Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
Go to
www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information.
| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
|
Total |
||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 772,217 | 2,708,757 | 6,559,881 |
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf .... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 772,217 | 2,708,757 | 6,559,881 |
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | 368,256 | |||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | 6,191,625 | |||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | 1,161,823 | 1,038,195 | 878,889 | 772,217 | 2,708,757 | 6,559,881 |
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | 29,032 | 9,337 | 22,917 | 26,170 | 61,963 | 149,419 |
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | 6,709,300 | |||||
Calendar year (or fiscal
year beginning in) ![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") . | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
Calendar year
(or fiscal year beginning in)
![]() |
(a) 2020 | (b) 2021 | (c) 2022 | (d) 2023 | (e) 2024 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6... | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources.. | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b. | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6 Other distributions (describe in Part VI). See instructions | 6 | |
| 7Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 6. | 7 | |
|
8
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
8 | |
| 9 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | 9 | |
| 10 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount | 10 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2024 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2024 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2024 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2024: | ||||
| a From 2019....... | ||||
| b From 2020....... | ||||
| c From 2021....... | ||||
| d From 2022....... | ||||
| e From 2023....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2019 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2024 from Section D, line 7: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2024 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2024, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2024. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2025. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2020..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2023..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2024..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSION | TO PROTECT NEW MEXICO'S COMMUNITIES AND THEIR AIR, LAND AND WATER IN THE FIGHT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. THE LAW CENTER'S EFFECTIVE LEGAL ADVOCACY AND REPRESENTATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUES WILL PROTECT NEW MEXICO'S COMMUNITIES AND CULTURES, AND ENSURE CLEAN AIR, LAND AND WATER FOR ALL. THE WORK OF THE LAW CENTER IS MADE POSSIBLE BY TAX- DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, FOUNDATIONS AND LIMITED EARNED INCOME. |
| FORM 990, PART III | CASE 1 AUGUSTIN PLAINS RANCH, LLC V. TOM BLAINE, P.E. NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, D-728-CV-XXX-XX-XXXX; NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS CASE A-1-CA-38615. BACKGROUND: IN 2014, THE AUGUSTIN PLAINS RANCH, LLC ("APR") SUBMITTED A MATERIALLY IDENTICAL APPLICATION AS ONE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IN 2007, TO APPROPRIATE 54,000 ACRE FEET OF WATER ANNUALLY FROM THE SAN AGUSTIN BASIN FOR THE PURPOSES OF "MUNICIPAL- AND "COMMERCIAL SALES" WITH THE NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER. THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER REPRESENTS WATER USERS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SAN AGUSTIN BASIN OPPOSING APR'S APPLICATION. APR'S 2007 APPLICATION WAS DENIED BY THE STATE ENGINEER IN 2011. THAT DENIAL WAS UPHELD BY THE NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN 2012, AND APR'S APPEAL OF THAT DECISION TO THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS WAS ULTIMATELY DISMISSED. APR'S 2014 APPLICATION WAS ALSO DENIED BY THE STATE ENGINEER ON THE BASIS THAT IT WAS SPECULATIVE, AND UPHELD BY THE NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. APR APPEALED THAT RULING TO THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS. THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNED THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION REGARDING ONE OF ITS BASES FOR ITS DECISION. THREE PARTIES FILED PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT, AND ON OCTOBER 28, 2022, THE SUPREME COURT DENIED ALL THREE PETITIONS FOR CERTIORARI, RETURNING THE CASE TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ADDITIONAL LITIGATION DURING 2023. IN 2024, THE NEW MEXICO SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR THE STATE ENGINEER, FINDING THAT THE APPLICATION WAS SPECULATIVE. THE FINAL ORDER WAS FILED ON AUGUST 23, 2024 AND ALTHOUGH IT WAS APPEALED, THE LAW CENTER DID NOT CONTINUE REPRESENTING CLIENTS ON APPEAL AND CLOSED OUT THIS CASE. . PUBLIC INTEREST: GROUND WATER IN NEW MEXICO "BELONGS TO THE PUBLIC." NMSA 1978, 72-12-1 (2003). OUR STATE'S GROUNDWATER DOES NOT BELONG TO THE OWNERS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY ABOVE GROUND WATER. ALTHOUGH INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES MAY USE GROUNDWATER FOR "BENEFICIAL USE," SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE STATE, ID., GROUND WATER IN NEW MEXICO IS A PUBLIC RESOURCE TO BE PROTECTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONSTITUTION DECLARES THAT "WATER AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES OF THIS STATE" ARE "OF FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY AND THE GENERAL WELFARE." N.M. CONST. ART. XX, 21. PUBLIC WATER IN NEW MEXICO IS HELD IN TRUST BY THE STATE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC. NEW MEXICO V. G.E., 467 F.3D 1223, 1243 (10TH CIR. 2006). THIS CASE DEALS WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST REGARDING GROUNDWATER APPROPRIATIONS, AS WELL AS THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL WAYS OF LIFE IN RURAL NEW MEXICO. IF APR IS SUCCESSFUL AND ITS APPLICATION IS ULTIMATELY APPROVED, OVER 17 BILLION GALLONS OF WATER WOULD POTENTIALLY BE TRANSPORTED OUT OF THE SAN AGUSTIN PLAINS, A TRADITIONAL RURAL COMMUNITY, TO THE GREATER ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF NEW MEXICO'S LARGEST CITY. ATTORNEYS' FEES: THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER HAS NEITHER SOUGHT NOR RECOVERED ANY ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM AN OPPOSING PARTY IN THIS CASE. CASE 2 NUCLEAR WATCH NEW MEXICO V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AND THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CASE 1:16-CV-0043-JCH-SCY. BACKGROUND: IN 2005, THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT ("NMED") ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH WAS AT THAT TIME THE SOLE OPERATOR OF THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY ("THE LABORATORY"), ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, CONCERNING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REMEDIATION OF TOXIC WASTE BURIED IN UNLINED PITS AND TRENCHES (SO-CALLED LEGACY WASTE) FROM THE MAKING OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVES AND RELATED WAR-TIME ACTIVITIES. THE HAZARDOUS WASTE BUREAU OF THE NMED ALLOWED NUMEROUS MANDATORY DEADLINES FOR VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE REMEDIATION PROCESS TO EXPIRE OR BE EXTENDED OUTSIDE THE TERMS REQUIRED UNDER THE CONSENT ORDER. THE 2005 CONSENT ORDER, THE STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE ACT ("HWA") AND THE FEDERAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT ("RCRA") REQUIRED THAT THOSE DEADLINES BE MET AND IMPOSED PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO MEET THOSE DEADLINES. IN JUNE, 2016, THE NMED AND THE OPERATORS OF THE LABORATORY (51% CONTINUING UNDER THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE REST DIVIDED AMONG BECHTEL, AECOM, AND ANOTHER COMPANY TO FORM A CONSORTIUM OPERATOR CALLED LANS OR LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC) ENTERED INTO A NEW CONSENT ORDER THAT VITIATED ALL OF THE DEADLINES IN THE ORIGINAL ORDER AND PUT THE CONSORTIUM AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IN CONTROL OF SETTING ALL FUTURE REMEDIATION DEADLINES. NUCLEAR WATCH NEW MEXICO SUED TO RESTORE AND ENFORCE THE CONSENT ORDER AND TO ENFORCE RCRA AND THE STATE HWA. THE LAWSUIT ALSO SEEKS TO IMPOSE PENALTIES - WHICH CONTINUED TO ACCRUE, BUT AT THE TIME OF FILING WERE APPROXIMATELY 275,000,000. THE CASE WAS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. THE DISTRICT COURT CONSIDERED THE MERITS OF THE CASE ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY ALL PARTIES. ON THE BASIS OF THOSE MOTIONS, THE DISTRICT COURT DENIED OUR CLAIM THAT THE CONSENT ORDER SHOULD BE RESTORED AND ENFORCED, BUT REFUSED TO DISMISS OUR CLAIM THAT THE DEFENDANTS SHOULD HAVE TO PAY THE PENALTIES THAT HAVE ACCRUED. THE CASE WAS SETTLED IN MARCH 2022 AND WE ARE CONTINUING TO MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. PUBLIC INTEREST: THIS CASE INVOLVES ENFORCEMENT OF RCRA AND THE HWA WHICH ARE INTENDED TO PROTECT OCCUPATIONAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY BY ASSURING PROPER DISPOSAL AND REMEDIATION OF DISPOSAL SITES INVOLVING THE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. ATTORNEYS' FEES: THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER SOUGHT ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER RCRA IN THIS CASE. IN SUMMER 2022, THE LAW CENTER AND OUR CLIENTS SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATED A SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY THAT INCLUDED RECOVERY OF SOME ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR THE LAW CENTER. THIS CASE IS NOW RESOLVED AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED ALTHOUGH WE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. CASE 3 SANTA BARBARA MARTINEZTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. D-202-CV-2018-04504 BACKGROUND: THE SANTA BARBARA MARTINEZTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS CHALLENGING THE DISCRIMINATORY ZONING ESTABLISHED IN MARTINEZTOWN THAT HAS ALLOWED FOR INCOMPATIBLE AND DETRIMENTAL LAND USES THAT GO AGAINST RESIDENTS' DESIRES TO KEEP MARTINEZTOWN A TRADITIONAL VILLAGE. THE LAW CENTER IS WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL SEEKING TO CHANGE THE MARTINEZTOWN COMMUNITY'S ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL, AND ASKING THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE TO BUFFER THESE NEIGHBORHOODS FROM INCONGRUENT USES AND PROVIDE PROTECTIONS THAT OTHER HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN ALBUQUERQUE HAVE BEEN GRANTED. THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY HAVE AGREED TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER, AND ARE WORKING ON IMPLEMENTING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. PUBLIC INTEREST: THIS CASE ADDRESSES THE DISPARATE TREATMENT WITH REGARDS TO ZONING PROTECTIONS OF A PREDOMINANTLY COMMUNITY OF COLOR COMPARED WITH A SIMILARLY SITUATED COMMUNITY THAT IS PREDOMINANTLY WHITE. ATTORNEYS' FEES: THE NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER HAS NEITHER SOUGHT NOR RECOVERED ANY ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM AN OPPOSING PARTY IN THIS CASE. CASE 4 MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY ACTION, MOUNTAIN VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, AND FRIENDS OF VALLE DE ORO V. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, AND THE ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCIL NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. D-202-CV-2023-09449 BACKGROUND: ON BEHALF OF CLIENTS, THE MOUNTAIN VIEW COALITION, THE LAW CENTER FILED A PETITION FOR RULEMAKING WITH THE ALBUQUERQUE - BERNALILLO COUNTY JOINT AIR QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ("AQCB"), CALLED THE HEALTH ENVIRONMENT AND EQUITY IMPACTS ("HEEI") REGULATION. THE RULEMAKING HEARING WAS HELD IN THE BEGINNING OF DECEMBER 2023. IN AN ATTEMPT TO BLOCK THE RULEMAKING, ABQ CITY COUNCILOR DAN LEWIS FILED TWO BILLS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL, ONE THAT WOULD DISSOLVE AND RECONSTITUTE THE AQCB AND ONE TO PUT A MORATORIUM ON HEALTH RELATED RULEMAKING BY THE AQCB. THE BILLS WERE PASSED AT THE DECEMBER 4, 2023 MEETING, AND WHILE THE MAYOR VETOED THE TWO BILLS, THE MAYORAL VETO WAS OVERRIDDEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE LAW CENTER FILED A COMPLAINT IN THE NEW MEXICO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CHALLENGING THE TWO BILLS. THE RULEMAKING HEARING PROCEEDED DESPITE THE BILLS AND PENDING LITIGATION AND CONCLUDED ON DECEMBER 11, 2023. MOUNTAIN VIEW COALITION'S CASE IS CURRENTLY STAYED PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE AQCB'S CASE CHALLENGING THE SAME ORDINANCES AND THE INDUSTRY CASE DEFENDING THE SAME ORDINANCES, WHICH ARE BEING LITIGATED IN THE NEW MEXICO FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT AND THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, RESPECTIVELY, AS WELL AS ON APPEAL IN THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS. PUBLIC INTER |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 11B | FORM 990 IS REVIEWED WITH THE FINANCE COMMITTEE PRIOR TO FILING. A COPY OF THE 990 IS PROVIDED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BOARD. THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORTS ON THE SUBSTANCE OF THE FORM TO THE BOARD. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 12C | ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY AND MANAGEMENT ARE KEENLY AWARE OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARE DISCUSSED AT BOARD MEETINGS AND ANYONE WITH A POTENTIAL CONFLICT IS RECUSED. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15A | THE ORGANIZAION CONDUCTS A REVIEW OF THE SALARIES PAID BY OTHER ORGANIZATION'S SALARIES TO ENSURE THEY ARE COMPARABLE FOR THIS AND OTHER POSITIONS. THE REVIEW IS CONDUCTED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AS PART OF THE BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS FOR THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR WHICH IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.THE ORGANIZATION REGULARLY PARTICIPATES IN ANNUAL SALARY INFORMATION SURVEYS SO THAT THE ORGANIZATION CAN RECIEVE COPIES OF THE RESULTS TO USE IN ESTABLISHING ITS EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION, INCLUDING THAT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. APPROVAL OF PAY IS DOCUMENTED IN THE BOARD MEETING MINUTES. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 15B | THE ORGANIZATION DOES NOT CURRENTLY COMPENSATE ANYONE IN THESE CLASSES BUT IF IT WERE TO IT WOULD GO BY THE SAME PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. |
| FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 | GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |