| (i) Name of supported organization | (ii) EIN | (iii) Type of organization (described on lines 1- 10 above (see instructions)) | (iv) Is the organization listed in your governing document? | (v) Amount of monetary support (see instructions) | (vi) Amount of other support (see instructions) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| (A)
NFIB INC |
940707299 | 10 | Yes | 0 | 0 | |
|
Total 1
|
0 | 0 | ||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2021 | (b) 2022 | (c) 2023 | (d) 2024 | (e) 2025 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grant.") .. | ||||||
| 2 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf .... | ||||||
| 3 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge.. | ||||||
| 4 | Total. Add lines 1 through 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f) .. | ||||||
| 6 | Public support. Subtract line 5 from line 4. | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2021 | (b) 2022 | (c) 2023 | (d) 2024 | (e) 2025 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Amounts from line 4.. | ||||||
| 8 | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources... | ||||||
| 9 | Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on.. | ||||||
| 10 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.).. | ||||||
| 11 | Total support. Add lines 7 through 10 | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2021 | (b) 2022 | (c) 2023 | (d) 2024 | (e) 2025 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.") | ||||||
| 2 | Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services performed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose | ||||||
| 3 | Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or business under section 513 ..... | ||||||
| 4 | Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf... | ||||||
| 5 | The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge | ||||||
| 6 | Total. Add lines 1 through 5 | ||||||
| 7a | Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons | ||||||
| b | Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year. | ||||||
| c | Add lines 7a and 7b.. | ||||||
| 8 | Public support. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) | ||||||
| Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | (a) 2021 | (b) 2022 | (c) 2023 | (d) 2024 | (e) 2025 | (f) Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Amounts from line 6 | ||||||
| 10a | Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources | ||||||
| b | Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975 | ||||||
| c | Add lines 10a and 10b | ||||||
| 11 | Net income from unrelated business activities not included on line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on. | ||||||
| 12 | Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) .. | ||||||
| 13 | Total support. (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.).. | ||||||
| Section A - Adjusted Net Income | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Net short-term capital gain | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Other gross income (see instructions) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Add lines 1 through 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Depreciation and depletion | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Other expenses (see instructions) | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Adjusted Net Income (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) | 8 | ||||
| Section B - Minimum Asset Amount | (A) Prior Year |
(B) Current Year (optional) |
||||
| 1 | Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): | 1 | ||||
| a | Average monthly value of securities | 1a | ||||
| b | Average monthly cash balances | 1b | ||||
| c | Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets | 1c | ||||
| d | Total (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) | 1d | ||||
| e |
Discount claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in Part VI): |
|||||
| 2 | Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt use assets | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Subtract line 2 from line 1d | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 0.015 of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Multiply line 5 by 0.035 | 6 | ||||
| 7 | Recoveries of prior-year distributions | 7 | ||||
| 8 | Minimum Asset Amount (add line 7 to line 6) | 8 | ||||
| Section C - Distributable Amount | Current Year | |||||
| 1 | Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Enter 85% of line 1 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) | 3 | ||||
| 4 | Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | Income tax imposed in prior year | 5 | ||||
| 6 | Distributable Amount. Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) | 6 | ||||
| Section D - Distributions | Current Year | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes | 1 | |
|
2
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity |
2 | |
| 3 Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations | 3 | |
| 4 Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets | 4 | |
| 5 Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required - provide details in Part VI) | 5 | |
| 6Total annual distributions. Add lines 1 through 5. | 6 | |
|
7
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in Part VI). See instructions |
7 | |
| 8 Distributable amount for 2025 from Section C, line 6 | 8 | |
| 9 Line 7 amount divided by Line 8 amount | 9 | |
| Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) |
(i) Excess Distributions |
(ii) Underdistributions Pre-2025 |
(iii) Distributable Amount for 2025 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Distributable amount for 2025 from Section C, line 6 | ||||
|
2
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2025 (reasonable cause required-- explain in Part VI).
See instructions. |
||||
| 3 Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2025: | ||||
| a From 2020....... | ||||
| b From 2021....... | ||||
| c From 2022....... | ||||
| d From 2023....... | ||||
| e From 2024....... | ||||
| fTotal of lines 3a through e | ||||
| g Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| h Applied to 2025 distributable amount | ||||
|
i
Carryover from 2020 not applied (see instructions) |
||||
| j Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from line 3f. | ||||
| 4Distributions for 2025 from Section D, line 6: | ||||
| $ | ||||
| a Applied to underdistributions of prior years | ||||
| b Applied to 2025 distributable amount | ||||
| c Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from line 4. | ||||
|
5
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2025, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
6
Remaining underdistributions for 2025. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1. If the amount is greater than zero, explain in Part VI. See instructions. |
||||
|
7 Excess distributions carryover to 2026. Add lines 3j and 4c. |
||||
| 8 Breakdown of line 7: | ||||
| a Excess from 2021..... | ||||
| b Excess from 2022..... | ||||
| c Excess from 2023..... | ||||
| d Excess from 2024..... | ||||
| e Excess from 2025..... | ||||
| Facts And Circumstances Test |
|---|
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| PART I, LINE 12G(VI): | NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER PROVIDES A VOICE FOR SMALL BUSINESS IN THE NATION'S COURTS AND IS A LEGAL RESOURCE FOR SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS NATIONWIDE. BY SUPPORTING SMALL BUSINESS IN THE NATION'S COURT AND LEGAL SYSTEM, NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER PROVIDES VALUABLE ASSISTANCE TO THE INDIVIDUALS FOR WHICH NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC. IS SERVING. |
| PART IV, LINE 3B: | WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF LBMC, PC, NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER ANNUALLY COMPLETES A PRO-FORMA SCHEDULE A UTILIZING THE FINANCIAL DATA OF NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC. ("NFIB") IN ORDER TO CONFIRM THAT NFIB MEETS THE PUBLIC SUPPORT TEST UNDER IRC SEC. 509(A)(2). IN ADDITION, NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER CONFIRMS WITH NFIB THAT IT MAINTAINS A VALID 501(C)(6) DETERMINATION LETTER. |
| PART IV, LINE 3C: | DURING 2025, NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY MONETARY SUPPORT TO NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC. THEREFORE, NO STEPS WERE NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT ALL SUPPORT WAS USED FOR SECTION 170(C)(2)(B) PURPOSES. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |
| Return Reference | Explanation |
|---|---|
| FORM 990, PART I, LINE 1: | THE NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER'S MISSION IS TO BE THE VOICE FOR SMALL BUSINESS IN THE NATION'S COURTS AND A LEGAL RESOURCE FOR SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS NATIONWIDE. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 1: | THE NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER IS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION CREATED UNDER THE TENNESSEE NONPROFIT CORPORATION ACT. IT IS ORGANIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CHARITABLE, EDUCATIONAL, AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES AS PERMITTED BY SECTION 501(C)(3) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED (THE "CODE"), INCLUDING, FOR SUCH PURPOSES, MAKING DISTRIBUTIONS TO ORGANIZATIONS THAT QUALIFY AS EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS UNDER SECTION 501(C)(3) OF THE CODE. THE LEGAL CENTER IS A SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 509(A)(3) OF THE CODE AND IS ORGANIZED AND OPERATED FOR THE BENEFIT OF NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ("NFIB"), WHICH IS A 501(C)(6) ORGANIZATION. THE LEGAL CENTER IS ORGANIZED TO CARRY ON CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES OF PROVIDING LEGAL EDUCATION AND REPRESENTATION ON ISSUES OF BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B | FORM 990 REVIEW PROCESS FOLLOWING AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, A DRAFT OF NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER'S FORM 990 IS PREPARED. THIS FORM 990 GOES THROUGH A THREE-TIER INTERNAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS. ANY QUESTIONS ARISING FROM THE INITIAL REVIEW ARE ADDRESSED TO ENSURE THE RETURN IS COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. ANY NECESSARY CHANGES/CORRECTIONS ARE MADE ON THE FORM 990 AND THE RETURN AGAIN GOES THROUGH NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER'S INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS. UPON APPROVAL OF THE CFO, THE RETURN IS REVIEWED BY THE CHAIR OF THE FINANCE/AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE FINAL RETURN IS THEN FILED WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C | COMPLIANCE WITH CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY EVERY BOARD MEMBER, OFFICER, AND EMPLOYEE OF NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN ANNUAL CODE OF CONDUCT & ETHICS CERTIFICATION TO THE CFO. ALL POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, ETHICAL CONCERNS, AND LEGAL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED BY THE CFO WITH A REPORT GOING TO THE FINANCE/AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. ANY TRANSACTIONS DISCLOSED ARE REVIEWED BY THE CFO TO DETERMINE THE TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP, DOLLAR VALUE INVOLVED, AND TO BE CERTAIN THAT ALL TRANSACTIONS ARE AT ARMS LENGTH. NO BOARD MEMBER SHALL VOTE ON ANY MATTER IN WHICH THERE IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15 | PROCESS OF DETERMINING COMPENSATION FOR OFFICERS THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NFIB IS RESPOSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND RECOMMENDING THE COMPENSATION OF ALL OFFICERS. DELIBERATIONS OF COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS ARE RECORDED CONTEMPORANEOUSLY IN THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING. THE ORGANIZATION'S PHILOSOPHY IS FOR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATON TO BE COMPETITIVE WITH MARKET NORMS IN ORDER TO ATTRACT, RETAIN, AND MOTIVATE QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES. ADDITIONALLY, INCENTIVE PAY IS LINKED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS AND IS COMPETITIVE AND CONSISTENT WITH MARKET NORMS. THE COMMITTEE REGULARLY ENGAGES THE SERVICES OF OUTSIDE CONSULTING FIRMS TO PROVIDE EXPERT INFORMATION REGARDING INDUSTRY WIDE COMPENSATON NORMS. |
| FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 | DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC IT IS NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER'S POLICY TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION, UPON REQUEST, EITHER WRITTEN OR IN PERSON, ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A: | NFIB SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER (SBLC) 2025 CASE LIST (*DESIGNATES CASES WHERE NFIB IS A PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER) *CUSTOM COMMUNICATIONS V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (1/2/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED A PETITION TO OVERTURN THE FTC'S CLICK-TO-CANCEL RULE IN OUR LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE RULE. STATUS: DECIDED. *MCCARTY V. MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE (1/3/25) - MISSOURI SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC JOINED A BUSINESS COALITION IN FILING MOTION TO INTERVENE IN CHALLENGE TO MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES AND PAID SICK LEAVE EMPLOYER MANDATES. STATUS: DECIDED. WARREN V. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (1/9/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF CHALLENGING THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR'S INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR RULE, SUPPORTING ARGUMENT THAT PLAINTIFFS HAVE STANDING. STATUS: PENDING. *TEXAS TOP COP V. GARLAND (1/10/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED BRIEFS IN NFIB'S LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY ACT. STATUS: PENDING. JAKE'S FIREWORKS V. CPSC (1/29/25) - US SUPREME COURT CERTIORARI NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THREATS OF ENFORCEMENT ARE FINAL AGENCY ACTION FOR WHICH JUDICIAL REVIEW IS RIPE. STATUS: DECIDED. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS INSTITUTE V. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY (1/30/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT CONGRESS EXCEEDED ITS CONSTITUTIONAL COMMERCE POWER IN ENACTING THE CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY ACT BECAUSE THE ACT REGULATES INACTIVITY OR NONECONOMIC ACTIVITY. STATUS: PENDING. *MN ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS V. ELLISON (1/31/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED A RESPONSE BRIEF IN ITS LAWSUIT AGAINST MINNESOTA LAW BANNING EMPLOYERS FROM SPEAKING ON POLITICAL MATTERS, INCLUDING UNIONIZATION, IN THE WORKPLACE. STATUS: DECIDED. DIAMOND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (2/3/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT D.C. CIRCUIT COURT'S DECISION UPHOLDING CLEAN AIR ACT PREEMPTION WAIVER FOR CALIFORNIA CONTAINED A WRONG JUSTICIABILITY ANALYSIS. STATUS: DECIDED. RYAN V. FTC (2/10/25) US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF SUPPORTING A CHALLENGE TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S (FTC) NONCOMPETE RULE THAT WOULD BAN MOST NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS. STATUS: PENDING. MARTINEZ V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (2/14/25) - MARYLAND SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT MARYLAND WAGE AND HOUR LAW SHOULD INCLUDE THE DE MINIMIS DOCTRINE FOR EMPLOYEE COMPENSABLE TIME. STATUS: DECIDED. SMITH V. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY (2/14/25) - US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAD NOT MET ITS BURDEN TO CONVINCE THE COURT TO STAY ITS PREVIOUS ORDER STAYING THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING RULE. STATUS: DECIDED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. CONSUMERS' RESEARCH (2/18/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF URGING COURT TO REVITALIZE AND PUT TEETH INTO NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE WHERE TWO LAYERS OF DELEGATION OCCURRED. STATUS: DECIDED. *OREGON-COLUMBIA CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, ET. AL., V. KOTEK (2/21/25) - OREGON CIRCUIT COURT, MARION COUNTY NFIB SBLC JOINED A BUSINESS COALITION IN SUING THE OREGON GOVERNOR, CHALLENGING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER THAT REQUIRES BUSINESSES TO SIGN PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS WITH UNIONS FOR ALL STATE PROJECTS. COURT GRANTED A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. STATUS: PENDING. LINNEY'S PIZZA V. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE (2/26/25) - US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT REGULATION II'S FEE CAP FOR DEBIT CARD INTERCHANGE FEES INCLUDES CATEGORIES OF COSTS THAT CONGRESS EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED. STATUS: DECIDED. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY V. N.C. FARM BUREAU FEDERATION (2/28/25) - NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT GENERAL PERMITS WHICH IMPOSE BINDING CONDITIONS ON THE PUBLIC ARE UNPROMULGATED RULES IN VIOLATION OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. THE COURT AGREED WITH OUR BRIEF AND AFFIRMED THE LOWER COURT DECISION INVALIDATING THE PERMIT CONDITIONS. STATUS: DECIDED. LABCORP V. DAVIS (3/12/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH NO LEGAL INJURY CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN CLASS CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 23 FOR FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. STATUS: DECIDED. SMITH V. TERUMO BCT (3/3/25) - COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT A PLAINTIFF CANNOT ESTABLISH STANDING TO SUE BASED SOLELY ON AN ALLEGATION THAT THE DEFENDANT'S NEGLIGENT CONDUCT MAY INCREASE HIS FUTURE RISK OF ILLNESS, AND THAT MEDICAL MONITORING, ABSENT A PROVEN PHYSICAL INJURY, IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE REMEDY UNDER TORT LAW. THE COURT AGREED. STATUS: DECIDED. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (3/19/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT NLRB DECISION HOLDING THAT EMPLOYERS VIOLATE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT WHEN THEY DISCUSS UNIONIZATION AT WORKPLACE MEETINGS VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT. STATUS: PENDING. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE V. ZUCH (3/24/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THE IRS CANNOT USE A TAXPAYER'S TAX RETURN TO SATISFY A DISPUTED TAX DEBT BEING LITIGATED IN THE TAX COURT AND MOOT OUT THE CASE. THE SUPREME COURT DISAGREED. STATUS: DECIDED. BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION V. NLRB (4/23/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT A UNION CARD AUTHORIZATION AND ORDER FORCING AN EMPLOYER TO BARGAIN WITH A UNION WAS AN IMPROPER REMEDY FOR THE NLRB TO APPLY FOR ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES DURING A UNION ELECTION. STATUS: PENDING. CHABOLLA V. CLASSPASS INC. (4/24/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF URGING NINTH CIRCUIT TO REHEAR CASE EN BANC AND CLARIFY ONLINE TERMS OF USE AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS. STATUS: DECIDED. TRUMP V. CASA (4/29/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ADVOCATING FOR ABILITY OF DISTRICT COURTS TO ISSUE NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS AND PROVIDE RELIEF TO ALL ASSOCIATION MEMBERS. STATUS: DECIDED. *BUSINESS COUNCIL OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. V. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (4/30/25) - NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC JOINED A BUSINESS COALITION IN SUING NEW YORK'S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION FOR A NEW RULE THAT WOULD REDEFINE MUCH PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE STATE AS PROTECTED WETLANDS AND IMPOSE RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS ON DEVELOPMENT. STATUS: PENDING. MNABC V. BLISSENBACH (4/30/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF SUPPORTING AN APPEAL OF A DENIED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN A CHALLENGE TO MINNESOTA'S INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR LAW. THE COURT DISAGREED AND AFFIRMED THE DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. STATUS: DECIDED. FISHER V. CITY OF OCEAN SPRINGS, MS (6/18/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD HAVE AN ADEQUATE PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGING BLIGHT DESIGNATIONS, WHICH OFTEN PRECEDE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS. STATUS: PENDING. GILL V. EXXONMOBIL (6/23/25) - PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING AGAINST WILDLY DISPROPORTIONATE "NUCLEAR" JURY VERDICTS THAT ARE UNTETHERED FROM ACTUAL DAMAGES. STATUS: PENDING. MIRKOVIC V. TENASYS CORPORATION (6/27/25) - OREGON COURT OF APPEALS NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT A PAY TRANSPARENCY LAW DOES NOT SHIELD EMPLOYEES FROM TERMINATION DURING RAISE OR PROMOTION NEGOTIATIONS. STATUS: PENDING. MADRIGAL V. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC (7/16/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT'S TRANSPORTATION WORKER EXEMPTION DOES NOT APPLY TO DRIVERS MAKING IN-STATE DELIVERIES OF GOODS THAT HAVE COME TO REST AT AN IN-STATE WAREHOUSE. STATUS: PENDING. DEL RIO V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (7/28/25) - CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT EMPLOYEE TIME SPENT IN SECURITY SCREENINGS BASED ON EMPLOYEE PERSONAL CHOICES IS NOT COMPENSABLE AND SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO A DE MINIMIS EXCEPTION. STATUS: PENDING. ATTORNEY GENERAL V. ELI LILLY AND CO. (8/28/25) - MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT A STATUTORY EXEMPTION SHOULD PROTECT COMPANIES FROM TARGETED CONSUMER PROTECTION INVESTIGATIONS. STATUS: PENDING. ENBRIDGE ENERGY LP V. NESSEL (9/5/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF URGING THE COURT TO PERMIT A NARROW EXCEPTION TO FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE DEADLINE IN ORDER TO PREVENT PARTIES FROM ENGAGING IN PROCEDURAL GAMESMANSHIP. STATUS: PENDING. |
| FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A: | BERNAVAGE V. GREEN RIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC (9/23/25) - PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT COURTS SHOULD NOT PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO RAISE NEW THEORIES OF LIABILITY CLAIMING PUNITIVE DAMAGES AT THE LAST POSSIBLE MOMENT. STATUS: PENDING. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC V. NEW YORK PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD (9/30/25) - US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT NEW YORK LAW GIVING STATE AGENCY MORE AUTHORITY OVER PRIVATE SECTOR LABOR RELATIONS IS PREEMPTED BY THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT. STATUS: PENDING. MCGEE V. ALGER COUNTY TREASURER (10/6/25) - US SUPREME COURT CERTIORARI NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT AFTER THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN TYLER V. HENNEPIN COUNTY, STATE LAWS MUST ENSURE PROPER PROCEDURES FOR RECOVERING HOME EQUITY IN THE EVENT OF A HOME SALE BY THE GOVERNMENT. STATUS: PENDING. OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (10/6/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING CONGRESS'S DISAPPROVAL OF A FEDERAL REGULATION PURSUANT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT PREVENTS AGENCY FROM REPUBLISHING PORTION OF REJECTED RULE. STATUS: PENDING. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. STATE OF NEW YORK (10/7/25) - US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT NEW YORK LAW GIVING STATE AGENCY MORE AUTHORITY OVER PRIVATE SECTOR LABOR RELATIONS IS PREEMPTED BY THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT. STATUS: PENDING. JOHNSON V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (11/14/25) - ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT ILLINOIS LAW SHOULD NOT TREAT TIME SPENT IN PRE-SHIFT SECURITY SCREENINGS AS COMPENSABLE. STATUS: PENDING. BUCKEYE INSTITUTE V. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (11/24/25) - US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT IRS 501(C)(3) DONOR REPORTING REQUIREMENT VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT. STATUS: PENDING. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA (11/25/25) - US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT CALIFORNIA LAW GIVING STATE AGENCY MORE AUTHORITY OVER PRIVATE SECTOR LABOR RELATIONS IS PREEMPTED BY THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT. STATUS: PENDING. HICKORY HEIGHTS HEALTH & REHAB LLC V. WATSON (12/1/25) - US SUPREME COURT CERTIORARI NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF URGING COURT TO HEAR THE CASE BECAUSE CMS RULE BANNING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IS UNLAWFUL AND HURTS SMALL BUSINESSES. STATUS: PENDING. PUNG V. ISABELLA COUNTY (12/8/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT AFTER THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN TYLER V. HENNEPIN COUNTY, STATE LAWS MUST ENSURE PROPER PROCEDURES FOR RECOVERING HOME EQUITY IN THE EVENT OF A HOME SALE BY THE GOVERNMENT. STATUS: PENDING. FLOWERS FOODS, INC. V. ANGELO BROCK (12/11/25) - US SUPREME COURT NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT'S TRANSPORTATION WORKER EXEMPTION OUGHT TO BE READ NARROWLY SO THAT SMALL BUSINESSES ARE ABLE TO HANDLE EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS THROUGH A LESS FORMAL, MORE COST-EFFECTIVE ARBITRATION PROCESS. STATUS: PENDING. MACY'S V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (12/22/25) - US SUPREME COURT CERTIORARI NFIB SBLC FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ARGUING THAT THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD LACKS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE COMPENSATORY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. STATUS: PENDING. |
| Software ID: | |
| Software Version: |