Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
0 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 6,247,519 | 7,201,982 | 7,479,873 | 9,325,788 | 11,013,891 | 41,269,053 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | 0 | |||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | 0 | |||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 6,247,519 | 7,201,982 | 7,479,873 | 9,325,788 | 11,013,891 | 41,269,053 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 9,861,319 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 31,407,734 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 6,247,519 | 7,201,982 | 7,479,873 | 9,325,788 | 11,013,891 | 41,269,053 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 43 | 64 | 14 | 2,020 | 1,093 | 3,234 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 14,745 | 1,679 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 16,548 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 41,288,835 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | 0 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2021 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2021 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2021: | ||||
| a From 2016....... | ||||
| b From 2017....... | ||||
| c From 2018....... | ||||
| d From 2019....... | ||||
| e From 2020....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2016 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2021 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2021, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2021. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2022. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pt II Ln 10 | Other Income Part II, Line 10 Description: Other income 2017: 14745. 2018: 1679. 2019: 124. 2020: 0. 2021: 0. |
| Software ID: | 21013422 |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pt VI, Line 11b | A copy of the 990 is emailed to the members of the governing body. |
| Pt VI, Line 12c | The conflict of interest policy is completed as part of the organization's annual audit. |
| Pt VI, Line 15a | The organization reviews the compensation paid by similar organizations. |
| Pt VI, Line 15b | The organization reviews the compensation paid by similar organizations. |
| Pt VI, Line 19 | No documents are available to the public at this time. |
| Other | Page 9 Part VIII line 8 and Schedule G page 2 |
| Other | NET ECONOMIC BENEFIT FROM CANTERBURY MEDAL GALA: Canterbury Medal Gala revenue $569,050 Canterbury Medal Gala expenses (528,893) NET ECONOMIC BENEFIT FROM CANTERBURY MEDAL GALA 40,157 Less contributions included on page 1 line 8 (397,281) Net loss reported on schedule G page 2 line 11 (357,124) |
| Other | Page 1 line B - Amended return because the PDF files for page 2 part III line 4a and page 6 part VI line 4 did not attach to the original tax return. They are now attached below on Schedule O. |
| Pt VI, Line 4 | Compensation of Officers. Officers of the Corporation other than the President shall not receive any compensation soley by virtue of their performance of the obligations set forth in these Bylaws, except that any Officer of the Corporation shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses for those services. Nothing herein contained shall preclude any Officer from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor. Compensation and performance of the President shall be fixed and evaluated from time to time. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Agudath Israel v. Cuomo: We represent Agudath Israel of America, an Orthodox Jewish advocacy organization. On the eve of several sacred Jewish holidays, New York Governor Cuomo issued a "cluster action initiative," which placed strict 10- and 25-person caps on worship services in areas of New York City. Agudath Israel and affiliated synagogues sued the Governor in federal court for violations of their First Amendment Free Exercise rights. A federal court concluded that Cuomo's plan "targeted" the Orthodox Jewish community. We are not charging any fees, but are in the process of seeking fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Apache Stronghold v. United States: We represent Apache Stronghold, a nonprofit coalition of Native peoples and allies, who are challenging the impending transfer and destruction of Oak Flat, an Apache sacred site. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Archdiocese of Washington v. Bowser: We represent the Archdiocese of Washington in a worship restriction suit against the mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser. We did not charge any fees but sought a fee award from the opposing party, which was granted and disbursed. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Belya v. Kapral: We represent the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia in a suit by a now-defrocked priest because they refused to make him a bishop. The Church is arguing that the ministerial exception and broader church autonomy doctrine bar civil courts from hearing this suit. We are not charging any fees and will not seek fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Berken v. St. John Paul II Catholic Academy: We represent the Diocese of Marquette in a suit against a Catholic high school employee who entered a same-sex relationship contrary to Catholic teachings. We are not charging any fees and will not seek fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Billard v. Diocese of Charlotte: We represent the Diocese of Charlotte in a suit against a retired Charlotte Catholic high school teacher when he was removed as a substitute because he entered into a same-sex union. We are not charging any fees and will not seek fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Buck v. Gordon: We represent St. Vincent Catholic Charities, a foster and adoption placement agency whose contract was terminated due to its religious beliefs on marriage and family. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Business Leaders in Christ v. University of Iowa: We represent Business Leaders in Christ, a religious student group at the University of Iowa, defending the students' right to organize and be treated on equal terms as any other student group. We are not charging any fees but sought a fee award from the opposing party, which was granted and disbursed. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: California v. Azar: We represent the Little Sisters of the Poor, defending a regulatory religious accommodation to the HHS contraception mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act, which has been challenged by the State of California, among other states. We are not charging any fees and will not have opportunity to seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Chung v. WIAA: We represented Seventh-day Adventist student athletes against Washington Interscholastic Activities Association who were barred from participating in athletic competitions due to religious Sabbath observance. A settlement agreement was reached and our Motion for court approval of settlement was granted. The disbursement of funds is complete. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Demkovich v. St. Andrew the Apostle Parish: We represent St. Andrew the Apostle Parish in a ministerial and church autonomy case involving an employee who sued the church regarding his termination. The Seventh Circuit ruled in our favor and the opposing side did not appeal to the Supreme Court, thus securing our victory. We did not charge any fees or seek a fee award from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Di Liscia v. Austin: We represent Edmund Di Liscia, an Orthodox Jewish sailor who requested an accommodation from the Navy to allow him to keep his beard as required by his religious faith. His commanding officer then ordered him to shave in 24 hours, so we filed a lawsuit on his behalf as well as three other Muslim sailors, asking the Navy to allow them to grow their beards in accordance with their faith. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Diocese of Albany v. Emami: We represent the Diocese of Albany and a coalition of religious groups that provide critical community services to people of all faiths, including an order of Carmelite Sisters who run nursing homes for the poor. They filed suit against the NY State Department of Financial Services to protect their right to serve the needy without having to provide or pay for abortions. In October of 2021, the Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded the case for further proceedings in the lower courts. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Doe v. San Diego Unified School District: We represent parents and students in a challenge against their school district's student vaccine mandate. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Dr. A v. Hochul: We represent several health care workers in a challenge against New York's COVID healthcare worker mandate. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District: We represent a chapter of Fellowship of Christian Athletes (FCA) in a suit against the school district. The student chapter at a public school in California was targeted, bullied, and ultimately kicked off campus due to their religious beliefs. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Fitzgerald v. Archdiocese of Indianapolis: We represent the Archdiocese of Indianapolis in a suit involving nonrenewal of employment contracts for Catholic high school teachers who violated Catholic teachings by entering into a same-sex marriage. We are not charging any fees or seeking fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Franciscan Alliance v. Price: We represent Franciscan Alliance, Specialty Physicians of Illinois, and the Christian Medical and Dental Associations in a Texas lawsuit against the HHS medical transition mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: We represented Catholic Social Services' right to provide services to foster families and children in a manner consistent with its religious beliefs. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Third Circuit in favor of CSS. We did not charge any fees but sought fees and costs from the opposing party. The disbursement of funds is complete. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Guerrero v. Diocese of Lubbock: We represent the Diocese of Lubbock, TX, which was sued for defamation for publicizing the name of a deacon credibly accused of sexual abuse. The US Supreme Court declined to take the case, solidifying our victory at the Texas Supreme Court. We did not charge any fees and did not seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: EEOC v. Walmart: We represent Edward Hedican, a Jehovah's Witness, who received a job offer at Walmart only to have it rescinded due to his request for a religious accommodation for him to observe his sabbath. We moved to intervene for the purpose of appealing to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court declined to take the case. We did not charge any fees and did not seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: InterVarsity v. University of Iowa: We represented InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA and its student chapter at the University of Iowa, defending the organization's right to equal treatment in terms of its ability to select leaders who support its mission. IVCF received a unanimous victory in July 2021. We did not charge any fees, but sought fees and costs from the opposing party. The disbursement of funds is complete. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: InterVarsity v. Wayne State: We represent InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA and its student chapter at Wayne State University, defending the organization's right to equal treatment in terms of its ability to select leaders who support its mission. In April of 2021, the district court ruled in favor of IVCF. We did not charge any fees, but sought fees and costs from the opposing party. The disbursement of funds is complete. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Lebovits v. Cuomo: We are representing two Jewish families in New York City, who sought (and obtained) a temporary restraining order against former Governor Cuomo's COVID executive order to shut down schools in Jewish neighborhoods. The Governor announced a change of policy thereafter, allowing Jewish schools to reopen. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Maxon v. Fuller Theological Seminary: We represent Fuller Theological Seminary, which was sued by a student for violating the school's religious beliefs agreement. The district court ruled in favor of the Seminary and on appeal the Ninth Circuit upheld that ruling. We did not charge any fees and did not seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: New York v. HHS: We represent Dr. Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations arguing that no healthcare professional should be forced to choose between violating her conscience or providing compassionate medical care. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Oakwood Adventist Academy v. Alabama HS Athletic Association: We represent Oakwood Adventist Academy in a suit against the HS Athletic Association due to their failure to accommodate religious sabbath in the basketball season. We did not charge any fees but are in the process of working out division of fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Payne-Elliott v. Archdiocese of Indianapolis: We represent the Archdiocese of Indianapolis in a suit involving nonrenewal of employment contracts for Catholic high school teachers who violated Catholic teachings by entering into a same-sex marriage. We won at the Indiana Supreme Court. We did not charge any fees and did not seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Pennsylvania v. Trump: We represent the Little Sisters of the Poor, defending a regulatory religious accommodation to the HHS contraception mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act, which has been challenged by the State of Pennsylvania, among other states. In July of 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Little Sisters. The case is back at the district court. We are not charging any fees or seeking fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Board: We represent George Ricks who asked for exemption from Idaho's requirement that he provide his Social Security Number on his application for a contractor's license, as doing so violates his religious beliefs. In June of 2021, the Supreme Court denied hearing the case. We did not charge any fees or seek a fee award from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Scott v. St. Louis University Hospital: We represent St. Louis University Hospital against a suit brought on by a former employee who claimed that the hospital violated the Affordable Care Act by declining to insure gender-transition procedures for the employee's child. We are not charging any fees and will not be seeking fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Seattle Pacific University v. Ferguson: We represent Seattle Pacific University in a challenge to the Washington Attorney General's investigation of SPU's employment practices. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Sisters of Life: We represented the Sisters of Life in a pre-enforcement challenge against New York's pregnancy center regulations. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: St. Vincent Catholic Charities v. Ingham County: We represent St. Vincent Catholic Charities regarding Ingham County's termination of their refugee services contract because they disapproved of St. Vincent's religious beliefs. The district court ruled for St. Vincent Catholic Charities, protecting its ministry. We are not charging any fees, but are in the process of seeking fees and costs from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Steffen v. Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: We represented Moody Bible Institute in a Title IX lawsuit involving disciplining a student who engaged in conduct in violation of school policies. We did not charge any fees or seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Slockish v. U.S. Federal Highway Administration: We represent several members of the Klickitat and Cascade Tribes of the Yakima Nation, located in Washington State, in a suit seeking damages after a highway project demolished sacred burial sites. The case is currently pending appellate review at the Supreme Court. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Smith v. Ward: We represented a Muslim prisoner in a RLUIPA case. The Supreme Court denied a petition for rehearing. We did not charge any fees or seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Starkey v. Archdiocese of Indianapolis: We represent the Archdiocese of Indianapolis in a suit involving nonrenewal of employment contracts for Catholic high school teachers who violated Catholic teachings by entering into a same-sex marriage. The Seventh Circuit awarded complete victory to the Archdiocese. We are not charging any fees or seeking fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Toor v. United States Marine Corps: We represent current and potential Marines who are seeking a beard accommodation in accordance with their faith. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Tucker v. Faith Bible Chapel: We represent Faith Bible Chapel in a ministerial exception and church autonomy case involving a former chaplain suing the church over his termination. We are not charging any fees or seeking fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: University of Mary v. Azar: We represent the University of Mary; the Religious Sisters of Mercy: the Sacred Heart Mercy Health Care Center of Jackson, MN; the Sacred Heart Mercy Health Care Center of Alma, MI; and SMP Health System in a North Dakota lawsuit against the HHS medical transition mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: University of Minnesota Chi Alpha: We represented the University of Minnesota's Chi Alpha chapter in an investigation over alleged gender and sexual orientation discrimination from 5 years ago against a former member of the organization. We did not charge any fees or seek fees from the opposing party. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: Young Israel of Tampa: We represent Young Israel of Tampa's challenge to public transportation advertising regulations that discriminate against religious content and viewpoint. We are not charging any fees, but will seek fees and costs from the opposing party if the suit is successful. |
| Other | Page 2 Part III Line 4a: YU Pride v. Yeshiva University: We represent Yeshiva University which was sued by a group of current and former students at the university under the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL") to try to force the university to officially recognize their club, YU Pride Alliance. We are not charging any fees or seeking fees from the opposing party. |
| Software ID: | 21013422 |
| Software Version: |