Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 277,005 | 667,936 | 1,331,821 | 3,084,712 | 5,361,474 | |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf.... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 277,005 | 667,936 | 1,331,821 | 3,084,712 | 5,361,474 | |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 5,361,474 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 277,005 | 667,936 | 1,331,821 | 3,084,712 | 5,361,474 | |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 39 | -13 | 302 | 8,766 | 9,094 | |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 5,370,568 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2017 | (b) 2018 | (c) 2019 | (d) 2020 | (e) 2021 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2021 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2021 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2021 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI). See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2021: | ||||
| a From 2016....... | ||||
| b From 2017....... | ||||
| c From 2018....... | ||||
| d From 2019....... | ||||
| e From 2020....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2016 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2021 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2021 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2021, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2021. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2022. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2017..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2018..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.
Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART III, LINES 1, 4A, 4B AND 4C | THE FIRST ORGANIZATION OF ITS KIND IN THE ANIMAL WELFARE MOVEMENT, THE CENTER FOR A HUMANE ECONOMY, INC. (CENTER OR CHE) IS FOCUSED ON DRIVING CORPORATE POLICY CHANGES FOR ANIMALS. IN A CULTURE WHERE CONSUMERS, INVESTORS AND OTHER KEY STAKEHOLDERS ABHOR ANIMAL CRUELTY AND THE DEGRADATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, THE CENTER WORKS TO ALERT CORPORATIONS TO THEIR MORAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND ENCOURAGES INNOVATION AS A MEANS OF SHEDDING ANIMAL CRUELTY IN THEIR SUPPLY CHAINS, R&D PROGRAMS, AND OTHER OPERATIONS. THERE ARE COMPANIES IN MORE THAN A DOZEN MAJOR SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY - FROM FOOD AND AGRICULTURE TO FORESTRY AND MINING TO TOURISM AND PHARMACEUTICALS - THAT HAVE VERY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON THE LIVES OF ANIMALS. OUR AIM IS TO HAVE EVERY ONE OF THEM IMPROVE THEIR PERFORMANCE WHEN IT COMES TO ANIMAL WELFARE. THE CENTER COLLABORATES WITH ANIMAL WELLNESS FOUNDATION (AWF), ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION (AWA), SPCA INTERNATIONAL, THE MICHELSON CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY, AND A VAST ARRAY OF OTHER ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER KEY STAKEHOLDERS TO ACCOMPLISH ITS MISSION AND GOALS. THE CENTER WORKS FOR CHANGE THROUGH A VARIETY OF MEANS, INCLUDING BY EDUCATING CITIZENS AND ACTIVATING THEM TO PROMOTE CORPORATE REFORMS FOR ANIMALS, PROMOTING CRUELTY-FREE ALTERNATIVES, SUPPORTING PUBLIC POLICIES THAT LIFT CORPORATE STANDARDS, INITIATING LAWSUITS AND ENCOURAGING ENFORCEMENT OF OUR LAWS, FORMULATING SCIENCE-BASED ANALYSES OF THE MAJOR PROBLEMS THAT CONFRONT ANIMALS, AND DRIVING INVESTIGATIONS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH ANIMALS AND THEN DIAGNOSING SOLUTIONS. OUR APPROACH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: BENCHMARKING STANDARDS - DEVELOPING SPECIFIC AND PRACTICAL MEASURES FOR COMPANIES TO TRACK AND NORMALIZE ANIMAL WELFARE PRACTICES INTERNALLY. ASSESSING INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE - ANALYZING BUSINESS PRACTICES ACROSS ANIMAL IMPACT INDUSTRIES AND ISSUING WHITE PAPERS ON THEIR OVERALL PERFORMANCE ON ANIMAL WELFARE. CHAMPIONING ALTERNATIVES - HIGHLIGHTING INNOVATORS AND COMPANIES LEADING THEIR FIELD IN ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL USE. EDUCATING CONSUMERS - INSPIRING AND EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE IMPACTS ON ANIMAL WELFARE. ENGAGING CORPORATIONS - PARTNERING WITH COMPANIES TO TRANSITION FROM HARMFUL TO HUMANE ANIMAL PRACTICES. LOBBYING POLICYMAKERS - SUPPORTING LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPROVE THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS IN CAPTIVITY AND IN THE WILD. CONDUCTING CAMPAIGNS - USING RESEARCH AND PARTNERSHIPS TO LEAD CAMPAIGNS ON A NUMBER OF CORPORATE ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES. THE CENTER CONDUCTS A WIDE VARIETY OF CAMPAIGNS TO ADVANCE ITS MISSION, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING CAMPAIGNS: KANGAROOS ARE NOT SHOES MODERNIZE TESTING CAGE-FREE FUTURE RETHINK MINK ENDING COCKFIGHTING DUNKING THE MILK MANDATE IN SCHOOLS SAVING WOLVES ENDING GREYHOUND RACING ELEPHANTS IN CRISIS FROM NOVEMBER 2021 THROUGH OCTOBER 2022, THE CENTER SUCCEEDED AT DRIVING MAJOR CHANGE FOR DOMESTICATED AND WILD ANIMALS. INITIATIVES INCLUDED: *LIFTING A FEDERAL MANDATE FOR ANIMAL TESTING FOR ALL NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOLS AND PROMOTING NON-ANIMAL METHODS IN SAFETY AND EFFICACY TESTING. *ENDING THE TRADE IN BIG CATS, SUCH AS TIGERS AND LIONS, AS PETS AND SHUTTING DOWN COMMERCIAL CUB-PETTING OPERATIONS THAT TREAT THEIR CUBS AND KITTENS AS PROPS. *PROHIBITING SHARK FINNING - SLICING OFF THE FINS OF LIVE SHARKS IN U.S. WATERS - WHICH IS LARGELY DONE FOR TRADE FOR USE IN SHARK FIN SOUP. *PUSHING THE HORSE RACING INDUSTRY TO ADOPT SAFER STRATEGIES FOR HORSES IN COMPETITION, INCLUDING BY HELPING ENGINEER A LEGISLATIVE FIX TO THE HORSERACING INTEGRITY AND SAFETY ACT (HISA) TO ASSURE THAT THE ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM IS CONSTITUTIONAL. *SECURING FROM CONGRESS RECORD-LEVEL FUNDING FOR ENFORCEMENT ($4.1 MILLION) TO STOP SORING UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL HORSE PROTECTION ACT (HPA). THE 1970 LAW PROHIBITS SORED HORSES (HORSES THAT ARE INTENTIONALLY HARMED AND GIVEN SORES TO FORCE A DESIRED GAIT) FROM PARTICIPATING IN SHOWS, EXHIBITIONS, SALES OR AUCTIONS. *FIGHTING INHUMANE AND COSTLY GOVERNMENT ROUNDUPS OF WILD HORSES ON PUBLIC LANDS AND PROMOTING HUMANE METHODS OF FERTILITY CONTROL TO KEEP HORSES ON THE RANGE. *INVESTIGATING ILLEGAL ANIMAL FIGHTING OPERATIONS AND WORKING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT TO INTERDICT THESE CRIMINAL SYNDICATES. *SAVING WOLVES AND OTHER PREDATORS AND FROM TROPHY HUNTING, RECKLESS GOVERNMENT CONTROL PROGRAMS, AND OTHER THREATS. *PROMOTING A CAGE-FREE FUTURE, INCLUDING BY ELEVATING FARM ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS IN ORGANIC ANIMAL AGRICULTURE. *BRINGING AWARENESS ABOUT THE CRUELTY OF MINK FARMING AND THE VERY DEMONSTRABLE THREATS OF VIRAL SPILLOVER FROM MINK TO PEOPLE AT THESE FACTORY FARMS. JIM KEEN, D.V.M., PH.D., OUR DIRECTOR OF VETERINARY SCIENCE, WROTE THE DEFINITIVE REPORT ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MINK FARMS AND THE SPREAD OF ZOONOTIC DISEASE. *FEEDING AND HELPING ELEPHANTS IN THAILAND AND WORKING TO HALT THE INHUMANE HANDLING, HOUSING, AND WORKING OF THESE ANIMALS IN THE TOURIST TRADE THERE. HERE WE PROVIDE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON SOME OF THE CAMPAIGNS SUMMARIZED ABOVE. MODERNIZE DRUG TESTING IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: CHE'S MOST CONSEQUENTIAL ACHIEVEMENT WAS OUR EFFORT TO REBOOT AMERICA'S BROKEN DRUG DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM. WE TOOK AIM AT AN ARCHAIC, COUNTERPRODUCTIVE GOVERNMENT MANDATE FOR EXTENSIVE ANIMAL TESTING FOR EVERY DRUG DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL, WHETHER IN THE R&D OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, BIOTECH START-UPS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, OR ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS. WITH THE ABLE ASSISTANCE OF AWA, THE CENTER SUCCEEDED IN WORKING WITH CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT TO ENACT THE FDA MODERNIZATION ACT 2.0. THAT MEASURE COMBINED THE ORIGINAL FDA MODERNIZATION ACT AND ALSO THE REDUCING ANIMAL TESTING ACT, ELIMINATING A FEDERAL MANDATE FOR ANIMAL TESTING FOR NEW DRUGS AND FOR BIOSIMILARS. THE FDA MODERNIZATION ACT 2.0 UPDATES AN ARCHAIC, 84-YEAR-OLD STATUTORY MANDATE FOR ANIMAL TESTING IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, UNLEASHING 21ST-CENTURY STRATEGIES IN OUR NATION'S CRUCIAL PUBLIC-PRIVATE DRUG DEVELOPMENT WORK. HUMAN-RELEVANT CELL-BASED ASSAYS, ORGANS-ON-A-CHIP, HUMAN-ON-A-CHIP MODELS, AND SOPHISTICATED COMPUTER MODELING ARE FAR SUPERIOR TO ANIMAL TESTS IN PREDICTING HUMAN RESPONSES TO DRUGS. BETWEEN 90 AND 95% OF DRUGS FOUND SAFE IN NONCLINICAL TESTS FAIL DURING HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS. IN-VITRO TESTING METHODS ARE 1.5- TO 30-TIMES LESS EXPENSIVE THAN ANIMAL TESTS, AND THEIR USE COULD BRING NEW DRUGS TO MARKET IN HALF THE TIME. THIS NEW LAW, WHICH TOOK EFFECT AT THE END OF DECEMBER 2022, PROMISES TO REDUCE THE USE OF COUNTLESS SCORES OF ANIMALS - DOGS, PRIMATES, RABBITS, AND OTHER ANIMALS - BRED AND SOLD AND USED IN LABORATORY TESTING. THIS IS THE FIRST MAJOR LEGISLATION TO PASS THE CONGRESS ON ANIMAL TESTING IN DECADES THAT WAS ORIGINALLY INTRODUCED AS A STAND-ALONE BILL. TO HELP BREATHE LIFE INTO THE STATUTE, WE HELPED SECURE $12.5 MILLION IN FEDERAL MONEY FOR FDA TO SUPPORT THE AGENCY'S NEW ALTERNATIVE METHODS PROGRAM TO REDUCE ANIMAL TESTING. THIS ADDITIONAL MONEY WILL BUILD THE TOOLKIT ON ALTERNATIVES, AS WE TURN TO PRESSING FDA AND PRIVATE AND PUBLIC DRUG DEVELOPERS TO EMBRACE ALTERNATIVE METHODS AND WORK ON DRAMATICALLY REDUCING THE NUMBERS OF DOGS, PRIMATES, MICE, RATS, AND OTHER ANIMALS USED IN TESTING. WE ARE PLANNING ON GLOBALIZING THE CAMPAIGN AND SECURING SIMILAR POLICIES IN OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS THAT ALSO DO DRUG DEVELOPMENT. GLOBAL DRUG COMPANIES WILL WANT TO HARMONIZE THE RULES FOR DRUG APPROVAL ACROSS THE VAST ARRAY OF NATIONS THEY WORK IN. BIG CATS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS: THIS WAS THE YEAR CHE CLOSED THE DOOR ON THE DANGEROUS AND CRUEL BUSINESS OF KEEPING BIG CATS - MOSTLY LIONS AND TIGERS - FOR COMMERCIAL CUB-PET OPERATIONS. OUR AFFILIATE AWA WORKED TO HELP SECURE OVERWHELMING BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE BIG CAT PUBLIC SAFETY ACT, H.R. 263, WHICH PRESIDENT BIDEN SIGNED INTO LAW IN DECEMBER 2022. THIS BILL SECURES THE NATIONAL BAN ON THE TRADE IN BIG CATS AS PETS AND CLOSES OUT THE ERA OF COMMERCIAL CUB PETTING THAT REQUIRES BREEDING TIGERS AND LIONS TO ALLOW PATRONS TO HANDLE CUBS FOR A FEE. THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF BIG CATS KEPT IN PRIVATE HANDS, AND JUST A DECADE AGO THERE WERE MORE THAN 60 CUB-PETTING MENAGERIES. THE CENTER AND AWA WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH HOWARD AND CAROLE BASKIN AND BIG CAT RESCUE ON THE MEASURE, AND THEY WERE STEADFAST AND HIGH-IMPACT PARTNERS, ALONG WITH THE NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION AND THE ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIUMS. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINES 1, 4A, 4B AND 4C - CONTINUED | TAKING SHARK FIN SOUP OFF THE MENU: ALSO IN 2022, CHE CONTRIBUTED TO THE LONG-TERM CAMPAIGN TO SECURE A SALES BAN FOR SHARK FINS IN THE UNITED STATES. SHARK FIN SOUP HAD LONG BEEN ON THE MENU AT SOME EATING ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, AND U.S. LEADERSHIP ON THIS ISSUE WILL CREATE PRESSURE TO HALT THE PRACTICE EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD, AS HAPPENED WHEN THE UNITED STATES BANNED IN 2018 THE SALE OF DOG AND CAT MEAT IN THE U.S. SHARK FINNING IS THE ABHORRENT AND IRRESPONSIBLE ACT OF SHARK HUNTERS WHO CAN MAKE A BUCK FROM SLICING OFF A SHARK'S FIN AND DISCARDING THE LIVING BODY BACK INTO THE WATERS TO DROWN. REMOVING APEX PREDATORS IN THIS MANNER IS NOT ONLY INHUMANE, BUT LOSSES OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR THE SHARK FIN SOUP INDUSTRY CAN HAVE TERRIBLE CONSEQUENCES FOR WHOLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS. "SHARK FINNING CONJURES UP THE CRUELTY AND WANTON DESTRUCTION OF THE MEDIEVAL ERA. BUT IT'S MORE OF A MODERN EVIL, AND THE UNITED STATES HAS DETERMINED THIS TRADE IS NO LONGER LEGAL IN OUR NATION. NOBODY REALLY KNOWS THE GLOBAL TOLL ON SHARKS KILLED FOR THEIR FINS, BUT IT HAS BEEN ESTIMATED AT AN EYE-POPPING 70 MILLION A YEAR." CHE PRESIDENT WAYNE PACELLE PROTECTING RACE HORSES: CHE'S AFFILIATE AWA, ALONG WITH THE JOCKEY CLUB, WORKED WITH KEY LAWMAKERS IN THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE U.S. SENATE TO AMEND THE HISA, FIXING A PROVISION IN THE ORIGINAL LAW THAT A FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN NOVEMBER AND THAT JEOPARDIZED THE NATIONAL BAN ON RACE-DAY DOPING OF THOROUGHBREDS. PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING DRUGS PUT THE ANIMALS AT RISK OF BREAKDOWNS AND OTHER CATASTROPHIC INJURIES. THE DOPING OF HORSES TO MASK INJURIES AND ENHANCE PERFORMANCE UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE SPORT AND MAKES THE OPERATIONS OF THE INDUSTRY SUSPECT TO BETTORS AND OTHER ENTHUSIASTS FOR THE SPECTATOR SPORT. THE CENTER CONTINUES TO DEMAND THAT THE PRIVATE ACTORS IN THE HORSE-RACING INDUSTRY - FROM TRAINERS TO OWNERS - WORK TO REDUCE ON-TRACK INJURIES, TO BREED SOUND HORSES LESS SUSCEPTIBLE TO BREAKDOWNS, TO HALT THE USE OF THE WHIP IN RACING, AND TO ADHERE TO PROHIBITIONS ON RACE-DAY DOPING. WE LAUNCHED OUR NEW SITE, WWW.HISAWATCHDOG.ORG, TO HELP FACILITATE COMMUNICATION AND KEEP A WATCHFUL EYE ON REGULATORS. STOPPING CRUELTY TO HORSES IN THE RING: IN 2022, CONGRESS APPROVED A RECORD LEVEL $4.1 MILLION TO ENFORCE THE HORSE PROTECTION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023- A $1 MILLION INCREASE IN SPENDING TO HALT THE BARBARIC PRACTICE OF INJURING THE FEET AND PASTERNS OF TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES TO INDUCE AN ARTIFICIAL AND EXAGGERATED GAIT TO WIN RIBBONS AT "BIG LICK" HORSE SHOWS. WITH MORE INSPECTIONS, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO CRACK DOWN ON SOME LEVEL OF LAWLESSNESS UNTIL WE CAN UPGRADE THE 52-YEAR-OLD HPA. UNTIL CHE'S AFFILIATE AWA STARTED PRESSING FOR MORE FUNDING IN 2018 WHEN THE ORGANIZATION OPENED SHOP, THE HPA NEVER SAW MORE THAN $705,000 IN FUNDING PER YEAR SINCE THE HPA WAS ENACTED IN 1970. FUNDING IS NEEDED. ACCORDING TO THE USDA ANIMAL PLANT AND HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICES, ONE-THIRD OF HORSES WERE FOUND NON-COMPLIANT WITH THE HPA AND DISQUALIFIED FROM THE YEAR-END TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE FINALE. KEEPING HORSES WILD: IN THE FALL OF 2022, THE CENTER LAUNCHED ITS FIRST-EVER NATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE SLAUGHTER OF AMERICAN-BORN HORSES THROUGHOUT NORTH AMERICAN IN COOPERATION WITH ANIMALS' ANGELS AND AWA. THAT INVESTIGATION IS DESIGNED TO SET UP A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN IN 2023 TO BAN THE LIVE EXPORT OF HORSES TO CANADA AND MEXICO FOR SLAUGHTER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. IN THE 2022 END-OF-YEAR SPENDING BILL, WE WORKED WITH FEDERAL LAWMAKERS TO RENEW A BAN ON USDA FUNDING FOR INSPECTIONS AT ANY HORSE-SLAUGHTER PLANTS IN THE U.S., CONTINUING THE DE FACTO BAN ON HORSE SLAUGHTER ON U.S. SOIL. THAT SAME END-OF-YEAR FUNDING BILL ALSO INCLUDED FUNDING AND DIRECTIVES FOR THE U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TO PURSUE MORE FORWARD-FACING, HUMANE ON-THE-RANGE MANAGEMENT OF WILD HORSES AND BURROS AND RENEWING AN EFFORT BY AFFILIATE AWA IN PRIOR YEARS TO SECURE $11 MILLION IN ANNUAL FUNDING FOR FERTILITY CONTROL. THIS IS JUST ONE STEP IN A LONG MARCH NEEDED TO KEEP WILD HORSES AND BURROS SAFE AND FREE IN THEIR NATIVE HABITATS. THE BLM MUST MOVE FROM PERSECUTOR TO PROTECTOR, AS IT IS CHARGED TO BE DOING FOR THESE EQUIDS. ENDING COCKFIGHTING: IN 2022, IT BECAME CLEAR THAT CHE AND ITS AFFILIATES AWA AND AWF ESTABLISHED THEMSELVES AS LEADERS IN THE EFFORT TO END THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COCKFIGHTING OR PUTTING ANY ANIMAL IN THE RING TO INSTINCTIVELY FIGHT FOR HUMAN ENTERTAINMENT AND BLOOD MONEY. THIS YEAR WE PUT A PUNCTUATION MARK ON OUR CAMPAIGN THAT HAS ENDED ALL ILLEGAL DOGFIGHTING AND COCKFIGHTING ON U.S. SOIL. AT THE END OF LAST YEAR, WHEN FEDERAL COURTS DELIVERED A SERIES OF RULINGS ON ANIMAL FIGHTING - WITH OUR AFFILIATE AWA IN THE THICK OF THEM - WE CELEBRATED THEM AS EMPHATIC BLOWS AGAINST THE U.S.-BASED COCKFIGHTING INDUSTRY. THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HAD AFFIRMED A RULING OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF GUAM THAT CONGRESS HAS THE AUTHORITY TO BAR ANIMAL FIGHTING THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES, CEMENTING THE BAN ON COCKFIGHTING IN FIVE U.S. TERRITORIES THAT HAVE BEEN MAJOR HOTSPOTS FOR STAGED FIGHTS. BUT COCKFIGHTERS NOT SURPRISINGLY PUSHED BACK IN THEIR DESIRE TO KEEP HARMING ANIMALS FOR THEIR SICK IDEA OF ENTERTAINMENT. ONE FORMER NORTHERN MARIANAS ISLANDS POLITICIAN - A SELF-DESCRIBED LIFELONG COCKFIGHTER - INITIATED A LEGAL ACTION TO INVALIDATE THE FEDERAL BAN ON COCKFIGHTING IN THE PACIFIC-ISLAND TERRITORY. BUT IN NOVEMBER, A U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN CNMI DISMISSED HIS CLAIM AND AFFIRMED THE PRIOR FEDERAL COURT RULINGS THAT ESTABLISHED THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES TO FORBID STAGED ANIMAL FIGHTING EVERYWHERE IN THE NATION. STATESIDE, WE CONGRATULATED FEDERAL PROSECUTORS FOR SECURING FEDERAL PRISON TIME FOR ONE OF THE NATION'S MOST ELABORATE COCKFIGHTING SYNDICATES, WITH BRENT EASTERLING AND SEVERAL RELATIVES BASED IN ALABAMA GOING TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR THEIR ILLEGAL ANIMAL FIGHTING VENTURES. WE PROVIDED COMPELLING EVIDENCE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT AIDED THE GOVERNMENT'S INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION AND ULTIMATELY LED TO THE CONVICTION OF SEVEN PEOPLE IN ALABAMA. WE OBTAINED A VIDEO OF BRENT EASTERLING INTERVIEWING WITH A PHILIPPINES-BASED COCKFIGHTING CHANNEL BNTV TALKING ABOUT HIS FIGHTING BIRDS AND MARKETING THEM TO WORLDWIDE AUDIENCES. WE CONTINUE TO SUPPLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITH DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT ILLEGAL ANIMAL FIGHTING SYNDICATES OPERATING THROUGHOUT THE U.S. AND DEMANDING ARRESTS IN CASES WHERE THESE PEOPLE DON'T CEASE THEIR ILLEGAL AND VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST ANIMALS. SAVING WOLVES: IN 2022, CHE AND AWA FILED PLEADINGS IN A CONSEQUENTIAL CASE CHALLENGING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S 2020 REMOVAL OF FEDERAL PROTECTIONS FOR WOLVES IN THE UPPER GREAT LAKES AND OTHER PARTS OF THE U.S. IN FEBRUARY 2022, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JEFFREY WHITE RULED THAT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (FWS) PREMATURELY REMOVED FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PROTECTIONS FOR GRAY WOLVES IN MOST OF THE LOWER 48 STATES LAST YEAR. THE DECISION WILL RESTORE PROTECTIONS FOR WOLVES ACROSS TENS OF THOUSANDS OF SQUARE MILES ACROSS THEIR RANGE, INCLUDING IN MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, AND WISCONSIN WHERE THE LARGEST POPULATIONS IN THE LOWER 48 LIVE. THE FEDERAL COURT RULING SECURED A STATE COURTROOM WIN LED BY THE CENTER THAT BLOCKED A FALL 2021 HUNT OF WOLVES IN WISCONSIN. HAD THE THREE UPPER GREAT LAKES STATES LAUNCHED WOLF-HUNTING SEASONS, THEY COULD HAVE COLLECTIVELY KILLED 1,000 WOLVES A YEAR. THE FEDERAL COURT RULING NOT ONLY PREVENTS SPORT KILLING, BUT IT LIMITS DAMAGE-CONTROL KILLING IN MICHIGAN AND WISCONSIN TO THREATS TO HUMAN LIFE (A VERY RARE EXCEPTION SINCE WOLVES ALMOST NEVER THREATEN PEOPLE). |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINES 1, 4A, 4B AND 4C - CONTINUED | A CAGE-FREE FUTURE: AT OUR URGING, AND THAT OF OTHER GROUPS LONG-ENGAGED ON THIS TOPIC, THIS YEAR THE USDA RELEASED ITS PROPOSED ORGANIC LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY STANDARDS RULE, WHICH CALLS FOR ELEVATED ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS IN ORGANIC ANIMAL AGRICULTURE. THE NEW RULE STIPULATES ANIMALS RAISED UNDER THE ORGANIC" LABEL GAIN VERY SPECIFIC PROTECTIONS WHEN IT COMES TO HOUSING AND OTHER HUSBANDRY STANDARDS, INCLUDING THE PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN PAINFUL PRACTICES, SUCH AS TAIL-DOCKING OF PIGS AND CATTLE AND DEBEAKING OF BIRDS. IMPORTANTLY, THE RULE SETS MINIMUM INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EGG-LAYING CHICKENS AND REQUIRES THAT PRODUCERS PROVIDE A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF EXITS AND OUTDOOR ENRICHMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO ENTICE BIRDS TO GO OUTSIDE ON A DAILY BASIS. IT ALSO SPECIFIES THAT COVERED PORCHES AND SIMILAR STRUCTURES DO NOT QUALIFY AS OUTDOOR SPACE. NOW WE NEED TO SEE A FINAL RULEMAKING ACTION THAT PROVIDES ONLY A SHORT PHASE-IN PERIOD AND THEN VIGOROUS OVERSIGHT. WE ALSO CONTINUED OUR WORK TO DEFEND CALIFORNIA'S LANDMARK PROPOSITION 12 FROM LEGAL CHALLENGES BY THE NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL AND THE AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION. PROPOSITION 12, THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO FARM ANIMALS ACT, WAS ENACTED BY A 63% MAJORITY OR 7.5 MILLION CALIFORNIA VOTERS IN 2018, BUILDING ON PROP 2 A DECADE EARLIER THAT RESTRICTED EXTREME CONFINEMENT OF LAYING HENS, VEAL CALVES, AND BREEDING PIGS. THE MOST RECENT MEASURE STIPULATES THAT ANY EGGS OR PORK SOLD IN THE STATE COME FROM ANIMALS AFFORDED SUFFICIENT SPACE TO MOVE AROUND, REGARDLESS OF WHERE THE ANIMALS ARE RAISED. TYSON, HORMEL, CLEMENS FOOD GROUP, NIMAN RANCH AND OTHERS HAVE SAID THEY CAN SUPPLY THE MARKET WITH ADJUSTMENTS THAT THEY'VE ALREADY MADE IN THEIR SOW HOUSING SYSTEMS. IN ADDITION TO FILING ITS OWN BRIEF, THE CENTER AND AWA ALSO WORKED CLOSELY WITH ITS TWO AGRICULTURAL VETERINARIANS, DRS. JIM KEEN AND THOMAS POOL, TO FILE THEIR OWN EXPERT AMICI BRIEF THAT LAYS BARE THE FALSE CLAIMS OF THE INDUSTRY AND THE VETERINARIANS WHO WORK FOR IT. TWO OF THE TOP ANIMAL-WELFARE VETERINARIANS IN THE UNITED STATES, DRS. KEEN AND POOL CRAFTED A COMPELLING COMPENDIUM OF THE MANY PUBLIC HEALTH AND ANIMAL WELFARE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONTINUED USE OF GESTATION CRATES PREVALENT IN OUR MODERN FACTORY FARMING SYSTEM. "THE DOOMSDAY FORECASTING OF EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECTS FOR THE PIG INDUSTRY IS A CONTRIVANCE AND A CHARADE," STATED WAYNE PACELLE, PRESIDENT OF THE CENTER. "KEY PLAYERS IN AMERICAN PORK PRODUCTION HAVE SAID THEY CAN READILY MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE CALIFORNIA MARKET, WHICH ACCOUNTS FOR LESS THAN 10% OF CONSUMPTION OF U.S.-PRODUCED PORK. IF FACTORY FARMERS IN IOWA AND NORTH CAROLINA DON'T WANT TO SUPPLY THE CALIFORNIA MARKET, THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO IT. THE HUMANE TREATMENT STANDARDS IN CALIFORNIA HAVE ALREADY BEEN RECOGNIZED AS A MARKET OPPORTUNITY BY THOUSANDS OF PIG FARMERS WHO ACTUALLY ENGAGE IN RESPONSIBLE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DON'T IMMOBILIZE ANIMALS IN CRATES." |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | THE PROCESS FOR REVIEWING THE FORM 990 PRIOR TO FILING INCLUDES CIRCULATION TO ALL BOARD MEMBERS AND THE PRESIDENT. IT IS ALSO CAREFULLY REVIEWED BY ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL PERSONNEL WITH EXPERIENCE IN PREPARING THIS TYPE OF DOCUMENT. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, IS CIRCULATED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS TO BOARD MEMBERS AND THE PRESIDENT WITH A REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS NOT KNOWN TO THE BOARD. ANY CONFLICTS THAT ARISE ARE ADDRESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY BY THE DISINTERESTED BOARD MEMBERS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15 | IN DETERMINING COMPENSATION FOR THE TOP MANAGEMENT, OFFICERS AND OTHER KEY PERSONNEL, THE ORGANIZATION TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE EXPERIENCE OF THE INCUMBENT AND COMPARABLE COMPENSATION DATA FOR SIMILAR POSITIONS WITHIN THE MARKET AREA. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | COPIES OF FORM 990 OR ANY GOVERNING DOCUMENTS CAN BE REQUESTED FROM THE ORGANIZATION VIA THE WEBSITE OR BY PHONE. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |