Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 301,289 | 469,175 | 455,150 | 302,484 | 381,805 | 1,909,903 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf .... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 301,289 | 469,175 | 455,150 | 302,484 | 381,805 | 1,909,903 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 583,160 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 1,326,743 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 301,289 | 469,175 | 455,150 | 302,484 | 381,805 | 1,909,903 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 621 | 678 | 773 | 844 | 1,522 | 4,438 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 1,932,014 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal
year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2024 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2024 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2024: | ||||
| a From 2019....... | ||||
| b From 2020....... | ||||
| c From 2021....... | ||||
| d From 2022....... | ||||
| e From 2023....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2019 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2024 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2024, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2024. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2025. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2023..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2024..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART III 4A, DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM SERVICE: - CONTINUED | ALF'S NATIONALLY RENOWNED AMICUS CURIAE PROGRAM WAS EXCEPTIONALLY PROLIFIC DURING 2023 AND CONTINUING INTO THE FIRST PART OF 2024. WE FILED, EITHER AT THE REQUEST OF THE NATION'S LEADING LAW FIRMS OR ON OUR OWN INITIATIVE, A TOTAL OF 29 AMICUS BRIEFS 23 IN THE SUPREME COURT, 5 IN FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEALS, AND 1 IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. THESE BRIEFS WERE FILED IN CAREFULLY SELECTED CASES VETTED BY ALF CHAIRMAN & PRESIDENT DAN FISK, ALF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL LARRY EBNER, AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. LARRY, WHO HAS BEEN ELECTED A FELLOW OF THE PRESTIGIOUS AMERICAN ACADEMY OF APPELLATE LAWYERS, PERSONALLY HAS AUTHORED MOST OF ALF'S AMICUS BRIEFS SINCE SEPTEMBER 2020. HE ALSO HAS RECRUITED A GROWING CADRE OF SKILLED APPELLATE SPECIALISTS EAGER TO ASSIST ALF ON A PRO BONO BASIS. DURING 2023, WE ALSO SUCCESSFULLY BROUGHT ON BOARD ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL HANNAH MARCLEY, A PREVIOUS ALF LAW CLERK WHO NOW HAS REJOINED US AS AN EXPERIENCED ATTORNEY. ALF'S AMICUS BRIEFS REPEATEDLY RECEIVE HIGH PRAISE AND WITH INCREASING FREQUENCY, THE ATTENTION OF NATIONAL LEGAL MEDIA. AS ALWAYS, OUR BRIEFS ADDRESS A BROAD VARIETY OF CRITICAL, CUTTING-EDGE LEGAL ISSUES ENCOMPASSED BY ONE OR MORE OF ALF'S SIX ADVOCACY MISSIONS. SOME HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR 2023 / EARLY 2024 AMICUS FILINGS, LISTED BELOW, INCLUDE: > A SUPREME COURT BRIEF IN A "SLIPPERY SLOPE" CASE ARGUING THAT CONGRESS CANNOT CONSTITUTIONALLY TAX UNREALIZED ECONOMIC GAINS, I.E. WEALTH, AS INCOME. > A BRIEF URGING THE SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE WHETHER, AS ALF CONTENDS, FEDERAL LAW PREEMPTS STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE COUNTRY FROM FILING SUITS AGAINST FOSSIL-FUEL ENERGY COMPANIES SEEKING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN DAMAGES FOR THE ALLEGED LOCAL EFFECTS OF THE OIL & GAS INDUSTRY'S ALLEGED CONTRIBUTIONS TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE. > A SUPREME COURT BRIEF CHALLENGING SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS ON STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS. > SUPREME COURT BRIEFS INCLUDING IN THE STUDENT LOAN DEBT CANCELLATION CASEA DVOCATING FOR JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT OF CONGRESS' EXCLUSIVE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO EXERCISE THE "POWER OF THE PURSE" UNDER THE APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE. > A SUPREME COURT BRIEF SUPPORTING THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR CHALLENGE TO THE CHEVRON DEFERENCE DOCTRINE, WHICH REQUIRES COURTS TO ACCEPT FEDERAL AGENCIES' INTERPRETATIONS OF THE STATUTES THAT DEFINE THE EXTENT OF THEIR REGULATORY AUTHORITY > BRIEFS ADVOCATING FOR SOUND SCIENCE, INCLUDING IN A WELL-PUBLICIZED SUPREME COURT CASE CONCERNING SOCIAL MEDIA'S GOVERNMENT-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTIFIC DEBATE CONCERNING COVID-19, AND IN A CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT CASE CONCERNING A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY'S ALLEGED LIABILITY FOR CHOOSING WHETHER AND WHEN TO DEVELOP A PARTICULAR PRESCRIPTION DRUG. > THREE SUPREME COURT BRIEFS SUPPORTING INDIVIDUALS WHOSE PROPERTY RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. THE SPECIFIC ISSUES THAT OUR AMICUS BRIEFS ADDRESSED DURING 2023 / EARLY 2024 ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW. DETAILS OF THE CASES IN WHICH WE FILED, AND THE BRIEFS THEMSELVES, ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE THROUGH ALF'S ROBUST WEBSITE, ATLANTICLEGAL.ORG. FOSTERING SOUND SCIENCE WHETHER EXECUTIVE BRANCH OFFICIALS' EFFORTS TO PRESSURE SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES INTO SUPPRESSING SCIENTIFIC DEBATE ABOUT THE EFFICACY AND/OR RISKS OF COVID-19 MITIGATION MEASURES CONFLICT WITH SOUND SCIENCE AS WELL AS THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH (MURTHY V. MISSOURI) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER THE FEDERAL PESTICIDE STATUTE PREEMPTS STATE-LAW DAMAGES CLAIMS BASED ON A MANUFACTURER'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE A HEALTH-RELATED LABEL WARNING THAT THE U.S. EPA DETERMINED IS SCIENTIFICALLY UNWARRANTED AND WOULD BE FALSE AND MISLEADING. (CARSON V. MONSANTO CO.) (11TH CIRCUIT) WHETHER THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S EXCLUSION OF ALL INDUSTRY-AFFILIATED SCIENTISTS FROM THE CLEAN AIR SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE UNDERMINES SOUND SCIENCE AS WELL AS VIOLATES THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACT'S REQUIREMENT THAT ALL FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES BE "FAIRLY BALANCED IN TERMS OF THE POINTS OF VIEW REPRESENTED" (YOUNG V. EPA) (D.C. CIRCUIT) PROMOTING FREE ENTERPRISE & CIVIL JUSTICE WHETHER FEDERAL COMMON LAW OR STATE CONTRACT LAW SHOULD GOVERN THE DEFINITION OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT (GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. V. CRYSTAL SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER THE "INTERNAL AFFAIRS" EXCEPTION TO THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT'S EXPANDED REMOVAL PROVISION SHOULD BE INTERPRETED NARROWLY OR BROADLY (COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. V. SUDHOLT) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER THE FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT PREEMPTS CLIMATE CHANGE-RELATED, STATE-LAW TORT SUITS BROUGHT BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AGAINST FOSSIL-FUEL ENERGY COMPANIES (SUNOCO V. CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER THE EXPERT WITNESS ADMISSIBILITY CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 702 SHOULD APPLY TO EXPERT TESTIMONY PROFFERED TO SATISFY THE ELEVATED FRAUD-PLEADING STANDARDS IN SECURITIES FRAUD LITIGATION (NVIDIA CORP. V. E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER AN INNOVATIVE PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECTED TO LIABILITY UNDER STATE TORT LAW FOR DECIDING TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND DEVELOPMENT AND POSTPONE COMMERCIALIZATION OF AN ALLEGEDLY SAFER ALTERNATIVE TO ITS EXISTING FEDERALLY APPROVED PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRODUCT (GILEAD TENOFOVIR CASES) (CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT) WHETHER THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGES PROTECT FROM DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH AN OUTSIDE COUNSEL-CONDUCTED INTERNAL INVESTIGATION REQUESTED BY A CORPORATION (IN RE FIRSTENERGY CORP. SECURITIES FRAUD LITIGATION) (6TH CIRCUIT) WHETHER THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS IN THE TERMS & CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRONIC TICKETS ARE ENFORCEABLE AGAINST ALL PERSONS WHO USE THE TICKETS TO GAIN ADMISSION TO SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, OR OTHER TYPES OF EVENTS (NAIMOLI V. PRO-FOOTBALL, INC.) (4TH CIRCUIT) WHETHER THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT'S "TRANSPORTATION WORKERS" EXEMPTION IS LIMITED TO WORKERS IN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY (BISSONNETTE V. LEPAGE BAKERIES PARK ST., LLC) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER COURTS MUST RESPECT THE CONTRACTING PARTIES' DECISION TO DELEGATE QUESTIONS OF ARBITRABILITY TO THE ARBITRATOR WHEN A LATER CONTRACT MIGHT MODIFY AN EARLIER ONE (COINBASE, INC. V. SUSKI) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER AN ONLINE SELLER WHOSE PRODUCTS SHIP NATIONWIDE THROUGH A THIRD-PARTY VIRTUAL "STOREFRONT" SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN EVERY STATE INTO WHICH EVEN ONE OF ITS PRODUCTS IS SHIPPED (PHOTOPLAZA, INC. V. HERBAL BRANDS, INC. (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER THE IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND SEC RULE 10B-5 DOES NOT ENCOMPASS CLAIMS FOR ALLEGED OMISSIONS OF DISCLOSURES REQUIRED UNDER ITEM 303 OF SEC REGULATION S-K (MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE CORP. V. MOAB PARTNERS, L.P. (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER THE CIVIL ACTION TREBLE DAMAGES PROVISION OF THE RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT ("RICO") DOES NOT EXTEND TO ECONOMIC HARM DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM PERSONAL INJURIES (MEDICAL MARIJUANA, INC. V. HORN) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER AN INTERVENOR'S INTEREST IN TRANSPARENCY IS SUFFICIENT TO CONFER STANDING TO SEEK ACCESS TO SEALED OR PROTECTED JUDICIAL RECORDS, OR WHETHER AN INTERVENOR MUST SHOW PERSONALIZED "ADVERSE EFFECTS" TO SEEK DOCUMENT UNSEALING (TARDY V. CORRECTIONS CORP. OF AMERICA) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER THE EXPERT TESTIMONY ADMISSIBILITY CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 702 APPLY TO CLASS CERTIFICATION DECISIONS (CARR V. GOOGLE, LLC) (9TH CIRCUIT) WHETHER A SELF-APPOINTED AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT "TESTER" HAS ARTICLE III STANDING TO CHALLENGE A HOTEL'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE DISABILITY ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION ON ITS WEBSITE, EVEN IF SHE LACKS ANY INTENTION OF VISITING THAT PLACE (ACHESON HOTELS, LLC V. LAUFER) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER A FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IS REQUIRED TO STAY ALL JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS WHILE DENIAL OF A MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS BEING APPEALED (COINBASE, INC. V. BIELSKI) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) ENFORCING THE CONSTITUTION & CURBING THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE WHETHER A REQUIREMENT TO PAY A FEE TO OBTAIN A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS EXEMPT FROM THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS DOCTRINE, AND THUS DOES NOT VIOLATE THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S JUST COMPENSATION/TAKINGS CLAUSE, MERELY BECAUSE THE EXACTION WAS IMPOSED THROUGH LEGISLATION (SHEETZ V. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) |
| FORM 990, PART III 4A, DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM SERVICE: - CONTINUED | WHETHER INDIVIDUALS WHOSE PROPERTY IS TAKEN WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION CAN SEEK REDRESS UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S JUST COMPENSATION/TAKINGS CLAUSE EVEN IF THE STATE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT AFFIRMATIVELY PROVIDED THEM WITH A CAUSE OF ACTION (DEVILLIER V. TEXAS) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) "IN HOUSE" CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE STRUCTURALLY CONSTITUTIONAL (SEC V. JARKESY) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER DUE PROCESS PERMITS A COURT TO EXERCISE SPECIFIC PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER A CORPORATE DEFENDANT BASED SOLELY ON THE FORUM CONTACTS OF AN ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR (BASF METALS, LTD. V. KPFF INVESTMENT, INC. (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER TAXATION OF UNREALIZED ECONOMIC GAINS VIOLATES THE SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION (MOORE V. UNITED STATES) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER "CHEVRON" JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES' INTERPRETATIONS OF THE STATUTES THAT THEY ADMINISTER SHOULD BE OVERRULED (LOPER BRIGHT ENT. V. RAIMONDO) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU'S CONGRESSIONALLY ENACTED SELF-FUNDING MECHANISM VIOLATES THE APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION (CFPB V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT AUTHORIZES THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO CREATE AND OPERATE A "POST-COMPLETION OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING PROGRAM" THAT ALLOWS HOLDERS OF "F-1" NONIMMIGRANT STUDENT VISAS TO STAY AND WORK IN THE UNITED STATES UP TO 3 YEARS AFTER RECEIVING A UNIVERSITY-LEVEL "STEM" (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, OR MATHEMATICS) DEGREE (WASHINGTON ALLIANCE OF TECHNOLOGY WORKERS V. DHS) (SUPREME COURT) (PETITION STAGE) WHETHER A LOCAL GOVERNMENT VIOLATES THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S JUST COMPENSATION/TAKINGS CLAUSE WHEN IT KEEPS, AS AUTHORIZED BY A STATE STATUTE, THE SURPLUS PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF A HOME THAT IT SEIZES TO COLLECT A DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX OR OTHER DEBT (TYLER V. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) WHETHER THE ADMINISTRATION'S PLAN TO UNILATERALLY CANCEL A HALF-TRILLION DOLLARS IN STUDENT LOAN DEBT VIOLATES THE APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION (BIDEN V. NEBRASKA) (SUPREME COURT) (MERITS STAGE) |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | ATLANTIC LEGAL HAS ENGAGED AN OUTSIDE ACCOUNTING FIRM TO PREPARE ITS FORM 990. THE FORM 990, IS PREPARED BY THE OUTSIDE ACCOUNTING FIRM, IS PROVIDED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND EACH DIRECTOR BY ELECTRONIC MAIL PRIOR TO FILING WITH THE IRS. EACH DIRECTOR IS ASKED TO REVIEW THE FORM 990 AND PROVIDE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. THE OFFICERS OF THE FOUNDATION AND THE FOUNDATION'S BOOKKEEPING CONSULTANT ARE IN FREQUENT COMMUNICATION WITH THE FOUNDATION'S OUTSIDE ACCOUNTANTS BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND TELEPHONE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION, RAISE QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE COMMENTS ON THE FORM 990 PRIOR TO FILING WITH THE IRS. AFTER ALL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, THE FORM 990 IS PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE FOUNDATION FOR HIS APPROVAL. IT IS THEN FILED WITH THE IRS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | THE FOUNDATION'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY IS SUBMITTED ANNUALLY TO EACH BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, ADVISOR AND STAFF MEMBER FOR REVIEW AND SIGNATURE WHERE THEY MUST DISCLOSE ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE DETERMINED AND REVIEWED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR A COMMITTEE DESIGNATED BY THE BOARD. NO BOARD MEMBER IS ALLOWED TO VOTE OR PARTICIPATE IN BOARD DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ANY MATTERS INVOLVING THE CONFLICT. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15A | THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WITHOUT PARTICIPATION OF THE PRESIDENT, DETERMINES THE COMPENSATION OF THE PRESIDENT. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERS COMPENSATION LEVELS PAID BY SIMILARLY SITUATED ORGANIZATIONS FOR FUNCTIONALLY COMPARABLE POSITIONS IN THE SAME GEOGRAPHICAL MARKET AND NATIONWIDE. THIS PROCESS WAS LAST UNDERTAKEN IN MAY 2023 AND WAS DULY DOCUMENTED. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | THE FOUNDATION MAKES ITS FORM 990 AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 6104 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. THE RETURN IS POSTED ON GUIDESTAR.ORG AND OTHER SIMILAR TYPES OF WEBSITES. IN ADDITION, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, FORM 990, FORM 1023, AND BY-LAWS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST OR BY CALLING THE ORGANIZATION DIRECTLY. |
| PART VII, SECTION A, LINE A: | LAWRENCE EBNER'S COMPENSATION IS IN EXCHANGE FOR CONSULTING, LEGAL RESEARCH, AND COMPOSITION SERVICES HE HAS PROVIDED TO THE ORGANIZATION, AND HE IS NOT COMPENSATED FOR HIS SERVICES AS AN OFFICER. TIZIANA CIRRILLO RECEIVED COMPENSATION NOT FOR HER ROLE AS AN OFFICER, BUT FOR HER WORK AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE ORGANIZATION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY. |
| FORM 990, PART XI, LINE 9: | WRITE OFF OF CONTRIBUTION RECEIVABLE -7,000. |
| FORM 990, PART XII, LINE 2C: | THE FOUNDATION IS GOVERNED BY A 35 MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 34 OF WHOM ARE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION. THE BOARD ORDINARILY MEETS 3 TIMES A YEAR. BETWEEN BOARD MEETINGS, THE FOUNDATION IS DIRECTED BY AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CONSISTING OF 10 INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ALSO ACT AS THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OVERSIGHT OF THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SELECTION OF AN INDEPENDENT OUTSIDE ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR. THIS PROCESS HAS NOT CHANGED FROM THE PRIOR YEAR. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |