Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2019 | (b) 2020 | (c) 2021 | (d) 2022 | (e) 2023 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 507,794 | 595,436 | 425,819 | 888,051 | 503,548 | 2,920,648 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf .... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 507,794 | 595,436 | 425,819 | 888,051 | 503,548 | 2,920,648 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 542,783 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 2,377,865 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2019 | (b) 2020 | (c) 2021 | (d) 2022 | (e) 2023 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 507,794 | 595,436 | 425,819 | 888,051 | 503,548 | 2,920,648 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 955 | 831 | 332 | 1,105 | 11,571 | 14,794 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | 15 | 100,523 | 20,338 | 53 | 689 | 121,618 |
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 3,057,060 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal
year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2019 | (b) 2020 | (c) 2021 | (d) 2022 | (e) 2023 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2019 | (b) 2020 | (c) 2021 | (d) 2022 | (e) 2023 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2023 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2023 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2023 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2023 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2023 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2023: | ||||
| a From 2018....... | ||||
| b From 2019....... | ||||
| c From 2020....... | ||||
| d From 2021....... | ||||
| e From 2022....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2023 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2018 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2023 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2023 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2023, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2023. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2024. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2019..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2023..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| PART II, LINE 10 | OTHER INCOME 121,618 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PAGE 2, PART III, LINE 4A | ADVOCATE FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, HEALTHCARE, CONSUMER PROTECTION, EDUCATION REFORM AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY. THE ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ONLY LITIGATES CASES THAT SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST. IN 2023, OUR CASES ALL SERVED THE BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST. IN ALL OF THE CENTER'S CASES, WE DO NOT CHARGE OUR CLIENTS ATTORNEYS' FEES. ARIZONA DOES RECOGNIZE THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL DOCTRINE. UNDER THIS DOCTRINE, OR IF THERE IS A SPECIFIC STATUTE PROVIDING FOR AN AWARD OF FEES FOR THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY, IF THE CENTER IS SUCCESSFUL, THE CENTER WILL SEEK ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM THE ADVERSE PARTY (THE STATE OF ARIZONA). 1. THE CENTER IS LITIGATING A CASE AGAINST THE STATE OF ARIZONA FOR ITS FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY FUND THE CAPITAL NEEDS OF ARIZONAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. THIS CASE IS ACTUALLY A FOLLOW UP CASE TO ONE THAT THE CENTER SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATED 30 YEARS AGO. AS A RESULT OF THAT CASE, FUNDS WERE PROVIDED TO BRING ALL DILAPIDATED SCHOOLS UP TO STANDARD, AND MONEY WAS TO BE PROVIDED TO KEEP ALL SCHOOLS IN GOOD SHAPE. THE LEGISLATURE SUBSEQUENTLY DE-FUNDED MOST OF THE PROGRAMS THAT WERE ESTABLISHED AS PART OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE OLD CASE, AND ARIZONA IS ONCE AGAIN IN A SYSTEM UNDER WHICH A SCHOOL DISTRICTS ABILITY TO MEET ITS CAPITAL NEEDS DEPENDS TO A VERY LARGE EXTENT ON THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY WEALTH IN THE DISTRICT. IF THE CENTER IS SUCCESSFUL, THEN THE STATE WILL BE FORCED TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM THAT COMPLIES WITH THE GENERAL AND UNIFORM CLAUSE IN THE ARIZONA CONSTITUTION. THIS CASE WILL HELP THE APPROXIMATELY 900,000 TO 1,000,000 CHILDREN IN ARIZONAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. THE CASE IS CAPTIONED, GLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT V. STATE OF ARIZONA. THE NAMED PLAINTIFFS ARE FOUR ARIZONA SCHOOL DISTRICTS AS WELL AS THE ARIZONA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION, THE ARIZONA SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION, THE ARIZONA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, AND AN INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER. 2. THE CENTER SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATED A CASE AGAINST THE STATE OF ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF ALL OF ARIZONAS FOSTER CHILDREN. THIS CASE IS A CLASS ACTION, WHERE IN ADDITION TO THE GENERAL CLASS OF ALL FOSTER CHILDREN THERE ARE SUBCLASSES THAT PERTAIN TO SUBSETS OF CHILDREN (E.G., THOSE WHO RECEIVE MEDICAID SERVICES, AND THOSE WHO ARE PLACED IN NON-KINSHIP SETTINGS). THE BASIS OF THE CASE WAS THAT THE STATE FAILS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE AND APPROPRIATE SERVICES TO ARIZONAS FOSTER CHILDREN. THE STATE FAILS TO ASSURE THAT FOSTER CHILDREN RECEIVE APPROPRIATE MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE. THE STATE UNREASONABLY PLACES CHILDREN IN CONGREGATE CARE SETTINGS (WHICH ARE BAD FOR CHILDREN), UNREASONABLY SEPARATES SIBLINGS, FAILS TO TIMELY AND ADEQUATELY INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE OF CHILDREN WHILE IN CARE, AND MANY OTHER DEFICIENT PRACTICES. THE STATE VIGOROUSLY CONTESTED WHETHER THIS CASE MAY PROCEED AS A CLASS ACTION. THE CENTER (AND CO-COUNSEL) HAVE ACHIEVED VICTORIES ON THIS QUESTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, AND THAT RULING WAS LARGELY AFFIRMED ON APPEAL IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. THE CASE IS KNOWN AS B.K. V. MCKAY AND THE STATE OF ARIZONA. THE CASE SEEKS BROAD RELIEF ON BEHALF OF ALL CURRENT AND FUTURE FOSTER CHILDREN, AND OBVIOUSLY SERVES A BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST. THE PARTIES ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT COURT IN EARLY 2021. THE CENTER WILL CONTINUE TO BE INVOLVED IN MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. MONITORING IS ONGOING. ATTORNEY FEES FOR MONITORING RECEIVED 11/15/23 - 75,000. 3. IN 2023, THE CENTER CONTINUED ITS WORK APPEALING RULINGS PERTAINING TO THE STATE OF ARIZONAS REFUSAL TO HOLD IN TRUST THE LAND THAT WAS UNDER ARIZONAS NAVIGABLE RIVERS AT THE TIME THAT ARIZONA BECAME A STATE. ARIZONA HAS ATTEMPTED NUMEROUS TIMES TO CLAIM THAT ITS RIVERS WERE NOT NAVIGABLE AT STATEHOOD, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT ARIZONA COULD ESSENTIALLY GIVE THAT LAND AWAY TO PRIVATE LANDOWNERS. THE CENTER HAS CONTENDED ON BEHALF OF ITS CLIENTS THAT ARIZONA MUST HOLD THAT LAND IN TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL ARIZONANS IN PERPETUITY. THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN BLOCKING THE STATES ATTEMPTS IN THIS REGARD SEVERAL TIMES IN ARIZONAS COURT SYSTEM OVER THE PAST APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS. AS A RESULT OF THOSE CASES, ARIZONA CONVENED AN ADJUDICATION COMMISSION, WHICH RULED THAT VARIOUS RIVERS WERE NOT NAVIGABLE. THE CENTER IS APPEALING THOSE RULINGS IN A CASE KNOWS AS DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, DONALD STEUTER, JERRY VAN GASSE, AND JIM VAALER V. ARIZONA NAVIGABLE STREAM ADJUDICATION COMMISSION. THE CASE SERVES A BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST IN THAT IT SEEKS TO PRESERVE THESE PRECIOUS PUBLIC RESOURCES AND TO FORCE THE STATE TO HOLD THEM IN TRUST FOR THE PUBLIC NOW AND IN THE FUTURE. (NOTE: IN 2023 THE CENTER RECEIVED A RULING ON THIS CASE. NO FEES WERE AWARDED. THE APPELLATE COURT RULING DENIED MOST RELIEF SOUGHT, BUT GRANTED PARTIAL RELIEF.) WE CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STATE FOLLOWING THE COURT OF APPEALS' RULING. 4. IN 2023, THE CENTER REPRESENTED MULTIPLE INTERVENORS IN THREE UTILITY RATE CASES BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION. UTILITIES THAT SEEK RATE INCREASES ARE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR APPROVAL FROM THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION. SEVERAL WEEKS OF HEARINGS WERE HELD FOR PROPOSED INCREASES BY TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER ("TEP"), ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ("APS"), AND UNS ELECTRIC ("UNS") THROUGHOUT SPRING AND AUTUMN 2023. AMONG THE ISSUES THAT THE CENTER PROVIDED REPRESENTATION FOR WERE ROOFTOP AND COMMUNITY SOLAR, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERALLY, PROTECTIONS FOR LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS IN UTILITY BILLING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE FOR COAL-IMPACTED COMMUNITIES ON AND NEAR TRIBAL LANDS IN NORTHEASTERN ARIZONA. WHILE TEP AND UNS HAVE FINAL ADJUDICATIONS ON THE INCREASES, CHALLENGES TO A SOLAR-SPECIFIC "GRID ACCESS CHARGE" ARE STILL PENDING IN THE APS MATTER. 5. IN LATE 2023, THE CENTER BEGAN REPRESENTATION OF PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE ("PARA") IN THE CHALLENGE OF AN AQUIFER PROTECTION PERMIT ("APP") ISSUED BY ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TO THE SOUTH32 HERMOSA PROJECT, A LARGE MINE IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA THAT PRODUCES, AMONG OTHER MINERALS, LEAD, SILVER, COPPER, AND MANGANESE. THE APP RELIES ON THE QUALITY OF THE WATER DISCHARGED FROM THE MINE'S NEW WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND FAILS TO REQUIRE ACTUAL MONITORING OF THE AQUIFER. AT THE TIME THE CENTER JOINED, PARA HAD ALREADY APPEARED THROUGH PRIVATE COUNSEL AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPERIOR COURT LEVELS, AND THE CENTER ASSISTED IN THE APPELLATE PROCESS. THE CASE REMAINS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. 6. PROPOSITION 211 FILED 12/15/22 (MOSTLY STARTED IN 2023). THE CENTER BEGAN ITS PRO BONO REPRESENTATION OF A GROUP CALLED VOTERS RIGHT TO KNOW, WHICH SUCCESSFULLY PLACED AN INITIATIVE MEASURE ON THE BALLOT TO FORCE DISCLOSURE OF THOSE WHO SPEND SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF MONEY ON ELECTIONS- RELATED ACTIVITIES TO IDENTIFY THEIR ORIGINAL DONORS. THUS, A GROUP COULD NOT USE A POTENTIALLY DECEPTIVE NAME TO SHIELD THE IDENTITIES OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF DONORS. SEVERAL LAWSUITS HAVE BEEN FILED BY OPPONENTS OF THE BALLOT MEASURE, WHICH WON OVERWHELMING SUPPORT IN THE 2022 ELECTION. THE CENTER IS ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL WITH CO-COUNSEL FROM THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER TO DEFEND THE VOTERS RIGHT TO KNOW ACT. AS DESCRIBED IN OTHER MATTERS ABOVE, DEFENDING THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE TO LEGISLATE THROUGH DIRECT DEMOCRACY INITIATIVES IS A CORE MISSION OF THE CENTER. IT SERVES THE PUBLIC INTEREST BY VINDICATING THE PUBLICS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PUT LEGISLATION ON THE BALLOT. THESE CASES ARE PRESENTLY ON APPEAL AND REMAIN VERY ACTIVE. OUR ROLE CONTINUES TO BE AS LOCAL COUNSEL. 7. THE CENTER IS REPRESENTING SEVERAL CITIZENS GROUPS, PODER LATINX, CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, AND CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA ACTION FUND IN LITIGATION FILED 8/25/22. THE CENTER IS ACTING AS CO-COUNSEL WITH ATTORNEYS FROM THE FAIR ELECTIONS CENTER AND OTHERS. THE SUIT SEEKS TO INVALIDATE TWO LAWS PASSED BY THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE, WHICH REQUIRE CERTAIN TYPES OF PROOF OF RESIDENCY AND CITIZENSHIP IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE. THE LAWS ARE WRITTEN IN A WAY THAT VIOLATES BOTH FEDERAL LAW AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. THEY ARE LIKELY TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST VARIOUS PROTECTED CLASSES OF INDIVIDUALS, PERHAPS MOST NOTABLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE BECOME NATURALIZED CITIZENS. PROTECTING AGAINST UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO VOTE ARE CORE MISSIONS OF THE CENTER AND OBVIOUSLY SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST. THESE CASES CONTINUE TO WORK THEIR WAY THROUGH THE APPELLATE COURT. IN FACT, AN ISSUE WAS BROUGHT ALL THE WAY TO THE US SUPREME COURT, AND IS PRESENTLY IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. 8. SIERRA CLUB V. SRP FILED 6/2/22. THE CENTER REPRESENTS THE SIERRA CLUB IN A SUIT SEEKING TO FORCE SALT RIVER PROJECT (A LARGE UTILITY) TO COMPLY WITH ARIZONAS PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. ARIZONA HAS A STRONG PUBLIC POLICY TO MAKE THE RECORDS OF PUBLIC ENTITIES ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. SRP |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 7A | BOARD MEMBERS ELECT NEW BOARD MEMBERS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND TREASURER REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTE TO BOARD MEMBERS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | THE ORGANIZATION REGULARLY AND CONSISTENTLY MONITORS AND ENFORCES COMPLIANCE WITH ITS CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | THE BOARD TREASURER REVIEWED COMPENSATION SURVEYS FROM THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA AND OTHER SOURCES TO DETERMINE THAT THE SALARY FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IS REASONABLE. THAT INFORMATION WAS SHARED WITH, AND DISCUSSED BY, BOARD MEMBERS AT ONE OF THE BOARDS MEETINGS. THE REVIEW AND SUBSTANTIATION IS DOCUMENTED IN THE BOARDS RECORDS. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DETERMINES COMPENSATION FOR STAFF SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | THEY ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN OUR OFFICE AND UPON REQUEST BY ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. |
| FORM 990, PART XI, LINE 9 | DIRECT COSTS OF SPECIAL EVENT 70,535 DIRECT COSTS OF SPECIAL EVENT -70,535 |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |