MEMBERS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED "MEMBERS" AS THAT TERM IS USED IN THE NEW YORK NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW OR IN ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION. ACCORDINGLY, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE AFFINITY MEMBERS WHO ARE ALSO GOVERNING MEMBERS, NO AFFINITY MEMBER SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON THE ELECTION OF PERSONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR ON ANY OTHER TRANSACTION OR MATTER THAT SHALL PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASPCA'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, THESE BY-LAWS, OR APPLICABLE LAW. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | THE FORM 990 WAS PREPARED BY A NATIONALLY RENOWNED ACCOUNTING FIRM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORGANIZATION'S FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE DRAFT OF THE FORM 990 IS REVIEWED BY SENIOR MANAGEMENT, LEGAL COUNSEL, AS WELL AS THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. A COPY IS CIRCULATED TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRIOR TO THE RETURN'S FILING WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | ALL DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES COMPLETE A WRITTEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE AND DECLARATION ANNUALLY. THE SECRETARY OF THE ASPCA PROVIDES COPIES OF ALL COMPLETED DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS TO THE CHAIR OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND TO THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER. ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARE ADDED TO RECORDS MAINTAINED BY THE ASPCA'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15 | THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE ASPCA BOARD IS THE AUTHORIZED COMPENSATION-SETTING BODY THAT REVIEWS AND APPROVES THE COMPENSATION OF THE "DISQUALIFIED PERSONS" OF THE ASPCA. THE ASPCA ENGAGES AN INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION EXPERT TO CONDUCT A COMPENSATION STUDY TO ASSESS THE REASONABLENESS OF EACH "DISQUALIFIED PERSON'S" TOTAL COMPENSATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4958 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. THE COMPENSATION EXPERT ASSESSES THE REASONABLENESS OF EACH PERSON'S TOTAL COMPENSATION BASED ON COMPARABILITY DATA FOR THE POSITIONS UNDER REVIEW AND PROVIDES SUCH DATA AND ANALYSIS TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR ITS REVIEW. THE COMPARABILITY DATA IS DRAWN FROM INDUSTRY SURVEYS AND DATA SOURCES FOR COMPARABLE POSITIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS OF SIMILAR SCOPE, OPERATING BUDGET, AND TYPE. WITH RESPECT TO "DISQUALIFIED PERSONS" OTHER THAN THE PRESIDENT & CEO, THE AUDIT COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE COMPENSATION EXPERT'S STUDY AND COMPARABILITY DATA AND THE PRESIDENT & CEO'S ANALYSIS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL'S PERFORMANCE, DELIBERATES, AND VOTES ON WHETHER TO APPROVE THE TOTAL COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATION PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT & CEO. THE PERSON WHOSE COMPENSATION IS UNDER REVIEW IS NOT PRESENT AND DOES NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE DELIBERATIONS, EXCEPT THAT SUCH PERSON MAY ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT WILL HELP THE COMMITTEE IN ITS DELIBERATIONS. WITH RESPECT TO THE PRESIDENT & CEO, THE AUDIT COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE COMPENSATION EXPERT'S STUDY AND COMPARABILITY DATA AND THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S ANALYSIS OF THE PRESIDENT & CEO'S PERFORMANCE, DELIBERATES, AND VOTES ON A RECOMMENDATION ON THE PRESIDENT & CEO'S TOTAL COMPENSATION (INCLUDING PERFORMANCE BONUS), WHICH RECOMMENDATION IT PROVIDES TO THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE FULL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ASSESSES THE AUDIT COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND VOTES WHETHER TO APPROVE THE TOTAL COMPENSATION (INCLUDING PERFORMANCE BONUS) FOR THE PRESIDENT & CEO. THE PRESIDENT & CEO IS NOT PRESENT DURING EITHER THE AUDIT COMMITTEE'S REVIEW OF HIS COMPENSATION NOR THE FULL BOARD'S APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION AND DOES NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE DELIBERATIONS, EXCEPT THAT HE MAY ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT WILL HELP THE COMMITTEE OR THE FULL BOARD IN THEIR DELIBERATIONS. FOR ALL "DISQUALIFIED PERSONS," THE AUDIT COMMITTEE DOCUMENTS THE BASIS FOR ITS DETERMINATIONS CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION BY DRAFTING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT WHICH THE DETERMINATIONS WERE MADE. THE MINUTES INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. THE TERMS OF THE APPROVED COMPENSATION AND THE DATE APPROVED; 2. THE NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE WHO WERE PRESENT DURING DISCUSSION OF THE COMPENSATION AND THOSE WHO VOTED ON IT; 3. THE COMPARABILITY DATA THAT WAS RELIED ON BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND HOW SUCH DATA WAS OBTAINED; AND 4. ANY ACTIONS (SUCH AS RECUSAL) TAKEN BY A MEMBER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HAVING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE THEN APPROVES THE MINUTES WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME AFTER ITS PREPARATION. SIMILARLY, THE BOARD DOCUMENTS THE BASIS FOR ITS DETERMINATION OF THE PRESIDENT & CEO'S COMPENSATION CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION BY DRAFTING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT WHICH THE DETERMINATION WAS MADE. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST AND THROUGH CHARITABLE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IN OVER 40 STATES. THE ASPCA MAKES ITS FORM 990 AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY RETAINING A COPY AT ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AND PLACING A COPY ON ITS WEBSITE. THE FORM 990 IS ALSO PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET AT WWW.GUIDESTAR.ORG. |
| FORM 990, PART XI, LINE 9: | UNREALIZED GAIN ON BENEFICIAL INTERESTS IN PERPETUAL TRUSTS HELD BY OTHERS 2,300,214. DUE FROM ASPCA VETERINARY SERVICES OF NC, PC 160,270. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |