Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 53,000 | 270,548 | 140,000 | 336,000 | 346,000 | 1,145,548 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf .... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 53,000 | 270,548 | 140,000 | 336,000 | 346,000 | 1,145,548 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 794,979 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 350,569 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 53,000 | 270,548 | 140,000 | 336,000 | 346,000 | 1,145,548 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 1,145,548 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal
year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2024 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2024 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2024: | ||||
| a From 2019....... | ||||
| b From 2020....... | ||||
| c From 2021....... | ||||
| d From 2022....... | ||||
| e From 2023....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2019 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2024 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2024, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2024. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2025. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2023..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2024..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A, LEGAL CASES CONTINUED: | WISCONSIN DAIRY ALLIANCE INC. V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS, CASE NUMBER 2024AP458) THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED THIS LAWSUIT IN 2023 ON BEHALF OF TWO ORGANIZATIONS THAT REPRESENT DAIRY FARMERS. THIS LAWSUIT CHALLENGES THE VALIDITY OF TWO ADMINISTRATIVE RULES ADOPTED BY THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR). ONE OF THOSE RULES REQUIRES CERTAIN LIVESTOCK FARMS TO HAVE A WASTEWATER-DISCHARGE PERMIT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE DNR CAN PROVE THAT THEY ARE DISCHARGING WASTEWATER. THE OTHER RULE REQUIRES CERTAIN LIVESTOCK FARMS TO HAVE A WASTEWATER-DISCHARGE PERMIT TO QUALIFY FOR THE STORMWATER-DISCHARGE EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. THIS LAWSUIT AIMS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY CLARIFYING THAT THE DNR CANNOT REQUIRE AN OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A "POINT SOURCE" OF WATER POLLUTION TO OBTAIN A WASTEWATER-DISCHARGE PERMIT IF THE DNR CANNOT PROVE THAT THE POINT SOURCE IS DISCHARGING A POLLUTANT INTO A WATER OF THE STATE. THIS LAWSUIT ALSO AIMS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY REDUCING REGULATORY COSTS FOR DAIRY FARMS, THEREBY HELPING TO LOWER THE COST OF FOOD AND BENEFIT THE ECONOMY OF RURAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITIES THAT RELY HEAVILY ON THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR. IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED AN APPEAL FROM A TRIAL COURT DECISION UPHOLDING THE DISPUTED REGULATIONS. THE LITIGATION CENTER SUBSEQUENTLY FILED TWO BRIEFS IN THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS. THE LITIGATION CENTER ALSO FILED A RESPONSE BRIEF OPPOSING A BYPASS PETITION IN THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. MINKS V. CITY OF NEENAH (WINNEBAGO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CASE NUMBER 23CV258) THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED THIS LAWSUIT IN 2023 ON BEHALF OF FOUR RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS IN THE CITY OF NEENAH, WISCONSIN. IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUPPORTING BRIEFS. THE TRIAL COURT SUBSEQUENTLY GRANTED THE LITIGATION CENTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARED SEVERAL PROVISIONS IN NEENAH'S SIGN ORDINANCE TO BE UNLAWFUL, AND ISSUED A PERMANENT INJUNCTION BLOCKING ENFORCEMENT OF THOSE PROVISIONS. THIS LAWSUIT CHALLENGED THE VALIDITY OF NEENAH'S SIGN ORDINANCE. THE LAWSUIT ALLEGED THAT THE SIGN ORDINANCE VIOLATED THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH IN SEVERAL WAYS. THIS LAWSUIT BENEFITTED THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL FREE-SPEECH RIGHTS OF NEENAH RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES. THIS LAWSUIT ALSO SOUGHT TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY SETTING JUDICIAL PRECEDENT STRIKING DOWN THIS TYPE OF ORDINANCE, THEREBY ENCOURAGING OTHER WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES TO REPEAL SIMILAR SIGN ORDINANCES OR AT LEAST PROVIDING JUDICIAL PRECEDENT FOR CHALLENGING THOSE OTHER ORDINANCES. PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1988, THE TRIAL COURT AWARDED THE LITIGATION CENTER $101,807.50 IN ATTORNEY FEES AND $189.57 IN COSTS, ALONG WITH $4 IN NOMINAL DAMAGES FOR THE LITIGATION CENTER'S FOUR CLIENTS. BINVERSIE V. TOWN OF EUREKA (POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CASE NUMBER 2024CV209) IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED THIS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE TOWN OF EUREKA IN POLK COUNTY, WISCONSIN ON BEHALF OF TWO RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS IN EUREKA. THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THAT A EUREKA ORDINANCE UNLAWFULLY IMPOSES SEVERAL MONETARY AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ON LIVESTOCK FARMS OVER A CERTAIN SIZE. THIS LAWSUIT SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PREVENTING THE TOWN FROM SPENDING TAXPAYER MONEY ENFORCING AN UNLAWFUL ORDINANCE. THIS LAWSUIT ALSO SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY REMOVING THE TOWN'S ONEROUS AND UNLAWFUL RESTRICTIONS ON LIVESTOCK FARMS, THEREBY ALLOWING LIVESTOCK FARMS TO MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE PRICES FOR THEIR PRODUCTS AND GENERALLY PROMOTING THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR OF THIS RURAL COMMUNITY'S ECONOMY. THIS LAWSUIT ALSO SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY SETTING JUDICIAL PRECEDENT STRIKING DOWN THIS TYPE OF ORDINANCESEVERAL OTHER MUNICIPALITIES IN WISCONSIN HAVE A VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL ORDINANCE. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE INC. V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DANE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CASE NO. 2023CV3275) THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED THIS LAWSUIT IN 2023 ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION THAT HAD SUBMITTED A PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST TO THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ). THE DOJ DENIED THE PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST, CLAIMING THAT EVERY RESPONSIVE DOCUMENT WAS PRIVILEGED AS AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION OR AS ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. THE REQUEST SOUGHT DOCUMENTS SHOWING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE DOJ AND A PRIVATE LAW FIRM THAT THE WISCONSIN STATE GOVERNMENT HAD HIRED TO SUE WISCONSIN BUSINESSES FOR USING AND MANUFACTURING CERTAIN LAWFUL CHEMICALS. IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED BRIEFS ON ITS CLAIMS IN THIS CASE. LATER IN 2024, THE TRIAL COURT AWARDED SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE LITIGATION CENTER, ORDERING THE DOJ TO TURN OVER DOZENS OF REQUESTED RECORDS TO THE LITIGATION CENTER'S CLIENT. THE TRIAL COURT ALSO AWARDED JUDGMENT TO THE DOJ BY DISMISSING THE LITIGATION CENTER'S CLAIM THAT THE DOJ HAD UNLAWFULLY DELAYED ITS RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR RECORDS. THIS LAWSUIT SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY COMPELLING A GOVERNMENT AGENCY TO PUBLICLY DISCLOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO AN ISSUE OF STATEWIDE INTEREST. GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY IS IN THE PUBLIC'S GENERAL INTEREST. IN THE COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER, THE LITIGATION CENTER INCLUDED A REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER HAD NOT RECEIVED ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. EVERS V. MARKLEIN (WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, CASE NO. 2023AP2020-OA) SEVERAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH OFFICIALS IN THE WISCONSIN STATE GOVERNMENT FILED THIS LAWSUIT AGAINST SEVERAL STATE LEGISLATORS, ALLEGING THAT SEVERAL WISCONSIN STATUTES UNCONSTITUTIONALLY ALLOW A LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE TO OBJECT TO PROPOSED OR ADOPTED AGENCY REGULATIONS. IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT IN THIS CASE. THE AMICUS BRIEF ARGUED THAT A LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE MAY CONSTITUTIONALLY OBJECT TO A PROPOSED AGENCY REGULATION. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF SOUGHT TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PRESERVING WISCONSIN'S SEPARATION OF POWERS, INCLUDING IMPORTANT LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT OF UNELECTED AGENCY OFFICIALS. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR RECEIVE ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE, INC. AND LEATHER RICH, INC. V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, APPEAL NUMBER 22AP718) IN THIS MATTER, A NOT-FOR-PROFIT BUSINESS TRADE ASSOCIATION AND A DRY CLEANER FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE WISCONSIN STATE GOVERNMENT TO SEEK A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING A STATE AGENCY FROM ENFORCING UNPROMULGATED RULES ON SO-CALLED EMERGING CONTAMINANTS UNDER WISCONSIN'S SPILLS LAW. THE BUSINESS TRADE ASSOCIATION IS JOINTLY REPRESENTED BY THE LITIGATION CENTER AND BY THE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND LIBERTY, A 501(C)(3) NOT-FOR-PROFIT, PUBLIC-INTEREST LAW FIRM. IN 2024, THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED A WRITTEN OPINION AFFIRMING THE TRIAL COURT'S DECISION, CONCLUDING THAT THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) WAS UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING "UNPROMULGATED RULES" REGARDING WHAT THE DNR CALLS "EMERGING CONTAMINANTS." SUBSEQUENTLY IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED A RESPONSE BRIEF OPPOSING A PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT. AFTER THAT PETITION WAS GRANTED, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED A BRIEF AT THE MERITS STAGE IN THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT. THIS LITIGATION WOULD BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY FORCING THE DNR TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW AND PROMULGATE RULES DESIGNATING CERTAIN EMERGING CONTAMINANTS AS HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES UNDER THE SPILLS LAW. THE DNR'S AD HOC ENFORCEMENT OF UNWRITTEN RULES REGARDING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES HARMS THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE FAIR WARNING OF WHICH SUBSTANCES ARE CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS OR IN WHAT CONCENTRATIONS OR CONTEXTS. REQUIRING THE DNR TO FOLLOW THE FORMAL RULEMAKING PROCESS WOULD BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY ALLOWING FOR LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT, ALLOWING PUBLIC INPUT IN THE RULEMAKING PROCESS, AND PROVIDING CLEAR GUIDANCE TO THE PUBLIC AS TO WHAT THE RULES ARE. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR RECEIVE ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. HAWTHORNE PLACE LLC ET AL. V VILLAGE OF DOUSMAN AND VILLAGE OF PEWAUKEE (WAUKESHA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CASE NUMBER 2024CV1584) IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED THIS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE VILLAGES OF DOUSMAN AND PEWAUKEE TO CHALLENGE THE VALIDITY OF THEIR ORDINANCES THAT IMPOSE ANNUAL "FIRE-PROTECTION FEES" ON ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN EACH VILLAGE. THIS LAWSUIT WAS FILED ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION, A TAXPAYER, AND TWO BUSINESSES. THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THAT THESE "FEES" ARE REALLY INVALID SPECIAL CHARGES AND UNLAWFUL PROPERTY TAXES. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A, LEGAL CASES CONTINUED: | THIS LAWSUIT SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PREVENTING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM ILLEGALLY CREATING NEW TAXES IN CIRCUMVENTION OF LEGAL LIMITS ON TAX INCREASES. THIS LITIGATION AFFECTS ALL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE VILLAGE OF PEWAUKEE AND THE VILLAGE OF DOUSMAN. IT ALSO AFFECTS BROAD PUBLIC INTERESTS INVOLVING THE POWER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO ADOPT NEW FEES AND TAXES. SEVERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN WISCONSIN HAVE ADOPTED A "FIRE-PROTECTION FEE OR "FIRE/EMS FEE" SIMILAR TO THE ONES BEING CHALLENGED IN THIS MATTER. THIS LITIGATION SEEKS TO SET A JUDICIAL PRECEDENT DECLARING THAT VILLAGES MAY NOT ENACT THIS TYPE OF FEE; SUCH JUDICIAL PRECENT WOULD HELP PREVENT OTHER COMMUNITIES FROM ADOPTING OR ENFORCING A SIMILAR FEE. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. ESTATE OF SARAH KRENTZ V. MOTOR CASTINGS COMPANY (WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS, CASE NUMBER 2023AP1803) ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN 2024 IN THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS. THIS CASE INVOLVES TORT LIABILITY FOR ASBESTOS EXPOSURE. FOLLOWING A TRIAL, THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FOUND MOTOR CASTINGS CO. LIABLE BECAUSE ONE OF ITS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES ALLEGEDLY BROUGHT ASBESTOS HOME ON HIS WORK CLOTHES, ALLEGEDLY CAUSING HIS STEPDAUGHTER TO FATALLY DEVELOP MESOTHELIOMA. THE LITIGATION CENTER ARGUED AGAINST THE LEGAL VIABILITY OF THIS THEORY OF "TAKE-HOME" LIABILITY. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF SOUGHT TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PROTECTING PERSONS FROM LIMITLESS LIABILITY FOR "TAKE-HOME" EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. THE AMICUS BRIEF ALSO SOUGHT TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY MAINTAINING REASONABLE AND LEGAL LIMITS ON TORT LIABILITY IN WISCONSIN, ALLOWING FOR THIS STATE TO HAVE A LEGAL CLIMATE CONDUCIVE TO ECONOMIC INVESTMENT. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. YOTAHM VEASEY V. FII USA, INC. (WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS, CASE NUMBER 2024AP1327-LV) IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION. THE AMICUS BRIEF URGED THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS TO HEAR THIS APPEAL AND CLARIFY THAT EMPLOYERS IN WISCONSIN MAY ENGAGE IN TIMECLOCK ROUNDING WHEN CALCULATING THE WAGES OWED TO THEIR HOURLY EMPLOYEES. THE AMICUS BRIEF NOTED THAT TIMECLOCK ROUNDING BENEFITS EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY CLARIFYING THE LEGALITY OF TIMECLOCK ROUNDING, A PRACTICE THAT MANY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EMPLOYERS PERFORM WHEN DETERMINING THE WAGES OWED TO HOURLY EMPLOYEES. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY ENCOURAGING THE APPELLATE COURT TO UPHOLD THE PRACTICE OF TIMECLOCK ROUNDING, WHICH IS BENEFICIAL FOR BOTH EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. THE AMICUS BRIEF ALSO SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY CLARIFYING THIS AREA OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN WISCONSIN, ALLOWING FOR THIS STATE TO HAVE A LEGAL CLIMATE CONDUCIVE TO ECONOMIC INVESTMENT. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. UNITED STATES V. CLARK (U.S. SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, CASE NUMBERS 24-1320 & 24-1321) IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. IN THIS CASE, A MANAGER AT A GRAIN MILL WAS SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR A FATAL, ACCIDENTAL EXPLOSION. THIS APPEAL MAINLY FOCUSES ON THE VAGUENESS OF A FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER WHICH THIS MANAGER WAS CONVICTED. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF RAISED VAGUENESS CONCERNS WITH THIS FEDERAL REGULATION. THE LITIGATION CENTER'S AMICUS BRIEF SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY SEEKING CLARITY ON THIS FEDERAL REGULATION. THE AMICUS BRIEF SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PREVENTING THE GOVERNMENT FROM CONVICTING AND SENTENCING PERSONS TO PRISON FOR ALLEGEDLY VIOLATING AN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE REGULATION. THE AMICUS BRIEF SEEKS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PRESERVING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FAIR NOTICE OF WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE, INC. V. CITY OF NEENAH (PRE-LAWSUIT; NO CASE NUMBER) IN 2024, THE LITIGATION CENTER SERVED THE CITY OF NEENAH WITH A NOTICE OF CLAIM ON BEHALF OF A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TRADE ORGANIZATION, ARGUING THAT NEENAH'S "TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT FEE" IS AN UNLAWFUL TAX. THIS NOTICE OF CLAIM WAS A PREREQUISITE TO FILING A LAWSUIT. SUBSEQUENTLY, NEENAH'S CITY COUNCIL REPEALED THIS ILLEGAL TAX AND THEREBY AVOIDED A LAWSUIT. THIS NOTICE OF CLAIM SOUGHT TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY PREVENTING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM ILLEGALLY CREATING NEW TAXES IN CIRCUMVENTION OF LEGAL LIMITS ON TAX INCREASES. IN SERVING THIS NOTICE OF CLAIM, THE LITIGATION CENTER SOUGHT TO SET A JUDICIAL PRECEDENT DECLARING THAT A "TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT FEE" IS AN UNLAWFUL TAX; SUCH JUDICIAL PRECENT WOULD HELP PREVENT OTHER COMMUNITIES FROM ADOPTING OR ENFORCING A SIMILAR FEE. THE LITIGATION CENTER DID NOT SEEK OR OBTAIN ANY FEES IN THIS MATTER. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7A | THE DIRECTORS OF THE CORPORATION SHALL BE APPOINTED BY WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE, INC. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | THE PREPARED FORM 990 IS REVIEWED BY THE OFFICERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY AND THE AUDIT/FINANCE COMMITTEE BEFORE THE RETURN IS FILED WITH THE IRS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | ANNUALLY ALL DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS COMPLETE AND SIGN A STATEMENT THAT PROVIDES INFORMATION REGARDING THEIR INTERESTS AND THOSE OF THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS THAT COULD GIVE RISE TO CONFLICTS. THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY MAKE DETERMINATIONS OF WHETHER A CONFLICT EXISTS AND REVIEW ACTUAL CONFLICTS. ANY PERSON WITH A CONFLICT IS PROHIBITED FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE GOVERNING BODY'S DELIBERATIONS AND DECISIONS IN THE TRANSACTION. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15A | COMPENSATION WAS DETERMINED BASED UPON THE MARKET RATE FOR AN ATTORNEY WITH LITIGATION EXPERIENCE IN DANE COUNTY, AND WAS COMPARED WITH COMPENSATION FOR ATTORNEYS DOING SIMILAR NONPROFIT WORK. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |