Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2018 | (b) 2019 | (c) 2020 | (d) 2021 | (e) 2022 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 1,043,633 | 1,401,296 | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 5,523,836 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 1,043,633 | 1,401,296 | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 5,523,836 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 75,742 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 5,448,094 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2018 | (b) 2019 | (c) 2020 | (d) 2021 | (e) 2022 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 1,043,633 | 1,401,296 | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 5,523,836 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 9,375 | 11,949 | 29,032 | 9,337 | 22,917 | 82,610 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 5,606,446 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2018 | (b) 2019 | (c) 2020 | (d) 2021 | (e) 2022 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2018 | (b) 2019 | (c) 2020 | (d) 2021 | (e) 2022 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2022 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2022 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2022 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2022 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2022 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2022: | ||||
| a From 2017....... | ||||
| b From 2018....... | ||||
| c From 2019....... | ||||
| d From 2020....... | ||||
| e From 2021....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2022 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2017 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2022 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2022 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2022, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2022. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2023. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | TO PROTECT NEW MEXICO'S COMMUNITIES AND THEIR AIR, LAND AND WATER IN THE FIGHT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. THE LAW CENTER'S EFFECTIVE LEGAL ADVOCACY AND REPRESENTATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUES WILL PROTECT NEW MEXICO'S COMMUNITIES AND CULTURES, AND ENSURE CLEAN AIR, LAND AND WATER FOR ALL. THE WORK OF THE LAW CENTER IS MADE POSSIBLE BY TAX- DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS, FOUNDATIONS AND LIMITED EARNED INCOME. |
| FORM 990, PART III | CASE 1 AQUIFER SCIENCE, LLC., V. SCOTT VERHINES, NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER. NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE D-202-CV-2014-07209; NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS CASE A-1-CA-39080. BACKGROUND: THIS CASE WAS TRIED IN THE NEW MEXICO DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT. IT WAS AN APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR WATER USE FROM THE AQUIFER SCIENCE COMPANY TO SUPPLY WATER TO A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON ITS CAMPBELL RANCH PROPERTY. THE DISTRICT COURT DECIDED IN FAVOR OF OUR CLIENTS BY DISMISSING THE APPEAL, AND GRANTING OUR CLIENTS COSTS THAT THEY INCURRED DURING THE LITIGATION (FOR EXPENSES SUCH AS COPYING, EXPERT WITNESSES, ETC., BUT NOT FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES). THE AQUIFER SCIENCE COMPANY AND THE STATE ENGINEER APPEALED THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING TO THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS. WE AND OUR CLIENTS WERE ABLE TO REACH A SETTLEMENT WITH THE STATE ENGINEER. IN DECEMBER 2022, THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION DENYING THE AQUIFER SCIENCE COMPANY'S APPLICATION AND AFFIRMED THE RULING GRANTING OUR CLIENTS THEIR COSTS. PUBLIC INTEREST: THE PUBLIC INTEREST HERE IS IN PROTECTING THE WATER SUPPLIES OF PERSONS WHO OBTAIN WATER FROM THE SANDIA BASIN--WHICH THE STATE ENGINEER DECLARED TO BE CLOSED TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT, AS ALL WATER RIGHTS WITHIN IT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED AND ARE USED. THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER REPRESENTS TWO GROUPS OF PEOPLE FROM AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WHOSE USABLE WATER WOULD BE THREATENED BY AQUIFER SCIENCE, LLC BEING ALLOWED TO PUMP WATER FOR ITS DEVELOPMENT. THE CASE ALSO APPEARS TO BE A SPECULATIVE VENTURE FOR THE PROPONENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT RATHER THAN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN A WATER RIGHT THAT WOULD BE PUT TO BENEFICIAL USE. HERE, THE PURPOSE APPEARS TO BE TO UPGRADE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WITH WATER RIGHTS IN ORDER TO MAKE IT MARKETABLE. ATTORNEYS' FEES: THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER HAS NEITHER SOUGHT NOR RECOVERED ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM AN OPPOSING PARTY IN THIS CASE. CASE 2 AUGUSTIN PLAINS RANCH, LLC V. TOM BLAINE, P.E. NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, D-728-CV-XXX-XX-XXXX; NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS CASE A-1-CA-38615. BACKGROUND: IN 2014, THE AUGUSTIN PLAINS RANCH, LLC ("APR") SUBMITTED A MATERIALLY IDENTICAL APPLICATION AS ONE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IN 2007, TO APPROPRIATE 54,000 ACRE FEET OF WATER ANNUALLY FROM THE SAN AUGUSTIN BASIN FOR THE PURPOSES OF "MUNICIPAL- AND "COMMERCIAL SALES" WITH THE NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER. THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER REPRESENTS WATER USERS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SAN AUGUSTIN BASIN OPPOSING APR'S APPLICATION. APR'S 2007 APPLICATION WAS DENIED BY THE STATE ENGINEER IN 2011. THAT DENIAL WAS UPHELD BY THE NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN 2012, AND APR'S APPEAL OF THAT DECISION TO THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS WAS ULTIMATELY DISMISSED. APR'S 2014 APPLICATION WAS ALSO DENIED BY THE STATE ENGINEER ON THE BASIS THAT IT WAS SPECULATIVE, AND UPHELD BY THE NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. APR APPEALED THAT RULING TO THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS. THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNED THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION REGARDING ONE OF ITS BASES FOR ITS DECISION. THREE PARTIES FILED PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT, AND ON OCTOBER 28, 2022, THE SUPREME COURT DENIED ALL THREE PETITIONS FOR CERTIORARI, MEANING THAT THE CASE WILL BE RETURNED TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ADDITIONAL LITIGATION IN 2023. PUBLIC INTEREST: GROUND WATER IN NEW MEXICO "BELONGS TO THE PUBLIC." NMSA 1978, 72-12-1 (2003). OUR STATE'S GROUND WATER DOES NOT BELONG TO THE OWNERS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY ABOVE GROUND WATER. ALTHOUGH INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES MAY USE GROUND WATER FOR "BENEFICIAL USE," SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE STATE, ID., GROUND WATER IN NEW MEXICO IS A PUBLIC RESOURCE TO BE PROTECTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONSTITUTION DECLARES THAT "WATER AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES OF THIS STATE" ARE "OF FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY AND THE GENERAL WELFARE." N.M. CONST. ART. XX, 21. PUBLIC WATER IN NEW MEXICO IS HELD IN TRUST BY THE STATE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC. NEW MEXICO V. G.E., 467 F.3D 1223, 1243 (10TH CIR. 2006). THIS CASE DEALS WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST REGARDING GROUNDWATER APPROPRIATIONS, AS WELL AS THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL WAYS OF LIFE IN RURAL NEW MEXICO. IF APR IS SUCCESSFUL AND ITS APPLICATION IS ULTIMATELY APPROVED, OVER 17 BILLION GALLONS OF WATER WILL BE TRANSPORTED OUT OF THE SAN AUGUSTIN PLAINS, A TRADITIONAL RURAL COMMUNITY, TO THE GREATER ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF NEW MEXICO'S LARGEST CITY. ATTORNEYS' FEES: THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER HAS NEITHER SOUGHT NOR RECOVERED ANY ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM AN OPPOSING PARTY IN THIS CASE. CASES 3, 4, 5, AND 6 THE FOLLOWING FOUR CASES RELATE TO THE PROPOSED SANTOLINA DEVELOPMENT. CASE 3 SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT, NEW MEXICO HEALTH EQUITY WORKING GROUP, PAJARITO VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, DANIEL RICHARD "RIP" ANDERSON, MARCIA BEAUREGARD FERNANDEZ, SANTIAGO JAMES MAESTAS, ROD MAHONEY, ROBERTO ROIBAL, AND KRISTINE SUOZZI V. BERNALILLO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION, WAYNE JOHNSON, DEBBIE O'MALLEY, STEPHEN MICHAEL QUEZADA, MAGGIE HART STEBBINS, AND LONNIE TALBERT, AND WESTERN ALBUQUERQUE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, AND CONSENSUS PLANNING, INC. NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT, S-1-SC-39398, FORMERLY NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS, A-1-CA-38717, FORMERLY NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE D-202-CV-2017-07037 CASE 4 SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT, PAJARITO VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, SOUTH VALLEY COALITION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, CENTER FOR SOCIAL SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, SOUTH VALLEY REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ACEQUIAS, DANIEL RICHARD "RIP" ANDERSON, MARCIA BEAUREGARD FERNANDEZ, SANTIAGO JAMES MAESTAS, ROD MAHONEY, ROBERTO ROIBAL, DR. VIRGINIA NECOCHEA, AND KRISTINE SUOZZI V. BERNALILLO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION, WAYNE JOHNSON, DEBBIE O'MALLEY, STEPHEN MICHAEL QUEZADA, MAGGIE HART STEBBINS, AND LONNIE TALBERT, AND WESTERN ALBUQUERQUE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, AND CONSENSUS PLANNING, INC. NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT, S-1-SC-39398, FORMERLY NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS, A-1-CA-38742 AND CONSOLIDATED WITH A-1-CA-38717, FORMERLY NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE D-202-CV-2018-09049. CASE 5 JAVIER BENAVIDEZ, JAMES SANTIAGO MAESTAS, ROBERTO ROIBAL, THE SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT, INCLUDING ITS INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP MEMBERS, AND THE PAJARITO VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INCLUDING ITS INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP MEMBERS V. BERNALILLO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION, ADRIANN BARBOA, WALT BENSON, DEBBIE O'MALLEY, CHARLENE PYSKOTY, AND STEVEN MICHAEL QUEZADA, AND WESTERN ALBUQUERQUE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, AND CONSENSUS PLANNING, INC. NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE D-202-CV-2021-05601 CASE 6 SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT, CENTER FOR SOCIAL SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, SOUTH VALLEY REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ACEQUIAS, DANIEL RICHARD "RIP" ANDERSON, MARCIA BEAUREGARD FERNANDEZ, SANTIAGO JAMES MAESTAS V. BERNALILLO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION, ADRIANN BARBOA, WALT BENSON, DEBBIE O'MALLEY, STEPHEN MICHAEL QUEZADA, AND CHARLENE PYSKOTY, AND WESTERN ALBUQUERQUE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, AND CONSENSUS PLANNING, INC. NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE D-202-CV-2022-05576 BACKGROUND: THESE FOUR CASES ALL INVOLVE THE PROPOSED SANTOLINA DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS A PROPOSED PLANNED COMMUNITY THAT, AT FULL BUILD OUT, WOULD BE HOME TO APPROXIMATELY 90,000 PEOPLE ON THE WEST MESA OF ALBUQUERQUE. EACH OF THE CASES WAS FILED IN THE NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT BY THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ON BEHALF OF THE CLIENTS LISTED ABOVE FOR EACH CASE. THE CASES WERE FILED AGAINST THE BERNALILLO COUNTY (NEW MEXICO) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (COLLECTIVELY THE "BOARD") AND THE TWO COMPANIES PROMOTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, CONSENSUS PLANNING, INC. AND WESTERN ALBUQUERQUE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC. IN CASE 3, THE NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT AFFIRMED THE DECISION OF THE BOARD TO APPROVE THE SANTOLINA LEVEL B MASTER PLAN. THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER'S CLIENTS APPEALED THE DECISION TO THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS ON JANUARY 22, 2020. IN CASE 4, THE NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT AFFIRMED THE DECISION OF THE BOARD TO APPROVE THE SANTOLINA LEVEL B DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH SERVES TO CODIFY AND IMPLEMENT THE SANTOLINA LEVEL B MASTER PLAN. THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER'S CLIENTS APPEALED THE DECISION TO THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS ON FEBRUARY 4, 2020. THIS CASE WAS CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE 3 ABOVE, AND ON APRIL 20, 2022 THE COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED THE DECI |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | FORM 990 IS REVIEWED WITH THE FINANCE COMMITTEE PRIOR TO FILING. A COPY OF THE 990 IS PROVIDED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BOARD. THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORTS ON THE SUBSTANCE OF THE FORM TO THE BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY AND MANAGEMENT ARE KEENLY AWARE OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARE DISCUSSED AT BOARD MEETINGS AND ANYONE WITH A POTENTIAL CONFLICT IS RECUSED. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | THE ORGANIZAION CONDUCTS A REVIEW FO THE SALARIES PAID BY OTHER ORGANIZATION'S SALARIES ARE COMPARABLE FOR THIS AND POSITIONS. THE REVIEW IS CONDUCTED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AS PART OF THE BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS FOR THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR WHICH IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE ORGANIZATION REGULARLY PARTICIPATES IN ANNUAL SALARY INFORMATION SURVEYS SO THAT THE ORGANIZATION CAN RECIEVE COPIES OF THE RESULTS TO USE IN ESTABLISHING ITS EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION, INCLUDING THAT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. APPROVAL OF PAY IS DOCUMENTED IN THE BOARD MEETING MINUTES. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | THE ORGANIZATION DOES NOT CURRENTLY COMPENSATE ANY ONE IN THESE CLASSES BUT IF IT WERE TO IT WOULD GO BY THE SAME PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |